这是用户在 2025-7-29 20:22 为 https://app.immersivetranslate.com/word/ 保存的双语快照页面,由 沉浸式翻译 提供双语支持。了解如何保存?

反正我下载的这个是最新版本

Oral Assessment Information Sheet and Rubric
口头评估信息表和评分标准

Assessment Information
评估信息

Total Weight
重量

45% of final course grade (assessment marked out of 100)
最终课程成绩的 45%(评估满分 100 分)

Part 1
第 1 部分

Submission of 3 presentation slides
提交3张幻灯片

Due on August 1st 2025
截止日期为 2025 年 8 月 1

Part 2
第 2 部分

5-min oral presentation of the 3 slides
3 张幻灯片的 5 分钟口头报告

+ 7-min conversation/Q&A with instructor
+ 与讲师的 7 分钟对话/问答

By appointment between
通过预约

Aug 4 – Aug 15
8月4日至8月15日

Results
结果

3-min oral feedback and a grade marked out of 100.
3 分钟的口头反馈和满分 100 分的成绩。

Grades will be released on or before August 22.
成绩将于 8 月 22 日或之前发布。

Assessment
评估

Overview
概述

You are required to prepare a 3-slide presentation and deliver it orally in 5 minutes followed by a 7-min conversation for questions and answers with instructor the day of your oral exam.
您需要准备一份 3 张幻灯片的演示文稿,并在 5 分钟内进行口头演示,然后在口试当天与教师进行 7 分钟的问答对话

There is no need to go beyond the 3 slides.
没有必要超越 3 张幻灯片。

You are not required to include a reference list for this assessment.
您不需要为本次评估提供参考文献列表。

The oral assessment has been growing in popularity across higher education, as it is viewed as an authentic, secure, and versatile means of measuring students’ competence. We want this assessment experience to be stress-free, and you should view it as an ‘evaluative conversation’.
口头评估在高等教育中越来越受欢迎,因为它被视为衡量学生能力的真实、安全和多功能手段。我们希望这种评估体验是无压力的,您应该将其视为“评估性对话”。

This is an opportunity for you to have an interesting conversation with the course instructor about the subject matter of the course. We intend this to be an interesting assignment, that will prepare you for interactions and situations you will encounter in your professional life in the near future. You can focus on the concepts and ideas that were most interesting to you, can freely express their opinions about them, and build upon the class material with your own ideas and propositions.
这是您与课程讲师就课程主题进行有趣对话的机会。我们希望这是一项有趣的任务,让您为不久的将来在职业生涯中遇到的互动和情况做好准备。您可以专注于您最感兴趣的概念和想法,可以自由地表达他们对它们的看法,并在课堂材料的基础上提出自己的想法和命题。

An oral conversation allows you to demonstrate what you learnt in class and to show your critical thinking skills in real time.
口头对话可以让您展示 您在课堂上学到的知识,并实时展示您的批判性思维 能力

Benefits
好处

Offer an authentic-like experience which you can apply to future work situations, e.g. in meetings, job interviews, pitches, professional tasks.
提供真实  的体验,您可以将其应用于未来的工作情况,例如在会议、工作面试、推介、专业任务中。

Both the assessment and preparation for it can help you to develop communication skills, which can enhance employability 
评估和准备都可以帮助您培养  沟通技巧 ,从而提高  就业能力 

With the increase in the use of Gen AI this oral assessment helps you harness your independent and unique thinking
随着 Gen AI 使用的增加,这种口头评估可以帮助您利用独立和独特的思维

Adds variety across your various assessments.
为您的各种评估增加   多样性

It can even be enjoyable for both instructors and students as it facilitates genuine connections and open discussion about a topic that we both are interested in
它甚至可以 教师和学生都感到愉快 ,因为它促进了真正的联系  和关于我们都感兴趣的话题的公开讨论

Aim
目的

Critical assessment of your understanding of the 3 bullet points below and their application in real-world scenarios:
批判性评估您对以下 3 个要点的理解及其在现实场景中的应用:

The basic concepts of urban sustainability
城市可持续发展的基本概念

The 3 new economies frameworks explored in class
课堂上探讨的3个新经济框架

The diverse approaches to legal entity enterprise design and mitigation of legal risk
法人实体企业设计与法律风险化解的多种方法

We will assess your ability to apply at least one (at most two) new economies framework(s) to a real-world scenario, that you did not discuss in your essay. You should demonstrate your creativity and innovation in relation to the potential legal approaches (policy or agency reforms, enterprise structures, etc.) that would enable, promote and advance urban sustainability and new economies.
我们将评估您将至少一个(最多两个)新经济框架应用于现实世界场景的能力 ,而您在论文中没有讨论过这些框架。您应该展示您在潜在法律方法(政策或机构改革、企业结构等)方面的创造力和创新能力,这些方法将促进、促进和推进城市可持续性和新经济。

