Introduction
In the rapidly evolving landscape of AI, the demand for efficient and scalable hardware solutions is more critical than ever. Whether powering intelligent devices in smart homes or driving complex algorithms in data centers, AI applications are ubiquitous in driving innovation across industries. To meet the computational demands of these applications, a variety of specialized hardware architectures have emerged, each with its own set of advantages and challenges. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of chip architectures designed specifically for AI workloads, offering insights into their design principles, performance characteristics, and deployment considerations.
At the forefront of AI hardware are graphics processing units (GPUs), renowned for their parallel processing capabilities that make them ideal for accelerating deep learning algorithms. Alongside GPUs are tensor processing units (TPUs), purpose-built ASICs designed by tech giants like Google to optimize specific AI tasks such as neural network inference [1], [2]. These dedicated accelerators offer unparalleled performance and energy efficiency, however, their proprietary nature can limit accessibility and integration. Additionally, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) provide customization and reconfigurability, enabling customized acceleration of AI workloads in both edge devices and data centers. In the pursuit of even greater efficiency, hybrid chips are emerging that integrate multiple processing units and combine the versatility of CPUs with the performance capabilities of specialized accelerators [3].
Beyond traditional architectures, emerging paradigms such as neuromorphic computing and quantum computing promise revolutionary advancements in AI hardware. Neuromorphic chips which mimic the brain's neural networks, offer low-power, event-driven processing for tasks such as sensory perception and pattern recognition [4]–[5]. Meanwhile, quantum computers leverage the principles of quantum mechanics to perform computations at exponential speeds, opening new frontiers in optimization, simulation, and machine learning [6]–[8]. However, the nascent nature of these technologies presents challenges in terms of scalability, reliability, and programming complexity. As AI continues to permeate every aspect of our lives, the selection and deployment of suitable hardware architectures will be crucial to unlocking the full potential of AI technologies [9]–[11]. This survey aims to guide researchers, engineers, and practitioners through the diverse landscape of AI hardware, enabling informed decision-making and fostering innovation in AI-driven applications and systems.
The paper is structured as follows: Section II presents a comprehensive literature review. Section III outlines the overview of chip architecture. In Section IV comparative analysis of AI hardware is presented. And the conclusion is provided in Section V.
Literature Survey
This survey provides a comprehensive exploration of the chip architecture landscape for AI, delving into the intricate design principles, cutting-edge technologies, and innovative implementations shaping this field. Through a thorough examination, we aim to offer valuable insights into the advancements, challenges, and emerging trends in AI hardware. Our analysis covers a broad spectrum of topics, including the optimization techniques that drive performance metrics, the computational efficiency of various architectures, and the transformative impact of AI innovations. This survey serves as a roadmap for researchers, engineers, and industry stakeholders, offering a deep understanding of the current state and future directions of chip architecture in the AI domain.
To begin this exploration, Krizhevsky, Sutskever, and Hinton introduced a landmark work in the field of computer vision and deep learning. The authors leveraged two NVIDIA GTX 580 GPUs to train AlexNet, effectively utilizing the parallel processing capabilities of GPUs to manage the significant computational demands of training a deep network on the ImageNet dataset. By distributing the model across two GPUs, the authors were able to train larger models more efficiently, with each GPU handling half of the kernels and the resulting feature maps were concatenated across the GPUs. The success of AlexNet demonstrated the potential of deep learning and GPUs in large-scale image classification tasks, ushering in a new era in artificial intelligence research [12].
The successful implementation of AlexNet on GPUs underscored the transformative potential of parallel processing in AI, highlighting GPUs' dominance in handling data-intensive tasks. However, as AI models grow increasingly complex, the limitations of GPUs in terms of energy consumption and scalability are becoming more apparent, paving the way for more specialized hardware solutions like TPUs.
Jouppi et al. [13] [14] introduced the Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), a domain-specific architecture optimized for the computational patterns of deep neural networks. The key architectural components include a large matrix multiplier unit, a systolic array for efficient data movement, and specialized memory designed to manage the vast amounts of data processed by deep neural networks. TPUs offer substantial enhancements in both energy efficiency and performance when compared to general-purpose CPUs and GPUs. The paper presents detailed performance metrics demonstrating that TPUs can deliver orders of magnitude better performance per watt across various deep learning workloads.
