这是用户在 2025-7-30 14:51 为 https://app.immersivetranslate.com/pdf-pro/c0f7be69-33df-4026-9e80-39d899dddd31/ 保存的双语快照页面,由 沉浸式翻译 提供双语支持。了解如何保存?
严重性 - 过程 FMEA
失效模式影响估计严重性
  级别   评估标准 对制造性能的影响 [这是失效模式对制造过程性能(例如循环时间、良率、报废/返工成本)、制造操作员(例如安全)以及其他与产品无关的影响的潜在影响]
对产品的影响 [这是失效模式对产品、产品的最终用户和/或患者的潜在影响] 注意:'对产品的影响'的严重性等级应从 dFMEA 逐级向下分配。
Effect on product [this is the potential effect of the failure mode on the product, the end user of the product and / or the patient] Note: Severity ranking on 'Effect on product' shall be cascaded down from the dFMEA.| Effect on product [this is the potential effect of the failure mode on the product, the end user of the product and / or the patient] | | :--- | | Note: Severity ranking on 'Effect on product' shall be cascaded down from the dFMEA. |
根据制造方面选择适用的等级:返工/非报废符合性 生产线停机 无工艺输出 工艺循环时间
Select applicable ranking based upon manufacturing aspect Rework/ non Scrap conforming Line shutdown No process output Process cycle time| Select applicable ranking based upon manufacturing aspect Rework/ non | | :--- | | Scrap conforming | | Line shutdown | | No process output | | Process cycle time |
S 未能满足安全要求 # 可能危及制造操作员或维护工程师(针对制造设备或安装)   危险清单
8   重大中断 连续废品(> <x> out of <y>)   复杂 LSD > <x> h/m
- 主要功能丧失(不影响安全) - 主要功能暂时丧失(不影响安全) - 主要功能退化(不影响安全)
- Loss of primary function (not affecting safety) - Temporary loss of primary function (not affecting safety) - Degradation of primary function(not affecting safety)| - Loss of primary function (not affecting safety) | | :--- | | - Temporary loss of primary function (not affecting safety) | | - Degradation of primary function(not affecting safety) |
5   中度干扰 多种产品(> <x> out of <y>)   中等 <y> < LSD \llx> h/m   连续 > <NN>%
- 产品可用,但舒适/便利功能无法使用(不影响安全) - 产品可用,但舒适/便利功能暂时失效(不影响安全) - 产品可用,但舒适/便利功能降低(不影响安全) - 用户高度不适/投诉显著
- Product usable but comfort/convenience function inoperable (not affecting safety) - Product usable but temporary loss of comfort/convenience function (not affecting safety) - Product usable but comfort/convenience function of reduced level of function (not affecting safety) - Highly irritated user / Significant level of complaints| - Product usable but comfort/convenience function inoperable (not affecting safety) | | :--- | | - Product usable but temporary loss of comfort/convenience function (not affecting safety) | | - Product usable but comfort/convenience function of reduced level of function (not affecting safety) | | - Highly irritated user / Significant level of complaints |
3   轻微干扰 单个产品(<<x> out of <y>)   简单 LSD \llx> h/m   单一产品 \llNN>%
- 用户轻微不满或烦恼 - 对产品的工作或性能有轻微影响
- Slight user dissatisfaction or annoyance - Slight effect on the working or performance of the product| - Slight user dissatisfaction or annoyance | | :--- | | - Slight effect on the working or performance of the product |
1   无影响   无可见影响。 - 用户可能不会注意到这种影响
Severity - Process FMEA Estimated severity for effect of failure mode Level Evaluation criteria Effect on manufacturing performance [this is the potential effect of the failure mode on manufacturing process performance (e.g. cycle time, yield, scrap / rework costs), manufacturing operator (e.g. safety) and other effects that are not product related] "Effect on product [this is the potential effect of the failure mode on the product, the end user of the product and / or the patient] Note: Severity ranking on 'Effect on product' shall be cascaded down from the dFMEA." "Select applicable ranking based upon manufacturing aspect Rework/ non Scrap conforming Line shutdown No process output Process cycle time" S Failure to meet safety requirements # May endanger Manufacturing operator or maintenance engineer (for manufacturing equipment or installation) Hazard list 8 Major disruption continuous scrap (> <x> out of <y>) complex LSD > <x> h/m "- Loss of primary function (not affecting safety) - Temporary loss of primary function (not affecting safety) - Degradation of primary function(not affecting safety)" 5 Moderate disruption multiple products (> <x> out of <y>) moderate <y> < LSD \llx> h/m continuous > <NN>% "- Product usable but comfort/convenience function inoperable (not affecting safety) - Product usable but temporary loss of