4
China’s financial system plays a critical role in promoting economic growth. It achieves this through efficiently allocating capital, managing risks, and transforming short-term assets to support long-term projects. Despite its importance, China's financial system has unique characteristics that differentiate it from others globally.
中国的金融体系在促进经济增长方面发挥着至关重要的作用。它通过高效配置资本、管理风险以及将短期资产转化为长期项目来实现这一目标。尽管中国金融体系至关重要，但它也具有与全球其他金融体系不同的独特之处。
Firstly, the Chinese financial system is highly opaque and undergoes rapid regulatory and institutional evolution. Every decade, significant changes occur in regulations, institutional frameworks, and capital flows. Furthermore, the Chinese Communist Party (CPC) exerts significant influence over financial institutions, with political appointments often overshadowing commercial considerations.
首先，中国金融体系高度不透明，监管和制度变革迅速。每十年，监管法规、制度框架和资本流动都会发生重大变化。此外，中国共产党对金融机构施加着巨大的影响力，政治任命往往掩盖了商业考量。
Secondly, there is a distinct lending bias in favor of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), which receive preferential access to loans, creating credit discrimination against private companies and small-medium enterprises (SMEs). This bias has fostered the rise of informal lending channels, commonly known as shadow banking, due to limited official credit access.
其次，贷款明显偏向国有企业，这些企业享有优先贷款机会，从而对私营企业和中小企业造成了信贷歧视。由于官方信贷渠道有限，这种偏好助长了非正式贷款渠道（通常称为影子银行）的兴起。
A distinctive feature of China’s financial landscape is the metric known as Total Social Financing (TSF). This uniquely Chinese measurement encompasses various funding sources, including loans, bonds, equity, trust products, and foreign direct investment (FDI), providing a comprehensive view of liquidity in the real economy.
中国金融格局的一个显著特征是被称为“社会融资总量”（TSF）的指标。这一中国独有的指标涵盖了各种资金来源，包括贷款、债券、股票、信托产品和外商直接投资（FDI），从而能够全面反映实体经济的流动性。
The regulatory framework includes key institutions such as the People's Bank of China (PBOC), responsible for monetary policy and financial stability; the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC), overseeing banking and insurance; the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), supervising securities and capital markets; and the Ministry of Finance (MOF), indirectly influencing through shareholdings. The Party’s Organization Department significantly influences senior financial appointments, creating a dual authority system combining administrative and party influence.
监管框架包括以下主要机构：负责货币政策和金融稳定的中国人民银行（PBOC）；监管银行业和保险业的中国银行保险监督管理委员会（CBIRC）；监管证券和资本市场的中国证券监督管理委员会（CSRC）；以及通过持股间接施加影响的财政部（MOF）。中共中央组织部对金融部门的高层任命具有重大影响力，从而形成了行政和党内双重权力体系。
Banks dominate the financial system, providing over 60% of credit. The "Big 5" banks are state-controlled, making the financial structure predominantly government-led. While China's bond market is expanding, it remains relatively small, though it helps diversify financing sources and reduces bank dependency. In contrast, the stock market is characterized by speculation and a lack of institutional investors, compounded by a politically influenced IPO quota system.
银行主导着金融体系，提供了超过 60%的信贷。“五大”银行均为国有控股，这使得金融结构主要由政府主导。尽管中国债券市场正在扩张，但规模仍然相对较小，尽管它有助于实现融资来源多元化并降低对银行的依赖。相比之下，股票市场的特点是投机性强、缺乏机构投资者，再加上受政治影响的 IPO 配额制度。
Challenges remain, notably improving financial inclusion for SMEs, modernizing regulatory frameworks, and balancing political control with market efficiency. Empirical research highlights that financial development in China has led to increased income inequality due to its state-led, SOE-favored financial structure. This supports the inequality-widening hypothesis, suggesting that financial development initially benefits capital holders disproportionately.
挑战依然存在，尤其需要提升中小企业的金融包容性、推进监管框架现代化，以及平衡政治控制与市场效率。实证研究表明，由于中国金融发展由国家主导、受国企青睐的金融结构，导致收入不平等加剧。这支持了不平等扩大假说，即金融发展最初使资本持有者受益过多。
Recent reforms, including the growth of rural credit cooperatives, microfinance institutions, and digital finance platforms (e.g., Alipay), aim to reduce these inequalities by enhancing financial inclusiveness. However, to sustainably address inequality, China must remove structural financial barriers, ensuring broad and fair access to financial services.
近期的改革，包括农村信用合作社、小额信贷机构和数字金融平台（例如支付宝）的发展，旨在通过增强金融包容性来减少这些不平等。然而，要可持续地解决不平等问题，中国必须消除结构性金融障碍，确保广泛、公平地获得金融服务。
In summary, China's financial system uniquely integrates political control, preferential lending practices, and a bank-centric structure, necessitating ongoing reform efforts. Effective reforms require balancing efficiency, stability, and inclusiveness to ensure equitable economic benefits across all societal sectors.