TPUs are specifically optimized for common operations in neural networks, such as matrix multiplications and convolutions, which are computationally intensive and benefit greatly from hardware acceleration [13]. Jouppi et al. additionally conducted a comprehensive analysis of the TPUs, comparing their performance and efficiency to traditional CPUs and GPUs, thereby highlighting their suitability for large-scale data center deployments [14]. This work presents detailed performance metrics, demonstrating that TPUs deliver significantly improved performance per watt for various deep-learning workloads. While TPUs have demonstrated significant improvements in performance and energy efficiency, particularly in data centers, their proprietary nature and limited accessibility outside Google's ecosystem pose challenges for widespread adoption. This highlights the ongoing trade-offs between performance optimization and accessibility in AI hardware development.
Hao et al. [16] introduce a scalable and energy-efficient chipset (SEECHIP) based GPU architecture that utilizes photonic links, specifically designed for hierarchical memory architectures and high-performance computing applications. By leveraging photonic links for inter-chipset communication, this architecture achieves significantly higher bandwidth and lower latency compared to traditional metallic interconnects. However, the description does not explicitly mention any potential disadvantages of the SEECHIP architecture.
Xin-Yu et al. [17] focus on the rapid selection of support vectors during the training process while supporting both linear and non-linear kernel operations within the same hardware. Their method efficiently updates Lagrange multipliers during training, resulting in reduced overall latency. The architecture achieves exceptionally low training latency for both linear and non-linear modes when processing 1024 training data points, providing versatility and adaptability for various applications. However, it is highly specialized for SVM operations, potentially limiting its applicability to other machine learning algorithms.
Architecture
A. CPUs (Central Processing Units)
CPUs are versatile processors designed to handle a broad spectrum of tasks, including artificial intelligence and machine learning workloads. They consist of multiple cores capable of executing instructions sequentially, making them versatile and suitable for diverse computing applications. CPUs are commonly used in traditional computing environments and offer advantages such as widespread availability, compatibility with various software frameworks, and ease of programming. However, CPUs may not deliver optimal performance for highly parallelizable AI tasks, such as deep learning training, due to their sequential processing nature. While CPUs are less specialized for AI workloads compared to GPUs or TPUs, they remain essential for handling non-parallelizable tasks and serving as the central processing unit in computing systems. Additionally, CPUs can be cost-effective and energy-efficient for certain AI applications, particularly those with low computational demands or requiring compatibility with existing infrastructure [22].
While CPUs are versatile and essential for general computing tasks, they fall short in AI-specific workloads when compared to GPUs and TPUs, which offer superior parallel processing capabilities. CPUs excel in tasks requiring complex control logic and sequential processing, but their scalability in AI workload is limited. In modern AI applications, CPUs are often used in conjunction with GPUs or TPUs to balance the need for general-purpose computing and specialized processing.
B. GPUs (Graphics Processing Units)
GPUs are highly parallel processing units originally designed for rendering graphics but are now widely employed for AI and machine learning tasks due to their capability to handle large volumes of data in parallel. They consist of thousands of small processing cores capable of executing multiple tasks simultaneously, making them ideal for training deep neural networks and performing complex computations. GPUs excel in tasks that can be parallelized, offering high throughput and scalability. However, they tend to have relatively high power consumption and limited memory capacity compared to other architectures. While moderately expensive, GPUs deliver significant computational power and are widely available across different hardware platforms and vendors, making them a popular choice for AI and machine learning workloads in various domains [20].
GPUs have become the go-to processors for AI and machine learning due to their massive parallelism and efficiency in handling large datasets. However, when compared to TPUs, GPUs may consume more power and may not always be the most cost-effective solution for deep learning tasks at scale. Despite this, the flexibility and widespread adoption of GPUs make them indispensable in both research and production environments, particularly where a variety of AI models need to be trained and deployed.
C. TPUs (Tensor Processing Units)
TPUs are custom-designed ASICs developed by Google to accelerate AI workloads, particularly deep learning tasks.
They are optimized for matrix multiplication operations commonly found in neural network computations, making them highly efficient for both training and inference. TPUs offer several advantages such as high throughput, low power consumption, and high scalability, making them well-suited for deployment in Google Cloud environments. However, their proprietary nature limits their availability and integration options outside of Google's ecosystem. TPUs are particularly beneficial for applications requiring high-performance AI processing at scale, such as image recognition, natural language processing, and recommendation systems [22].
TPUs offer specialized performance advantages in deep learning tasks, particularly when dealing with large-scale neural networks. In comparison to GPUs, TPUs can deliver higher throughput and energy efficiency for specific AI workloads, especially within the Google ecosystem. However, their specialization limits their utility in broader AI applications where flexibility and adaptability are required, areas where GPUs continue to dominate.
D. FPGAs (Field-Programmable Gate Arrays)
In the context of AI, FPGAs provide flexibility and low latency for accelerating workloads, particularly in edge computing environments where power efficiency and real-time processing are critical. FPGAs can be configured to implement custom DNN architectures or to offload specific tasks from CPUs or GPUs, resulting in performance improvements and energy efficiency gains. However, programming FPGAs requires specialized knowledge and expertise, and they may not offer the same level of performance or efficiency as ASICs for highly specialized AI tasks. FPGAs are advantageous for applications requiring customization, rapid prototyping, or adaptation to changing requirements, but they may incur higher initial costs and development complexity compared to off-the-shelf ASIC solutions [24].
FPGAs provide a unique combination of reconfigurability and efficiency, making them ideal for use cases where latency and power consumption are critical factors. Unlike GPUs and TPUs, which are fixed in architecture, FPGAs can be tailored to specific AI tasks, offering customization that is unmatched. However, this flexibility comes at the cost of increased development complexity, making FPGAs more suitable for specialized applications rather than general-purpose AI workloads.
E. ASICs
ASICs are application specific integrated circuits customized for specific tasks or applications, AI and ML workloads. Unlike general-purpose processors like CPUs and GPUs, ASICs are tailored to perform particular functions with maximum efficiency. In the context of AI, ASICs are often designed to accelerate specific operations commonly found in neural networks, such as matrix multiplications and convolutional operations. ASICs offer advantages such as high performance, energy efficiency, and scalability for targeted tasks. ASICs are particularly well-suited for applications requiring dedicated hardware acceleration, such as deep learning inference in edge devices or data center servers. However, the design and manufacturing of ASICs can be expensive, making them less flexible and cost-effective for applications with evolving requirements or smaller production volumes [25].
ASICs are unparalleled in terms of efficiency and performance for dedicated AI tasks, offering a level of optimization that general-purpose processors cannot match. However, their lack of flexibility and high upfront design costs make them less ideal for environments where the AI workload is dynamic or evolving. In such scenarios, GPUs or FPGAs might be preferred due to their ability to handle a broader range of tasks with more adaptability.
F. Hybrid Chips
Hybrid chips merge various processing units, like CPUs, GPUs, or AI accelerators, on one cohesive chip design. By combining the strengths of different architectures, these chips are designed to optimize performance and efficiency for specific workloads. In AI and ML tasks, hybrid chips may include dedicated AI accelerators alongside traditional processing units to offload specialized computations, thereby enhancing overall system performance. They offer several advantages, including versatility, optimized performance for specific tasks, and potential cost savings by consolidating multiple functions onto a single chip. However, designing and optimizing hybrid chips can be complex, and achieving seamless integration between different processing units may require specialized expertise. Hybrid chips are particularly beneficial for applications that require a balance of general-purpose and specialized processing, such as AI inference in edge devices or data center servers [25].
G. Neuromorphic Computing
Neuromorphic computing is a paradigm modeled after the structure and functionality of biological neural networks. Neuromorphic hardware typically consists of large-scale arrays of interconnected neurons and synapses, implemented using specialized analog or digital circuits. These systems provide benefits like reduced power consumption and increased parallelism, and fault tolerance, having them well-suited for tasks requiring real-time processing and low-latency inference, such as sensor data processing or autonomous robotics. However, neuromorphic computing is still in the early stages of development, and practical implementations face challenges such as scalability, programming complexity, and compatibility with existing software frameworks. While neuromorphic computing has the potential to revolutionize AI and ML by enabling more efficient and brain-like computation, significant research and development efforts are needed to realize its full potential [26].
Neuromorphic chips represent a promising frontier in AI hardware, particularly for tasks that mimic cognitive processes. They offer potential breakthroughs in energy efficiency and real-time processing but are still largely experimental compared to the more established CPUs, GPUs, and TPUs. As the technology matures, neuromorphic chips could become vital in applications requiring brain-like processing, though their general-purpose utility remains limited for now.
H. Quantum Computing
Quantum computers utilize quantum bits, or qubits, as their basic unit of information. Unlike classical bits, qubits can exist in various states at the same time due to superposition, enabling the parallel computation of a vast number of possibilities. In the context of AI and ML, quantum computing holds the promise of exponential speedup for certain tasks, such as optimization, simulation, and specific machine learning algorithms. Quantum algorithms have been proposed for applications including database search, machine learning, and cryptography. However, practical quantum computers are still in the early stages of development, facing significant challenges related to qubit stability, error correction, and scalability. Quantum computing is expected to complement classical computing rather than replace it entirely, offering advantages for tasks that require massive parallelism and probabilistic computation. While quantum computing holds great promise for advancing AI and ML, it remains a nascent technology with many technical and practical hurdles to overcome before widespread adoption [27].
I. HPC Clusters (High-Performance Computing)
HPC clusters consist of interconnected high-performance computing nodes, often equipped with CPUs, GPUs, or specialized accelerators, and are used to solve computationally intensive tasks such as AI and ML simulations, scientific research, and big data analytics. These clusters offer advantages such as high computational power, scalability, and flexibility, making them ideal for managing large-scale AI workloads. HPC clusters can be deployed in on-premises data centers or accessed via cloud services, providing researchers and organizations with the computational resources needed to solve complex problems. However, building and managing HPC clusters require expertise in system administration, parallel programming, and workload optimization. Additionally, they can be expensive to deploy and maintain, with costs associated with hardware, infrastructure, and energy consumption. Despite these challenges, HPC clusters play a crucial role in advancing AI and ML research and enabling breakthroughs in scientific discovery, engineering, and data analysis [28].
J. Cloud AI Services
Cloud AI services provide on-demand access to AI and ML resources, tools, and infrastructure through cloud platforms offered by providers. These services offer advantages such as scalability, flexibility, and ease of deployment, allowing organizations to build, train, and deploy AI models without the need for on-premises infrastructure or specialized expertise. Cloud AI services typically include a range of AI capabilities, such as pre-trained models, machine learning algorithms, and tools for data labeling, training, and inference. They also offer managed services for deploying AI models at scale, managing data pipelines, and monitoring model performance. However, using cloud AI services may entail costs associated with data storage, processing, and usage which can vary depending on factors such as data volume, model complexity, and service tier. Additionally, organizations must consider data privacy, security, and regulatory compliance, particularly when dealing with sensitive or regulated data. Despite these considerations, cloud AI services democratize access to AI and ML capabilities, enabling organizations of all sizes to leverage the power of AI for innovation, productivity, and competitive advantage [29].
K. Edge AI Devices
Edge AI devices are computing devices equipped with AI processing capabilities that enable them to perform AI inference tasks locally, at the edge of the network, without relying on continuous connectivity to a central server or cloud. These devices include smartphones, IoT devices, edge servers, and embedded systems deployed in various environments such as factories, vehicles, and smart cities. Edge AI devices offer advantages such as low latency, privacy, and resilience, making them ideal for applications that require real-time processing, data privacy, or operation in disconnected or bandwidth-constrained environments. By performing AI inference locally, edge AI devices reduce dependence on cloud services, mitigating privacy and security risks associated with transmitting sensitive data over the network. However, edge AI devices usually have limited computational resources, storage capacity, or energy constraints compared to cloud or data center servers, which can impact their performance and scalability. Additionally, deploying and managing AI models on edge devices may require specialized expertise in areas such as model optimization, deployment, and monitoring. Despite these challenges, edge AI devices are pivotal in enabling distributed AI architectures, extending AI capabilities to the edge, and unlocking new opportunities for innovation and automation in various industries and applications.
Comparative Analysis of AI Hardware Architectures
In the rapidly evolving AI hardware landscape, choosing the right processing architecture is key for optimal performance, efficiency, and scalability. Each of the various hardware types offer unique advantages and trade-offs based on AI application needs.
Block diagram of central processor core architecture [30].
A. Flexibility vs. Specialization
CPUs provide exceptional flexibility and handle a broad range of computing tasks. Their versatility is valuable for applications needing diverse instructions but often comes with reduced efficiency in highly parallel AI workloads.
GPUs excel at parallel processing, making them ideal for deep learning and simultaneous data tasks. They significantly speed up neural network training and inference. However, for non-parallel tasks, their power consumption can be a limiting factor.
TPUs are tailored for AI workloads, delivering outstanding performance in tensor operations typical of neural networks. This specialization enhances speed and energy efficiency but limits their use in non-AI tasks compared to CPUs or GPUs.
B. Power Efficiency and Deployment Context
ASICs and FPGAs offer high power efficiency and performance for specific tasks, though at the cost of flexibility. ASICs, designed for particular functions, achieve top performance-per-watt, ideal for energy-efficient data center deployments. FPGAs, while less efficient than ASICs, provide some post-manufacturing adaptability.
Edge AI hardware is built for low-power, real-time processing in constrained environments. These devices process data locally to reduce latency and bandwidth use. Their lower computational power compared to data center hardware requires careful optimization for edge deployment.
Block diagram of central processor core architecture [31]
C. Power Efficiency and Deployment Context
Quantum computing is a rapidly advancing field with the potential to achieve groundbreaking computational capabilities. By solving certain problems significantly faster than classical systems, quantum computers hold immense promise. However, issues like qubit instability and the need for effective error correction currently restrict their practical use in AI. As technology progresses, these applications are expected to become more feasible and impactful.
Block diagram of central processor core architecture [32]
D. Scalability and Cost Implications
GPUs and TPUs are essential for scalable cloud-based AI, distributing workloads across numerous processing units, crucial for training large AI models in natural language processing and computer vision.
ASICs and FPGAs offer high efficiency but come with higher initial costs due to their specialized nature. These costs are often justified in scenarios requiring large-scale deployment or specific performance targets.
By understanding the strengths and limitations of each architecture, stakeholders can make informed decisions in selecting and deploying AI hardware solutions, driving innovation and progress in AI-driven applications and systems. In the future, as hybrid chips become more common, research should focus on improving how different processing units work together on a single chip. This includes creating better ways to manage tasks and resources to boost efficiency. Quantum computing, though still developing, could transform AI by solving problems that current computers can't handle. Research should aim to develop practical quantum AI algorithms, stabilize qubits, and build scalable quantum hardware that works with existing systems. Additionally, as AI becomes more widespread, it's important to find ways to reduce the energy use of AI hardware, especially for edge devices and large data centers, without losing performance.
Conclusion
The landscape of AI hardware architectures is diverse and constantly evolving, with each type offering distinct strengths and challenges. CPUs, GPUs, and TPUs serve as foundational components, each playing a unique role depending on the workload. While CPUs provide versatility across tasks, GPUs and TPUs excel in parallel processing, making them ideal for deep learning and AI workloads. Specialized accelerators like TPUs and ASICs deliver unparalleled performance and energy efficiency for specific applications, though their proprietary nature can limit integration flexibility. In contrast, FPGAs and hybrid chips offer customization and adaptability, albeit with trade-offs in performance and complexity.
Emerging technologies such as neuromorphic computing and quantum computing hold great promise for revolutionizing AI hardware. However, these technologies face challenges related to scalability, stability, and programming, limiting their immediate practical use. Quantum computing, in particular, has the potential to address problems that current hardware struggles with, but further research is necessary to stabilize qubits, develop practical AI algorithms, and integrate quantum systems with existing infrastructure.
Ultimately, the selection and deployment of AI hardware must balance performance, efficiency, flexibility, and scalability. As hybrid chips become more common, research should focus on improving how different processing units collaborate on a single chip. Moreover, addressing energy consumption, especially for edge devices and large data centers, will be crucial as AI technologies continue to scale. By understanding the strengths and limitations of each architecture, stakeholders can make informed decisions that drive innovation and maximize the potential of AI-driven systems.
![Fig. 1. - Block diagram of central processor core architecture [30].](/mediastore/IEEE/content/media/10990332/10990369/10991015/10991015-fig-1-source-small.gif)
![Fig. 2. -
Block diagram of central processor core architecture [31]](/mediastore/IEEE/content/media/10990332/10990369/10991015/10991015-fig-2-source-small.gif)
![Fig. 3. -
Block diagram of central processor core architecture [32]](/mediastore/IEEE/content/media/10990332/10990369/10991015/10991015-fig-3-source-small.gif)