The oral assessment will help achieve all 5 Course Learning Objectives (CLOs). Your instructor and convenor together will provide, in due time, a class demonstration/explanation of what the oral assessment experience might look like.
口头评估将有助于实现所有 5 个课程学习目标 (CLO)。您的教师和召集人将在适当的时候提供课堂演示/解释口语评估体验可能是什么样子。

Task for students
学生任务

Based on the course content, encompassing all class materials, prepare a 5-minute oral presentation of a real case, anywhere around the world, which is locally specific (happening in a city/country), and globally relevant (able to be extrapolated, adapted, and offer lessons for other contexts in its wider region at any scale). Your presentation should:
根据课程内容,涵盖所有课堂材料,准备一个 5 分钟的真实案例口头报告 ,该案例在世界任何地方,具体到当地(发生在一个城市/国家),并且与全球相关(能够推断、改编,并为其更广泛地区的其他背景提供任何规模的课程)。您的演示文稿应该:

clearly identify an urban sustainability issue, justifying its significance in both social and environmental terms
明确识别城市可持续性问题,证明其在社会和环境方面的重要性

analyse a key aspect of the current legal and/or economic framework in which the case takes place
分析案件发生的当前法律和/或经济框架的一个关键方面

highlight or propose a ‘new economy’ form or legal device you have studied that would support sustainable development and improve the status quo either socially or environmentally, or both.
强调或提出您研究过的“新经济”形式或法律手段,这些形式或法律手段将支持可持续发展并在社会或环境方面或两者兼而有之地改善现状。

Structure of the 15-minute oral assessment
15分钟口头评估的结构

5 min oral presentation
5 分钟口头报告

You can use a maximum of 3 slides as visual or text aids for your oral presentation. You will be evaluated in your ability to present your already incorporated knowledge and critically assess the case study that you selected. As a guide, you can use a slide for each point of the task. Please do not read a script.
您最多可以使用 3 张幻灯片作为口头演示的视觉或文本辅助工具。您将评估您展示已经融入的知识并批判性地评估您选择的案例研究的能力。作为指导,您可以为任务的每个点使用幻灯片。请不要阅读剧本。

7-minute conversation
7 分钟对话

This gives an opportunity for 1-3 follow up questions. The principal aim of these questions will be for clarification purposes, for you to provide any additional information, and for you to demonstrate responsiveness and/or thoughtfulness in relation to the question. Please note we will not be assessing your language ability, and we are aware that English is a second language for many. It is fine for you to ask us to repeat or clarify any question you are asked.
这提供了 1-3 个后续问题的机会。这些问题的主要目的是澄清目的,让您提供任何其他信息,并让您表现出对问题的回应和/或深思熟虑。请注意,我们不会评估您的语言能力,而且我们知道英语是许多人的第二语言。您可以要求我们重复或澄清您被问到的任何问题。

3-minute instructor’s feedback
3 分钟讲师反馈

The instructor will provide immediate feedback on how the presentation and conversation were conducted and will focus on highlighting the strongest part and providing suggestions and/or tips for strengthening any weak points.
讲师将就演示和对话的进行方式提供即时反馈,并将专注于突出最强的部分,并提供加强任何弱点的建议和/或技巧。

Notes
笔记

The oral assessment session will be recorded on Teams for later reference to ensure comparability and accuracy of grading.
口头评估环节将记录在 Teams 上,以供日后参考,以确保评分的可比性和准确性。

The timings above will be followed strictly whether or not you have finished what you have prepared (you can finish your current sentence!)
无论您是否完成了准备的内容,都将严格遵循上述时间(您可以完成当前的句子!

Oral assessments will take place in person on campus (exact location to be determined) and scheduled by individual appointments between Aug 4 – Aug 15.
口头评估将在校园内亲自进行 (具体地点待定),并安排在 8 月 4 日至 8 月 15 日期间进行个人预约。

No devices can be used during the oral assessment, and no notes. Slides will all be sent to the instructor in advance by 1 August 2025, and you will present these slides to the instructor the day of your oral assessment.
口头评估期间不能使用任何设备,也不能使用笔记。幻灯片将在 2025 年 8 月 1 日之前提前发送给教师 ,您将在口试当天将这些幻灯片展示给教师。

Please let us know if you will need any accommodations for this assessment. We will revise any special needs case by case and will consult with the Director of Equitable Learning where needed.
如果您需要任何便利来进行此评估,请告知我们。我们将逐案修改任何特殊需求,并在需要时咨询公平学习主任。

Rubrics / Grading Criteria for Oral Assessment
口头评核评分标准 / 评分准则

Criteria
标准

Weight (points)
重量(点)

High Distinction
高荣誉

Distinction
分别

Credit
信用

Pass
通过

Fail
失败

Case study is locally specific and globally relevant
案例研究针对特定于当地且与全球相关

15

Demonstrates an exemplary choice of a case that is deeply embedded in its local context and clearly offers transferable lessons across regions or scales; relevance is articulated with originality and depth.
展示了对案例的模范选择,该案例深深植根于其当地背景,并清楚地提供了跨地区或跨规模的可转移经验教训;相关性与原创性和深度相结合。