总而言之，中国的金融体系独特地融合了政治控制、优惠贷款政策和以银行为中心的结构，需要持续的改革。有效的改革需要在效率、稳定性和包容性之间取得平衡，以确保社会各部门公平地获得经济利益。
5&6
China's financial system heavily relies on banks, making it bank-dominated, with over 60% of financing coming from banks. The banking sector illustrates China's state-led growth model, where credit allocation follows government policies rather than market mechanisms.
中国的金融体系高度依赖银行，以银行为主导，超过60%的融资来自银行。银行业体现了中国国家主导型的增长模式，即信贷分配遵循政府政策而非市场机制。
China's banking structure includes Policy Banks (e.g., CDB, EXIM, ADBC) serving national strategies, the Big Four (ICBC, CCB, ABC, BOC) focusing on state-owned enterprises (SOEs), joint-stock commercial banks like CITIC Bank, and city and rural commercial banks addressing local financial needs.
中国的银行结构包括服务于国家战略的政策性银行（如国家开发银行、进出口银行、农业发展银行）、专注于国有企业的四大银行（工商银行、建设银行、农业银行、中国银行）、中信银行等股份制商业银行以及满足地方金融需求的城市和农村商业银行。
The banking system features strong state dominance, with top managers appointed by the central government, reflecting significant Party control. Lending practices often favor SOEs, especially during economic stimulus phases, demonstrating "state-led credit allocation" and "SOE lending bias." Financial repression has historically maintained artificially low-interest rates, disadvantaging savers while benefiting borrowers and imposing capital controls.
银行体系高度国家主导，高层管理人员由中央政府任命，反映出党的严格控制。贷款行为往往偏向国有企业，尤其是在经济刺激阶段，体现出“国家主导的信贷分配”和“国有企业贷款偏好”。金融抑制历来人为地维持低利率，使储蓄者处于不利地位，同时使借款人受益，并实施资本管制。
Non-performing loans (NPLs) are commonly underreported due to political motivations, leading to hidden financial risks. Implicit government guarantees also cause moral hazards, with banks lacking strict budget constraints.
不良贷款（NPL）通常因政治动机而被低估，从而导致隐性金融风险。由于银行缺乏严格的预算约束，政府隐性担保也引发道德风险。
Shadow banking, credit intermediation outside traditional banks, rapidly expanded post-2008 due to regulatory avoidance and credit quota bypassing. Key shadow banking instruments include Wealth Management Products (WMPs), trust loans, entrusted loans, and bank-acceptance bills. Shadow banking carries risks such as maturity mismatches, implicit guarantees causing "rigid repayment" expectations, and systemic contagion.
影子银行，即传统银行以外的信贷中介，由于规避监管和绕过信贷额度，在2008年后迅速扩张。主要的影子银行工具包括理财产品、信托贷款、委托贷款和银行承兑汇票。影子银行存在诸多风险，例如期限错配、隐性担保导致的“刚性还款”预期以及系统性传染。
Recent regulatory reforms aim to address these risks, with tighter controls on WMPs and trust products. The 2020 Asset Management Rules emphasize transparency and eliminating implicit guarantees. China's objective is balancing control of shadow banking with maintaining overall credit growth.
近期的监管改革旨在应对这些风险，加强了对理财产品和信托产品的管控。2020年《资管新规》强调透明度并消除隐性担保。中国的目标是在控制影子银行与维持整体信贷增长之间取得平衡。
Strategically, China’s financial system is adjusting to support national goals through five financial pillars: tech-driven finance, green finance, inclusive finance, pension finance, and digital finance. However, structural imbalances persist due to the dominance of banks, limited direct financing, and capital concentration in traditional sectors. Real estate and local government debts pose significant risks, necessitating institutional reforms that prioritize quality and differentiation among financial institutions.
从战略角度来看，中国金融体系正在调整，以通过五大金融支柱（科技驱动型金融、绿色金融、普惠金融、养老金融和数字金融）支持国家目标。然而，由于银行主导地位、直接融资有限以及资本集中在传统行业，结构性失衡依然存在。房地产和地方政府债务构成重大风险，亟需进行制度改革，优先考虑金融机构的质量和差异化。
China’s banking system maintains stability with high deposit-based funding, stable loan-to-deposit ratios, and improving liquidity coverage ratios. Looking ahead, challenges include enhancing direct financing via capital market development, reforming mid-sized banks' governance, and strengthening macroprudential supervision to prevent systemic risks.
中国银行体系保持稳健，存款融资规模保持高位，存贷比保持稳定，流动性覆盖率持续改善。展望未来，挑战包括：通过发展资本市场增强直接融资；改革中型银行治理；加强宏观审慎监管，防范系统性风险。
In summary, China's financial system is evolving towards greater balance, resilience, and innovation. The future will depend on effectively balancing market liberalization with regulatory control, institutional differentiation, and systemic stability.
综上所述，中国金融体系正朝着更加均衡、更具韧性、更具创新性的方向发展。未来发展的关键在于如何有效平衡市场自由化与监管控制、制度差异化和系统稳定性。
7
China's financial technology (FinTech) sector is reshaping the country's financial landscape, acting as a double-edged sword. While FinTech greatly enhances efficiency and financial inclusion, it also introduces significant risks such as regulatory arbitrage and data security concerns.
中国的金融科技（FinTech）行业正在重塑其金融格局，如同一把双刃剑。金融科技在大幅提升效率和金融包容性的同时，也带来了监管套利和数据安全等重大风险。
FinTech in China developed through distinct phases. The initial phase (2004–2014) was driven by payment innovations like Alipay and WeChat Pay, revolutionizing micro-transactions and user engagement through third-party payments and mobile wallets, effectively reducing transaction costs. The subsequent phase (2014–2020) involved rapid credit expansion and the rise of big data-driven lending models, including consumer credit, peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, and payday loans. This phase leveraged credit scoring algorithms and digital lending platforms extensively.
中国金融科技的发展经历了几个不同的阶段。初始阶段（2004-2014 年）由支付宝和微信支付等支付创新驱动，通过第三方支付和移动钱包彻底改变了小额交易和用户参与度，有效降低了交易成本。后续阶段（2014-2020 年）信贷快速扩张，大数据驱动的借贷模式兴起，包括消费信贷、P2P 借贷和发薪日贷款。这一阶段广泛利用了信用评分算法和数字借贷平台。
Platform finance, exemplified by Ant Group, showcases the tech-first, financialized later (“tech-fin”) model. This approach aggregates users through technology, subsequently monetizing user bases via credit, investment, and insurance products. However, such models carry embedded structural risks, including leverage amplification, information opacity, implicit guarantees (rigid repayment expectations), and maturity mismatches, potentially triggering financial contagion.
以蚂蚁集团为代表的平台金融体现了“科技先行，金融化后发展”（“科技金融”）的模式。该模式通过技术聚合用户，随后通过信贷、投资和保险产品将用户群货币化。然而，此类模式存在内在的结构性风险，包括杠杆放大、信息不透明、隐性担保（刚性还款预期）以及期限错配，可能引发金融危机蔓延。
In response to these risks, China's regulatory framework for FinTech evolved significantly, transitioning from encouraging innovation to enforcing structured regulation. Notably, the suspension of Ant Group’s IPO in 2020 marked this regulatory shift toward tighter oversight, emphasizing "look-through supervision" and "function-based regulation." Regulators now prioritize data governance, enforcing stricter rules on data localization, algorithm transparency, and user privacy protection.
为了应对这些风险，中国的金融科技监管框架发生了重大变化，从鼓励创新转向实施结构化监管。值得注意的是，2020 年蚂蚁集团 IPO 的暂停标志着监管转向更严格的监管，强调“穿透式监管”和“功能性监管”。监管机构现在优先考虑数据治理，在数据本地化、算法透明度和用户隐私保护方面实施更严格的规定。
FinTech aligns closely with China’s broader policy objectives, such as Digital China and Rural Revitalization initiatives. It serves as a key tool in achieving financial inclusion, particularly addressing financial service gaps in underserved areas through last-mile finance solutions and public-private partnerships.
金融科技与中国更广泛的政策目标（例如数字中国和乡村振兴计划）紧密契合。它是实现金融包容性的关键工具，特别是通过“最后一公里”金融解决方案和公私合作模式，弥补金融服务欠缺地区的金融服务缺口。
In summary, China’s FinTech sector has moved from a growth-first strategy to a governance-focused framework. Institutional responses increasingly emphasize regulatory capacity building and balance innovation with stability. The future success of FinTech in China depends on fostering a fintech-state symbiosis, harmonizing innovative financial solutions with rigorous regulatory standards to ensure systemic stability.
总而言之，中国金融科技行业已从增长优先战略转向以治理为重点的框架。机构应对措施日益强调监管能力建设，并在创新与稳定之间取得平衡。中国金融科技未来的成功取决于能否促进金融科技与国家共生，将创新金融解决方案与严格的监管标准相协调，以确保系统稳定。
8
China's bond market has rapidly evolved to become the world's second-largest, serving as a crucial tool for long-term capital formation and monetary policy transmission. Initially dominated by government bonds with significant growth from 1990 onward, policy financial bonds have also played a key role, especially in funding infrastructure projects similar to U.S. municipal bonds.
中国债券市场迅速发展成为全球第二大债券市场，成为长期资本形成和货币政策传导的重要工具。政策性金融债券最初以国债为主，自1990年以来显著增长，也发挥了关键作用，尤其是在为类似美国市政债券的基础设施项目融资方面。
Corporate bonds have faced historical bottlenecks due to fragmented regulation by multiple agencies such as the NDRC, PBOC, and CSRC. However, the adoption of a registration-based issuance system after 2010 streamlined the issuance process, reducing entry barriers and enhancing market efficiency.
由于国家发改委、人民银行、证监会等多部门监管，企业债券曾面临历史性瓶颈。然而， 2010 年后引入注册制发行制度，简化了发行流程，降低了进入门槛，提高了市场效率。
Local government debt, often raised through municipal investment corporations (MICs), poses significant risks due to implicit government guarantees and opaque accounting practices. These off-balance-sheet financings create hidden liabilities and increase fiscal decentralization stress.