comfort/convenience function (not affecting safety) - Product usable but comfort/convenience function of reduced level of function (not affecting safety) - Highly irritated user / Significant level of complaints" 3 Minor disruption single product (<<x> out of <y>) simple LSD \llx> h/m single product \llNN>% "- Slight user dissatisfaction or annoyance - Slight effect on the working or performance of the product" 1 No effect No discernible effect. - The user will probably not notice the effect| Severity - Process FMEA | | | | | | | | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Estimated severity for effect of failure mode | | | | | | | | | Level | Evaluation criteria | Effect on manufacturing performance [this is the potential effect of the failure mode on manufacturing process performance (e.g. cycle time, yield, scrap / rework costs), manufacturing operator (e.g. safety) and other effects that are not product related] | | | | | Effect on product [this is the potential effect of the failure mode on the product, the end user of the product and / or the patient] <br> Note: Severity ranking on 'Effect on product' shall be cascaded down from the dFMEA. | | | | Select applicable ranking based upon manufacturing aspect Rework/ non <br> Scrap conforming <br> Line shutdown <br> No process output <br> Process cycle time | | | | | | | S | Failure to meet safety requirements # | May endanger Manufacturing operator or maintenance engineer (for manufacturing equipment or installation) | | | | | Hazard list | | 8 | Major disruption | continuous scrap (> <x> out of <y>) | complex | LSD > <x> h/m | | | - Loss of primary function (not affecting safety) <br> - Temporary loss of primary function (not affecting safety) <br> - Degradation of primary function(not affecting safety) | | 5 | Moderate disruption | multiple products (> <x> out of <y>) | moderate | <y> < LSD \llx> h/m | continuous | > <NN>% | - Product usable but comfort/convenience function inoperable (not affecting safety) <br> - Product usable but temporary loss of comfort/convenience function (not affecting safety) <br> - Product usable but comfort/convenience function of reduced level of function (not affecting safety) <br> - Highly irritated user / Significant level of complaints | | 3 | Minor disruption | single product (<<x> out of <y>) | simple | LSD \llx> h/m | single product | \llNN>% | - Slight user dissatisfaction or annoyance <br> - Slight effect on the working or performance of the product | | 1 | No effect | No discernible effect. | | | | | - The user will probably not notice the effect |
  注释:
报废 返工 不合格品 线路停机 无工艺输出 工艺周期时间
Scrap Rework non conforming Line shutdown No process output Process cycle time| Scrap | | :--- | | Rework non conforming Line shutdown No process output Process cycle time |
选择最合适的制造方面,如果多个方面相关,则选择得分最高的方面。"连续"在此情况下意味着一次故障模式导致连续报废(例如模具损坏)。如果故障模式是系统性的,但仅导致单个产品报废,则"严重性"=3,"发生概率"=8 或 10。返工单个产品的努力,不合格品遵循不合格品工艺。故障模式导致生产停机。故障模式导致无工艺输出。周期时间损失,仅在 CT 超过瓶颈 CT 的情况下相关
Select the manufacturing aspect that is most suitable, if multiple aspects are relevant select aspact with the highest score 'continuous' in this case means that 1 occurrence of the failure mode results in continuous scrap (e.g. mould damaged) If the failure mode is systematic but only results in single product to be scrapped than 'severity' = 3 and 'occurrence' = 8 or 10 Is the effort to rework a single product, Non conforming follows the non-conforming process the failure mode results in an production stop The failure mode results in have no process output Los of cycle time, only relevent in case CT is exceeding the CT of the bottleneck| Select the manufacturing aspect that is most suitable, if multiple aspects are relevant select aspact with the highest score | | :--- | | 'continuous' in this case means that 1 occurrence of the failure mode results in continuous scrap (e.g. mould damaged) | | If the failure mode is systematic but only results in single product to be scrapped than 'severity' = 3 and 'occurrence' = 8 or 10 | | Is the effort to rework a single product, | | Non conforming follows the non-conforming process | | the failure mode results in an production stop | | The failure mode results in have no process output | | Los of cycle time, only relevent in case CT is exceeding the CT of the bottleneck |