Case is strongly grounded locally and linked to broader global relevance; transferability is clearly explained.
案例在当地扎根,并与更广泛的全球相关性相关;可转让性得到了明确的解释。

Case shows reasonable local specificity and some discussion of global relevance; connections may lack clarity or depth.
案例显示了合理的局部特异性和对全球相关性的一些讨论;连接可能缺乏清晰度或深度。

Case is somewhat relevant locally and/or globally; limited articulation of broader relevance.
案例在本地和/或全球范围内具有一定的相关性;具有更广泛相关性的有限表达。

Case lacks clear local specificity and/or global relevance; connections are superficial or missing.
病例缺乏明确的局部特异性和/或全球相关性;联系是肤浅的或缺失的。

Identification of an urban sustainability issue in both social & environmental terms
从社会和环境角度识别城市可持续性问题

25

Clearly and insightfully identifies an urgent and complex urban sustainability issue with well-integrated social and environmental dimensions.
清晰而富有洞察力地确定了一个紧迫而复杂的城市可持续性问题,并结合了社会和环境维度。

Clearly identifies a relevant urban sustainability issue, covering both social and environmental aspects.
明确识别相关的城市可持续发展问题,涵盖社会和环境方面。

Identifies an issue with some recognition of both dimensions; may lack detail or clarity.
识别一个问题,并对两个维度都有一定的认识;可能缺乏细节或清晰度。

Addresses an issue, but one dimension (social or environmental) is underdeveloped.
解决了一个问题,但一个维度(社会或环境)不发达。

Fails to identify a clear or relevant urban sustainability issue; missing the social and/or environmental dimension.
未能确定明确或相关的城市可持续性问题;缺少社会和/或环境维度。

Analysis of the legal and/or economic framework
对法律和/或经济框架的分析

25

Provides sophisticated, accurate, and well-contextualized analysis of legal/economic frameworks; integrates theoretical and practical dimensions seen in class
对法律/经济框架进行复杂、准确和情境化的分析;整合课堂上的理论和实践维度

Offers accurate and thoughtful analysis with appropriate depth; some integration of theory and practice
提供准确、深思熟虑、深度适中的分析;理论与实践的某种融合

Provides sound analysis with some contextual relevance; back lacks depth in some parts of the analysis.
提供具有一定上下文相关性的合理分析;背部在分析的某些部分缺乏深度。

Offers basic or somewhat fragmented analysis; basic understanding of legal/economic frameworks
提供基本或有些零散的分析;对法律/经济框架的基本了解

Lacks coherent analysis; demonstrates misunderstanding or lack of awareness of frameworks.
缺乏连贯的分析;表现出对框架的误解或缺乏认识。

Highlight/proposal of a ‘new economy’ form or legal device to support sustainable development
支持可持续发展的“新经济”形式或法律手段的亮点/建议

25

Innovatively applies or proposes a highly relevant ‘new economy’ form or legal device; demonstrates clear benefits and thoughtful critique of the status quo.
创新地应用或提出高度相关的“新经济”形式或法律手段;展示了明显的好处和对现状的深思熟虑的批评。

Proposes or applies an appropriate ‘new economy’ form or legal device; shows clear relevance and improvement of the status quo
提出或应用适当的“新经济”形式或法律手段;显示出明显的相关性和现状的改善

Makes a reasonable proposal or application; somewhat relevant to the issue but lacks detail.
提出合理的建议或申请;与问题有些相关,但缺乏细节。

Proposal is basic or underdeveloped; limited connection to the problem or framework.
提案是基本的或不发达的;与问题或框架的联系有限。

No clear identification nor proposal of ‘new economy’ forms nor legal device; lacks understanding
没有明确的标识或提出“新经济”形式或法律程序;缺乏理解

Communication and clarity of expression
沟通和表达清晰

(during the slides presentation and the 7-minute conversation)
(在幻灯片演示和 7 分钟的对话中)

10

Communicates and responds to questions with exceptional clarity, confidence, and flow; persuasive and engaging delivery; terminology is accurate and fluent.
以异常清晰、自信和流畅的方式沟通和回答问题;有说服力和吸引力的交付;术语准确流畅。

Clear, confident presentation with few hesitations; responds to questions with engagement and depth; appropriate and mostly fluent use of terminology.
清晰、自信的演示,毫不犹豫;以参与和深度回答问题;适当且大部分流利地使用术语。

Generally clear and well-paced presentation and responses; minor lapses in fluency or terminology.
总体上清晰且节奏合理的演示和回应;流利程度或术语的轻微失误。

Adequate communication but uneven delivery either in the presentation or responses; some unclear expressions or responses; has some terminology issues.
充分的沟通,但在演示或回应中表达不均匀;一些不清楚的表达或反应;有一些术语问题。

Unclear or ineffective presentation and responses; delivery is disjointed or difficult to follow; incorrect use of terms.
表达和回应不清晰或无效;交付脱节或难以遵循;术语使用不正确。

Total:
总:

100 points
100 积分