地方政府债务通常通过市政投资公司（MIC）筹集，由于隐性政府担保和不透明的会计处理，构成重大风险。这些表外融资造成了隐性负债，并加剧了财政分权的压力。
China's domestic credit rating system faces substantial issues such as rating inflation, driven by government control and conflicts of interest due to the issuer-pays model. The reliability of ratings has deteriorated further following increased corporate defaults since 2020, highlighting the need for reform in post-default resolution mechanisms.
中国国内信用评级体系面临着诸多重大问题，例如受政府控制和发行人付费模式影响的评级通胀等。自2020年以来，随着企业违约率的上升，评级可靠性进一步下降，凸显了违约后处置机制改革的必要性。
Structurally, China's bond market is segmented into three main areas: the interbank market regulated by the PBOC, the exchange market overseen by the CSRC, and the OTC market catering to retail investors. Banks dominate market holdings and secondary trading, creating an imbalanced investor base that lacks long-term institutional investors such as pension funds and insurers.
从结构上看，中国债券市场主要分为三个部分：由中国人民银行监管的银行间债券市场、由中国证监会监管的交易所债券市场，以及面向散户投资者的场外债券市场。银行主导着债券市场持仓和二级市场交易，导致投资者结构不平衡，缺乏养老基金和保险公司等长期机构投资者。
In response, China has accelerated market liberalization and internationalization, notably through initiatives like Bond Connect and inclusion in global indices such as Bloomberg, FTSE, and J.P. Morgan. Foreign credit rating agencies like Moody’s and S&P have also been encouraged to participate, improving rating credibility.
为此，中国加快了市场自由化和国际化进程，特别是通过“债券通”等举措以及纳入彭博、富时和摩根大通等全球指数。此外，中国还鼓励穆迪和标准普尔等外国信用评级机构参与，以提高评级可信度。
Looking forward, China's bond market faces challenges including fragmented regulation, investor concentration, and opaque local government debt structures. Recommended reforms include creating a unified regulatory framework, attracting long-term institutional investors, and aligning disclosure standards internationally.
展望未来，中国债券市场面临诸多挑战，包括监管碎片化、投资者集中度高以及地方政府债务结构不透明。建议的改革措施包括建立统一的监管框架、吸引长期机构投资者以及实现信息披露标准的国际接轨。
In summary, China's bond market is transitioning from a state-dominated, bank-centric model to a more market-oriented and internationally integrated system. Its future success hinges on improving regulatory cohesion, investor diversification, and transparency in debt management.
总而言之，中国债券市场正在从国家主导、银行为中心的模式向更加市场化、国际化、一体化的体系转型。其未来的成功取决于监管凝聚力的提升、投资者多元化以及债务管理的透明度。
9
Financial stability refers to the ability of a financial system to withstand shocks and continue performing its critical functions—such as payment processing, financial intermediation, and capital allocation—without disruption. Achieving financial stability involves maintaining resilience, containing system-wide risks, and ensuring the continuity of financial services.
金融稳定是指金融体系抵御冲击并持续履行其关键职能（例如支付处理、金融中介和资本配置）而不中断的能力。实现金融稳定需要保持韧性，控制系统性风险，并确保金融服务的连续性。
Systemic risk differs from individual risk as it spreads across markets, institutions, and sectors, leading to widespread disruption. Primary sources of systemic risk include bank runs, asset bubble bursts, excessive leverage and maturity mismatches, and failures of credit rating agencies. The transmission mechanisms involve cross-sector contagion, liquidity crunch spirals, and interconnected institutions that are "too-interconnected-to-fail."
系统性风险不同于个体风险，它蔓延至各个市场、机构和部门，并导致大范围的混乱。系统性风险的主要来源包括银行挤兑、资产泡沫破裂、过度杠杆和期限错配，以及信用评级机构的失灵。其传导机制包括跨部门传染、流动性紧缩螺旋，以及相互关联的、“过于紧密以至于不能倒闭”的机构。
China's financial system exhibits specific structural features amplifying systemic risk. Implicit government guarantees contribute to moral hazards, particularly in local government financing vehicles (LGFVs). The shadow banking sector, operating outside traditional regulatory frameworks, presents additional systemic vulnerabilities due to non-transparent lending chains and high-risk financial products. Moreover, banks' extensive exposure to the real estate sector concentrates risk further, posing significant systemic threats.
中国金融体系展现出放大系统性风险的特定结构性特征。隐性政府担保加剧了道德风险，尤其是在地方政府融资平台（LGFV）中。影子银行部门在传统监管框架之外运作，由于不透明的贷款链和高风险的金融产品，带来了额外的系统性脆弱性。此外，银行在房地产领域的广泛敞口进一步集中了风险 ，构成了严重的系统性威胁。
To manage systemic risk, China employs several tools and policy frameworks. These include the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), conducted jointly with the IMF, which identifies systemic vulnerabilities. Additionally, the macroprudential policy toolkit, featuring instruments such as countercyclical capital buffers (CCyB) and loan-to-value (LTV) ratio caps, helps mitigate excessive credit growth and sector-specific risks.