Notes: "Scrap Rework non conforming Line shutdown No process output Process cycle time" "Select the manufacturing aspect that is most suitable, if multiple aspects are relevant select aspact with the highest score 'continuous' in this case means that 1 occurrence of the failure mode results in continuous scrap (e.g. mould damaged) If the failure mode is systematic but only results in single product to be scrapped than 'severity' = 3 and 'occurrence' = 8 or 10 Is the effort to rework a single product, Non conforming follows the non-conforming process the failure mode results in an production stop The failure mode results in have no process output Los of cycle time, only relevent in case CT is exceeding the CT of the bottleneck"| Notes: | | | :--- | :--- | | Scrap <br> Rework non conforming Line shutdown No process output Process cycle time | Select the manufacturing aspect that is most suitable, if multiple aspects are relevant select aspact with the highest score <br> 'continuous' in this case means that 1 occurrence of the failure mode results in continuous scrap (e.g. mould damaged) <br> If the failure mode is systematic but only results in single product to be scrapped than 'severity' = 3 and 'occurrence' = 8 or 10 <br> Is the effort to rework a single product, <br> Non conforming follows the non-conforming process <br> the failure mode results in an production stop <br> The failure mode results in have no process output <br> Los of cycle time, only relevent in case CT is exceeding the CT of the bottleneck |
发生概率 - 工艺 FMEA 每个工艺机会的估计发生概率,基于当前预防控制措施
Occurrence - Process FMEA Estimated probability of occurrence per process opportunity, based on current controls on prevention;| Occurrence - Process FMEA | | :--- | | Estimated probability of occurrence per process opportunity, based on current controls on prevention; |
  级别   评估标准   详细说明   可能故障率*
10   频繁 新生产流程,无历史记录   超过10%
8   很可能 已知但存在问题的工艺。该应用显示出显著的工艺挑战。 1% 到 10%
5   很可能 具有成功工艺验证的相似工艺。在该工艺中对该应用的经验有限。 在0.1至1%之间
3   远程 该工艺已在量产中执行并测试,结果成功。工艺能力已得到证明。 在0.01至0.1%之间
1   不可能的 通过预防控制消除故障。   低于0.01%
"Occurrence - Process FMEA Estimated probability of occurrence per process opportunity, based on current controls on prevention;" Level Evaluation criteria Detailed explanation Likely failure rates* 10 Frequent New production process with no history Higher than 10% 8 Likely Known but problematic process. The application shows significant process challenges. Between 1 and 10% 5 Probable Similar process with successful process validation. Limited experience with the application in this process. Between 0.1 and 1% 3 Remote The process was executed and tested with successful results in series production. Process capability is proven. Between 0.01 and 0.1% 1 Improbable Failure is eliminated through preventive control. Lower than 0.01%| Occurrence - Process FMEA <br> Estimated probability of occurrence per process opportunity, based on current controls on prevention; | | | | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | | | | | Level | Evaluation criteria | Detailed explanation | Likely failure rates* | | 10 | Frequent | New production process with no history | Higher than 10% | | 8 | Likely | Known but problematic process. The application shows significant process challenges. | Between 1 and 10% | | 5 | Probable | Similar process with successful process validation. Limited experience with the application in this process. | Between 0.1 and 1% | | 3 | Remote | The process was executed and tested with successful results in series production. Process capability is proven. | Between 0.01 and 0.1% | | 1 | Improbable | Failure is eliminated through preventive control. | Lower than 0.01% |
