這是用戶在 2025-7-21 16:47 為 https://app.immersivetranslate.com/pdf-pro/295e72a9-82e1-4fe5-9713-23814715811f/ 保存的雙語快照頁面,由 沉浸式翻譯 提供雙語支持。了解如何保存?

COURSE UNIT (MODULE) DESCRIPTION
課程單元(單元)說明

Course unit (module) title
課程單元(單元)標題
Code  法典
Cross-cultural Negotiations
跨文化談判
Course unit (module) title Code Cross-cultural Negotiations | Course unit (module) title | Code | | :--- | :---: | | Cross-cultural Negotiations | |
Lecturer(s)  講師 Department(s) where the course unit (module) is delivered
提供課程單元(單元)的部門

協調員:博士。Ieva Žebryte 其他:
Coordinator: dr. Ieva Žebryte
Other(s):
Coordinator: dr. Ieva Žebryte Other(s):| Coordinator: dr. Ieva Žebryte | | :--- | | Other(s): |

經濟與工商管理學院 Sauletekio ave. 9, II building, LT 10222 維爾紐斯
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
Sauletekio ave. 9, II building, LT 10222 Vilnius
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Sauletekio ave. 9, II building, LT 10222 Vilnius| Faculty of Economics and Business Administration | | :--- | | Sauletekio ave. 9, II building, LT 10222 Vilnius |
Lecturer(s) Department(s) where the course unit (module) is delivered "Coordinator: dr. Ieva Žebryte Other(s):" "Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Sauletekio ave. 9, II building, LT 10222 Vilnius"| Lecturer(s) | Department(s) where the course unit (module) is delivered | | :--- | :--- | | Coordinator: dr. Ieva Žebryte <br> Other(s): | Faculty of Economics and Business Administration <br> Sauletekio ave. 9, II building, LT 10222 Vilnius |
Study cycle  學習週期 Type of the course unit (module)
課程單元(單元)的類型
First   Elective  選修課
Study cycle Type of the course unit (module) First Elective| Study cycle | Type of the course unit (module) | | :--- | :--- | | First | Elective |
Mode of delivery  交貨方式

課程單元(單元)交付的期間
Period when the course unit
(module) is delivered
Period when the course unit (module) is delivered| Period when the course unit | | :---: | | (module) is delivered |
Language(s) of instruction
教學語言
Face-to-face, on-line  面對面、在線 Spring semester  春季學期 English  英語
Mode of delivery "Period when the course unit (module) is delivered" Language(s) of instruction Face-to-face, on-line Spring semester English| Mode of delivery | Period when the course unit <br> (module) is delivered | Language(s) of instruction | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Face-to-face, on-line | Spring semester | English |
Requirements for students
對學生的要求
Prerequisites: Management, Global Marketing
先決條件:管理、全球行銷
Requirements for students Prerequisites: Management, Global Marketing| Requirements for students | | :--- | | Prerequisites: Management, Global Marketing |

課程(模組)體積(學分)
Course (module) volume
in credits
Course (module) volume in credits| Course (module) volume | | :---: | | in credits |
Total student's workload
學生的總工作量
Contact hours  聯絡時間 Self-study hours  自學時數
5 130 48 82
"Course (module) volume in credits" Total student's workload Contact hours Self-study hours 5 130 48 82| Course (module) volume <br> in credits | Total student's workload | Contact hours | Self-study hours | | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | | 5 | 130 | 48 | 82 |
Purpose of the course unit (module): programme competences to be developed
課程單元(單元)的目的:課程能力的發展
This course aims to (i) develop an understanding about processes involved in, features and management of crosscultural negotiations; (ii) develop learners’ abilities to apply this knowledge in practice; as well as (iii) practice intercultural communication skills during negotiations.
本課程旨在 (i) 了解跨文化談判所涉及的過程、特點和管理;(ii) 培養學習者在實踐中應用這些知識的能力;以及 (iii) 在談判過程中練習跨文化溝通技巧。
Learning outcomes of the course unit (module)
課程單元(單元)的學習成果
Teaching and learning methods
教學方法
Assessment methods  評估方法
Students will be able to describe the communicative aspects of the negotiation process and apply them in their analysis of case studies.
學生將能夠描述談判過程的溝通方面,並將其應用到案例研究的分析中。
Interactive lecture, discussion, case study, problem-based learning, collaborative learning, group (team) project.