为了管理系统性风险，中国采用了多种工具和政策框架。其中包括与国际货币基金组织联合实施的金融部门评估规划（FSAP），该规划旨在识别系统性脆弱性。此外，宏观审慎政策工具包，包括逆周期资本缓冲（ CCyB ）和贷款价值比（LTV）上限等工具，有助于缓解信贷过度增长和特定行业的风险。
China’s institutional response is gradually shifting from reactive interventions to proactive, forward-looking risk management. Key reforms emphasize enhancing regulatory coordination among the People's Bank of China (PBC), China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC), and China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). Strengthening data transparency, implementing cross-market emergency protocols, and introducing rigorous stress-testing and antifragility assessments are central to these reforms.
中国的机构应对措施正逐步从被动干预转向主动、前瞻性的风险管理。关键改革强调加强中国人民银行（PBC）、中国银行保险监督管理委员会（CBIRC）和中国证券监督管理委员会（CSRC）之间的监管协调。增强数据透明度、实施跨市场应急机制以及引入严格的压力测试和反脆弱性评估是这些改革的核心。
In conclusion, the identification, transmission, and management of systemic risk are central to China's financial stability. Future success in maintaining stability depends on improved regulatory coordination, transparency enhancement, and proactive risk governance.
总而言之，系统性风险的识别、传导和管理系统性风险是中国金融稳定的核心。未来维护金融稳定的成功取决于加强监管协调、提高透明度和积极主动的风险治理。
10
Money Market Funds (MMFs) are collective investment vehicles that invest primarily in short-term, highly rated debt instruments. They offer low risk and high liquidity, making them attractive alternatives to traditional bank deposits.
货币市场基金 (MMF) 是一种集合投资工具，主要投资于短期、高评级的债务工具。它们风险低、流动性高，是传统银行存款的颇具吸引力的替代品。
China's MMFs have experienced exponential growth since 2013, driven by higher yields compared to traditional deposits, convenient accessibility through fintech platforms like Alipay, and products such as Yu’E Bao. By 2017, assets under management had increased nearly eightfold, and the number of funds had quadrupled.
自 2013 年以来，中国的货币市场基金经历了指数级增长，这得益于其收益率高于传统存款、通过支付宝等金融科技平台的便捷访问以及余额宝等产品。到 2017 年，货币市场基金的管理资产增长了近八倍，基金数量也增加了四倍。
Structurally, Chinese MMFs differ from their counterparts in developed economies like the U.S. and EU. Chinese MMFs allow leverage up to 20%, previously even higher, through repo agreements, while U.S. MMFs prohibit leverage, and the EU limits it to 10%. Additionally, Chinese MMFs typically act as repo borrowers, contrasting with the lender roles in the U.S. and EU markets. Redemption guarantees in China are implicit, relying on large corporate sponsorships, rather than formal deposit insurance as in other regions.
从结构上看，中国的货币市场基金与美国和欧盟等发达经济体的货币市场基金有所不同。中国货币市场基金允许通过回购协议将杠杆率提高到20%，此前甚至更高；而美国货币市场基金则禁止杠杆，欧盟则将杠杆率限制在10%。此外，中国货币市场基金通常充当回购借款人的角色，这与美国和欧盟市场的贷款人角色形成鲜明对比。中国的赎回担保是隐性的，依赖于大型企业的担保，而不是像其他地区那样依赖正式的存款保险。
Investors in China’s MMFs include both retail and institutional investors, attracted by the ease of access, perceived safety, and strong liquidity. Platforms such as Yu’E Bao, launched by Tianhong Asset Management through Alipay, exemplify the success of MMFs, having garnered over 250 million investors by integrating financial services with e-commerce and payments.
中国货币市场基金的投资者既包括散户，也包括机构投资者，他们被便捷的准入、安全性和强大的流动性所吸引。 天弘基金通过支付宝推出的余额宝等平台就是货币市场基金成功的典范，通过将金融服务与电子商务和支付相结合，吸引了超过 2.5 亿投资者。
Despite their popularity, MMFs face significant risks, including liquidity mismatches, maturity transformation risks, and potential leverage-related vulnerabilities. These issues can trigger fire sales and redemption pressures during market stresses, causing systemic spillover effects as seen in past financial crises.
尽管货币市场基金广受欢迎，但它们也面临着巨大的风险，包括流动性错配、期限转换风险以及潜在的杠杆相关漏洞。这些问题在市场承压时可能引发抛售和赎回压力，造成系统性溢出效应，就像过去金融危机中出现的那样。
Regulatory responses since 2016 by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) have tightened MMF rules, including reducing leverage limits from 40% to 20%, introducing redemption restrictions, and enhancing prudential oversight. Although regulations remain relatively flexible compared to international standards, ongoing regulatory convergence aims to mitigate systemic risks while retaining market discipline.
自 2016 年以来，中国证监会（CSRC）采取的监管措施收紧了货币市场基金（MMF）规则，包括将杠杆率上限从 40%降至 20%，引入赎回限制，并加强审慎监管。尽管与国际标准相比，监管规定仍相对灵活，但持续的监管趋同旨在降低系统性风险，同时维护市场纪律。
In conclusion, China’s MMFs represent a significant intersection of fintech innovation and financial intermediation. Despite inherent systemic risks, their role in liquidity management and financial innovation continues to grow, emphasizing the necessity of robust regulatory frameworks to safeguard stability and investor confidence.