(*) Failure rate ranges can no longer be tailored on Business / factory level (*) If the actual Occurrence percentage is exactly on the treshold of 2 Occurrence levels: take the highest Occurrence level  (*)   Failure rate ranges can no longer be tailored on Business / factory level   (*)   If the actual Occurrence percentage is exactly on the treshold of  2  Occurrence levels: take the highest Occurrence level  {:[" (*) "," Failure rate ranges can no longer be tailored on Business / factory level "],[" (*) "," If the actual Occurrence percentage is exactly on the treshold of "2" Occurrence levels: take the highest Occurrence level "]:}\begin{array}{ll}\text { (*) } & \text { Failure rate ranges can no longer be tailored on Business / factory level } \\ \text { (*) } & \text { If the actual Occurrence percentage is exactly on the treshold of } 2 \text { Occurrence levels: take the highest Occurrence level }\end{array}
检测评估标准
检测 - 过程 FMEA
  无/失效   0至4   级别   检测可能性
10   几乎不可能
  有理由通过   3至4 8   远程
5   中等
  通过
0至2 3至4
0 to 2 3 to 4| 0 to 2 | | :--- | | 3 to 4 |
5   中等
已实施防错检测* 3   
1 几乎确定 第 3 步:选择与 TMV 结果和总检测控制分数相关的检测级别。(注意:'检测可能性'仅是对检测级别的描述,不再进一步使用)。
1 Almost certain Step 3: Select the detection Level that relates to the TMV Result and Total Detection Control Score. (Note: 'Likelyhood of Detection' is only a description of the detection level and is not used further).| 1 | | :--- | | Almost certain | | Step 3: Select the detection Level that relates to the TMV Result and Total Detection Control Score. (Note: 'Likelyhood of Detection' is only a description of the detection level and is not used further). |
步骤 1:选择与特定检测活动 TMV 结果相关的行。
步骤2:使用下表定义总检测控制分数。(总检测控制分数=位置分数+频率分数+设备分数+停止控制分数)
Step 2: Define the Total Detection Control Score with the table below. (Total Detection Control Score=Location score + Frequency score + Equipment score + Stop controls score)| Step 2: Define the Total Detection Control Score with the table below. | | :--- | | (Total Detection Control Score=Location score + Frequency score + Equipment score + Stop controls score) |
  位置   频率   设备   停止控制
  注意:
TMV 结果:参考 TMV PEPF 00001509 获取 TMV 结果。MSA 接受标准是默认值,但可以是特定于业务的。
'有理由通过': 关键测量的理由应基于风险。例如,通过达到特定的业务可靠性水平。参见
工艺验证 TMV 指南。非关键测量可能具有与风险无关的接受理由,例如商业案例。
站内:制造后立即进行的检测
抽样:每批进行检测,但不是100%。样本量必须具有统计学依据。
审核:并非每批次都进行检测
*“防错检测”是一种检测控制,能够以极高的确定性识别现有缺陷。例如,通过使缺陷高度显眼或
通过存在缺陷而使组装变得不可能。这不是一种“预防控制”,它不能消除或减少发生。
完全避免发生。
NOTES: TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific. 'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case. In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned. Audits: Detections not performed on every lot *A 'Poka-yoke detection' is a Detection Control that identifies existing defects with high certainty. For example, by making defects highly visible or by making assembly impossible because of the existence of a defect. This is not a 'Prevention Control' which eliminates or reduces the occurrences from happening at all.| NOTES: | | :---: | | TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific. | | 'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See | | Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case. | | In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture | | Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned. | | Audits: Detections not performed on every lot | | *A 'Poka-yoke detection' is a Detection Control that identifies existing defects with high certainty. For example, by making defects highly visible or | | by making assembly impossible because of the existence of a defect. This is not a 'Prevention Control' which eliminates or reduces the occurrences | | from happening at all. |
NOTES:TMV 结果:参考 TMV PEPF 00001509 获取 TMV 结果。MSA 验收标准为默认值,但可以是特定于业务的。'有理由通过':关键测量的理由应为基于风险的。例如,通过满足特定于业务的可靠性水平。参见工艺验证 TMV 指南。非关键测量可能具有与风险无关的验收理由,例如商业案例。
  NOTES:
  NOTES:
TMV 结果:参考 TMV PEPF 00001509 获取 TMV 结果。MSA 验收标准为默认值,但可以是特定于业务的。'有理由通过':关键测量的理由应为基于风险的。例如,通过满足特定于业务的可靠性水平。参见工艺验证 TMV 指南。非关键测量可能具有与风险无关的验收理由,例如商业案例。在站检测:制造后立即执行抽样:每批次执行检测,但非 100%。样本量必须具有统计支持。审计:每批次不执行检测在站检测:制造后立即执行
抽样:每批次都进行检测,但不是100%。样本量必须具有统计学依据。
审核:并非每批次都进行检测
*“防错检测”是一种检测控制,能够以极高的确定性识别现有缺陷。例如,通过使缺陷高度可见,或因存在缺陷而使装配变得不可能。这不是“预防控制”,后者能完全消除或减少缺陷的发生。