互動講座、討論、案例分析、基於問題的學習、協作學習、小組(團隊)項目。
Test of open-ended and (or) closed questions, assessment of case study according to criteria, assessment of group project (negotiation plan) according to the evaluation criteria detailed in the rubric.
開放式和(或)封閉式問題的測試,根據標準評估案例研究,根據評分標準中詳述的評估標準評估小組專案(談判計劃)。
Students will be able to recognize intercultural differences and apply this understanding in the analysis of case studies.
學生將能夠認識到跨文化差異,並將這種理解應用到案例研究的分析中。
Students will be able to describe the course of a negotiation process, negotiation strategies, as well as styles and tactics of cross-cultural negotiations.
學生將能夠描述談判過程的過程、談判策略以及跨文化談判的風格和策略。
Students will be able to develop a negotiation plan and a variety of scenarios based on different negotiation strategies, styles and tactics taking into account cultural differences.
學生將能夠根據不同的談判策略、風格和戰術,考慮到文化差異,制定談判計劃和各種場景。
Students will be able to work in a team to create a joint project and present it to an audience.
學生將能夠在團隊中創建一個聯合項目並將其展示給觀眾。
Purpose of the course unit (module): programme competences to be developed This course aims to (i) develop an understanding about processes involved in, features and management of crosscultural negotiations; (ii) develop learners’ abilities to apply this knowledge in practice; as well as (iii) practice intercultural communication skills during negotiations. Learning outcomes of the course unit (module) Teaching and learning methods Assessment methods Students will be able to describe the communicative aspects of the negotiation process and apply them in their analysis of case studies. Interactive lecture, discussion, case study, problem-based learning, collaborative learning, group (team) project. Test of open-ended and (or) closed questions, assessment of case study according to criteria, assessment of group project (negotiation plan) according to the evaluation criteria detailed in the rubric. Students will be able to recognize intercultural differences and apply this understanding in the analysis of case studies. Students will be able to describe the course of a negotiation process, negotiation strategies, as well as styles and tactics of cross-cultural negotiations. Students will be able to develop a negotiation plan and a variety of scenarios based on different negotiation strategies, styles and tactics taking into account cultural differences. Students will be able to work in a team to create a joint project and present it to an audience. | Purpose of the course unit (module): programme competences to be developed | | | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | This course aims to (i) develop an understanding about processes involved in, features and management of crosscultural negotiations; (ii) develop learners’ abilities to apply this knowledge in practice; as well as (iii) practice intercultural communication skills during negotiations. | | | | Learning outcomes of the course unit (module) | Teaching and learning methods | Assessment methods | | Students will be able to describe the communicative aspects of the negotiation process and apply them in their analysis of case studies. | Interactive lecture, discussion, case study, problem-based learning, collaborative learning, group (team) project. | Test of open-ended and (or) closed questions, assessment of case study according to criteria, assessment of group project (negotiation plan) according to the evaluation criteria detailed in the rubric. | | Students will be able to recognize intercultural differences and apply this understanding in the analysis of case studies. | | | | Students will be able to describe the course of a negotiation process, negotiation strategies, as well as styles and tactics of cross-cultural negotiations. | | | | Students will be able to develop a negotiation plan and a variety of scenarios based on different negotiation strategies, styles and tactics taking into account cultural differences. | | | | Students will be able to work in a team to create a joint project and present it to an audience. | | |
Content: breakdown of the topics
內容:主題細分
Contact hours  聯絡時間 Self-study work: time and assignments
自學作業:時間和作業
Lectures  講座 Tutorials  教學課程 Seminars  研討會 Exercises  習題 Laboratory work  實驗室工作 Internship/work placement
實習/工作實習
E-learning  電子學習 Contact hours  聯絡時間 Self-study hours  自學時數 Assignments  作業
1. The concept of negotiation. Overview of the negotiation process: planning, preparation, executing, closing, post negotiation activities.
1. 談判的概念。談判過程概述:規劃、準備、執行、結束、談判後活動。
2 2 4 6 Form teams, participate in drawing up of the presentations schedule.
組成團隊,參與制定演講時間表。
2. Culture and negotiations: elements of culture and their role in negotiations. The phenomena of cross-cultural, intercultural, multicultural and intersectional relations.
2. 文化與談判:文化元素及其在談判中的作用。跨文化、跨文化、多元文化和交叉關係的現象。
2 2 6 Selection of crosscultural negotiation case study.
跨文化談判案例研究的選擇。
3. Dimensions of cultural differences, classification of cultures. Cultural differences between developed and developing countries, consolidated and emerging economies etc.
3. 文化差異的維度,文化的分類。發達國家和發展中國家、綜合經濟體和新興經濟體之間的文化差異等。
2 2 4 2 Description of the cultural characteristics relevant to the selected case study. (1)
描述與所選案例研究相關的文化特徵。(1)
4. Negotiations as a communication process: verbal and nonverbal communication. Listening in communication.
4. 談判作為一種溝通過程:口頭和非口頭溝通。在溝通中傾聽。
2 2 6 Description of the cultural characteristics relevant to the selected case study. (2 & 3)
描述與所選案例研究相關的文化特徵。(2 & 3)
5. The 7 Cs of communication and their role in Cross-cultural Negotiations. Business and management theories of negotiations.
5. 溝通的 7C 及其在跨文化談判中的作用。談判的商業和管理理論。
2 2 4 2 Creation of the communicative part of the selected case study.
創建所選案例研究的交流部分。
6. Psychology of negotiation/s: transactional and other analyses. Particularities of Business Negotiations.
6. 談判心理學:交易分析和其他分析。商務談判的特殊性。
2 2 6 Analysis of the communicative part of the selected case from an intercultural perspective
從跨文化角度分析所選案例的交際部分
7. Psychology of negotiation/s: manipulation. Reasons for manipulation. Types of manipulation. Ways to recognize and resist manipulation.
7. 談判心理學:操縱。操縱的原因。操縱類型。識別和抵制操縱的方法。
2 2 4 2 Presentation of the prepared case study
介紹準備好的案例研究
8. Midterm "check-in" (test)
8. 期中「打卡」(考試)
2 2 10 Preparation for midterm test
期中考試準備
9. Negotiation Planning: setting goals and determining positions.
9. 談判規劃:設定目標並確定立場。
2 2 4 6 Choosing a case for a negotiation plan
選擇談判計劃的案例
10. Negotiation Planning: sources of power. The concept of BATNA.
10. 談判計劃:權力的來源。BATNA 的概念。
2 2 2 Analysis of negotiation goals, wants, needs, and negotiation power
談判目標、需求、需求和談判能力分析
11. Negotiation Planning: creating a strategy. The Harvard negotiation project.
11. 談判規劃:制定策略。哈佛談判項目。
2 2 4 6 The other negotiating side: information gathering & determination needs
另一方談判:資訊收集與確定需求
12. Negotiation Planning: choice of tactics. Tactical orientation continuum. Variants of cooperative strategy (win-win) tactics. Confrontational tactics and their counter-tactics. Tactics during the different stages of negotiations.
12. 談判計劃:策略的選擇。戰術定位連續體。合作戰略(雙贏)戰術的變體。對抗策略及其反策略。談判不同階段的策略。
2 2 2 Development of negotiation scenarios based on different strategies. Choosing a negotiation strategy.
根據不同策略制定談判方案。選擇談判策略。
13. Conducting the process of live negotiation: stages and approaches.
13. 進行現場談判過程:階段和方法。
2 2 4 6 Preparation of negotiation scenarios based on different
根據不同的情況準備談判場景
Content: breakdown of the topics Contact hours Self-study work: time and assignments Lectures Tutorials Seminars Exercises Laboratory work Internship/work placement E-learning Contact hours Self-study hours Assignments 1. The concept of negotiation. Overview of the negotiation process: planning, preparation, executing, closing, post negotiation activities. 2 2 4 6 Form teams, participate in drawing up of the presentations schedule. 2. Culture and negotiations: elements of culture and their role in negotiations. The phenomena of cross-cultural, intercultural, multicultural and intersectional relations. 2 2 6 Selection of crosscultural negotiation case study. 3. Dimensions of cultural differences, classification of cultures. Cultural differences between developed and developing countries, consolidated and emerging economies etc. 2 2 4 2 Description of the cultural characteristics relevant to the selected case study. (1) 4. Negotiations as a communication process: verbal and nonverbal communication. Listening in communication. 2 2 6 Description of the cultural characteristics relevant to the selected case study. (2 & 3) 5. The 7 Cs of communication and their role in Cross-cultural Negotiations. Business and management theories of negotiations. 2 2 4 2 Creation of the communicative part of the selected case study. 6. Psychology of negotiation/s: transactional and other analyses. Particularities of Business Negotiations. 2 2 6 Analysis of the communicative part of the selected case from an intercultural perspective 7. Psychology of negotiation/s: manipulation. Reasons for manipulation. Types of manipulation. Ways to recognize and resist manipulation. 2 2 4 2 Presentation of the prepared case study 8. Midterm "check-in" (test) 2 2 10 Preparation for midterm test 9. Negotiation Planning: setting goals and determining positions. 2 2 4 6 Choosing a case for a negotiation plan 10. Negotiation Planning: sources of power. The concept of BATNA. 2 2 2 Analysis of negotiation goals, wants, needs, and negotiation power 11. Negotiation Planning: creating a strategy. The Harvard negotiation project. 2 2 4 6 The other negotiating side: information gathering & determination needs 12. Negotiation Planning: choice of tactics. Tactical orientation continuum. Variants of cooperative strategy (win-win) tactics. Confrontational tactics and their counter-tactics. Tactics during the different stages of negotiations. 2 2 2 Development of negotiation scenarios based on different strategies. Choosing a negotiation strategy. 13. Conducting the process of live negotiation: stages and approaches. 2 2 4 6 Preparation of negotiation scenarios based on different| Content: breakdown of the topics | Contact hours | | | | | | | | Self-study work: time and assignments | | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Lectures | Tutorials | Seminars | Exercises | Laboratory work | Internship/work placement | E-learning | Contact hours | Self-study hours | Assignments | | 1. The concept of negotiation. Overview of the negotiation process: planning, preparation, executing, closing, post negotiation activities. | 2 | | 2 | | | | | 4 | 6 | Form teams, participate in drawing up of the presentations schedule. | | 2. Culture and negotiations: elements of culture and their role in negotiations. The phenomena of cross-cultural, intercultural, multicultural and intersectional relations. | 2 | | | | | | | 2 | 6 | Selection of crosscultural negotiation case study. | | 3. Dimensions of cultural differences, classification of cultures. Cultural differences between developed and developing countries, consolidated and emerging economies etc. | 2 | | 2 | | | | | 4 | 2 | Description of the cultural characteristics relevant to the selected case study. (1) | | 4. Negotiations as a communication process: verbal and nonverbal communication. Listening in communication. | 2 | | | | | | | 2 | 6 | Description of the cultural characteristics relevant to the selected case study. (2 & 3) | | 5. The 7 Cs of communication and their role in Cross-cultural Negotiations. Business and management theories of negotiations. | 2 | | 2 | | | | | 4 | 2 | Creation of the communicative part of the selected case study. | | 6. Psychology of negotiation/s: transactional and other analyses. Particularities of Business Negotiations. | 2 | | | | | | | 2 | 6 | Analysis of the communicative part of the selected case from an intercultural perspective | | 7. Psychology of negotiation/s: manipulation. Reasons for manipulation. Types of manipulation. Ways to recognize and resist manipulation. | 2 | | 2 | | | | | 4 | 2 | Presentation of the prepared case study | | 8. Midterm "check-in" (test) | 2 | | | | | | | 2 | 10 | Preparation for midterm test | | 9. Negotiation Planning: setting goals and determining positions. | 2 | | 2 | | | | | 4 | 6 | Choosing a case for a negotiation plan | | 10. Negotiation Planning: sources of power. The concept of BATNA. | 2 | | | | | | | 2 | 2 | Analysis of negotiation goals, wants, needs, and negotiation power | | 11. Negotiation Planning: creating a strategy. The Harvard negotiation project. | 2 | | 2 | | | | | 4 | 6 | The other negotiating side: information gathering & determination needs | | 12. Negotiation Planning: choice of tactics. Tactical orientation continuum. Variants of cooperative strategy (win-win) tactics. Confrontational tactics and their counter-tactics. Tactics during the different stages of negotiations. | 2 | | | | | | | 2 | 2 | Development of negotiation scenarios based on different strategies. Choosing a negotiation strategy. | | 13. Conducting the process of live negotiation: stages and approaches. | 2 | | 2 | | | | | 4 | 6 | Preparation of negotiation scenarios based on different |
negotiation styles. Choice of a style.
談判風格。風格的選擇。
14. Closing negotiation/s. Decisionmaking. Termination of negotiations and withdrawal. Evaluation of negotiations.
14. 結束談判。終止談判和退出。談判評估。
2 2 2 Preparation of negotiation scenarios based on different tactics. Choice of tactics.
根據不同的策略準備談判場景。策略的選擇。
15. Approval and implementation of negotiation agreements.
十五、協約之核准及執行。
2 2 4 6 Preparation of negotiation close and evaluation of negotiation.
準備談判結束和評估談判。
16. Negotiating as a team. Factors of team effectiveness. Team composition and processes.
16. 團隊談判。團隊效率的因素。團隊組成和流程。
2 2 2 Final presentation of the negotiation plan.
談判計劃的最終介紹。
Final test  最終測試 10 Preparation for the final test.
準備期末考試。
Total   32 16 48 82
negotiation styles. Choice of a style. 14. Closing negotiation/s. Decisionmaking. Termination of negotiations and withdrawal. Evaluation of negotiations. 2 2 2 Preparation of negotiation scenarios based on different tactics. Choice of tactics. 15. Approval and implementation of negotiation agreements. 2 2 4 6 Preparation of negotiation close and evaluation of negotiation. 16. Negotiating as a team. Factors of team effectiveness. Team composition and processes. 2 2 2 Final presentation of the negotiation plan. Final test 10 Preparation for the final test. Total 32 16 48 82 | | | | | | | | | | negotiation styles. Choice of a style. | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 14. Closing negotiation/s. Decisionmaking. Termination of negotiations and withdrawal. Evaluation of negotiations. | 2 | | | | | | 2 | 2 | Preparation of negotiation scenarios based on different tactics. Choice of tactics. | | 15. Approval and implementation of negotiation agreements. | 2 | 2 | | | | | 4 | 6 | Preparation of negotiation close and evaluation of negotiation. | | 16. Negotiating as a team. Factors of team effectiveness. Team composition and processes. | 2 | | | | | | 2 | 2 | Final presentation of the negotiation plan. | | Final test | | | | | | | | 10 | Preparation for the final test. | | Total | 32 | 16 | | | | | 48 | 82 | |
Assessment strategy  評估策略 Weight, %  重量,% Deadline  截止日期 Assessment criteria  評核準則
Case study (individual work)
案例研究(個人工作)
20% According to seminars schedule published on Moodle
根據 Moodle 上發布的研討會時間表

學生必須完成一個應用講座材料和科學文獻進行跨文化談判分析的案例(作業的詳細解釋發表在 Moodle 上)。完成的分析必須上傳到 Moodle VMA (word.doc),並根據時間表在研討會期間在課堂 (.ppt) 中展示和答辯。沒有演示的案例研究不會被評估(即輸入的等級將為 0)。評估標準(根據布魯姆分類法):1)案例描述的完整性(事實描述、理解)2)概念和理論應用(應用、分析)的正確性 3)概括邏輯(綜合); 4) 在展示作品(評估)時推理和回答問題的清晰度和邏輯性。完全符合所有規定標準的作品將獲得 10 分的評價。完全符合第一、第二標準且僅部分符合第三、第四標準的作品,評分為 9 分。完全符合第一、第二標準且僅部分符合第三、第四標準的作品,評分為 8 分。完全符合第一、第二標準,但未完全符合第三、第四標準的作品,評分為 7 分。完全符合第一個標準、部分滿足第二個標準、完全不符合第三、第四個標準的作品,評分為 6 分。至少部分滿足第一和第二標準且不完全符合第三和第四標準的作品以 5 分評價。僅部分符合第一個標準或不符合任何標準的作品以 1-4 分進行評估。
Students must complete a case of intercultural negotiations analysis applying lecture materials and scientific literature (detailed explanation of the assignment is published in Moodle). The completed analysis must be uploaded to Moodle VMA (word.doc), presented and defended in the class (.ppt) during seminars according to the schedule. The case studies without presentation are not evaluated (that is, the grade entered will be 0 ). Assessment criteria (according to Bloom's taxonomy):
1) completeness of the case description (description of facts, understanding)
2) correctness of concepts and theory application (application, analysis)
3) logic of generalizations (synthesis);
4) clarity and logic of reasoning and answering questions when presenting the work (evaluation).
Works that fully meet all the specified criteria are evaluated with 10 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria and only partially meet the third or fourth criteria are evaluated with 9 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria and only partially meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 8 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria, but do not fully meet the third or fourth criteria, are evaluated with 7 points. Works that fully meet the first criterion, partially meet the second criterion, and completely do not meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 6 points. Works that at least partially meet the first and second criteria and do not fully meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 5 points. Works that only partially meet the first criterion or do not meet any criterion are evaluated with 1-4 points.
Students must complete a case of intercultural negotiations analysis applying lecture materials and scientific literature (detailed explanation of the assignment is published in Moodle). The completed analysis must be uploaded to Moodle VMA (word.doc), presented and defended in the class (.ppt) during seminars according to the schedule. The case studies without presentation are not evaluated (that is, the grade entered will be 0 ). Assessment criteria (according to Bloom's taxonomy): 1) completeness of the case description (description of facts, understanding) 2) correctness of concepts and theory application (application, analysis) 3) logic of generalizations (synthesis); 4) clarity and logic of reasoning and answering questions when presenting the work (evaluation). Works that fully meet all the specified criteria are evaluated with 10 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria and only partially meet the third or fourth criteria are evaluated with 9 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria and only partially meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 8 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria, but do not fully meet the third or fourth criteria, are evaluated with 7 points. Works that fully meet the first criterion, partially meet the second criterion, and completely do not meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 6 points. Works that at least partially meet the first and second criteria and do not fully meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 5 points. Works that only partially meet the first criterion or do not meet any criterion are evaluated with 1-4 points.| Students must complete a case of intercultural negotiations analysis applying lecture materials and scientific literature (detailed explanation of the assignment is published in Moodle). The completed analysis must be uploaded to Moodle VMA (word.doc), presented and defended in the class (.ppt) during seminars according to the schedule. The case studies without presentation are not evaluated (that is, the grade entered will be 0 ). Assessment criteria (according to Bloom's taxonomy): | | :--- | | 1) completeness of the case description (description of facts, understanding) | | 2) correctness of concepts and theory application (application, analysis) | | 3) logic of generalizations (synthesis); | | 4) clarity and logic of reasoning and answering questions when presenting the work (evaluation). | | Works that fully meet all the specified criteria are evaluated with 10 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria and only partially meet the third or fourth criteria are evaluated with 9 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria and only partially meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 8 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria, but do not fully meet the third or fourth criteria, are evaluated with 7 points. Works that fully meet the first criterion, partially meet the second criterion, and completely do not meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 6 points. Works that at least partially meet the first and second criteria and do not fully meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 5 points. Works that only partially meet the first criterion or do not meet any criterion are evaluated with 1-4 points. |
Negotiation plan (group work)
談判計劃(小組工作)
20% According to seminars schedule published on Moodle
根據 Moodle 上發布的研討會時間表

學生必須準備一份適合特定案例的談判計劃(作業的詳細解釋發佈在 Moodle 上)。準備好的計劃必須上傳到 Moodle VMA (word.doc),並根據時間表在研討會期間在課堂 (.ppt) 中進行演示和答辯。未評估未呈現的已準備計劃 (0)。 評估標準:1)計劃的一致性——描述的事實沒有矛盾(理解); 2)計劃的完整性——包括所有結構部分,它們以全面的方式描述(理論的應用);
Students must prepare a negotiation plan adapted to a specific case (detailed explanation of the assignment is published in Moodle). The prepared plan must be uploaded to Moodle VMA (word.doc), presented and defended in the class (.ppt) during seminars according to the schedule. The prepared plan without presentation is not evaluated (0).
Assessment criteria:
1) consistency of the plan - facts described without contradiction (understanding);
2) completeness of the plan - all structural parts are included, they are described in a comprehensive manner (application of a theory);
Students must prepare a negotiation plan adapted to a specific case (detailed explanation of the assignment is published in Moodle). The prepared plan must be uploaded to Moodle VMA (word.doc), presented and defended in the class (.ppt) during seminars according to the schedule. The prepared plan without presentation is not evaluated (0). Assessment criteria: 1) consistency of the plan - facts described without contradiction (understanding); 2) completeness of the plan - all structural parts are included, they are described in a comprehensive manner (application of a theory);| Students must prepare a negotiation plan adapted to a specific case (detailed explanation of the assignment is published in Moodle). The prepared plan must be uploaded to Moodle VMA (word.doc), presented and defended in the class (.ppt) during seminars according to the schedule. The prepared plan without presentation is not evaluated (0). | | :--- | | Assessment criteria: | | 1) consistency of the plan - facts described without contradiction (understanding); | | 2) completeness of the plan - all structural parts are included, they are described in a comprehensive manner (application of a theory); |
Assessment strategy Weight, % Deadline Assessment criteria Case study (individual work) 20% According to seminars schedule published on Moodle "Students must complete a case of intercultural negotiations analysis applying lecture materials and scientific literature (detailed explanation of the assignment is published in Moodle). The completed analysis must be uploaded to Moodle VMA (word.doc), presented and defended in the class (.ppt) during seminars according to the schedule. The case studies without presentation are not evaluated (that is, the grade entered will be 0 ). Assessment criteria (according to Bloom's taxonomy): 1) completeness of the case description (description of facts, understanding) 2) correctness of concepts and theory application (application, analysis) 3) logic of generalizations (synthesis); 4) clarity and logic of reasoning and answering questions when presenting the work (evaluation). Works that fully meet all the specified criteria are evaluated with 10 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria and only partially meet the third or fourth criteria are evaluated with 9 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria and only partially meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 8 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria, but do not fully meet the third or fourth criteria, are evaluated with 7 points. Works that fully meet the first criterion, partially meet the second criterion, and completely do not meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 6 points. Works that at least partially meet the first and second criteria and do not fully meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 5 points. Works that only partially meet the first criterion or do not meet any criterion are evaluated with 1-4 points." Negotiation plan (group work) 20% According to seminars schedule published on Moodle "Students must prepare a negotiation plan adapted to a specific case (detailed explanation of the assignment is published in Moodle). The prepared plan must be uploaded to Moodle VMA (word.doc), presented and defended in the class (.ppt) during seminars according to the schedule. The prepared plan without presentation is not evaluated (0). Assessment criteria: 1) consistency of the plan - facts described without contradiction (understanding); 2) completeness of the plan - all structural parts are included, they are described in a comprehensive manner (application of a theory);"| Assessment strategy | Weight, % | Deadline | Assessment criteria | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Case study (individual work) | 20% | According to seminars schedule published on Moodle | Students must complete a case of intercultural negotiations analysis applying lecture materials and scientific literature (detailed explanation of the assignment is published in Moodle). The completed analysis must be uploaded to Moodle VMA (word.doc), presented and defended in the class (.ppt) during seminars according to the schedule. The case studies without presentation are not evaluated (that is, the grade entered will be 0 ). Assessment criteria (according to Bloom's taxonomy): <br> 1) completeness of the case description (description of facts, understanding) <br> 2) correctness of concepts and theory application (application, analysis) <br> 3) logic of generalizations (synthesis); <br> 4) clarity and logic of reasoning and answering questions when presenting the work (evaluation). <br> Works that fully meet all the specified criteria are evaluated with 10 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria and only partially meet the third or fourth criteria are evaluated with 9 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria and only partially meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 8 points. Works that fully meet the first and second criteria, but do not fully meet the third or fourth criteria, are evaluated with 7 points. Works that fully meet the first criterion, partially meet the second criterion, and completely do not meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 6 points. Works that at least partially meet the first and second criteria and do not fully meet the third and fourth criteria are evaluated with 5 points. Works that only partially meet the first criterion or do not meet any criterion are evaluated with 1-4 points. | | Negotiation plan (group work) | 20% | According to seminars schedule published on Moodle | Students must prepare a negotiation plan adapted to a specific case (detailed explanation of the assignment is published in Moodle). The prepared plan must be uploaded to Moodle VMA (word.doc), presented and defended in the class (.ppt) during seminars according to the schedule. The prepared plan without presentation is not evaluated (0). <br> Assessment criteria: <br> 1) consistency of the plan - facts described without contradiction (understanding); <br> 2) completeness of the plan - all structural parts are included, they are described in a comprehensive manner (application of a theory); |