总而言之，中国的货币市场基金代表着金融科技创新与金融中介的重要交汇。尽管存在固有的系统性风险，但它们在流动性管理和金融创新中的作用仍在不断增强，这凸显了建立健全的监管框架以维护市场稳定和投资者信心的必要性。
11
The real estate sector is a pillar of China’s economy, significantly impacting GDP, local government finances, credit allocation, and household wealth. Its value chain operates through a self-reinforcing cycle: land sales finance local governments, credit expansion fuels property development, housing prices rise, creating a wealth effect that drives further investment.
房地产行业是中国经济的支柱产业，对 GDP、地方政府财政、信贷配置和家庭财富产生重大影响。其价值链遵循一个自我强化的循环：土地出让金为地方政府提供资金，信贷扩张推动房地产开发，房价上涨，最终形成财富效应，进而推动进一步投资。
The sector contributes approximately 25–30% of China's GDP, considering both direct and indirect impacts, and up to 40% of local government revenues come from land sales. Historically, China's real estate policy has fluctuated between growth and risk management, transitioning from rapid commercialization (1998–2003), through explosive credit-driven growth (2004–2013), strict regulatory interventions (2014–2019), and the current structural deleveraging efforts characterized by policies like the “Three Red Lines.”
房地产行业对中国 GDP 的贡献约为 25%至 30%，这包括直接和间接影响，地方政府收入中高达 40%来自土地出让金。历史上，中国的房地产政策在增长与风险管理之间摇摆不定，经历了快速商业化（1998-2003 年）、信贷驱动的爆炸式增长（2004-2013 年）、严格的监管干预（2014-2019 年），以及当前以“三条红线”等政策为特征的结构性去杠杆。
Current risks include housing oversupply, particularly in lower-tier cities, elevated household leverage, and inflated housing price-to-income ratios. The interconnectedness between real estate and the financial sector amplifies systemic risks, exemplified by the Evergrande crisis, where over-leverage and dependence on pre-sale financing led to severe liquidity issues, default risks, and market confidence erosion.
当前的风险包括住房供应过剩（尤其是在低线城市）、家庭杠杆率上升以及房价收入比过高。房地产与金融行业的相互关联加剧了系统性风险，以恒大地产危机为例，其高杠杆率和对预售融资的依赖导致了严重的流动性问题、违约风险和市场信心的削弱。
The Evergrande crisis illustrated the potential for systemic contagion across multiple layers of the financial system, impacting banks, wealth management products, offshore bondholders, and consumer confidence. However, the crisis differs fundamentally from events like the Lehman collapse due to China's strong government intervention, controlled capital flows, implicit guarantees, and prioritization of social stability.
恒大地产危机凸显了系统性危机蔓延至金融体系多个层面的可能性，其影响范围涵盖银行、理财产品、境外债券持有人和消费者信心。然而，由于中国政府的强力干预、资本流动的管控、隐性担保以及对社会稳定的优先考虑，此次危机与雷曼兄弟破产等事件有着根本性的不同。
In response, the government has implemented liquidity injections, asset takeovers, and creditor prioritization reforms. Future policy directions will focus on reducing financial-real estate linkages, enhancing market-based risk pricing, and diminishing local government reliance on land sales revenue.
为应对这一挑战，政府实施了流动性注入、资产收购和债权人优先排序改革。未来的政策方向将侧重于减少金融与房地产的关联，加强基于市场的风险定价，并减少地方政府对土地出让收入的依赖。
Overall, the Evergrande crisis underscores the need for structural reform in China's real estate sector, marking a shift away from debt-driven growth toward a more sustainable and stable housing market.
总体而言，恒大危机凸显了中国房地产行业结构性改革的必要性，标志着中国房地产市场从债务驱动型增长转向更可持续、更稳定的增长模式。
12
China's housing market is deeply intertwined with institutional systems such as the hukou (household registration) and zhaijidi (rural housing land policy), which regulate labor mobility and land use rights, creating significant rural-urban disparities and intergenerational inequalities.
中国的房地产市场与户口、宅基地等制度体系紧密相连 ， 这些制度规范着劳动力的流动和土地使用权，造成了巨大的城乡差距和代际不平等。
The hukou system, established in the 1950s, restricts rural-to-urban migration and has historically prioritized state development objectives, leading to segmented residential rights. Similarly, the zhaijidi policy allows rural households to use collectively-owned village land but enforces strict inheritance and migration rules, contributing to land tenure inequality.
20 世纪 50 年代建立的户籍制度限制了农村人口向城市的迁移，并且历来将国家发展目标放在首位，导致居住权被分割。同样， “宅基地” 政策允许农村家庭使用集体所有的村庄土地，但执行严格的继承和迁移规则，加剧了土地使用权的不平等。
China's real estate boom heavily depends on government intervention and fiscal support, notably through capitalizing state-owned land and providing dual credit flows to developers and homebuyers. Market confidence, driven by macroeconomic expectations rather than purely rational demand-supply analysis, further fuels speculative bubbles.
中国房地产繁荣严重依赖政府干预和财政支持，尤其是通过国有土地资本化以及向开发商和购房者提供双向信贷流。市场信心受宏观经济预期而非纯粹理性的供需分析驱动，进一步助长了投机泡沫。
Short-term housing regulations, such as purchase restrictions initiated in 2010, achieved temporary price stabilization but failed to resolve underlying structural mismatches. Consequently, tighter controls often led to sharp price rebounds termed “vengeful bump back,” demonstrating speculative resilience.
2010年启动的限购等短期房地产调控措施，虽然暂时稳定了房价，但未能解决潜在的结构性错配问题。因此，更严格的调控往往导致房价大幅反弹，被称为“报复性反弹”，体现了投机性韧性。
Systemic financial risks are amplified by banks’ mortgage exposures and opaque shadow banking activities, including off-balance-sheet lending. Regulatory bodies like the CBRC have aimed to enhance transparency, yet oversight remains behind financial innovations.
银行的抵押贷款风险敞口以及不透明的影子银行活动（包括表外贷款）加剧了系统性金融风险。银监会等监管机构一直致力于提高透明度，但监管力度仍然落后于金融创新。
The real estate market's risks escalate significantly when intertwined with local government financing vehicles (LGFVs). LGFVs act as hidden supports for China's property boom through debt-financed land and infrastructure development, creating systemic vulnerabilities due to refinancing pressures and hidden liabilities.
房地产市场与地方政府融资平台（LGFV）交织在一起时，风险会显著上升。地方政府融资平台通过举债融资进行土地和基础设施建设，为中国房地产繁荣提供了隐形支撑，再融资压力和隐性负债导致系统性脆弱性。
Policy responses include debt restructuring, asset liquidation, debt swaps, and enhanced regulatory scrutiny, emphasizing selective interventions to avoid moral hazard. However, the tight linkages between land financing, LGFV debt, and the real estate market pose substantial systemic risks. A downturn in real estate can reduce land sale revenues, impair LGFV debt repayment, and strain the banking sector.
政策应对措施包括债务重组、资产清算、债务互换和加强监管审查，强调选择性干预以避免道德风险。然而，土地融资、地方政府融资平台债务和房地产市场之间的紧密联系构成了巨大的系统性风险。房地产市场低迷可能会减少土地出让收入，削弱地方政府融资平台债务偿还能力，并给银行业带来压力。
Ultimately, addressing China's housing market issues requires long-term structural reforms to improve capital allocation efficiency, transparency, and market stability, shifting away from short-term tactical measures towards comprehensive institutional restructuring.
归根结底，解决中国房地产市场问题需要长期结构性改革，提高资金配置效率、透明度和市场稳定性，从短期战术措施转向全面的体制改革。
13
Shadow banking in China refers to financial activities and institutions outside traditional banking regulation, performing credit functions without taking formal deposits. It involves maturity and liquidity transformation, credit risk transfer, and high leverage, often through off-balance sheet channels.
中国的影子银行是指不受传统银行监管的金融活动和机构，它们在不吸收正式存款的情况下履行信贷职能。影子银行涉及期限和流动性转换、信用风险转移以及高杠杆率，通常通过表外渠道进行。
Globally, shadow banking is defined by organizations like the Financial Stability Board (FSB) as non-bank credit intermediation posing systemic risks. However, China’s definition is politically nuanced and ambiguous, covering a spectrum from completely unregulated entities (like internet finance) to partially regulated bodies (micro-loan companies) and licensed institutions operating loosely regulated financial products (wealth management products, WMPs).
在全球范围内，影子银行被金融稳定理事会（FSB）等组织定义为构成系统性风险的非银行信贷中介机构。然而，中国的定义在政治层面上却存在细微差别且含糊不清，涵盖范围广泛，从完全不受监管的实体（如互联网金融），到部分受监管的机构（小额贷款公司），再到持有牌照运营监管松散的金融产品（理财产品，WMP）的机构。
China's shadow banking system can be divided into three tiers: unregulated entities (e.g., peer-to-peer lending), semi-regulated non-bank credit (trust products), and bank-originated non-traditional credits (off-balance-sheet WMPs). This multi-layered structure blurs boundaries between formal and informal finance, creating embedded risks within licensed institutions.
中国的影子银行体系可以分为三个层级：不受监管的实体（例如，个人对个人借贷）、半监管的非银行信贷（例如，信托产品）以及银行衍生的非传统信贷（例如，表外理财产品）。这种多层级结构模糊了正规金融和非正规金融之间的界限，导致持牌机构内部存在隐患。
Major risks include liquidity mismatch (short-term liabilities funding long-term assets), regulatory arbitrage (banks bypassing capital requirements), implicit guarantees creating moral hazard, and contagion risks due to financial opacity. Wealth Management Products (WMPs), often off-balance sheet and issued by banks through trust companies, exemplify these risks by channeling funds into high-risk projects such as local government financing vehicles (LGFVs).
主要风险包括流动性错配（短期负债为长期资产融资）、监管套利（银行规避资本要求）、隐性担保引发的道德风险，以及金融不透明带来的蔓延风险。理财产品（WMP）通常由银行通过信托公司发行，属于表外业务，它们通过将资金引入地方政府融资平台（LGFV）等高风险项目，体现了这些风险。
Despite regulatory efforts like the 2017 deleveraging campaign and the 2018 New Asset Management Rules, shadow banking continues evolving due to fragmented oversight, regulatory evasion, and persistent economic pressures to maintain growth targets. As regulatory frameworks lag financial innovations, shadow banking adapts, taking new forms and perpetuating systemic risk.
尽管监管部门采取了诸如2017年去杠杆和2018年资管新规等举措，但由于监管碎片化、规避监管以及持续的经济增长目标压力，影子银行仍在不断演变。由于监管框架滞后于金融创新，影子银行不断适应变化，呈现出新的形式，并加剧了系统性风险。
China’s shadow banking system is uniquely bank-centric, distinct from Western market-based models, deeply embedded within state institutions, and strategically tolerated by the government. It serves critical roles in financing local governments and meeting growth targets yet simultaneously accumulates systemic financial risks.
中国的影子银行体系以银行为中心，不同于西方市场化模式，它深深植根于国家机构，并受到政府的战略性容忍。影子银行体系在地方政府融资和实现增长目标方面发挥着关键作用，但同时也积累了系统性金融风险。
Moving forward, policy responses should aim at adaptive governance, balancing financial innovation and stability. Rather than suppressing shadow banking outright, reforms should focus on enhancing transparency, aligning growth imperatives with financial stability, and integrating shadow banking more effectively into regulatory frameworks.
展望未来，政策应对措施应着眼于适应性治理，平衡金融创新与金融稳定。改革不应直接抑制影子银行，而应侧重于提高透明度，将增长目标与金融稳定相协调，并将影子银行更有效地纳入监管框架。
14
China's informal financial sector, commonly known as shadow banking, includes financial intermediaries and activities operating beyond formal regulatory oversight. Despite being outside the traditional regulatory framework, these institutions play a critical role in bridging financing gaps, especially for underserved market participants such as small and medium enterprises (SMEs).
中国的非正规金融部门，通常被称为影子银行，包括金融中介机构和在正式监管范围之外运作的活动。尽管这些机构游离于传统的监管框架之外，但它们在弥补融资缺口方面发挥着关键作用，尤其对于中小企业等服务不足的市场参与者而言。
Several structural factors contribute to the existence of informal finance in China. Firstly, local government borrowing crowds out private enterprises from formal credit channels. Secondly, large banks predominantly lend to state-owned or large enterprises, leaving SMEs underserved. Thirdly, China's corporate bond market remains underdeveloped, limiting private firms' access to alternative funding sources. Additionally, the restrictive IPO approval system favors politically connected firms, preventing broader capital market access. Finally, periods of negative real deposit rates due to high inflation incentivize investors to seek higher returns in informal financial channels.
若干结构性因素导致了中国非正规金融的存在。首先，地方政府借贷将私营企业挤出了正规信贷渠道。其次，大型银行主要向国有企业或大型企业提供贷款，导致中小企业得不到充分服务。第三，中国企业债券市场仍然欠发达，限制了私营企业获得其他融资渠道。此外，严格的 IPO 审批制度有利于有政治背景的企业，阻碍了其更广泛的资本市场准入。最后，高通胀导致的实际存款利率为负，这促使投资者通过非正规金融渠道寻求更高的回报。
While fulfilling important financial functions, informal finance poses significant systemic risks. Key issues include a lack of transparency, maturity mismatches, and heavy reliance on off-balance-sheet operations, increasing the vulnerability of the financial system. Former Bank of China head Xiao Gang notably compared certain wealth management product (WMP) structures to Ponzi schemes, highlighting the inherent systemic risks.
民间金融在履行重要金融职能的同时，也构成了重大的系统性风险。关键问题包括缺乏透明度、期限错配以及严重依赖表外业务，这增加了金融体系的脆弱性。中国银行前行长肖钢曾将某些理财产品（WMP）结构与庞氏骗局进行了类比，强调了其固有的系统性风险。
In response, Chinese regulators have implemented tighter controls, including enhanced risk disclosures, stricter asset management rules, and limitations on off-balance-sheet activities. Despite these regulatory efforts, the informal sector continues evolving, necessitating ongoing oversight improvements and reforms.
为应对这一挑战，中国监管机构实施了更严格的管控措施，包括加强风险披露、更严格的资产管理规则以及限制表外活动。尽管采取了这些监管措施，但非正规部门仍在不断发展演变，需要持续改进监管并进行改革。
Overall, understanding China's informal financial sector, its structural origins, roles, and associated risks is crucial for evaluating the health and reform trajectory of China's broader financial system. Future regulatory efforts should aim to enhance transparency, mitigate systemic risks, and better integrate informal financial activities into the formal regulatory framework.
总体而言，了解中国非正规金融部门及其结构性起源、作用和相关风险，对于评估中国整体金融体系的健康状况和改革轨迹至关重要。未来的监管工作应致力于提高透明度，降低系统性风险，并将非正规金融活动更好地纳入正规监管框架。