NOTES:,TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific.,'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See,Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case.,In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture,Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned.,Audits: Detections not performed on every lot,*A 'Poka-yoke detection' is a Detection Control that identifies existing defects with high certainty. For example, by making defects highly visible or,by making assembly impossible because of the existence of a defect. This is not a 'Prevention Control' which eliminates or reduces the occurrences,from happening at all. NOTES: TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific. 'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case. NOTES: NOTES: TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific. 'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case. In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned. Audits: Detections not performed on every lot In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned. Audits: Detections not performed on every lot *A 'Poka-yoke detection' is a Detection Control that identifies existing defects with high certainty. For example, by making defects highly visible or by making assembly impossible because of the existence of a defect. This is not a 'Prevention Control' which eliminates or reduces the occurrences from happening at all.| NOTES: <br> TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific. <br> 'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See <br> Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case. <br> In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture <br> Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned. <br> Audits: Detections not performed on every lot <br> *A 'Poka-yoke detection' is a Detection Control that identifies existing defects with high certainty. For example, by making defects highly visible or <br> by making assembly impossible because of the existence of a defect. This is not a 'Prevention Control' which eliminates or reduces the occurrences <br> from happening at all. | | :--- | | NOTES: TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific. 'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case. | | NOTES: | | NOTES: | | TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific. 'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case. In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned. Audits: Detections not performed on every lot In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture | | Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned. | | Audits: Detections not performed on every lot | | *A 'Poka-yoke detection' is a Detection Control that identifies existing defects with high certainty. For example, by making defects highly visible or by making assembly impossible because of the existence of a defect. This is not a 'Prevention Control' which eliminates or reduces the occurrences from happening at all. |
  后处理 抽样或审核得分=0 人工检验(即目视)或手动测量判定合格性得分=0 人工决策停止处理,防止不合格产品放行得分=0
Detection - Process FMEA None/Fail 0 to 4 Level Likelyhood of Detection 10 Almost impossible Passing with rationale 3 to 4 8 Remote 5 Moderate Pass "0 to 2 3 to 4" 5 Moderate Poka-yoke* detection in place 3 High "1 Almost certain Step 3: Select the detection Level that relates to the TMV Result and Total Detection Control Score. (Note: 'Likelyhood of Detection' is only a description of the detection level and is not used further)." Step 1: Select the row that relates to the TMV Result of the specific detection activity. "Step 2: Define the Total Detection Control Score with the table below. (Total Detection Control Score=Location score + Frequency score + Equipment score + Stop controls score)" Location Frequency Equipment Stop controls "NOTES:,TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific.,'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See,Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case.,In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture,Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned.,Audits: Detections not performed on every lot,*A 'Poka-yoke detection' is a Detection Control that identifies existing defects with high certainty. For example, by making defects highly visible or,by making assembly impossible because of the existence of a defect. This is not a 'Prevention Control' which eliminates or reduces the occurrences,from happening at all. NOTES: TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific. 'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case. NOTES: NOTES: TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific. 'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case. In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned. Audits: Detections not performed on every lot In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned. Audits: Detections not performed on every lot *A 'Poka-yoke detection' is a Detection Control that identifies existing defects with high certainty. For example, by making defects highly visible or by making assembly impossible because of the existence of a defect. This is not a 'Prevention Control' which eliminates or reduces the occurrences from happening at all." Post-processing Sampling or Audits Score=0 Human inspection (i.e. visual) or Manual gauging determines conformance Score = 0 Human decision stops processing, prevents release of discrepant product Score = 0 | Detection - Process FMEA | | | | | | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | None/Fail | 0 to 4 | | | Level | Likelyhood of Detection | | | | | | 10 | Almost impossible | | Passing with rationale | 3 to 4 | | | 8 | Remote | | | | | | 5 | Moderate | | Pass | 0 to 2 <br> 3 to 4 | | | 5 | Moderate | | | Poka-yoke* detection in place | | | | 3 | High | | | | | | | 1 <br> Almost certain <br> Step 3: Select the detection Level that relates to the TMV Result and Total Detection Control Score. (Note: 'Likelyhood of Detection' is only a description of the detection level and is not used further). | | | Step 1: Select the row that relates to the TMV Result of the specific detection activity. | Step 2: Define the Total Detection Control Score with the table below. <br> (Total Detection Control Score=Location score + Frequency score + Equipment score + Stop controls score) | | | | | | Location | Frequency | Equipment | Stop controls | NOTES: <br> TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific. <br> 'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See <br> Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case. <br> In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture <br> Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned. <br> Audits: Detections not performed on every lot <br> *A 'Poka-yoke detection' is a Detection Control that identifies existing defects with high certainty. For example, by making defects highly visible or <br> by making assembly impossible because of the existence of a defect. This is not a 'Prevention Control' which eliminates or reduces the occurrences <br> from happening at all. <br> NOTES: TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific. 'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case. <br> NOTES: <br> NOTES: <br> TMV Result: Reference TMV PEPF 00001509 for TMV Result. MSA acceptance criteria are defaults, but can be business specific. 'Passing with Rationale': Rationale for critical measurements shall be risk based. For example, by meeting business specific reliability levels. See Process Validation TMV guidance. Non-critical measurements may have non-risk related rationale for acceptance such as a business case. In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned. Audits: Detections not performed on every lot In-station: Detections performed immediately after manufacture <br> Sampling: Detections performend on every lot but not 100%. Sample sizes must be statistically underpinned. <br> Audits: Detections not performed on every lot <br> *A 'Poka-yoke detection' is a Detection Control that identifies existing defects with high certainty. For example, by making defects highly visible or by making assembly impossible because of the existence of a defect. This is not a 'Prevention Control' which eliminates or reduces the occurrences from happening at all. | | | Post-processing | Sampling or Audits Score=0 | Human inspection (i.e. visual) or Manual gauging determines conformance Score = 0 | Human decision stops processing, prevents release of discrepant product Score = 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |