这是用户在 2025-7-13 10:07 为 https://app.immersivetranslate.com/html/ 保存的双语快照页面,由 沉浸式翻译 提供双语支持。了解如何保存?

1. Osteoporos Int. 2024 Aug;35(8):1469-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07138-w. Epub
1. 骨质疏松症国际 2024 年 8 月;35(8):1469-1475.doi:10.1007/s00198-024-07138-w.电子版

2024 May 27.
2024 年 5 月 27 日。


Total knee arthroplasty and periprosthetic distal femoral fracture: looking
全膝关节置换术和假体周围股骨远端骨折:观察

beyond the osteoporosis to previous osteoporotic fracture.
超越骨质疏松症到既往骨质疏松性骨折。


Park YB(1), Kim M(2), Nam HC(3), Jeon JW(4), Ha CW(5)(6).
Park YB(1), Kim M(2), Nam HC(3), Jeon JW(4), Ha CW(5)(6).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital,
(1)中央大学光明医院骨外科

Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 110, Deokan-ro, Gwangmyeong-si,
中央大学医学院, 110, Deokan-ro, Gwangmeong-si,

Gyeonggi-do, 14353, Republic of Korea. whybe1122@gmail.com.
京畿道,14353,大韩民国。whybe1122@gmail.com。

(2)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keunhim Hospital, 246, Sincheon-daero,
(2)Keunhim 医院骨科, 246, Sincheon-daero,

Busanjin-gu, Busan, 47192, Republic of Korea.
釜山市釜山区 47192,大韩民国。

(3)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital,
(3)中央大学光明医院骨外科

Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 110, Deokan-ro, Gwangmyeong-si,
中央大学医学院, 110, Deokan-ro, Gwangmeong-si,

Gyeonggi-do, 14353, Republic of Korea.
京畿道,14353,大韩民国。

(4)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang
(4)中央大学医院骨外科

University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 06973,
大学医学院, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, 首尔, 06973,

Republic of Korea.
大韩民国。

(5)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan
(5)Sungkyunkwan 三星医疗中心骨外科

University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic
大学医学院, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic

of Korea.
韩国。

(6)Ha's Orthopedic Hospital, 518, Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of
(6)Ha's Orthopedic Hospital, 518, Gangnam-daero, 江南区, 首尔, Republic of

Korea.
韩国。


Osteoporosis increases the risk of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after
骨质疏松症会增加 10 岁以下股骨远端假体周围骨折的风险

TKA, especially in patients with a history of osteoporotic fractures. Therefore,
TKA,尤其是有骨质疏松性骨折病史的患者。因此

careful assessment and proper treatment of osteoporosis need and the importance
仔细评估和适当治疗骨质疏松症的必要性和重要性

of taking osteoporotic medication needs to be recognized by the patients
服用骨质疏松药物需要得到患者的认可

following primary TKA.
在初次 TKA 之后。

PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is a risk factor for fractures, including those of the
目的: 骨质疏松症是骨折的危险因素,包括

hip, vertebrae, and distal radius; however, the association between osteoporosis
髋部、椎骨和桡骨远端;然而,骨质疏松症

and periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 后假体周围骨折未

much investigated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association of the
进行了大量调查。因此,我们旨在调查

presence of systemic osteoporosis with periprosthetic fractures after TKA.
TKA 后存在全身性骨质疏松症伴假体周围骨折。

METHODS: This study included 34 patients with periprosthetic fractures following
方法: 本研究包括 34 例以下假体周围骨折患者

primary TKA and 106 controls matched for age and sex. Bone mineral density was
主要 TKA 和 106 个对照与年龄和性别相匹配。骨密度

evaluated at the femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine using dual X-ray
使用双 X 线检查在股骨颈、全髋关节和腰椎进行评估

absorptiometry. Medical records were reviewed for age; sex; body mass index;
吸收测定法。审查医疗记录的年龄;性;体重指数;

smoking; rheumatoid arthritis, endocrine diseases, and cardiovascular diseases;
吸烟;类风湿性关节炎、内分泌疾病和心血管疾病;

history of glucocorticoid use; medication for osteoporosis; and history of
糖皮质激素使用史;治疗骨质疏松症的药物;和历史

previous osteoporotic fracture. In addition, anterior femoral notching after TKA
既往骨质疏松性骨折。此外,TKA 后股骨前切迹

was evaluated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were
进行了评估。单因素和多因素 logistic 回归分析

used to determine factors associated with periprosthetic fracture.
用于确定与假体周围骨折相关的因素。

RESULTS: The prevalence of osteoporosis in the fracture group was higher than
结果: 骨折组骨质疏松症患病率高于

that in the control group (61.8% vs. 40.6%, p=0.045). The rate of medication for
对照组 (61.8% vs. 40.6%,p=0.045)。用药率

osteoporosis was significantly low in the fracture group (47.6 % vs 76.7%,
骨折组的骨质疏松症显著降低 (47.6 % vs 76.7%,

p=0.026). History of previous osteoporotic fracture (odds ratio [OR], 9.1;
p=0.026)。既往骨质疏松性骨折史 (比值比 [OR],9.1;

p=0.015) and osteoporosis (OR, 3.6; p=0.013) were significant risk factors for
p=0.015)和骨质疏松症 (OR, 3.6;p=0.013) 是

periprosthetic fractures after TKA. Medication for osteoporosis could decrease
TKA 后假体周围骨折。治疗骨质疏松症的药物可能会减少

the risk of periprosthetic fracture (OR 0.3; p=0.020).
假体周围骨折的风险 (OR 0.3;p=0.020)。

CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for periprosthetic distal
结论: 骨质疏松症是假体周围远端的主要危险因素

femoral fractures after TKA. Therefore, careful assessment and proper treatment
TKA 后股骨骨折。因此,仔细评估和适当治疗

of osteoporosis need and the importance of taking osteoporotic medication needs
骨质疏松症的需求和服用骨质疏松症药物的重要性的需求

to be recognized to the patients following primary TKA, especially in patients
被原发性 TKA 后的患者识别,尤其是

with a history of osteoporotic fracture.
有骨质疏松性骨折病史。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level III.
证据级别: 预后研究,III 级。


© 2024. International Osteoporosis Foundation and Bone Health and Osteoporosis
© 2024 年。国际骨质疏松症基金会和骨骼健康与骨质疏松症

Foundation.
基础。


DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07138-w
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07138-w

PMID: 38801524 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:38801524 [MEDLINE 索引]



2. Orthop Surg. 2015 Nov;7(4):297-305. doi: 10.1111/os.12199.
2. 骨科外科 2015 年 11 月;7(4):297-305.doi:10.1111/os.12199。


Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fracture after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic
全膝关节置换术后假体周围股骨远端骨折:一种系统性

Review.
回顾。


Ebraheim NA(1), Kelley LH(1), Liu X(1), Thomas IS(1), Steiner RB(1), Liu J(1).
Ebraheim NA(1), Kelley LH(1), Liu X(1), Thomas IS(1), Steiner RB(1), Liu J(1).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center,
(1)托莱多大学医学中心骨科外科,

Toledo, Ohio, USA.
美国俄亥俄州托莱多。


This study was designed to itemize and analyze the classification of fracture
本研究旨在逐项列出和分析骨折的分类

types and their corresponding outcomes in an attempt to provide a better
类型及其相应的结果,以尝试提供更好的

understanding of the current treatment methods. Two PubMed searches were
了解当前的治疗方法。两项 PubMed 检索是

performed using the words "periprosthetic distal femur fracture" and
使用“股骨假体远端骨折”一词进行,并且

"periprosthetic supracondylar femur fracture" in studies that were published in
“假体周围髁上骨折”发表在

the previous 10 years (2004-2014). Data from 41 articlesthat met the general
前 10 年(2004-2014 年)。来自 41 篇符合一般

inclusion criteria, were collected and categorized into fracture type and
纳入标准,被收集并分为骨折类型和

treatment method groupings. Healing outcome and complications were the two
治疗方法分组。愈合结果和并发症是两个

parameters used to analyze the data. Treatment techniques were grouped in the
参数。治疗技术分为

following categories: locking plate, non-locking plate, intramedullary nail/rod,
以下类别: 锁定钢板, 非锁定钢板, 髓内钉/棒,

screw, blade plate, cerclage wires, allograft, external fixation, revision
螺钉、刀片板、环扎丝、同种异体移植物、外固定、翻修

arthroplasty, non-operative, and other. Classification systems by Lewis and
关节置换术、非手术和其他。Lewis 和 的分类系统

Rorabeck, the Association for Osteosynthesis/Orthopedic Trauma Association
Rorabeck,接骨术协会/骨科创伤协会

(AO/OTA), Su et al., Neer et al., Kim et al., Backstein et al., and the Société
(AO/OTA)、Su 等人、Neer 等人、Kim 等人、Backstein 等人和学会

Française de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique were reported. In total
报道了法国骨科和创伤外科学会。总计

448 fractures were identified, of which Rorabeck type II was the most common
确定了 448 例骨折,其中 Rorabeck II 型是最常见的

fracture studied. The two most successful treatment options for periprosthetic
研究骨折。假体周围治疗的两种最成功选择

distal femur fractures were locking plate (87%) and intramedullary nail/rod
股骨远端骨折为锁定钢板 (87%) 和髓内钉/棒

(84%). The most frequent complications associated with periprosthetic distal
(84%).与远端假体周围相关的最常见并发症

femur fractures included non/mal/delayed union and the need for revision.
股骨骨折包括非/MAL/延迟愈合和需要翻修。

Locking plates used to treat Rorabeck type II fractures had a complication rate
用于治疗 Rorabeck II 型骨折的锁定钢板的并发症发生率

of 35% and those treated with intramedullary nailing had a higher complication
35% 的患者,髓内钉治疗的患者并发症更高

rate of 53%. In conclusion, the most frequent type of periprosthetic distal
率为 53%。总之,最常见的假体周围远端类型

femur fracture after total knee arthroplasty was Rorabeck type II. The most
全膝关节置换术后股骨骨折为 Rorabeck II 型。最

common treatments for these types of fractures are locked plating and
这些类型骨折的常见治疗方法是锁定钢板和

intramedullary nailing, with similar healing rates of 87% and 84%, respectively.
髓内钉,愈合率相似,分别为 87% 和 84%。

However, the complication rate for locked plating was lower than for
然而,锁定电镀的并发症发生率低于

intramedullary nailing.
髓内钉。


© 2015 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
© 2015 中华医学会骨科学会和 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.


DOI: 10.1111/os.12199
DOI: 10.1111/os.12199

PMCID: PMC6583744
PMCID:PMC6583744

PMID: 26790831 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:26790831 [MEDLINE 索引]



3. J Orthop Trauma. 2022 Mar 1;36(3):e92-e97. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002236.
3. J 骨科创伤。2022 年 3 月 1 日;36(3):e92-e97。doi: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000002236.


Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femoral Fractures Above a Total Knee Replacement:
全膝关节置换术上方的假体髁上股骨骨折:

An Updated Compatibility and Technique Guide for Fixation With a Retrograde
更新的逆行固定兼容性和技术指南

Intramedullary Nail.
髓内钉。


Gerow DE(1), Ross HL(1), Bodrogi A(2), Johnson KJ(3), Endres TJ(3).
Gerow DE(1), Ross HL(1), Bodrogi A(2), Johnson KJ(3), Endres TJ(3).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Metro Health/University of Michigan Health, Wyoming, MI.
(1)Metro Health/密歇根大学健康中心,密歇根州怀俄明州。

(2)OrthoIndy, Indianapolis, IN; and.
(2)印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯的 OrthoIndy;和。

(3)Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI.
(3)密歇根州大急流城密歇根骨科协会。


BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have described retrograde nailing as a treatment of
背景: 多项研究将逆行钉描述为

periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures (OTA/AO type 33A-C) above total
假体髁上股骨骨折(OTA/AO 型 33A-C)以上

knee replacements (TKRs). It is often difficult to discern which TKRs will be
膝关节置换术 (TKR)。通常很难辨别哪些 TKR 将是

compatible with intramedullary nailing because the femoral component design and
与髓内钉兼容,因为股骨组件设计和

intercondylar distance is highly variable among total knee designs. The goal of
髁间距离在全膝关节设计中差异很大。目标

our study is 3-fold: (1) Review and update previous work of intercondylar
我们的研究分为 3 个方面:(1) 回顾和更新 intercondiar 的先前工作

distances of all currently available prostheses in the United States. (2) Review
美国目前所有可用假肢的距离。(2) 评论

retrograde nails currently on the market and associated driving end to nail
目前市场上的逆行钉子和相关的钉子驱动端

shaft diameter mismatch and opening reamer sizing. (3) Review technical tricks
轴径不匹配和开口铰刀尺寸。(3) 回顾技术技巧

for executing a retrograde femoral nail for the treatment of periprosthetic
用于执行逆行股骨钉以治疗假体周围

supracondylar femur fractures.
股骨髁上骨折。

METHODS: Data for the intercondylar distance of the femoral components, diameter
方法:股骨组件的髁间距离、直径的数据

of retrograde nails and reamers, and notch compatibility were gathered.
收集了逆行钉子和铰刀,以及缺口兼容性。

RESULTS: The results were compiled and recorded. A "technical tricks" section
结果: 对结果进行编译和记录。“技术技巧”部分

was included that highlights reduction and fixation techniques.
包括强调复位和固定技术。

CONCLUSIONS: This update further empowers surgeons to use all the tools
结论:此更新进一步使外科医生能够使用所有工具

available when treating periprosthetic femur fractures and allows efficient
可用于治疗股骨假体周围骨折,并允许高效的

identification of the compatibility of different TKR designs with various
识别不同 TKR 设计与各种

intramedullary nails.
髓内钉。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a
证据级别:治疗水平 V。有关以下内容,请参阅作者说明

complete description of levels of evidence.
证据级别的完整描述。


Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002236
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000002236

PMID: 34270521 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:34270521 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: One author, K. J. Johnson, is a paid consultant
利益冲突声明:作者 K. J. Johnson 是一名付费顾问

for DePuy for work on implants not discussed in this paper and receives support
为 DePuy 提供本文未讨论的植入物工作,并得到支持

for research on implants not discussed in this paper. He is also a committee
对于本文未讨论的植入物的研究。他也是一个委员会

member for MARCQI (Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality
MARCQI(密歇根关节置换术登记处协作质量)成员

Initiative) database. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest.
倡议)数据库。其余作者报告没有利益冲突。



4. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Feb;33(2):e64-e68. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001332.
4. J 骨科创伤。2019 年 2 月;33(2):e64-e68。doi: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000001332.


Nail Plate Combination Technique for Native and Periprosthetic Distal Femur
自体和假体周围股骨远端的钉板组合技术

Fractures.
骨折。


Liporace FA(1), Yoon RS.
Liporace FA(1),Yoon RS。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Trauma & Complex
(1)骨科外科部门,骨科创伤与复杂部门

Adult Reconstruction, the Orthopedic Institute, Jersey City Medical

Center-RWJBarnabas Health, Jersey City, NJ.
Center-RWJBarnabas Health,新泽西州泽西城。


In the elderly, low-energy distal femur fractures (native or periprosthetic) can
在老年人中,低能量股骨远端骨折(自体或假体周围)可以

be devastating injuries, carrying high rates of morbidity and mortality,
是毁灭性的伤害,发病率和死亡率高,

comparable with the hip fracture population. Poor, osteoporotic bone quality
与髋部骨折人群相当。骨质疏松性骨质差

facilitates fracture in a vulnerable anatomical region, and as a result,
促进脆弱解剖区域的骨折,因此,

operative fixation can be challenging. With goals of early mobilization to
手术固定可能具有挑战性。以早期动员为目标

reduce subsequent complication risk, using the nail plate combination technique
使用指甲板组合技术降低后续并发症风险

can offer stable, balanced fixation allowing for immediate weight bearing and
可以提供稳定、平衡的固定,允许立即负重和

early mobilization. We outline the rationale, technical steps, and early
早期动员。我们概述了基本原理、技术步骤和早期

clinical outcomes after nail plate combination in the treatment of osteoporotic
钢板联合治疗骨质疏松症后的临床结局

distal femur (native or periprosthetic) fractures.
股骨远端(自体或假体周围)骨折。


DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001332
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000001332

PMID: 30277982 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:30277982 [MEDLINE 索引]



5. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Sep;33 Suppl 6:S33-S35. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001566.
5. J 骨科创伤。2019 年 9 月;33 增刊 6:S33-S35。doi: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000001566.


Role of Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures Above a Total
股骨远端置换术对全裂缝以上假体周围骨折的作用

Knee Arthroplasty: When and How?
膝关节置换术:何时以及如何进行?


Haidukewych GJ(1).
海杜克维奇 GJ(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Orlando Health Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, FL.
(1)奥兰多健康骨科研究所,佛罗里达州奥兰多。


With increasing incidence of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a concurrent rise in
随着全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 发病率的增加,同时

periprosthetic fractures is also expected. Although many periprosthetic
假体周围骨折也是预期的。虽然许多 假体周围

fractures about a TKA can be fixed through locked plating, retrograde
TKA 左右的骨折可以通过锁定镀层、逆行固定

intramedullary nailing, or both, some fracture patterns combined with poor bone
髓内钉,或两者兼而有之,一些骨折类型合并骨质差

stock and/or osteolysis can offer a loose femoral component requiring TKA
原液和/或骨质溶解可提供松散的股骨成分,需要 TKA

revision. TKA revision in the setting of periprosthetic fracture can be
校订。假体周围骨折情况下的 TKA 翻修可以是

challenging and, often, nearly impossible as fractures that extend proximally
具有挑战性,而且通常几乎不可能,因为骨折向近端延伸

may not be amenable to standard revision components. Distal femoral replacement
可能不适合 Standard Revision 组件。股骨远端置换术

may offer a more efficient, facile approach to treating periprosthetic fractures
可能为治疗假体周围骨折提供更有效、更简单的方法

about a loose TKA component. Here, the role of distal femoral replacement is
关于松散的 TKA 组件。在这里,股骨远端置换术的作用是

reviewed, offering indications, salient technical points, and tips to avoid
已审查,提供指示、突出的技术要点和要避免的提示

pitfalls while allowing for immediate, reliable weight bearing in this
陷阱,同时允许立即、可靠的负重

challenging patient population.
具有挑战性的患者群体。


DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001566
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000001566

PMID: 31404044 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:31404044 [MEDLINE 索引]



6. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Jun 20;14(2):e23.00018. doi:
6. JBJS Essent 外科技术 2024 年 6 月 20 日;14(2):e23.00018。doi:

10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00018. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
10.2106/JBJS。ST.23.00018. eCollection 2024 年 4 月至 6 月。


Dual Plating of Distal Femoral Fractures.
股骨远端骨折的双重钢板。


Thorne TJ(1), Nelson CT(1), Lisitano LSJ(1), Higgins TF(1), Rothberg DL(1),
索恩 TJ(1), 尼尔森 CT(1), 利西塔诺 LSJ(1), 希金斯 TF(1), 罗斯伯格 DL(1),

Haller JM(1), Marchand LS(1).
哈勒 JM(1),马尔尚 LS(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
(1)犹他州盐湖城犹他大学骨科系。


BACKGROUND: Dual plating of the distal femur is indicated for the treatment of
背景: 股骨远端双钢板适用于治疗

complex intra-articular fractures, supracondylar femoral fractures, low
复杂的关节内骨折、髁上股骨骨折、低位

periprosthetic fractures, and nonunions. The aim of this procedure is anatomical
假体周围骨折和骨不连。该程序的目的是解剖学

alignment of the articular surface, restoration of the articular block, and
关节面对齐,关节阻滞的修复,以及

prevention of varus collapse.
预防内翻塌陷。

DESCRIPTION: Following preoperative planning, the patient is positioned supine
描述: 根据术前计划,患者仰卧位

with the knee flexed at 30°. The lateral incision is made first, with a
膝盖弯曲 30°。首先做横向切口,用

mid-lateral incision that is in line with the femoral shaft. If intra-articular
与股骨干成一直线的中外侧切口。如果关节内

work is needed this incision can be extended by curving anteriorly over the
需要做功,这个切口可以通过在

lateral femoral condyle. Next, the iliotibial band is transected in line with
股骨外侧髁。接下来,将髂胫束沿

its fibers. The vastus lateralis fascia is incised and elevated off the septum,
它的纤维。股外侧筋膜被切开并从隔膜外抬高,

working distal to proximal. Care should be taken to maintain hemostasis when
工作远端到近端。当

encountering femoral artery perforating vessels. Once there is adequate
遇到股动脉穿孔血管。一旦有足够的

exposure, several reduction aids can be utilized, including a bump under the
暴露,可以使用几种复位辅助工具,包括

knee, Schanz pins, Kirschner wires, and reduction clamps. A lateral precontoured
拐点、Schanz 销、Kirschner 线和变径夹。A 侧向预轮廓

plate is placed submuscularly, and the most proximal holes are filled
将钢板置于肌下放置,并填充最近端的孔

percutaneously. The medial incision begins distally at the adductor tubercle and
经皮。内侧切口从远端的内收肌结节开始,

is a straight incision made proximally in line with the femoral shaft. The
是在近端与股骨干成一直线的笔直切口。这

underlying fascia is transected in line with the skin incision, and the vastus
下面的筋膜与皮肤切口呈直线横切,股骨

medialis is elevated. Care should be taken to avoid the descending geniculate
内侧肌升高。应注意避免膝状下降

artery, as well as its articular branch and the muscular branch to the vastus
动脉,以及其关节支和股肌支

medialis. A lateral tibial plateau plate is contoured and placed.
内侧。胫骨外侧平台板被塑造并放置。

ALTERNATIVES: Nonoperative treatment of distal femoral fractures is rare, but
其他选择: 股骨远端骨折的非手术治疗很少见,但

relative indications for nonoperative treatment include frailty of the patient,
非手术治疗的相对适应证包括患者虚弱,

lack of ambulatory status, a non-reconstructible fracture, or a stable fracture.
缺乏行走状态、不可重建的骨折或稳定的骨折。

These patients are placed in a long-leg cast followed by a hinged knee brace1.
这些患者被放置在长腿石膏中,然后是铰链式膝关节支架1。

There are several other surgical fixation options, including lateral plating,
还有其他几种手术固定选项,包括侧板、

retrograde intramedullary nailing, distal femoral replacement, and augmentation
逆行髓内钉、股骨远端置换术和扩骨术

of a retrograde nail with a plate.
带板的逆行钉子。

RATIONALE: Dual plating has several benefits, depending on the clinical
基本原理:根据临床情况,双板有几个好处

scenario. Biomechanical studies have found that dual plating results in
场景。生物力学研究发现,双重电镀导致

increased stiffness and construct strength2,3. Additional construct stability
增加刚度和结构强度2,3。额外的结构稳定性

can be offered through the use of locking plates, particularly in osteoporotic
可通过使用锁定钢板提供,尤其是在骨质疏松症中

bone. Taken together, this increased stability and construct strength can allow
骨。总而言之,这种增加的稳定性和结构强度可以允许

for earlier weight-bearing, which is particularly important for fractures in the
用于早期负重,这对于

geriatric population. Furthermore, the increased stiffness and construct
老年人口。此外,刚度和结构增加

strength make this procedure a favorable treatment option for nonunion, and it
强度使该手术成为骨不连的有利治疗选择,并且

has been shown to result in lower rates of postoperative nonunion compared with
已被证明导致术后骨不连的发生率低于

lateral plating alone4-7. Adjunctive use of a medial plate also has been
单独侧板4-7。辅助使用内侧钢板也已

suggested to prevent varus collapse, particularly with metaphyseal comminution
建议预防内翻塌陷,尤其是干骺端粉碎

and poor bone quality2,3,8. Finally, in the periprosthetic fracture population,
和骨质量差2,3,8。最后,在假体周围骨折人群中,

dual plating also removes the concern of incompatibility with a retrograde nail.
双重电镀还消除了与逆行钉子不兼容的担忧。

EXPECTED OUTCOMES: The outcomes of dual plating are promising, given the
预期结果: 鉴于

severity of the injury. When comparing operative to nonoperative treatment
受伤的严重程度。比较手术治疗与非手术治疗时

outcomes, nonoperatively managed patients had worse functional outcomes and
结局,非手术治疗患者功能结局较差,并且

higher rates of complications related to immobility1. Dual plating of
与制动相关的并发症发生率更高1。双重电镀

supracondylar fractures and intra-articular distal femoral fractures yields
髁上骨折和关节内股骨远端骨折

nonunion rates ranging from 0% to 12.5%, lower than the 18% to 20% reported with
骨不连率从 0% 到 12.5% 不等,低于报告的 18%-20%

lateral locking plates4-7,9-12. This reduction in nonunions has been shown to
侧锁骨板4-7,9-12。骨不连的减少已被证明

lead to fewer revisions when compared with single-plating techniques7. In prior
与单电镀技术相比,导致更少的修订7。在之前的

studies, 95% of nonunions treated with the dual-plating technique achieved union
研究,95% 接受双钢板技术治疗的骨不连实现了骨愈合

postoperatively11. One concern when utilizing the medial approach is critical
术后 11.使用内侧方法时的一个问题是关键的

damage to medial vascularity; however, this result has not been reported in the
内侧血管损伤;但是,此结果尚未在

literature, and there is a safe operating window13. Despite the benefits of dual
文献,并且有一个安全的作窗口13。尽管双重

plating, there are relatively high rates of infection following dual plating (0%
电镀,双电镀后感染率相对较高(0%

to 16.7%) compared with lateral plating alone (3.6% to 8.5%)5,14-17. However,
至 16.7%)与单独侧向电镀(3.6% 至 8.5%)相比5,14-17。然而

many of these studies are small case series, highlighting that a surgeon's
其中许多研究是小型病例系列研究,强调外科医生的

comfort and skill with these procedures is paramount to patient outcomes.
这些程序的舒适度和技能对患者的预后至关重要。

IMPORTANT TIPS: Meticulous placement and contouring of lateral and medial plates
重要提示:外侧板和内侧板的精细放置和轮廓塑造

are required to prevent malreduction of the articular block that creates a
是防止关节阻滞复位不良所必需的,该阻滞会导致

"golf-club deformity."18,19During the medial approach, be aware of descending
“高尔夫球杆畸形。”18,19在内侧入路时,注意下行

geniculate artery-particularly its muscular branch, which is ∼5 cm from the
膝状动脉 - 特别是它的肌肉分支,距离 ∼5 cm

adductor tubercle/medial epicondyle, and its root, which enters the compartment
内收结节/内上髁及其根部,进入隔室

at the adductor hiatus at ∼16 cm13.
在内收裂孔处 ∼16 cm13。


Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
版权所有 © 2024 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated。


DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00018
DOI:10.2106/JBJS。编号:ST.23.00018

PMCID: PMC11186817
PMCID:PMC11186817

PMID: 38903606
PMID:38903606


Conflict of interest statement: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential
利益冲突声明:披露:潜在披露

Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article
利益冲突表格随文章的在线版本一起提供

(http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A447).
(http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A447)。



7. J Knee Surg. 2019 May;32(5):388-391. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683978. Epub 2019 Apr
7. J 膝关节外科杂志 2019 年 5 月;32(5):388-391.doi:10.1055/s-0039-1683978。Epub 2019 年 4 月

8.


Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures around Total Knee
全膝关节周围假体周围骨折的股骨远端置换术

Arthroplasty: When and How?
关节置换术:何时以及如何进行?


Khan S(1), Schmidt AH(1).
汗 S(1),施密特 AH(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis,
(1)明尼阿波利斯 Hennepin Healthcare 骨科外科

Minnesota.
明尼苏达州。


Periprosthetic fractures around total knee arthroplasty have become more common
全膝关节置换术周围的假体周围骨折已变得越来越普遍

with the increasing incidence of total knee arthroplasty. These fractures are
随着全膝关节置换术发病率的增加。这些骨折是

challenging to treat, especially in older patients with poor bone stock.
难以治疗,尤其是对于骨量不佳的老年患者。

Although open reduction internal fixation remains the most common treatment,
尽管切开复位内固定仍然是最常见的治疗方法,

revision with distal femoral replacement has become popular in recent years.
股骨远端置换术翻修近年来变得流行起来。

Careful evaluation and planning are required to have successful outcomes. We
需要仔细评估和规划才能获得成功的结果。我们

present a review of distal femoral replacement in periprosthetic fractures
介绍假体周围骨折中股骨远端置换术的综述

around the total knee arthroplasty, along with surgical technique, and pearls
全膝关节置换术周围,以及手术技术和珍珠

and pitfalls.
和陷阱。


Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Thieme Medical Publishers 美国纽约州纽约市第七大道 333 号,邮编 10001。


DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683978
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683978

PMID: 30959548 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:30959548 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Dr. Schmidt reports grants from the Department
利益冲突声明:Schmidt 博士报告了该部门的资助

of Defense, personal fees from ActivOrtho, personal fees and other from
的辩护、ActivOrtho 的个人费用、个人费用和其他

Conventus Orthopaedics, other from EPIC Orthopaedics, personal fees from Acumed,
Conventus Orthopaedics, 其他来自 EPIC Orthopaedics, 个人费用来自 Acumed,

outside the submitted work.
在提交的作品之外。



8. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):911-918. doi:
8. Eur J 骨科外科创伤。2023 年 5 月;33(4):911-918.doi:

10.1007/s00590-022-03225-y. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
10.1007/s00590-022-03225-y。Epub 2022 年 2 月 19 日。


High reoperation and mortality rate after distal femoral replacement for
股骨远端置换术后再手术率和死亡率高

periprosthetic knee fracture in the elderly.
老年人假体周围膝关节骨折。


Pujol O(1)(2), Joshi-Jubert N(3)(4), Nuñez JH(3)(4), Pijoan J(3)(4), Castellet
Pujol O(1)(2), Joshi-Jubert N(3)(4), Nuñez JH(3)(4), Pijoan J(3)(4), Castellet

E(3)(4), Minguell J(3)(4).
E(3)(4),Minguell J(3)(4)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Knee Surgery Unit, Orthopedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University
(1)瓦尔德希伯伦大学骨科外科膝关节外科

Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035,
巴塞罗那自治大学医院,第 119-129 页,08035,

Barcelona, Spain. opujol@vhebron.net.
西班牙巴塞罗那。opujol@vhebron.net。

(2)Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. opujol@vhebron.net.
(2)Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, 巴塞罗那, 西班牙.opujol@vhebron.net。

(3)Knee Surgery Unit, Orthopedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University
(3)瓦尔德希伯伦大学骨科外科膝关节外科

Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035,
巴塞罗那自治大学医院,第 119-129 页,08035,

Barcelona, Spain.
西班牙巴塞罗那。

(4)Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
(4)Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, 巴塞罗那, 西班牙.


PURPOSE: To analyze the outcomes of elderly patients with periprosthetic
目的: 分析老年假体周围患者预后

fractures around the knee operated on with a distal femur replacement (DFR).
膝关节周围的骨折通过股骨远端置换术 (DFR) 进行手术。

METHODS: We performed a retrospective case series study of eleven elderly
方法: 我们对 11 名老年人进行了回顾性病例系列研究

patients who underwent DFR due to a periprosthetic fracture. Mean follow-up was
因假体周围骨折而接受 DFR 的患者。平均随访率

30.1 months (SD 28.1). Demographic, clinical and radiological data were
30.1 个月 (SD 28.1)。人口统计学、临床和放射学数据

reviewed. A descriptive analysis and a study of survival were conducted. Then, a
检讨。进行了描述性分析和生存研究。然后,一个

comparative analysis between the patients who needed reoperation and did not
需要再次手术和不需要再次手术的患者之间的比较分析

need reoperation, and the patients who died and the patients who were alive
需要再次手术,以及死亡的患者和存活的患者

during the follow-up was performed.
在随访期间进行。

RESULTS: Mean age was 77.1 years (SD 13.9). Reoperation rate was 36%, being
结果: 平均年龄为 77.1 岁 (SD 13.9)。再手术率为 36%,且

infection the most common complication (27%). The risk of reoperation increased
感染是最常见的并发症 (27%)。再次手术的风险增加

with a longer time between fracture and surgery. The 36.4% of patients died
骨折和手术之间的时间更长。36.4% 的患者死亡

during the follow-up. Older age, need of blood transfusion and need of early
在随访期间。年龄较大,需要输血且需要早期

reoperation were related to a higher risk of mortality.
再次手术与较高的死亡风险相关。

CONCLUSION: DFR could be a valuable option for knee periprosthetic fractures in
结论: DFR 可能是膝关节假体周围骨折的有价值的选择

elderly patients. However, surgeons should be aware of the high reoperation and
老年患者。然而,外科医生应该意识到高再手术和

mortality rate.
死亡率。


© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS,
© 2022 年。作者,经 Springer-Verlag France SAS 独家许可,

part of Springer Nature.
施普林格自然的一部分。


DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03225-y
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03225-y

PMID: 35182239 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:35182239 [MEDLINE 索引]



9. Bone Joint J. 2021 Apr;103-B(4):650-658. doi:
9. 骨关节杂志 2021 年 4 月;103-B(4):650-658。doi:

10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1046.R2.


Factors influencing periprosthetic femoral fracture risk.
影响假体周围股骨骨折风险的因素。


Konow T(1), Baetz J(1), Melsheimer O(2), Grimberg A(2)(3), Morlock M(1).
科诺 T(1),贝茨 J(1),梅尔斯海默 O(2),格里姆伯格 A(2)(3),莫洛克 M(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Institute of Biomechanics, TUHH Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg,
(1)TUHH 汉堡工业大学生物力学研究所,汉堡,

Germany.
德国。

(2)Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD), Berlin, Germany.
(2)德国内假体登记处 (EPRD),德国柏林。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,
(3)骨外科、物理医学和康复科,

University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
慕尼黑大学医院 (LMU),德国慕尼黑。


AIMS: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) are a serious complication of total
目的: 股骨假体周围骨折 (PPF) 是

hip arthroplasty (THA) and are becoming an increasingly common indication for
髋关节置换术 (THA) 的 API 和

revision arthroplasty with the ageing population. This study aimed to identify
老龄化人口的翻修关节置换术。本研究旨在确定

potential risk factors for PPF based on an analysis of registry data.
基于登记处数据分析的 PPF 的潜在风险因素。

METHODS: Cases recorded with PPF as the primary indication for revision
方法: 以 PPF 作为翻修主要指征记录的病例

arthroplasty in the German Arthroplasty Registry (Endoprothesenregister
德国关节置换术登记处 (Endoprothenregister) 中的关节置换术

Deutschland (EPRD)), as well as those classified as having a PPF according to
德国 (EPRD)),以及根据

the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes in patients' insurance
患者保险中的国际疾病分类 (ICD) 代码

records were identified from the complete datasets of 249,639 registered primary
记录是从 249,639 名注册小学的完整数据集中确定的

hip arthroplasties in the EPRD and included in the analysis.
EPRD 中的髋关节置换术并包含在分析中。

RESULTS: The incidence of PPFs was higher (24.6%; 1,483) than reported in EPRD
结果: PPFs 的发生率高于 EPRD 报告的 (24.6%;1,483)

annual reports listing PPF as the main reason for revision (10.9%; 654). The
年度报告将 PPF 列为修订的主要原因 (10.9%;654)。这

majority of fractures occurred intraoperatively and were directly related to the
大多数骨折发生在术中,与

implantation process. Patients who were elderly, female, or had comorbidities
植入过程。老年人、女性或有合并症的患者

were at higher risk of PPFs (p < 0.001). German hospitals with a surgical volume
PPF 的风险更高 (p < 0.001)。手术量大的德国医院

of < 300 primary procedures per year had a higher rate of PPFs (p < 0.001). The
的 <每年 300 例初级手术的 PPF 发生率较高 (p < 0.001)。这

use of cemented and collared prostheses had a lower fracture risk PPF compared
与骨水泥和有环修复体相比,使用骨水泥和有环修复体的骨折风险较低 PPF

to uncemented and collarless components, respectively (both p < 0.001). Collared
分别到无胶合和无领组件 (均 P < 0.001)。领

prostheses reduced the risk of PPF irrespective of the fixation method and
无论采用何种固定方法,假体都降低了 PPF 的风险,并且

hospital's surgical volume.
医院的手术量。

CONCLUSION: The high proportion of intraoperative fractures emphasises the need
结论: 术中骨折比例高强调了这种需求

to improve surgeon training and surgical technique. Registry data should be
改善外科医生的培训和手术技术。注册表数据应为

interpreted with caution because of potential differences in coding standards
由于编码标准可能存在差异,因此请谨慎解释

between institutions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):650-658.
机构之间。引用本文:Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):650-658。


DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1046.R2
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1046.R2

PMID: 33789487 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:33789487 [MEDLINE 索引]



10. Bone Joint J. 2024 Feb 1;106-B(2):158-165. doi:
10. 骨关节杂志 2024 年 2 月 1 日;106-B(2):158-165。doi:

10.1302/0301-620X.106B2.BJJ-2023-0700.R1.


The characteristics and predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures
假体周围骨折的特征和死亡率预测因素

around the knee.
膝盖周围。


Nasser AAHH(1), Sidhu M(1), Prakash R(1), Mahmood A(2); PPF Study Collaborative;
纳赛尔 AAHH(1), 西杜 M(1), 普拉卡什 R(1), 马哈茂德 A(2);PPF 研究合作;

PPF Study Collaborative; Osman K(1), Chauhan GS(1), Nandra R(1), Dewan V(1),
PPF 研究合作;奥斯曼 K(1), 乔汉 GS(1), 南德拉 R(1), 德万 V(1),

Davidson J(3), Al-Azzawi M(3), Smith C(3), Gawad M(3), Palaiologos I(4),
戴维森 J(3), 阿扎维 M(3), 史密斯 C(3), 加瓦德 M(3), 帕里奥洛格斯 I(4),

Cuthbert R(4), Wignadasan W(4), Banks D(5), Archer J(5), Odeh A(5), Moores T(6),
卡斯伯特 R(4), 维格纳达桑 W(4), 班克斯 D(5), 阿彻 J(5), 奥德 A(5), 摩尔斯 T(6),

Tahir M(6), Brooks M(6), Biring G(7), Jordan S(7), Elahi Z(7), Shaath M(7),
塔希尔 M(6), 布鲁克斯 M(6), 比林 G(7), 乔丹 S(7), 埃拉希 Z(7), 沙斯 M(7),

Veettil M(8), De C(8), Handford C(8), Bansal M(9), Bawa A(9), Mattar A(9),
Veettil M(8), De C(8), Handford C(8), Bansal M(9), Bawa A(9), Mattar A(9),

Tandra V(9), Daadipour A(9), Taha A(9), Gangoo S(10), Srinivasan S(10), Tarisai
Tandra V(9), Daadipour A(9), Taha A(9), Gangoo S(10), Srinivasan S(10), 塔里赛

M(10), Budair B(11), Subbaraman K(11), Khan F(11), Gomindes A(11), Samuel A(11),
男(10), 布代尔 B(11), 苏巴拉曼 K(11), 汗 F(11), 戈明德斯 A(11), 塞缪尔 A(11),

Kang N(12), Kapur K(12), Mainwaring E(12), Bridgwater H(12), Lo A(12), Ahmed
康 N(12), 卡普尔 K(12), 曼瓦林 E(12), 布里奇沃特 H(12), 罗 A(12), 艾哈迈德

U(13), Khaleeq T(13), El-Bakoury A(14), Rashed R(14), Hosny H(14), Yarlagadda
U(13), Khaleeq T(13), El-Bakoury A(14), Rashed R(14), Hosny H(14), Yarlagadda

R(14), Keenan J(14), Hamed A(14), Riemer B(15), Qureshi A(15), Gupta V(15),
R(14), Keenan J(14), Hamed A(14), Riemer B(15), Qureshi A(15), Gupta V(15),

Waites M(16), Bleibleh S(16), Westacott D(16), Phillips J(17), East J(17),
韦茨 M(16), 布莱布勒 S(16), 韦斯塔科特 D(16), 菲利普斯 J(17), 东 J(17),

Huntley D(17), Masud S(18), Mirza Y(18), Mishra S(18), Dunlop D(19), Khalefa
亨特利 D(17), 马苏德 S(18), 米尔扎 Y(18), 米什拉 S(18), 邓禄普 D(19), 哈利法

M(19), Balakumar B(19), Thibbaiah M(19), Payton O(19), Berstock J(20), Deano
男(19), 巴拉库马尔 B(19), 蒂巴亚 M(19), 佩顿 O(19), 伯斯托克 J(20), 迪亚诺

K(20), Sarraf KM(21), Logishetty K(21), Lee G(21), Subbiah-Ponniah H(21), Shah
K(20), Sarraf KM(21), Logishetty K(21), Lee G(21), Subbiah-Ponniah H(21), 沙阿

N(22), Venkatesan A(22), Cheseldene-Culley J(22), Ayathamattam J(22)(23), Tross
N(22), Venkatesan A(22), Cheseldene-Culley J(22), Ayathamattam J(22)(23), 特罗斯

S(23), Randhawa S(23), Mohammed F(23), Ali R(23), Bird J(24), Khan K(24), Akhtar
S(23), Randhawa S(23), Mohammed F(23), Ali R(23), Bird J(24), Khan K(24), Akhtar

MA(25), Brunt A(25), Roupakiotis P(25), Subramanian P(26), Bua N(26), Hakimi
MA(25), Brunt A(25), Roupakiotis P(25), Subramanian P(26), Bua N(26), Hakimi

M(27), Bitar S(27), Al Najjar M(27), Radhakrishnan A(27), Gamble C(27), James
M(27), Bitar S(27), Al Najjar M(27), Radhakrishnan A(27), Gamble C(27), 詹姆斯

A(28), Gilmore C(28), Dawson D(28), Sofat R(29), Antar M(29), Raghu A(29),
A(28), 吉尔摩 C(28), 道森 D(28), 索法特 R(29), 安塔尔 M(29), 拉古 A(29),

Heaton S(30), Tawfeek W(30), Charles C(30), Burnand H(31), Duffy S(31), Taylor
希顿 S(30), 陶菲克 W(30), 查尔斯 C(30), 伯恩南德 H(31), 达菲 S(31), 泰勒

L(31), Magill L(32), Perry R(32), Pettitt M(32), Okoth K(32), Pinkney T(32).
L(31), Magill L(32), Perry R(32), Pettitt M(32), Okoth K(32), Pinkney T(32).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)The Birmingham Orthopaedic Network, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital,
(1)伯明翰骨科网络、皇家骨科医院、

Birmingham, UK.
英国伯明翰。

(2)Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
(2)英国伯明翰伊丽莎白女王医院创伤和骨科。

(3)St Thomas Hospital, London, UK.
(3)英国伦敦圣托马斯医院。

(4)The Whittington Hospital, London, UK.
(4)英国伦敦惠廷顿医院。

(5)New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.
(5)英国伍尔弗汉普顿新十字医院。

(6)Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall, UK.
(6)Walsall Manor Hospital,英国沃尔索尔。

(7)Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK.
(7)Stoke Mandeville 医院,英国艾尔斯伯里。

(8)Sandwell General Hospital, West Bromwich, UK.
(8)桑德威尔综合医院,英国西布罗姆维奇。

(9)Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, UK.
(9)英国奥平顿皇家公主大学医院。

(10)James Paget Hospital, Norfolk, UK.
(10)英国诺福克詹姆斯佩吉特医院。

(11)Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
(11)英国伯明翰伊丽莎白女王医院。

(12)Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
(12)Addenbrooke's Hospital,英国剑桥。

(13)Princess Royal Hospital, Telford, UK.
(13)英国特尔福德公主皇家医院。

(14)Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.
(14)英国普利茅斯 Derriford 医院。

(15)University Hospital Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
(15)考文垂和沃里克郡大学医院,考文垂,英国。

(16)Russell's Hall Hospital, Dudley, UK.
(16)Russell's Hall 医院,英国达德利。

(17)Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK.
(17)英国埃克塞特皇家德文郡和埃克塞特医院。

(18)Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
(18)莫里斯顿医院,英国斯旺西。

(19)Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
(19)英国伯明翰皇家骨科医院。

(20)Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
(20)英国巴斯皇家联合医院。

(21)St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
(21)英国伦敦圣玛丽医院。

(22)Worthing Hospital, Worthing, UK.
(22)沃辛医院,英国沃辛。

(23)Ealing Hospital, Southall, UK.
(23)英国绍索尔伊灵医院。

(24)University Hospital Lewisham, London, UK.
(24)英国伦敦刘易舍姆大学医院。

(25)Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, UK.
(25)维多利亚医院,英国柯科迪。

(26)Barnet General Hospital, Barnet, UK.
(26)巴尼特综合医院,英国巴尼特。

(27)Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, UK.
(27)索尔福德皇家医院,英国索尔福德。

(28)Ulster Hospital, Belfast, UK.
(28)英国贝尔法斯特阿尔斯特医院。

(29)Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
(29)英国斯蒂夫尼奇 Lister 医院。

(30)Yeovil District Hospital, Yeovil, UK.
(30)英国约维尔约维尔地区医院。

(31)Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
(31)布里斯托尔皇家医院,英国布里斯托尔。

(32)The Birmingham Centre for Observational and Prospective Studies (BiCOPS),
(32)伯明翰观察和前瞻性研究中心 (BiCOPS),

University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
伯明翰大学,英国伯明翰。


AIMS: Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the knee are challenging injuries.
目的: 膝关节周围的假体周围骨折 (PPF) 是具有挑战性的损伤。

This study aims to describe the characteristics of knee PPFs and the impact of
本研究旨在描述膝关节 PPF 的特征和

patient demographics, fracture types, and management modalities on in-hospital
患者人口统计学、骨折类型和院内管理方式

mortality.
死亡率。

METHODS: Using a multicentre study design, independent of registry data, we
方法: 使用多中心研究设计,独立于注册数据,我们

included adult patients sustaining a PPF around a knee arthroplasty between 1
纳入了膝关节置换术周围 PPF 在 1

January 2010 and 31 December 2019. Univariate, then multivariable, logistic
2010 年 1 月和 2019 年 12 月 31 日。单变量,然后是多变量,逻辑

regression analyses were performed to study the impact of patient, fracture, and
进行回归分析以研究患者、骨折和

treatment on mortality.
治疗对死亡率。

RESULTS: Out of a total of 1,667 patients in the PPF study database, 420
结果: 在 PPF 研究数据库的总共 1,667 名患者中,有 420 名

patients were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 6.4%. Multivariable
患者被纳入。院内死亡率为 6.4%。多变量

analyses suggested that American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade,
分析表明,美国麻醉医师协会 (ASA) 等级、

history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD), history of rheumatic disease,
外周血管疾病 (PVD) 病史、风湿性疾病史、

fracture around a loose implant, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) during
松动的植入物周围骨折,以及期间的脑血管意外 (CVA)

hospital stay were each independently associated with mortality. Each point
住院时间均与死亡率独立相关。每个点

increase in ASA grade independently correlated with a four-fold greater
ASA 等级的增加与增加 4 倍独立相关

mortality risk (odds ratio (OR) 4.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to
死亡风险(比值比 (OR) 4.1(95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.19 至

14.06); p = 0.026). Patients with PVD have a nine-fold increase in mortality
14.06);p = 0.026)。PVD 患者的死亡率增加了 9 倍

risk (OR 9.1 (95% CI 1.25 to 66.47); p = 0.030) and patients with rheumatic
风险 (OR 9.1 (95% CI 1.25-66.47);p = 0.030) 和风湿性

disease have a 6.8-fold increase in mortality risk (OR 6.8 (95% CI 1.32 to
疾病的死亡风险增加 6.8 倍(OR 6.8 (95% CI 1.32 至

34.68); p = 0.022). Patients with a fracture around a loose implant (Unified
34.68);p = 0.022)。植入物松动周围骨折的患者(统一

Classification System (UCS) B2) have a 20-fold increase in mortality, compared
分类系统 (UCS) B2) 的死亡率增加了 20 倍,与

to UCS A1 (OR 20.9 (95% CI 1.61 to 271.38); p = 0.020). Mode of management was
至 UCS A1 (OR 20.9 (95% CI 1.61 至 271.38);p = 0.020)。管理模式是

not a significant predictor of mortality. Patients managed with revision
不是死亡率的重要预测指标。接受翻修治疗的患者

arthroplasty had a significantly longer length of stay (median 16 days; p =
关节置换术的住院时间明显更长(中位 16 天;p =

0.029) and higher rates of return to theatre, compared to patients treated
0.029)和更高的手术室回报率

nonoperatively or with fixation.
非手术或固定。

CONCLUSION: The mortality rate in PPFs around the knee is similar to that for
结论: 膝关节周围 PPF 的死亡率与

native distal femur and neck of femur fragility fractures. Patients with certain
自体股骨远端和股骨颈部脆性骨折。某些

modifiable risk factors should be optimized. A national PPF database and
应优化可改变的危险因素。国家 PPF 数据库和

standardized management guidelines are currently required to understand these
目前需要标准化的管理指南来理解这些

complex injuries and to improve patient outcomes.
复杂的伤害并改善患者的预后。


© 2024 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
© 2024 年英国骨与关节外科编辑学会。


DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B2.BJJ-2023-0700.R1
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B2.BJJ-2023-0700.R1

PMID: 38425310 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:38425310 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: A. A. H. H. Nasser and A. Mahmood report funding
利益冲突声明:A. A. H. H. Nasser 和 A. Mahmood 报告资金

from Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham Charity Trauma Research and Education
来自伯明翰伊丽莎白女王医院慈善创伤研究和教育

Fund, related to this study.
基金,与本研究相关。



11. Maturitas. 2018 Nov;117:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug
11. 马图里塔斯。2018 年 11 月;117:1-5。doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010.Epub 2018 年 8 月

27.


Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee
全髋关节和全膝关节后的股骨假体周围骨折

arthroplasty.
置换 术。


King SW(1), Lamb JN(2), Cage ES(3), Pandit H(4).
King SW(1),Lamb JN(2),Cage ES(3),Pandit H(4)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George
(1)大乔治利兹综合医院创伤和骨科

Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, 英国。

(2)Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George
(2)大乔治利兹综合医院创伤和骨科

Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK; Leeds Institutes of Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal
Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, 英国;利兹风湿病学和肌肉骨骼研究所

Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Rd, Leeds,
医学, 利兹大学, Chapel Allerton 医院, Chapeltown Rd, 利兹,

LS7 4SA, UK. Electronic address: umjnl@leeds.ac.uk.
LS7 4SA,英国。电子地址:umjnl@leeds.ac.uk。

(3)Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George
(3)大乔治利兹综合医院创伤和骨科

Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK; Indiana University School of Medicine, 340 West 10th
Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, 英国;印第安纳大学医学院,340 West 10th

Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, 美国。

(4)Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George
(4)大乔治利兹综合医院创伤和骨科

Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK; Leeds Institutes of Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal
Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, 英国;利兹风湿病学和肌肉骨骼研究所

Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Rd, Leeds,
医学, 利兹大学, Chapel Allerton 医院, Chapeltown Rd, 利兹,

LS7 4SA, UK.
LS7 4SA,英国。


Total joint arthroplasties are increasing worldwide in both frequency and
全球关节置换术总关节置换术的频率和

prevalence. When successful, they offer great improvements in quality of life.
流行。成功后,它们会极大地改善生活质量。

However, fractures around implants are often difficult to manage and require
然而,植入物周围的骨折通常难以处理并且需要

prolonged inpatient stays in tertiary hospitals. Management may differ between
在三级医院住院时间延长。管理可能有所不同

surgeons, but most patients will be managed surgically if mobility or joint
外科医生,但大多数患者如果活动能力或关节

stability is threatened. Those affected are often at higher risk from surgery,
稳定受到威胁。受影响的人通常面临更高的手术风险,

are frailer and at higher risk of mortality and a lifelong reduction in
更虚弱,死亡风险更高,终生

mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing, and patients should
流动性。这些骨折的发生率正在增加,患者应该

appreciate the risk and implications of this recognised complication of joint
了解这种公认的关节并发症的风险和影响

arthroplasty.
置换 术。


Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
皇家版权所有 © 2018。出版商 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010

PMID: 30314554 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:30314554 [MEDLINE 索引]



12. Orthop Res Rev. 2019 Sep 16;11:119-128. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S209647. eCollection
12. 骨科研究修订版,2019 年 9 月 16;11:119-128。doi: 10.2147/ORR.S209647。eCollection 系列

2019.


Interprosthetic femoral fractures: management challenges.
股骨修复间骨折:管理挑战。


Rozell JC(1), Delagrammaticas DE(2), Schwarzkopf R(1).
Rozell JC(1), Delagrammaticas DE(2), Schwarzkopf R(1).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New
(1)纽约大学朗格尼骨科医院骨科外科

York, NY, USA.
美国纽约州约克。

(2)Central Coast Orthopedics, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA.
(2)Central Coast Orthopedics,美国加利福尼亚州圣路易斯奥比斯波。


Interprosthetic femur fractures are a rare but serious complication following
股骨假体骨折是一种罕见但严重的并发症,以下情况

total hip and knee arthroplasty. Classification systems have focused not only on
全髋关节和膝关节置换术。分类系统不仅关注

diagnosis but also on treatment algorithm. Critical to the evaluation of
诊断,但也取决于治疗算法。对

patients with these fractures are an assessment of fracture location, bone
对于这些骨折的患者,应评估骨折位置、骨

quality, and the presence of stemmed implants. The gold standard for fracture
质量,以及带茎植入物的存在。骨折的黄金标准

fixation is locked plating with bicortical and unicortical screws, supplemented
固定是用双皮质和单皮质螺钉锁定镀层,并辅以

with wires or cables as needed. For patients with compromised bone stock or
根据需要使用电线或电缆。对于骨质受损或

insufficient bony area for fixation, allograft augmentation with struts or
骨面积不足,无法固定、同种异体移植物增加支柱或

interprosthetic sleeves may be used. For fractures with severe bone loss,
可以使用假体间套管。对于严重骨质流失的骨折,

conversion to a megaprosthesis or total femur replacement may be warranted.
可能需要转换为巨假体或全股骨置换术。


© 2019 Rozell et al.
© 2019 Rozell 等人。


DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S209647
DOI:10.2147/ORR。S209647

PMCID: PMC6754334
PMCID:PMC6754334

PMID: 31572021
PMID:31572021


Conflict of interest statement: Dr Ran Schwarzkopf provided consultancy service
利益冲突声明:Ran Schwarzkopf 博士提供咨询服务

to Smith & Nephew, holds stock options from Intelijoint, and involved in the
到 Smith & Nephew,持有 Intelijoint 的股票期权,并参与了

Gauss Surgical Research for Smith & Nephew. The authors report no other
为史密斯和侄子设计的高斯外科研究。作者没有报告其他

conflicts of interest in this work.
这项工作的利益冲突。



13. J Orthop Trauma. 2021 Nov 1;35(11):573-583. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002080.
13. J 骨科创伤。2021 年 11 月 1 日;35(11):573-583.doi: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000002080.


Very Distal Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures: Replacement Versus Fixation: A
极远端股骨假体周围骨折:置换 vs 固定:A

Systematic Review.
系统评价.


Rubinger L(1), Khalik HA(2), Gazendam A(1), Wolfstadt J(3), Khoshbin A(4),
鲁宾格 L(1), 哈利克 HA(2), 加森丹 A(1), 沃尔夫施塔特 J(3), 科什宾 A(4),

Tushinski D(1), Johal H(1).
图申斯基 D(1),乔哈尔 H(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Evidence Based Orthopaedics,
(1)循证骨科中心骨科外科,

McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
麦克马斯特大学,加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿。

(2)Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON,
(2)Michael G. DeGroote 医学院,麦克马斯特大学,汉密尔顿,安大略省,

Canada.
加拿大。

(3)Granovsky Gluskin Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Sinai Health System,
(3)西奈卫生系统骨科外科 Granovsky Gluskin 科,

University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; and.
多伦多大学,加拿大安大略省多伦多市;和。

(4)Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of
(4)大学圣迈克尔医院骨科

Toronto, ON, Canada.
加拿大安大略省多伦多。


OBJECTIVES: To synthesize all-cause reoperations and complications data as well
研究目的: 综合全因再手术和并发症数据

as secondary clinical and functional outcomes, after the management of very
作为次要临床和功能结果,在管理后非常

distal femur periprosthetic fractures (vDFPFs) in a geriatric patient population
老年患者群体中的股骨远端假体周围骨折 (vDFPFs)

with either a distal femoral locking plate (DFLP) or distal femoral replacement
使用股骨远端锁定钢板 (DFLP) 或股骨远端置换术

(DFR).
(DFR) 的 S Var

DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for English
数据源:检索 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Web of Science 的英语

language articles from inception to March 16, 2020, in accordance to the PRISMA
从建国到 2020 年 3 月 16 日的语言文章,根据 PRISMA

guidelines.
指引。

STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting the management of vDFPFs in adults older than
研究选择: 研究报告了 vDFPFs 在 10 岁以上的成年人中的管理

65 years with either a DFLP or DFR were included. To ensure this review solely
包括 65 岁 DFLP 或 DFR。确保此审核

focused on very distal femoral periprosthetic fractures, only fractures of the
专注于非常远端的股骨假体周围骨折,仅

following classifications were included: (1) Lewis and Rorabeck type II or III,
包括以下分类:(1) Lewis 和 Rorabeck II 型或 III 型,

(2) Su and Associates' Classification of Supracondylar Fractures of the Distal
(2) Su and Associates 对远端髁上骨折的分类

Femur type III, (3) Backstein et al type F2, and/or (4) Kim et al type II or
股骨 III 型,(3) Backstein 等人 F2 型,和/或 (4) Kim 等人 II 型或

III.
第三。

DATA EXTRACTION: Three reviewers independently extracted data from the included
资料提取: 三位评价员独立从纳入的

studies. Study validity was assessed using the methodological index for
研究。使用

nonrandomized studies (MINORS), a quality assessment tool for nonrandomized
非随机研究 (MINORS),一种非随机质量评估工具

controlled studies in surgery.
外科对照研究。

DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-five studies with 649 vDFPFs were included for analysis.
数据综合: 纳入 25 项研究,涉及 649 个 vDFPFs 进行分析。

There were 440 knees in the DFLP group (mean age range: 65.9-88.3 years) and 209
DFLP 组有 440 个膝关节 (平均年龄范围: 65.9-88.3 岁) 和 209 个

knees in the DFR group (mean age range: 71.0-84.8 years). Because of the
DFR 组的膝盖(平均年龄范围:71.0-84.8 岁)。由于

literature's heterogeneity, the data were qualitatively synthesized.
文献的异质性,数据被定性综合。

CONCLUSIONS: vDFPFs in the elderly treated with DFR underwent fewer reoperations
结论: 接受 DFR 治疗的老年人 vDFPFs 再次手术较少

relative to DFLP (0%-45% vs. 0%-77%, respectively). Time to weight-bearing was
相对于 DFLP(分别为 0%-45% 和 0%-77%)。负重时间

observably shorter in DFR studies relative to DFLP studies. Functional outcomes
相对于 DFLP 研究,在 DFR 研究中明显更短。功能结果

and postoperative range of motion indicated a trend for DFLP knees to outperform
术后活动度表明 DFLP 膝关节有优于 DFLP 膝关节的趋势

DFR knees. Future research should include prospective studies and
DFR 膝盖。未来的研究应包括前瞻性研究和

cost-effectiveness evaluations to better understand the utility of DFR for these
成本效益评估,以更好地了解 DFR 对这些的效用

fractures.
骨折。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a
证据级别:治疗 III 级。有关以下内容,请参阅作者说明

complete description of levels of evidence.
证据级别的完整描述。


Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002080
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000002080

PMID: 33993176 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:33993176 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: The authors report no conflict of interest.
利益冲突声明:作者报告没有利益冲突。



14. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Apr;32(3):383-393. doi:
14. Eur J 骨科外科创伤症。2022 年 4 月;32(3):383-393.doi:

10.1007/s00590-021-02989-z. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
10.1007/s00590-021-02989-z。Epub 2021 年 4 月 26 日。


Anterior femoral notching ≥ 3 mm is associated with increased risk for
股骨前切迹≥ 3 mm 与

supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty: a
全膝关节置换术后股骨假体周围髁上骨折:A

systematic review and meta-analysis.
系统评价和荟萃分析。


Stamiris D(1)(2)(3), Gkekas NK(4)(5), Asteriadis K(4)(5), Stamiris S(4)(6)(5),
Stamiris D(1)(2)(3), Gkekas NK(4)(5), Asteriadis K(4)(5), Stamiris S(4)(6)(5),

Anagnostis P(4)(5)(7), Poultsides L(4)(5), Sarris I(4)(5), Potoupnis M(4)(5),
Anagnostis P(4)(5)(7), Poultsides L(4)(5), Sarris I(4)(5), Potoupnis M(4)(5),

Kenanidis E(4)(5), Tsiridis E(4)(5).
Kenanidis E(4)(5),Tsiridis E(4)(5)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Academic Orthopedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General
(1)亚里士多德大学医学院骨科学术部,普通

Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road west 56403 Nea Efkarpia, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road west 56403 Nea Efkarpia, 塞萨洛尼基, 希腊.

dimitris.stamiris@hotmail.com.
dimitris.stamiris@hotmail.com。

(2)Department of Orthopedics, 424 General Military Hospital of Thessaloniki,
(2)塞萨洛尼基 424 总军事医院骨科,

56429, Thessaloniki, Greece. dimitris.stamiris@hotmail.com.
56429, 塞萨洛尼基, 希腊.dimitris.stamiris@hotmail.com。

(3)Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine Research (CORE), Center for
(3)骨科与再生医学研究中心 (CORE), 中心

Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI), Aristotle University of
亚里士多德大学跨学科研究与创新 (CIRI)

Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. dimitris.stamiris@hotmail.com.
塞萨洛尼基,塞萨洛尼基,希腊。dimitris.stamiris@hotmail.com。

(4)Academic Orthopedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General
(4)亚里士多德大学医学院骨科学术部,普通

Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road west 56403 Nea Efkarpia, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road west 56403 Nea Efkarpia, 塞萨洛尼基, 希腊.

(5)Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine Research (CORE), Center for
(5)骨科与再生医学研究中心 (CORE), 中心

Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI), Aristotle University of
亚里士多德大学跨学科研究与创新 (CIRI)

Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
塞萨洛尼基,塞萨洛尼基,希腊。

(6)Department of Orthopedics, 424 General Military Hospital of Thessaloniki,
(6)塞萨洛尼基 424 总军事医院骨科,

56429, Thessaloniki, Greece.
56429, 塞萨洛尼基, 希腊.

(7)Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and
(7)生殖内分泌科、第一产科和

Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki,
塞萨洛尼基亚里士多德大学医学院妇科,塞萨洛尼基,

Greece.
希腊。


PURPOSE: Anterior femoral notching (AFN) may be associated with a higher risk
目的: 股骨前切迹 (AFN) 可能与更高的风险相关

for supracondylar periprosthetic fracture (sPPF) after total knee arthroplasty
用于全膝关节置换术后髁上假体周围骨折 (sPPF)

(TKA), although studies have yielded inconclusive results. We aimed to
(TKA),尽管研究尚未得出结论性结果。我们的目标是

systematically investigate and meta-analyze the best available evidence
系统地调查和荟萃分析最佳可用证据

regarding the association between AFN and the risk of sPPF after TKA.
关于 AFN 与 TKA 后 sPPF 风险之间的关联。

METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Mendeley, Google Scholar and
方法: 全面检索 PubMed、Scopus、Mendeley、Google Scholar 和

Cochrane databases was performed, from conception to February 29, 2020. Data
从受孕到 2020 年 2 月 29 日进行了 Cochrane 数据库。数据

were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). I2-index
以比值比 (OR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 表示。I2 索引

was employed for heterogeneity. Newcastle-Ottawa scale was implemented for
用于异质性。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表的实施

quality assessment of the included studies.
纳入研究的质量评估。

RESULTS: Nine studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, including a total of
结果: 9 项研究符合资格标准,包括总共

3264 patients subjected to TKA. Among them, there were 150 patients who
3264 名接受 TKA 的患者。其中,有 150 名患者

sustained a sPPF. Overall, patients exposed to AFN (AFN group) demonstrated an
持续 sPPF。总体而言,暴露于 AFN 的患者(AFN 组)表现出

increased risk for sPPF compared to those not exposed (control group) (OR 3.91,
与未暴露的人(对照组)相比,sPPF 的风险增加(OR 3.91,

95% CI 1.22-12.58, p = 0.02; I2 68.52%). Subgroup analysis based on AFN depth
95% CI 1.22-12.58,p = 0.02;I2 68.52%)。基于 AFN 深度的子组分析

with a cut-off value of 3 mm further clarified this association. Patients with
截断值为 3 mm 进一步阐明了这种关联。患者

AFN ≥ 3mm were at higher risk for sPPF compared to patients with AFN < 3 mm and
与 AFN ≥< 3 mm 和

control group (OR 4.85, 95% CI 2.08-11.33, p = 0.00; I2 0.0%). On the contrary,
对照组 (OR 4.85,95% CI 2.08-11.33,p = 0.00;I2 0.0%)。相反,

fracture risk was not significant for patients with AFN < 3 mm compared to the
<与

control group (OR 5.0, 95% CI 0.44-56.82, p = 0.19; I2 42.99%).
对照组 (OR 5.0,95% CI 0.44-56.82,p = 0.19;I2 42.99%)。

CONCLUSION: Patients, exposed to AFN ≥ 3 mm in depth, are at higher risk for
结论: 暴露于 3 mm 深度 AFN ≥患者发生 AFN 的风险更高

sustaining a sPPF.
维持 sPPF。


© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS,
© 2021 年。作者,经 Springer-Verlag France SAS 独家许可,

part of Springer Nature.
施普林格自然的一部分。


DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-02989-z
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-02989-z

PMID: 33900452 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:33900452 [MEDLINE 索引]



15. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Dec;56(8):688-696. doi: 10.1007/s00391-022-02139-y.
15. Z Gerontol Geriatr.2023 年 12 月;56(8):688-696.doi:10.1007/s00391-022-02139-y.

Epub 2022 Dec 2.
Epub 2022 年 12 月 2 日。


[Periprosthetic fractures-Diagnostics, classification and treatment].
[假体周围骨折 - 诊断、分类和治疗]。


[Article in German; Abstract available in German from the publisher]
[德文文章;摘要可从出版商获得德文版]


Obbelode F(1), Landschoof S(1), Kreitz N(1), Kühne CA(2).
Obbelode F(1),Landschoof S(1),Kreitz N(1),Kühne CA(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Klinik für Unfall- und Handchirurgie, Zentrum für Alterstraumatologie,
(1)创伤和手外科诊所, 老年创伤学中心,

Schön-Klinik Hamburg Eilbek, Dehnhaide 120, 22081, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Schön-Klinik Hamburg Eilbek, Dehnhaide 120, 22081, 汉堡, 德国.

(2)Klinik für Unfall- und Handchirurgie, Zentrum für Alterstraumatologie,
(2)创伤和手外科诊所, 老年创伤学中心,

Schön-Klinik Hamburg Eilbek, Dehnhaide 120, 22081, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Schön-Klinik Hamburg Eilbek, Dehnhaide 120, 22081, 汉堡, 德国.

ckuehne@schoen-klinik.de.
ckuehne@schoen-klinik.de。


BACKGROUND: Due to the increase in hip and knee prosthetic as a result of the
背景:由于髋关节和膝关节假体的增加

demographic changes, with raised levels of activity among older persons with
人口结构变化,老年人的活动水平增加

geriatric comorbidities, a continuous increase in periprosthetic fractures can
老年合并症,假体周围骨折的持续增加可以

be observed.
被观察。

OBJECTIVE: The incidence and causes of periprosthetic fractures, presentation of
目的: 假体周围骨折的发生率和原因,表现

diagnostic pathways and derivation of a recommendation according to generally
诊断途径和根据一般推荐

accepted classifications.
接受的分类。

MATERIAL AND METHOD: Literature search of basic scientific work, recommendations
材料和方法: 基础科学工作的文献检索、建议

of experts as well as evaluation of own patient collective.
的专家以及评估自己的患者集体。

CONCLUSION: With a growing number of prosthetic interventions in combination
结论: 随着越来越多的人工干预联合使用

with increasing patient age, an increase in periprosthetic fractures is to be
随着患者年龄的增长,假体周围骨折的增加

expected. The treatment of periprosthetic fractures is complex and requires
预期。假体周围骨折的治疗很复杂,需要

detailed analysis of the location of the fracture and its morphology as well as
对裂缝位置及其形态进行详细分析,以及

the recognition of possibly loosened prosthetic material. Based on this
识别可能松动的假肢材料。基于此

information, the correct surgical treatment can be determined and scheduled in
信息,可以确定和安排正确的手术治疗

an appropriate center of care. In geriatric patients with corresponding
适当的护理中心。在具有相应

comorbidities, an individual holistic treatment plan should be developed.
合并症,应制定个体整体治疗计划。


Publisher: ZUSAMMENFASSUNG: HINTERGRUND: Aufgrund der durch den demografischen
出版商: 摘要: 背景: 由于人口统计

Wandel bedingten Zunahme endoprothetischer Eingriffe bei gesteigertem
与变化相关的 endoprosthement 手术增加

Aktivitätsanspruch unter seneszenziell bedingten Begleiterkrankungen ist eine
衰老相关合并症下的活动权利是

stetige Zunahme periprothetischer Frakturen zu beobachten.
假体周围骨折稳步增加。

FRAGESTELLUNG: Inzidenz und Ursachen von periprothetischen Frakturen,
问题:假体周围骨折的发生率和原因,

Darstellung von Diagnostik und über allgemein akzeptierte Klassifikationen
诊断方法和普遍接受的分类

Ableitung einer Therapieempfehlung.
治疗建议的推导。

MATERIAL UND METHODE: Literaturrecherche von Grundlagenarbeiten und
材料和方法: 基础论文的文献综述和

Expertenempfehlungen sowie Analyse des eigenen Patientenguts.
专家建议以及对自己患者群体的分析。

FAZIT: Bei wachsender Zahl implantierter Endoprothesen und steigendem
结论: 随着植入内假体数量的增加和增加

Patientenalter ist eine Zunahme periprothetischer Frakturen zu erwarten. Die
假体周围骨折的增加是可以预期的。这

Therapie periprothetischer Frakturen ist komplex und erfordert sowohl eine
假体周围骨折的治疗很复杂,需要

exakte Analyse der Frakturlokalisation und -morphologie als auch, die Frage nach
精确分析断裂位置和形态以及

Lockerung des einliegenden Materials zu beantworten. Auf dieser Basis kann als
插入的材料松动。在此基础上,

essenzieller Schritt die korrekte Versorgung gewählt und in einem
选择正确护理的重要步骤

spezialisierten Zentrum geplant werden. Mitunter muss bei geriatrischen
专科中心。有时是老年

Patienten mit begleitender Komorbidität ein individuelles Therapiekonzept
伴有合并症的患者接受个体化治疗理念

erstellt werden.
可以创建。


© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH,
© 2022 年。作者,经 Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH 独家许可,

ein Teil von Springer Nature.
施普林格自然的一部分。


DOI: 10.1007/s00391-022-02139-y
DOI: 10.1007/s00391-022-02139-y

PMID: 36459188 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:36459188 [MEDLINE 索引]



16. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Aug;104(2):135-143. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00628-9.
16. 肌肉骨骼外科杂志 2020 年 8 月;104(2):135-143.doi:10.1007/s12306-019-00628-9。

Epub 2019 Oct 23.
Epub 2019 年 10 月 23 日。


Periprosthetic fractures about total knee arthroplasty.
关于全膝关节置换术的假体周围骨折。


Lombardo DJ(1), Siljander MP(2), Sobh A(2), Moore DD(2), Karadsheh MS(2).
Lombardo DJ(1)、Siljander MP(2)、Sobh A(2)、Moore DD(2)、Karadsheh MS(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health, 3535 W 13. Mile Road,
(1)骨科外科,Beaumont Health,3535 W 13。英里路,

Suite 744, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA. dj.lombardo1987@gmail.com.
Suite 744, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, 美国。dj.lombardo1987@gmail.com。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health, 3535 W 13. Mile Road,
(2)骨科外科,Beaumont Health,3535 W 13。英里路,

Suite 744, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA.
Suite 744, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, 美国。


Periprosthetic fracture after total knee arthroplasty presents a difficult
全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折表现为困难

complication for many orthopaedic surgeons. These fractures occur most
许多骨科医生的并发症。这些骨折最常发生

frequently around the distal femur followed by the patella and then tibia. These
经常在股骨远端周围,然后是髌骨,然后是胫骨。这些

fractures are frequently complicated by poor bone quality or compromised bone
骨折经常并发于骨质差或骨骼受损

due to the presence of the implants. Surgical treatment is typically necessary
由于植入物的存在。通常需要手术治疗

and requires varied techniques of open fixation, intramedullary fixation, or
并且需要各种开放固定、髓内固定或

revision arthroplasty. Outcomes of these injuries vary widely. This review aims
翻修关节置换术。这些损伤的结果差异很大。本综述旨在

to describe the epidemiology, classification, treatment options and outcomes for
描述 的流行病学、分类、治疗选择和结局

periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty.
全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折。


DOI: 10.1007/s12306-019-00628-9
DOI: 10.1007/s12306-019-00628-9

PMID: 31643045 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:31643045 [MEDLINE 索引]



17. Int Orthop. 2015 Oct;39(10):1909-20. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2967-4. Epub 2015
17. 国际骨科 2015 年 10 月;39(10):1909-20.doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2967-4。Epub 2015 年

Sep 2.
9 月 2 日。


Periprosthetic femoral fractures--incidence, classification problems and the
股骨假体周围骨折 - 发生率、分类问题和

proposal of a modified classification scheme.
修改后的分类方案的提案。


Frenzel S(1), Vécsei V(2), Negrin L(3).
Frenzel S(1),Vécsei V(2),Negrin L(3)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer
(1)维也纳医科大学创伤外科系,Waehringer

Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. stephan.frenzel@meduniwien.ac.at.
Guertel 18-20, A-1090, 维也纳, 奥地利。stephan.frenzel@meduniwien.ac.at。

(2)Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer
(2)维也纳医科大学创伤外科系,Waehringer

Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. vilmos.vecsei@meduniwien.ac.at.
Guertel 18-20, A-1090, 维也纳, 奥地利。vilmos.vecsei@meduniwien.ac.at。

(3)Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer
(3)维也纳医科大学创伤外科系,Waehringer

Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. lukas.negrin@meduniwien.ac.at.
Guertel 18-20, A-1090, 维也纳, 奥地利。lukas.negrin@meduniwien.ac.at。


INTRODUCTION: The increasing incidence of periprosthetic fractures correlates
引言:假体周围骨折发生率的增加与

directly with the year-after-year increasing frequency of primary joint
直接与同年增加的初次关节频率

replacement surgery. The most common fracture localisation is the femur. The
替代手术。最常见的骨折定位是股骨。这

undisputed leader in frequency is the fracture that occurs around a total hip
无可争议的发生频率是发生在全髋关节周围的骨折

arthroplasty. Unfortunately, no general epidemiologic data exist dealing with
置换 术。遗憾的是,没有关于以下方面的一般流行病学数据

exact fracture incidence numbers. Furthermore, existing classifications are
确切的骨折发生率数字。此外,现有的分类是

lacking important information like time point of fracture occurrence, type of
缺少重要信息,如断裂发生的时间点、类型

the implanted prosthesis and implantation technique (cemented vs. cementless).
植入修复体和植入技术(骨水泥与非骨水泥)。

Additionally, information about mechanical quality of the bone structure and the
此外,有关骨骼结构的机械质量和

fracture type are also missing in part.
Fracture type 部分缺失。

METHODS: We scanned the literature for adequate and widely used classifications
方法: 我们浏览了文献以寻找适当和广泛使用的分类

in the field of hip and knee arthroplasty. In a next step we analyzed those
在髋关节和膝关节置换术领域。在下一步中,我们分析了这些

classification systems in order to find out to what extent they are able to
分类系统,以便了解他们能够在多大程度上

describe the specific aspects of the fracture event. Therefore we compared the
描述骨折事件的具体方面。因此,我们比较了

existing classifications and presented their most relevant emphasis.
现有分类法,并提出了它们最相关的重点。

Furthermore, we looked at our own patient population to evaluate incidence of
此外,我们研究了我们自己的患者群体,以评估

fracture occurrence over time and percentage of loosened components.
随着时间的推移而发生的断裂和松动组件的百分比。

RESULTS: The existing classification systems address themselves specifically to
结果: 现有的分类系统专门针对

the task of describing fracture localization and to some extent fracture type,
描述裂缝定位和某种程度上裂缝类型的任务,

or combine these two in order to calculate the possibility of loosening of the
或者将这两者结合起来,以计算

implanted prosthesis. Some of the important criteria like mechanical quality of
植入的假体。一些重要的标准,如机械质量

the bone stock, primary implantation technique or time point of the prosthesis
骨料、初次植入技术或假体的时间点

loosening (prior to or because of the fracture) remain ignored. The incidence of
松动(在断裂之前或由于断裂)仍然被忽略。发生率

periprosthetic femur fractures at our department increased approximately 2.5
我科股骨假体周围骨折增加约 2.5 例

fold over the past two decades. The risk of suffering from a periprosthetic
fold 的患有假体周围的风险

fracture was substantially higher after THA than after TKA. We observed a loose
THA 后骨折率显著高于 TKA 后。我们观察到一个松散的

femoral component of the THA in about 45 % of the cases. Finally, we postulate
在大约 45% 的情况下,THA 的股骨成分。最后,我们假设

the application of a modified classification for periprosthetic fractures as an
将改良的假体周围骨折分类应用为

alternative to the already published ones; not only for the femur, but also
替代已经发布的;不仅用于股骨,而且

universally for all joints with an arthroplasty.
普遍适用于关节置换术的所有关节。

CONCLUSION: The classification that is introduced in this study allows, in our
结论:本研究中引入的分类允许,在我们的

opinion, a differentiated reflection of the given post-traumatic pathologic
观点,这是对给定创伤后病理的不同反映

changes and enables the description of the fracture itself according to a
更改并启用裂缝本身的描述,并根据

generally accepted fracture classification scheme.
普遍接受的骨折分类方案。


DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2967-4
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2967-4

PMID: 26330085 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:26330085 [MEDLINE 索引]



18. JBJS Rev. 2020 Sep;8(9):e2000003. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00003.
18. JBJS 修订版 2020 年 9 月;8(9):e2000003。doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00003.


The Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femoral Fractures After Total Knee
全膝关节术后假体周围股骨远端骨折的治疗

Replacement: A Critical Analysis Review.
替代品:批判性分析评论。


Quinzi DA(1), Childs S, Lipof JS, Soin SP, Ricciardi BF.
Quinzi DA(1), Childs S, Lipof JS, Soin SP, Ricciardi BF.


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)1Center for Musculoskeletal Research (B.F.R.), Department of Orthopedic
(1)1 肌肉骨骼研究中心 (B.F.R.) 骨科

Surgery (D.A.Q., S.C., J.S.L., S.P.S., and B.F.R.), University of Rochester
外科(D.A.Q.、S.C.、J.S.L.、S.P.S. 和 BFR),罗切斯特大学

School of Medicine, Rochester, New York.
纽约州罗切斯特医学院。


Periprosthetic distal femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty carries
全膝关节置换术后假体周围股骨远端骨折

substantial morbidity and mortality regardless of fixation technique. Surgical
无论固定技术如何,发病率和死亡率都很高。外科

treatment is favored in most patients compared with conservative therapy because
与保守治疗相比,大多数患者倾向于治疗,因为

of high rates of nonunion, malunion, and reoperation after casting or bracing.
石膏固定或支具后骨连、畸形愈合和再次手术的发生率高。

Internal fixation techniques including retrograde intramedullary nailing and
内固定技术包括逆行髓内钉和

locked plating are favored for surgical treatment in most fractures when bone
对于大多数骨折,当骨

stock in the distal fragment allows for appropriate fixation. In the setting of
远端碎片中的原液允许适当固定。在

deficient distal femoral bone stock or femoral component loosening, revision
股骨远端骨库缺陷或股骨成分松动、翻修

arthroplasty with distal femoral replacement is the favored technique. Further
股骨远端置换术的关节置换术是最受欢迎的技术。进一步

studies with regard to the use of intramedullary nailing, locked plating, and
关于髓内钉、锁定钢板和

distal femoral replacement are necessary to refine the indications for each
股骨远端置换术是必要的,以完善每个

technique and to define the use of combinations of these fixation techniques.
技术,并定义这些固定技术的组合的使用。


DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00003
DOI:10.2106/JBJS。RVW.20.00003

PMID: 33151645 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:33151645 [MEDLINE 索引]



19. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec 2;22(1):1009. doi:
19. BMC 肌肉骨骼 Disord。2021 年 12 月 2 日;22(1):1009.doi:

10.1186/s12891-021-04875-5.
10.1186/s12891-021-04875-5。


Risk factors of early periprosthetic femoral fracture after total knee
全膝关节术后早期假体周围骨折的危险因素

arthroplasty.
置换 术。


Pornrattanamaneewong C(1), Sitthitheerarut A(2), Ruangsomboon P(1),
Pornrattanamaneewong C(1), Sitthitheerarut A(2), Ruangsomboon P(1),

Chareancholvanich K(1), Narkbunnam R(3).
Chareancholvanich K(1),Narkbunnam R(3)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital,
(1)Siriraj 医院医学院骨科

Mahidol University, 2 Wang Lang Road, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
玛希隆大学,2 Wang Lang Road, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Prajuabkirikhan Hospital, Bangkok,
(2)曼谷 Prajuabkirikhan 医院骨科外科

Thailand.
泰国。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital,
(3)Siriraj 医院医学院骨科

Mahidol University, 2 Wang Lang Road, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
玛希隆大学,2 Wang Lang Road, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand。

mai_parma@hotmail.com.
mai_parma@hotmail.com。


BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a serious complication
背景: 股骨假体周围骨折 (PFF) 是一种严重的并发症

after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the risk factors of PFF in the
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 后。然而,PFF 在

early postoperative setting are not well documented. This study determines the
术后早期情况没有得到很好的记录。本研究确定了

risk factors of early PFF after primary TKA.
初次 TKA 后早期 PFF 的危险因素。

METHODS: This study recruited 24 patients who had early PFF within postoperative
方法: 本研究招募了 24 例术后早期 PFF 患者

3 months and 96 control patients. Demographic data (age, gender, weight, height,
3 个月和 96 名对照患者。人口统计数据(年龄、性别、体重、身高、

body mass index, Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index, diagnosis, operated side,
体重指数,Deyo-Charlson 合并症指数,诊断,手术侧,

underlying diseases and history of steroid usage intraoperative outcomes),
潜在疾病和术中类固醇使用史结局),

intraoperative outcomes (operative time, surgical approach, type and brand of
术中结局(手术时间、手术入路、类型和品牌

the prosthesis), and radiographic outcomes (distal femoral width; DFW,
假体)和影像学结果(股骨远端宽度;DFW,

prosthesis-distal femoral width ratio; PDFW ratio, anatomical lateral distal
假体-股骨远端宽度比;PDFW 比值,解剖外侧远端

femoral angle; LDFA, the change of LDFA, femoral component flexion angle; FCFA
股骨角;LDFA,LDFA,股骨成分屈曲角度的变化;FCFA

and anterior femoral notching; AFN) were recorded and compared between groups.
和股骨前切迹;AFN) 记录并在组间进行比较。

Details of PFF, including fracture pattern, preoperative deformity, and time to
PFF 的详细信息,包括骨折类型、术前畸形和

PFF were also documented.
还记录了 PFF。

RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the PFF group had significantly older, right
结果: 在单变量分析中,PFF 组明显年龄较大,右

side injury, rheumatoid, dyslipidemia, Parkinson patients than the control group
侧伤、类风湿、血脂异常、帕金森患者比对照组

(p < 0.05). No cruciate-retaining design was used in PFF group (p = 0.004).
(p < 0.05)。PFF 组未使用十字架固定设计 (p = 0.004)。

Differences between the prosthetic brand used were found in this study
在本研究中发现了所使用的假肢品牌之间的差异

(p = 0.049). For radiographic outcomes, PFF group had significantly lower DFW
(p = 0.049)。对于影像学结局,PFF 组的 DFW 显著降低

but higher PDFW ratio and postoperative LDFA than the control group (p < 0.05).
但 PDFW 比值和术后 LDFA 高于对照组 (p < 0.05)。

While the change of LDFA, FCFA and AFN were similar between groups. The fracture
而 LDFA 、 FCFA 和 AFN 的变化在组间相似。骨折

patterns were medial condylar (45.8%), lateral condylar (25.0%) and
模式为内侧髁 (45.8%)、外侧髁 (25.0%) 和

supracondylar fracture (29.2%). The mean overall time to PFF was
髁上骨折 (29.2%)。PFF 的平均总时间为

37.2 ± 20.6 days (range 8-87 days). Preoperative deformity was significantly
37.2 ± 20.6 天(范围 8-87 天)。术前畸形明显

different among the three patterns (p < 0.05). When performed multivariate
三种模式之间的差异 (P < 0.05)。执行多变量时

analysis using the logistic regression model, age was only an independent risk
使用 Logistic 回归模型进行分析,年龄只是一个独立的风险

factor for early PFF. The cut-off point of age was > = 75 years, with a
早期 PFF 的因素。年龄的临界点是 > = 75 岁,其中

sensitivity of 75.0% and specificity of 78.1%.
敏感性为 75.0%,特异性为 78.1%。

CONCLUSION: This study determined that age was the independent risk factors for
结论: 本研究确定年龄是

early PFF. However, further well-controlled studies with a larger sample size
早期 PFF。然而,进一步进行对照良好的研究,样本量更大

were needed to address this issue.
需要解决这个问题。


© 2021. The Author(s).
© 2021 年。作者。


DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04875-5
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04875-5

PMCID: PMC8641153
PMCID:PMC8641153

PMID: 34856975 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:34856975 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict
利益冲突声明:作者声明他们没有冲突

of interest.
感兴趣。



20. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Nov;110(7):103856. doi:
20. 骨科创伤外科研究 2024 年 11 月;110(7):103856.doi:

10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103856. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103856.Epub 2024 年 3 月 2 日。


Revision total knee arthroplasty with periprosthetic distal femoral fracture.
翻修全膝关节置换术伴股骨假体远端骨折。


Chantelot C(1), Saab M(2), Martin T(2), Begue T(3), Ehlinger M(4), Flecher X(5);
尚特洛 C(1), 萨博 M(2), 马丁 T(2), 贝格 T(3), 埃林格 M(4), 弗莱彻 X(5);

SoFCOT(6).
SoFCOT(6) 的。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Service de traumatologie, hôpital Salengro, CHU de Lille, avenue du
(1)里尔大学医院 Salengro 医院创伤科,大道

Professeur Emile-Laine, 59000 Lille, France. Electronic address:
Professor Emile-Laine, 59000 Lille, France.电子地址:

christophe.chantelot@chru-lille.fr.
christophe.chantelot@chru-lille.fr。

(2)Service de traumatologie, hôpital Salengro, CHU de Lille, avenue du
(2)里尔大学医院 Salengro 医院创伤科,大道

Professeur Emile-Laine, 59000 Lille, France.
Professor Emile-Laine, 59000 Lille, France.

(3)Service de traumatologie, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, 157, rue de la Porte de
(3)Antoine-Béclère 医院创伤科,157 号,rue de la Porte de

Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France.
Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, 法国。

(4)Service de traumatologie, hôpital de Hautepierre, avenue Molière, 67200
(4)Hautepierre 医院创伤科,莫里哀大道,67200

Strasbourg, France.
法国斯特拉斯堡。

(5)Service de traumatologie, hôpital Nord, chemin des Bourrely, 13015 Marseille,
(5)创伤科, 北方医院, chemin des Bourrely, 13015 马赛,

France.
法国。

(6)56, rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris cedex, France.
(6)56, rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris cedex, France.


Treatment strategies for periprosthetic distal femoral fracture depend on the
假体周围股骨远端骨折的治疗策略取决于

type of fracture, level with respect to the prosthesis, and prosthesis fixation.
骨折类型、相对于假体的水平和假体固定。

The usual treatment is internal fixation by nail or locking plate. This can be
通常的治疗方法是通过钉子或锁定钢板进行内固定。这可以是

more difficult when the fracture is close to the joint, is destabilizing the
当骨折靠近关节时,更困难的是不稳定

prosthesis or is associated with reduced bone stock, and implant exchange should
修复体或与骨量减少有关,并且应更换种植体

be considered, depending on the patient's health status. The aim is to obtain
根据患者的健康状况进行考虑。目的是获得

the fastest possible recovery while limiting complications and minimizing
最快的恢复速度,同时减少并发症并最大限度地减少

surgery time for often frail and elderly patients. The present study details the
通常体弱和老年患者的手术时间。本研究详细介绍了

implant revision technique in periprosthetic distal femoral fracture, which
股骨假体周围远端骨折的种植体翻修技术,其中

requires experience in traumatology and prosthetic revision and material adapted
需要创伤学和修复经验,并适应材料

to the situation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, expert opinion.
到情况。证据级别: V,专家意见。


Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS。保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103856
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103856

PMID: 38438108 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:38438108 [MEDLINE 索引]



21. Injury. 2021 Nov;52(11):3483-3488. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.015. Epub 2021
21. 受伤。2021 年 11 月;52(11):3483-3488.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.015。Epub 2021 年

Jan 19.
1 月 19 日。


Periprosthetic fractures of hip and knee-A morbidity and mortality analysis.
髋关节和膝关节假体周围骨折 A 发病率和死亡率分析。


Smolle MA(1), Hörlesberger N(2), Maurer-Ertl W(3), Puchwein P(4), Seibert FJ(5),
Smolle MA(1), Hörlesberger N(2), Maurer-Ertl W(3), Puchwein P(4), Seibert FJ(5),

Leithner A(6).
莱斯纳 A(6)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz,
(1)格拉茨医科大学骨科和创伤系

Auenbruggerplatz 5, Graz 8036, Austria. Electronic address:
Auenbruggerplatz 5, 格拉茨 8036, 奥地利。电子地址:

maria.smolle@medunigraz.at.
maria.smolle@medunigraz.at。

(2)Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz,
(2)格拉茨医科大学骨科和创伤系

Auenbruggerplatz 5, Graz 8036, Austria. Electronic address:
Auenbruggerplatz 5, 格拉茨 8036, 奥地利。电子地址:

nina.hoerlesberger@aon.at.
nina.hoerlesberger@aon.at。

(3)Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz,
(3)格拉茨医科大学骨科和创伤系

Auenbruggerplatz 5, Graz 8036, Austria. Electronic address:
Auenbruggerplatz 5, 格拉茨 8036, 奥地利。电子地址:

werner.maurer-ertl@medunigraz.at.
werner.maurer-ertl@medunigraz.at。

(4)Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz,
(4)格拉茨医科大学骨科和创伤系

Auenbruggerplatz 5, Graz 8036, Austria. Electronic address:
Auenbruggerplatz 5, 格拉茨 8036, 奥地利。电子地址:

paul.puchwein@medunigraz.at.
paul.puchwein@medunigraz.at。

(5)Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz,
(5)格拉茨医科大学骨科和创伤系

Auenbruggerplatz 5, Graz 8036, Austria. Electronic address:
Auenbruggerplatz 5, 格拉茨 8036, 奥地利。电子地址:

franz.seibert@medunigraz.at.
franz.seibert@medunigraz.at。

(6)Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz,
(6)格拉茨医科大学骨科和创伤系

Auenbruggerplatz 5, Graz 8036, Austria. Electronic address:
Auenbruggerplatz 5, 格拉茨 8036, 奥地利。电子地址:

andreas.leithner@medunigraz.at.
andreas.leithner@medunigraz.at。


BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fractures (PPF) following total knee (TKA) and hip
背景:全膝关节 (TKA) 和髋关节后假体周围骨折 (PPF)

arthroplasty (THA) have become more common over the years. The aim of the
多年来,关节置换术 (THA) 变得越来越普遍。目标

present study was to assess morbidity and mortality following surgery for PPF of
本研究旨在评估 PPF 手术后的发病率和死亡率

hip and knee.
臀部和膝盖。

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Altogether, 124 patients (mean age: 77 years; 77.4%
患者和方法: 总共 124 例患者 (平均年龄: 77 岁;77.4%

female) with PPF of the hip (n=97) and knee (n=27), treated between 2005 and
女性)患有髋关节 (n=97) 和膝关节 (n=27) 的 PPF,在 2005 年至 2005 年间接受治疗

2017 at a level-1 trauma centre, were retrospectively included. In order to
2017 年在 1 级创伤中心,被回顾性纳入。为了

assess risk factors for postoperative morbidity, Fine and Gray's model was used
评估术后发病的危险因素,使用 Fine 和 Gray 模型

to compensate for death as the competing event. Risk factors for mortality were
以补偿作为竞争事件的死亡。死亡的危险因素是

estimated with uni- and multivariate Cox-regression models.
使用单变量和多变量 Cox 回归模型进行估计。

RESULTS: Vancouver B2 fractures were most common (n=39; 42.4%), followed by B1
结果: 温哥华 B2 骨折最常见 (n=39;42.4%),其次是 B1

fractures (n=23; 25.0%). Lewis-Rorabeck Type I fractures (n=14; 51.9%) were most
骨折 (n=23;25.0%)。Lewis-Rorabeck I 型骨折 (n=14;51.9%) 最

frequent in PPF of the knee. Overall complication rates were 44.0% and 29.9% for
在膝关节 PPF 中常见。总体并发症发生率分别为 44.0% 和 29.9%

PPF of the knee and hip, respectively, with three patients having both early and
膝关节和髋关节的 PPF,3 例患者早期和

late complications, 25 patients developing early complications and 19 patients
晚期并发症,25 例患者出现早期并发症,19 例患者

undergoing surgery for implant-related, late complications. In the multivariate
因植入物相关的晚期并发症而接受手术。在多元

Fine and Gray model, advanced patient age (HR: 0.956; 95%CI: 0.922-0.991;
精细和灰色模型,晚期患者年龄 (HR: 0.956;95% CI: 0.922-0.991;

p=0.014) and prosthesis exchange (vs. ORIF; HR: 0.242, 95%CI: 0.068-0.859;
p=0.014)和假体置换(vs. ORIF;HR: 0.242, 95%CI: 0.068-0.859;

p=0.028) were associated with lower risk of implant-related complications,
p=0.028)与植入物相关并发症风险较低,

irrespective of gender (p=0.450) and a surgical delay > 2 days (p=0.411). One-
不分性别 (p=0.450) 和手术延迟 2 天 > (p=0.411)。一-

and 5-year overall survival-rates were 97.9% and 93.1%, respectively. Gender,
5 年总生存率分别为 97.9% 和 93.1%。性

type of fixation (ORIF vs. prosthesis exchange), surgical delay > 2 days, BMI
固定类型(ORIF 与假体置换)、手术延迟 2 >、BMI

and age at surgery were neither in the univariate, nor multivariate
和手术年龄既不是单变量的,也不是多变量的

Cox-regression model associated with an increased mortality rate.
与死亡率增加相关的 Cox 回归模型。

CONCLUSION: Postoperative morbidity caused by implant-related complications is
结论: 种植体相关并发症引起的术后并发症发病率

higher in younger patients and those receiving ORIF. With the statistical
在年轻患者和接受 ORIF 的患者中更高。使用统计数据

approach used, potential underestimation of actual complication rates may have
使用的方法,可能低估了实际并发症发生率

been avoided, taking into account death as the competing event. Despite being
被避免了,考虑到死亡是竞争事件。尽管是

based on a retrospective, heterogenous patient collective treated at a level-1
基于在 1 级治疗的回顾性异质性患者集体

trauma centre, our results indicate that careful planning of the surgical
创伤中心,我们的结果表明,仔细规划手术

procedure beyond 2 days, taking into consideration both patient's age and
超过 2 天的程序,同时考虑患者的年龄和

activity level, has no negative effect on patient outcome.
活动水平,对患者预后没有负面影响。


Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2021 The Authors。出版商 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.015
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.015

PMID: 33536128 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:33536128 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the
利益冲突声明:利益冲突声明 没有

authors has any conflicts of interest related to the present manuscript to
作者与本手稿有任何利益冲突

declare.
宣。



22. Injury. 2023 Apr;54(4):1030-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.037. Epub 2023
22. 受伤。2023 年 4 月;54(4):1030-1038.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.037。Epub 2023 年

Feb 22.
2 月 22 日。


Periprosthetic distal femur fractures around total knee replacements: A
全膝关节置换术周围假体股骨远端骨折:A

comprehensive review.
综合审查。


Al-Jabri T(1), Ridha M(2), McCulloch RA(2), Jayadev C(3), Kayani B(4),
Al-Jabri T(1), Ridha M(2), McCulloch RA(2), Jayadev C(3), Kayani B(4),

Giannoudis PV(5).
詹努迪斯 PV(5)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial
(1)创伤和骨科外科, 外科和癌症, 帝国理工学院

College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; Joint Reconstruction Unit, The Royal
College London, London SW7 2AZ, 英国;皇家联合重建单位

National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, Stanmore HA7 4LP, UK; King Edward VII's
英国伦敦国家骨科医院 Stanmore HA7 4LP;爱德华七世国王

Hospital, 5-10 Beaumont Street, Marylebone, London W1G 6AA, UK. Electronic
医院,5-10 Beaumont Street, Marylebone, London W1G 6AA, UK。电子的

address: tjresearcharticles@hotmail.com.
地址 : tjresearcharticles@hotmail.com.

(2)Joint Reconstruction Unit, The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London,
(2)伦敦皇家国家骨科医院联合重建科

Stanmore HA7 4LP, UK.
Stanmore HA7 4LP,英国。

(3)Joint Reconstruction Unit, The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London,
(3)伦敦皇家国家骨科医院联合重建科

Stanmore HA7 4LP, UK; King Edward VII's Hospital, 5-10 Beaumont Street,
Stanmore HA7 4LP,英国;爱德华七世国王医院,博蒙特街 5-10 号,

Marylebone, London W1G 6AA, UK.
马里波恩,伦敦 W1G 6AA,英国。

(4)Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital,
(4)大学学院医院创伤与骨外科

235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London NW1 2BU, UK.
235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, 伦敦 NW1 2BU, 英国。

(5)Academic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine,
(5)医学院创伤与骨外科学术系,

University of Leeds, Clarendon Wing, Floor D, Great George Street, Leeds General
利兹大学,克拉伦登翼,大乔治街 D 楼,利兹将军

Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK; NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Chapel
英国利兹 LS1 3EX 医务室;NIHR 利兹生物医学研究中心,教堂

Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Allerton 医院,英国利兹。


With a growing number of patients undergoing total knee replacements globally,
随着全球接受全膝关节置换术的患者数量不断增加,

coupled with an elderly population, the incidence of periprosthetic fractures
再加上老年人口,假体周围骨折的发生率

around total knee replacements is increasing. As such, this is a highly topical
全膝关节置换术正在增加。因此,这是一个高度热门的话题

subject that is gaining increasing interest within the orthopaedic community.
这个主题在骨科界越来越受到关注。

This review provides a narrative synthesis of the most contemporary literature
这篇评论提供了最当代文学的叙述性综合

regarding distal femoral periprosthetic fractures. We review the related
关于远端股骨假体周围骨折。我们回顾了相关的

epidemiology, initial patient evaluation, the evolution and relevance of the
流行病学、初始患者评估、

classification systems and treatment options, particularly related to
分类系统和治疗方案,特别是与

endoprosthetics and hybrid fixation constructs. The latest orthopaedic evidence
内假体和混合固定结构。最新的骨科证据

related to this topic has been included.
与此主题相关的内容已包含在内。


Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2023 作者。出版商 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.037
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.037

PMID: 36854630 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:36854630 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of Competing interest The authors
利益冲突声明:利益争夺声明 作者

declare that they do not have any competing interests.
声明他们没有任何竞争利益。



23. J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Jan;34(1):83-92. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3584. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
23. J Bone Miner Res. 2019 年 1 月;34(1):83-92.doi:10.1002/jbmr.3584。Epub 2018 年 10 月 2 日。


Prevalence and Characteristics of Atypical Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures.
非典型假体股骨周围骨折的患病率和特征。


Leclerc JT(1), Michou L(2)(3), Vaillancourt F(4), Pelet S(1)(3), Simonyan D(5),
勒克莱尔 JT(1), Michou L(2)(3), Vaillancourt F(4), Pelet S(1)(3), Simonyan D(5),

Belzile EL(1)(3).
贝尔齐尔 EL(1)(3)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de
(1)大学医院中心 (CHU) de 骨外科

Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
魁北克-拉瓦尔大学,魁北克,加拿大。

(2)Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier
(2)Centre Hospitalier 内科风湿病科

Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
魁北克拉瓦尔大学医院 (CHU),加拿大魁北克市,魁北克省。

(3)Centre de recherche Fonds de la recherche du Québec en santé (FRQS) du Centre
(3)Centre de recherche Fonds de la recherche du Québec en santé (FRQS) du Centre

Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada.
加拿大魁北克省魁北克省魁北克大学医院 (CHU)。

(4)Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
(4)加拿大魁北克省魁北克省拉瓦尔大学医学系。

(5)Clinical and Evaluative Research Platform, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
(5)Centre Hospitalier Universitaire 临床与评价研究平台

(CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Quebec, QC, Canada.
(CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre,魁北克省,QC,加拿大。


Bisphosphonate use has been associated with atypical femoral fractures (AFFs),
使用双膦酸盐与非典型股骨骨折 (AFF) 有关,

defined by the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) Task Force
由美国骨与矿物质研究学会 (ASBMR) 工作组定义

criteria, which currently exclude periprosthetic fractures. The objectives of
标准,目前排除了假体周围骨折。目标

this study were to establish the prevalence of atypical periprosthetic femoral
这项研究旨在确定非典型假体股骨假体的患病率

fractures (APFFs) in patients with hip and knee arthroplasties and to determine
髋关节和膝关节置换术患者的骨折 (APFFs) 并确定

the clinical and radiological risk factors associated with these fractures. We
与这些骨折相关的临床和放射学危险因素。我们

performed a retrospective radiological review of all femoral fractures between
对两者之间的所有股骨骨折进行了回顾性放射学回顾

January 1, 2006, and March 31, 2015, in Quebec City, Canada. Patients who
2006 年 1 月 1 日和 2015 年 3 月 31 日,加拿大魁北克市。以下患者

sustained a periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) were identified and included
确定并纳入了持续的假体股骨周围骨折 (PFF)

in this study. We used the ASBMR Task Force criteria to identify atypical
在这项研究中。我们使用 ASBMR 工作组标准来识别非典型

fractures and establish their prevalence. Data from medical records and
骨折并确定其患病率。来自病历的数据和

radiological assessments of the femoral anatomy, the characteristics of the
股骨解剖结构的放射学评估、

fracture, and the positioning of the prosthesis were collected. The prevalence
收集骨折和假体的位置。患病率

of APFFs among PFFs was 8.3% (11/133). A strong association with bisphosphonates
PFF 中 APFF 的 8.3% (11/133)。与双膦酸盐的强关联

(p = 0.007) was observed, as well as an increased risk of APFFs among
(p = 0.007) 的 API 中观察到的 APFF 风险增加

alendronate users compared to risedronate users (p = 0.04). A transverse
阿仑膦酸盐使用者与利塞膦酸盐使用者的比较 (p = 0.04)。A 横向

fracture (p < 0.0001), a periosteal thickening of the lateral cortex at the
骨折 (P < 0.0001),外侧皮层在

fracture (p < 0.0001), a unicortical fracture (p = 0.02), and prodromal symptoms
骨折 (P < 0.0001)、单皮质骨折 (P = 0.02) 和前驱症状

(p = 0.03) were associated with APFFs. The type of implant, its positioning, and
(p = 0.03) 与 APFF 相关。植入物的类型、位置和

the femoral geometry did not appear to be risk factors for APFFs compared to
股骨几何形状似乎不是 APFF 的危险因素

PFFs. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
PFF. © 2018 美国骨与矿物研究学会。


© 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
© 2018 年美国骨骼和矿物研究学会。


DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3584
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3584

PMID: 30280425 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:30280425 [MEDLINE 索引]



24. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7 Suppl 2):S450-S458. doi:
24. J 关节置换术。2023 年 7 月;38(7 增刊 2):S450-S458。doi:

10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.044. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.044.Epub 2023 年 2 月 2 日。


Distal Femoral Replacement versus Operative Fixation for Periprosthetic Distal
股骨远端置换术与假体周围远端修复术的手术固定

Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
股骨骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。


Bundschuh KE(1), Grommersch BM(1), Tipton SC(1), Chihab S(1), Wilson JM(2),
Bundschuh KE(1), Grommersch BM(1), Tipton SC(1), Chihab S(1), Wilson JM(2),

Guild GN 3rd(1).
公会 GN 第 3 (1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atlanta, Georgia.
(1)佐治亚州亚特兰大骨科外科。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee.
(2)田纳西州纳什维尔骨科外科。


BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and distal femoral
背景: 切开复位内固定术 (ORIF) 和股骨远端

replacement (DFR) have been utilized in the management of periprosthetic distal
替代物 (DFR) 已用于远端假体周围修复体的治疗

femur fractures. At present, much of the literature has been limited to small
股骨骨折。目前,许多文献仅限于小型

retrospective series. The purpose of the current investigation was to present
回顾性系列。当前调查的目的是提出

the results of pooled data to determine the complication rates associated with
用于确定与

ORIF and DFR.
ORIF 和 DFR。

METHODS: Publications from 2010 to 2020 describing 10 or more periprosthetic
方法: 2010 年至 2020 年描述 10 个或更多假体周围修复体的出版物

distal femur fractures treated with ORIF (ie, single plate, intramedullary nail,
用 ORIF 治疗的股骨远端骨折(即单钢板、髓内钉、

and dual fixation) or DFR were included, resulting in 32 publications and 1,258
和双重固定)或 DFR 的研究中,共发表了 32 篇出版物和 1,258 篇

fractures (977 ORIF and 281 DFR). Occurrence of surgical complications,
骨折 (977 ORIF 和 281 DFR)。手术并发症的发生,

reoperations, and medical complications were evaluated and compared.
对再次手术和躯体并发症进行评估和比较。

RESULTS: The rate of surgical complications (ORIF versus DFR, 20.5 versus 14.9%,
结果: 手术并发症发生率 (ORIF vs DFR,20.5 vs 14.9%,

P = 1.0) and reoperations (12.9 versus 12.5%, P = 1.0) following DFR were
P = 1.0) 和 DFR 后再次手术 (12.9 vs 12.5%,P = 1.0) 分别为

similar. However, pooled analyses demonstrated that patients treated with DFR
类似。然而,汇总分析表明,接受 DFR 治疗的患者

had a higher medical complication rate (ORIF versus DFR, 8.5 versus 23.1%, P =
医疗并发症发生率较高 (ORIF vs DFR,8.5 vs 23.1%,P =

.0006).

CONCLUSION: ORIF and DFR for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femur
结论: ORIF 和 DFR 治疗股骨假体周围远端

fractures have similar surgical complication and reoperation profiles. While
骨折具有相似的手术并发症和再次手术特征。而

this review found an increased rate of medical complication following DFR, there
本综述发现 DFR 后医疗并发症的发生率增加,有

are limitations in quality reporting in the literature, which should be
是文献中质量报道的局限性,这应该是

considered when interpreting the study's findings. Failed ORIF can be salvaged
在解释研究结果时考虑。失败的 ORIF 可以挽救

with DFR, but the difficulty of this reoperation is dependent on the ORIF
使用 DFR,但这种再次手术的难度取决于 ORIF

technique that was used. With future prospective studies, this review can help
技术。对于未来的前瞻性研究,本综述可以提供帮助

guide management of these fractures.
指导这些骨折的处理。


Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2023 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.044
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.044

PMID: 36738864 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:36738864 [MEDLINE 索引]



25. J Arthroplasty. 2024 Oct;39(10):2615-2620. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.033. Epub
25. J 关节置换术。2024 年 10 月;39(10):2615-2620.doi:10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.033.电子版

2024 May 15.
2024 年 5 月 15 日。


Risk and Epidemiology of Periprosthetic Knee Fractures After Primary Total Knee
初次全膝关节术后假体周围膝关节骨折的风险和流行病学

Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
关节成形术:一项全国性的队列研究。


Risager SK(1), Arndt KB(2), Abrahamsen C(2), Viberg B(1), Odgaard A(3),
里萨格尔 SK(1), 阿恩特 KB(2), 亚伯拉罕森 C(2), 维伯格 B(1), 奥德加德 A(3),

Lindberg-Larsen M(1).
林德伯格-拉森 M(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic and traumatology, Odense University Hospital,
(1)欧登塞大学医院骨科和创伤科,

Odense Denmark.
丹麦欧登塞。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Lillebaelt,
(2)利勒巴伊尔特医院骨科外科和创伤科,

University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding Denmark.
南丹麦大学医院,丹麦科灵。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Rigshospitalet,
(3)Rigshospitalet 骨外科和创伤科,

Copenhagen Denmark.
丹麦哥本哈根。


BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic knee fractures (PPKFs) following total knee
背景:全膝关节术后假体周围膝关节骨折 (PPKFs)

arthroplasty (TKA) are uncommon, but potentially serious injuries. We analyze
关节置换术 (TKA) 并不常见,但可能造成严重损伤。我们分析

the risk and risk factors for a PPKF in standard primary TKA patients who have
标准原发性 TKA 患者发生 PPKF 的风险和危险因素

osteoarthritis and a minimally (cruciate-retaining TKAs without a femoral box
骨关节炎和无股骨盒的轻微(交叉骨保留 TKA)

cut) or posterior-stabilized TKA. In addition, we report the risk for patients
cut) 或后部稳定的 TKA。此外,我们还会向患者报告

who have other underlying knee disorders and/or a higher level of TKA
患有其他潜在膝关节疾病和/或更高水平的 TKA 的人

constraint.
约束。

METHODS: All primary TKAs were identified from the Danish National Patient
方法: 从丹麦国家患者中确定所有原发性 TKA

Register and the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register using data between 1997 and
登记册和丹麦膝关节置换术登记册,使用 1997 年至 1997 年间的数据

2022. Subsequent fractures were identified through the International
2022. 随后的骨折是通过国际

Classification of Diseases diagnosis code, Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee
疾病分类诊断代码,北欧医学统计委员会

procedure code, or indication for revision TKA.
过程代码或修订版 TKA 的指示。

RESULTS: We included 120,642 standard primary TKA patients who had 1,659 PPKFs.
结果: 我们纳入了 120,642 例标准原发性 TKA 患者,这些患者有 1,659 个 PPKFs。

The cumulated proportions were 0.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3 to 0.4) at
累积比例为 0.4% (95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.3 至 0.4)

2 years 0.8% (0.7 to 0.8) at 5 years. At 10 years, the cumulated proportion was
2 年为 0.8%(0.7 至 0.8),5 年。10 岁时,累积比例为

1.7% (1.6 to 1.8), with 1.3% in the femur, 0.2% in the patella, and 0.2% in the
1.7%(1.6 至 1.8),股骨 1.3%,髌骨 0.2%,髌骨 0.2%

tibia. Significant risk factors were (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI]); ipsilateral
胫骨。显著的危险因素是 (风险比 [HR] [95% CI]);侧

hip arthroplasty (2.3 [2.0 to 2.6]); women (2.1 [1.8 to 2.4]), osteoporosis (1.4
髋关节置换术(2.3 [2.0 至 2.6]);女性 (2.1 [1.8 至 2.4])、骨质疏松症 (1.4

[1.2 to 1.7]); age 80+ (1.4 [1.3 to 1.6]), uncemented TKA (1.3 (1.1 to 1.5) and
[1.2 至 1.7]);年龄 80+(1.4 [1.3 至 1.6])、非骨水泥 TKA(1.3(1.1 至 1.5)和

Charlson Comorbidity Index score 3+ (1.4 [1.1 to 1.8]). An additional 22,624
Charlson 合并症指数评分 3+(1.4 [1.1-1.8])。新增 22,624 人

primary TKA patients who had other underlying knee disorders and/or a higher
患有其他潜在膝关节疾病和/或更高级别的原发性 TKA 患者

level of implant constraint were included with 633 PPKFs. The 10-year cumulated
633 个 PPKF 包括种植体约束水平。10 年累计

proportions were 8.3% (95% CI 6.9 to 9.8) when the underlying disorder was a
当基础疾病为

previous fracture, 2.8% (2.2 to 3.5) for rheumatic disorders, and 5.2% (2.6 to
既往骨折,风湿性疾病为 2.8%(2.2 至 3.5),风湿性疾病为 5.2%(2.6 至

10.6) for osteonecrosis. In patients who had condylar constrained knees, it was
10.6) 治疗骨坏死。在髁突受限膝关节的患者中,它是

6.9% (5.1 to 9.4), and 12.4% (8.0 to 16.04) for hinges.
铰链为 6.9%(5.1 至 9.4)和 12.4%(8.0 至 16.04)。

CONCLUSIONS: In standard primary TKA patients, the 10-year cumulated proportion
结论: 在标准原发性 TKA 患者中,10 年累积比例

of PPKFs was 1.7%, and ipsilateral hip arthroplasty, women, osteoporosis,
PPKF 为 1.7%,同侧髋关节置换术、女性、骨质疏松症、

advanced age, uncemented TKA and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index increased the
高龄、未骨水泥 TKA 和较高的 Charlson 合并症指数增加了

risk. Higher risks were observed in non-osteoarthritis patients and/or patients
风险。在非骨关节炎患者和/或患者中观察到更高的风险

who had a higher level of TKA constraint.
具有更高级别的 TKA 约束。


Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2024 作者。由 Elsevier Inc. 出版保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.033
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.033

PMID: 38759816 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:38759816 [MEDLINE 索引]



26. J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7):1354-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.115. Epub
26. J 关节置换术。2022 年 7 月;37(7):1354-1358.doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.115。电子版

2022 Mar 8.
2022 年 3 月 8 日。


Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA: Australian
TKA 后假体周围骨折的股骨远端置换术:澳大利亚

Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Review.
骨科协会全国关节置换登记审查。


Aebischer AS(1), Hau R(2), de Steiger RN(3), Holder C(4), Wall CJ(5).
Aebischer AS(1), Hau R(2), de Steiger RN(3), 持有人 C(4), 沃尔 CJ(5)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia.
(1)澳大利亚图文巴图文巴医院骨科。

(2)Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Victoria,
(2)莫纳什大学东部健康临床学院,维多利亚州博士山,

Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Northern Medical
澳大利亚;墨尔本大学北方医学外科

School, Epping, Victoria, Australia.
学校,澳大利亚维多利亚州埃平。

(3)Department of Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, University of Melbourne, Richmond,
(3)墨尔本大学里士满分校 Epworth Healthcare 外科

Australia; Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement
澳大利亚;澳大利亚骨科协会全国关节置换术

Registry, Adelaide, Australia.
澳大利亚阿德莱德登记处。

(4)MBiostat, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI),
(4)MBiostat,南澳大利亚健康与医学研究所 (SAHMRI),

Adelaide, South Australia.
南澳大利亚州阿德莱德。

(5)Department of Orthopaedics, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia; School
(5)澳大利亚图文巴 Toowoomba 医院骨科;学校

of Medicine Rural Clinical School, University of Queensland, Toowoomba,
昆士兰大学 Toowoomba 医学农村临床学院,

Australia.
澳大利亚。


BACKGROUND: Distal femoral replacement (DFR) is a potential treatment option
背景: 股骨远端置换术 (DFR) 是一种潜在的治疗选择

following periprosthetic fracture (PPF) of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 的假体周围骨折 (PPF) 后。

However, there is limited literature regarding implant survivorship and
然而,关于种植体存活率和

complication rates. The aim of this study was to examine patient demographics
并发症发生率。本研究的目的是检查患者人口统计数据

and trends in usage, implant survivorship and modes of failure, and patient
以及使用趋势、植入物存活率和失败模式以及患者

mortality following DFR for PPF captured by a national joint replacement
国家关节置换术捕获的 PPF 的 DFR 后死亡率

registry.
注册表。

METHODS: A retrospective registry review was performed using data from the
方法: 使用来自

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处

(AOANJRR). In total, 306 DFR were performed for PPF of a known primary TKA.
(AOANJRR) 的。总共对已知原发性 TKA 的 PPF 进行了 306 例 DFR。

Eighty-five percent of patients were female, and the mean age was 76.4 years.
85% 的患者为女性,平均年龄为 76.4 岁。

Kaplan-Meier estimates of implant and patient survivorship were performed.
对植入物和患者存活率进行 Kaplan-Meier 估计。

RESULTS: The number of DFR performed for PPF has doubled over the past five
结果:在过去五年中,为 PPF 进行的 DFR 数量翻了一番

years. The cumulative percent second revision rate at six years was 12%. The
年。六年时的累积第二次翻修率为 12%。这

most common indications for revision were infection (37%) and aseptic loosening
翻修最常见的适应症是感染 (37%) 和无菌性松动

(33%). Patient survivorship after DFR was 97% and 83% at five and ten years,
(33%).DFR 后患者生存率分别为 97% 和 5 年和 10 年为 83%,

respectively.
分别。

CONCLUSION: A national registry review has identified the increasing prevalence
结论: 一项全国登记审查确定了患病率的增加

of DFR for PPF after primary TKA and demonstrated implant survivorship of 88% at
初次 TKA 后 PPF 的 DFR 并证明植入物存活率为 88%

midterm follow-up. Surgeons may consider DFR as an acceptable and durable
中期随访。外科医生可能会认为 DFR 是可接受且耐用的

treatment option.
治疗选项。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - Case Series.
证据级别: III 级 - 案例系列。


Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2022 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.115
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.115

PMID: 35271977 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:35271977 [MEDLINE 索引]



27. Injury. 2024 Jun;55 Suppl 1:111351. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111351. Epub 2024
27. 受伤。2024 年 6 月;55 增刊 1:111351。doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111351.电子出版 2024

Jul 26.
7 月 26 日。


Periprosthetic fracture around total knee arthroplasty: What are the advantages
全膝关节置换术周围的假体周围骨折:有哪些优势

of minimal-invasive surgery?
微创手术?


Chantelot C(1), Saab M(2), Bégué T(3), Kaba A(4), Favreau H(5), Ehlinger M(5).
香特洛 C(1),萨博 M(2),贝格 T(3),卡巴 A(4),法夫罗 H(5),埃林格 M(5)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Service de Traumatologie, Hôpital Roger Salengro, CHU de Lille, F-59000,
(1)里尔大学医院 Roger Salengro 医院创伤科,F-59000,

Lille, France.
法国里尔。

(2)Service de Traumatologie, Hôpital Roger Salengro, CHU de Lille, F-59000,
(2)里尔大学医院 Roger Salengro 医院创伤科,F-59000,

Lille, France. Electronic address: marc.saab@outlook.com.
法国里尔。电子地址:marc.saab@outlook.com。

(3)Service de Traumatologie/orthopédie, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la
(3)Antoine Béclère 医院创伤科/骨科,157 rue de la

porte de Trivaux, 92140, Clamart, France.
porte de Trivaux, 92140, 克拉马特, 法国.

(4)Service de Traumatologie, Hôpital Général, 130 Avenue Louis Herbeaux, 59240,
(4)总医院创伤科,130 Avenue Louis Herbeaux, 59240,

Dunkerque, France.
法国敦刻尔克。

(5)Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie, 1 avenue Molière,
(5)骨科外科和创伤学系,莫里哀大道 1 号,

67098, Strasbourg, France.
67098, 斯特拉斯堡, 法国.


OBJECTIVES: Periprosthetic femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty in
目的: 全膝关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折

older adults are mostly treated by internal fixation. Members of the GETRAUM
老年人主要通过内固定治疗。GETRAUM 的成员

(French Orthopedic Trauma Society) sought to compare two surgical techniques -
(法国骨科创伤协会)试图比较两种手术技术 -

conventional open surgery and minimally invasive surgery - with the aim of
常规开放手术和微创手术 - 目的是

analyzing the patients' functional recovery. We hypothesized that a minimally
分析患者的功能恢复。我们假设

invasive technique would produce better early functional outcomes with recovery
侵入性技术将产生更好的早期功能结果并恢复

of independence.
独立。

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study of patients treated
材料和方法: 这项对接受治疗的患者进行的回顾性多中心研究

between 2009 and 2015 consisted of 90 fractures with a follow-up of 1 year.
2009 年至 2015 年间包括 90 例骨折,随访 1 年。

Demographic, preoperative data and the characteristics of fractures, type of
人口统计学、术前数据和骨折特征、类型

fixation and the surgeon's experience level were collected. The endpoints were
收集固定和外科医生的经验水平。端点是

the Parker Mobility score, Katz ADL, place of residence at the time of fracture
Parker 活动度评分、Katz ADL、骨折时居住地

and at 6 months and one-year follow-up. All complications and one-year mortality
和 6 个月和 1 年的随访。所有并发症和 1 年死亡率

during the follow up were searched.
在随访期间进行了检索。

RESULTS: At 6 months follow-up, the minimally invasive technique contributed to
结果: 在 6 个月的随访中,微创技术有助于

significantly better functional recovery as measured by the Parker (p < 0.05)
通过 Parker 测量的功能恢复明显更好 (p < 0.05)

and Katz scores (p < 0.05). However, there were no differences in these scores
和 Katz 评分 (p < 0.05)。然而,这些分数没有差异

at one-year follow-up. The complication rate was 31% at one year follow-up.
在一年的随访中。1 年随访时并发症发生率为 31%。

Mortality rate was 12 % (11 patients).
死亡率为 12 % (11 例患者)。

CONCLUSION: Our hypothesis was confirmed, as there was a difference between
结论: 我们的假设得到了证实,因为

techniques that impacted functional recovery and independence, but only in the
影响功能恢复和独立性的技术,但仅限于

early postoperative phase. A minimally invasive technique appears to be
术后早期。一种微创技术似乎是

beneficial in the short term for distal femur fractures after total knee
对全膝关节后股骨远端骨折的短期有益

arthroplasty but must be evaluated in a comparative and prospective study to
关节置换术,但必须在比较和前瞻性研究中进行评估,以

fully confirm its reliability.
充分确认其可靠性。


Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
版权所有 © 2024。由 Elsevier Ltd. 出版


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111351
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111351

PMID: 39069343 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:39069343 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of competing interest Christophe
利益冲突声明:利益争夺声明 Christophe

Chantelot, Marc Saab, Arnaud Kaba, Thierry Bégué, Henri Favreau: none Matthieu
Chantelot, Marc Saab, Arnaud Kaba, Thierry Bégué, Henri Favreau: 无 Matthieu

Ehlinger: educational consultant for DePuy Synthes, Newclip Technics and Lépine
Ehlinger:DePuy Synthes、Newclip Technics 和 Lépine 的教育顾问



28. Injury. 2015 Dec;46(12):2293-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.009.
28. 受伤。2015 年 12 月;46(12):2293-6.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.009.


What is new in distal femur periprosthetic fracture fixation?
股骨远端假体周围骨折固定有什么新内容?


Tosounidis TH(1), Giannoudis PV(2).
Tosounidis TH(1),Giannoudis PV(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Leeds,
(1)利兹大学创伤与骨科外科学术系,

Clarendon Wing, Floor A, Great George Street, Leeds General Infirmary, LS1 3EX
Clarendon Wing, Floor A, Great George Street, 利兹综合医院, LS1 3EX

Leeds, UK; NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, LS7
英国利兹;NIHR 利兹生物医学研究部,Chapel Allerton 医院,LS7

4SA Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
4SA 利兹,英国西约克郡。

(2)Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Leeds,
(2)利兹大学创伤与骨科外科学术系,

Clarendon Wing, Floor A, Great George Street, Leeds General Infirmary, LS1 3EX
Clarendon Wing, Floor A, Great George Street, 利兹综合医院, LS1 3EX

Leeds, UK; NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, LS7
英国利兹;NIHR 利兹生物医学研究部,Chapel Allerton 医院,LS7

4SA Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK. Electronic address: pgiannoudi@aol.com.
4SA 利兹,英国西约克郡。电子地址:pgiannoudi@aol.com。


Distal femoral periprosthetic fractures are on the rise. Increased mortality of
股骨远端假体周围骨折呈上升趋势。死亡率增加

these injuries is also evident from recent data. Their incidence and risk
这些伤害从最近的数据中也很明显。它们的发生率和风险

factors have been extensively reported in the past but new data are being
过去已经广泛报道了这些因素,但新的数据正在

available that merit attention. The increased incidence and the even higher
值得关注的可用。发病率增加,甚至更高

projected incidence should direct the focus of future strategies to the
预计的发病率应将未来策略的重点引向

education of surgeons, relevant capacity of hospital and reconfiguration of
外科医生的教育、医院的相关能力和

health care resources. New and potentially modifiable risk factors should be
医疗保健资源。新的和可能可改变的风险因素应该是

taken into consideration to the informed consent process and new studies should
考虑到知情同意过程和新的研究应该

be developed to clarify the causative relationship of the new risk factors such
旨在阐明新风险因素的因果关系,例如

as the peptic ulcer disease and the COPD. The main internal fixation techniques
作为消化性溃疡病和 COPD。主要的内固定技术

remain the lateral locking plating and the retrograde intramedullary nailing.
保持侧锁定板和逆行髓内钉。

New techniques in plating are the supplementary medial plate in selected cases
钢板的新技术是特定病例中的补充内侧钢板

and the far cortical locking. Nailing is considered a valid option especially in
以及远皮质锁定。钉子被认为是一个有效的选择,尤其是在

fractures located well above the anterior flange of the femoral component of the
骨折位于

arthroplasty. Results and outcomes from good quality studies are still sparse
置换 术。高质量研究的结果和结局仍然很少

regarding the comparison between plating and nailing. Interprosthetic fractures
关于电镀和钉子的比较。假体间骨折

constitute an entity that is lately gaining considerable attention. The best
构成一个最近受到相当关注的实体。最好的

method of management of these injuries is still evolving with considerable
这些损伤的处理方法仍在不断发展,相当

amount of work being done in the clinical and biomechanical level.
在临床和生物力学层面完成的工作量。


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.009
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.009

PMID: 26654682 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:26654682 [MEDLINE 索引]



29. Orthop Clin North Am. 2021 Oct;52(4):335-346. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2021.05.001.
29. Orthop Clin North Am. 2021 年 10 月;52(4):335-346.doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2021.05.001.

Epub 2021 Jul 29.
Epub 2021 年 7 月 29 日。


Treatment of B1 Distal Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.
B1 远端假体股骨周围骨折的治疗。


Sheridan GA(1), Sepehri A(2), Stoffel K(3), Masri BA(2).
谢里丹 GA(1),塞佩里 A(2),斯托弗尔 K(3),马斯里 BA(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver,
(1)温哥华英属哥伦比亚大学骨科系

British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: sheridga@tcd.ie.
加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省。电子地址:sheridga@tcd.ie。

(2)Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver,
(2)温哥华英属哥伦比亚大学骨科系

British Columbia, Canada.
加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省。

(3)Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel,
(3)巴塞尔大学医院骨科和创伤科,

Gellertstrasse 144, 4052 Basel, Switzerland.
Gellertstrasse 144, 4052 巴塞尔, 瑞士。


The burden of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures is projected to increase
预计假体周围股骨远端骨折的负担将增加

accordingly with the increase in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed
相应地,随着全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 的增加

globally in the future. Less invasive plating and intramedullary (IM) nailing
未来在全球范围内。微创钢板和髓内 (IM) 钉

techniques still seem to provide similar outcomes based on current literature.
根据目前的文献,技术似乎仍然提供了类似的结果。

Double-plating and combination techniques may prove to be beneficial in the
双电镀和组合技术可能被证明对

future pending further large-scale studies but currently have not demonstrated
未来有待进一步的大规模研究,但目前尚未证明

superiority over single plating and IM nailing based on current evidence. Distal
基于当前证据优于单板和 IM 钉。末梢部的

femoral replacement may provide a useful option for future treatment, provided
股骨置换术可能为未来的治疗提供有用的选择,前提是

it is performed by a trained knee arthroplasty surgeon.
它由训练有素的膝关节置换术外科医生进行。


Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2021 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2021.05.001
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2021.05.001

PMID: 34538346 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:34538346 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Disclosure The authors have no commercial or
利益冲突声明: 披露 作者没有商业或

financial conflicts of interest to disclose. There were no funding sources for
披露的财务利益冲突。没有资金来源

any of the authors listed.
列出的任何作者。



30. Bone Joint J. 2016 Nov;98-B(11):1489-1496. doi:
30. 骨关节杂志 2016 年 11 月;98-B(11):1489-1496。doi:

10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.BJJ-2016-0029.R1.


Periprosthetic fractures associated with total knee arthroplasty: an update.
与全膝关节置换术相关的假体周围骨折:更新。


Konan S(1), Sandiford N(1), Unno F(1), Masri BS(1), Garbuz DS(1), Duncan CP(1).
Konan S(1), Sandiford N(1), Unno F(1), Masri BS(1), Garbuz DS(1), Duncan CP(1).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, JP North 3rd
(1)英属哥伦比亚大学温哥华综合医院 JP North 3rd

floor, Room 3114, 910 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E3, Canada.
楼层,3114 室,910 West 10th Avenue,温哥华,BC V5Z 4E3,加拿大。


Fractures around total knee arthroplasties pose a significant surgical
全膝关节置换术周围的骨折是一项重要的外科手术

challenge. Most can be managed with osteosynthesis and salvage of the
挑战。大多数可以通过接骨术和挽救

replacement. The techniques of fixation of these fractures and revision surgery
更换。这些骨折的固定技术和翻修手术

have evolved and so has the assessment of outcome. This specialty update
已经发展了,结果评估也发生了变化。此专业更新

summarises the current evidence for the classification, methods of fixation,
总结了分类、固定方法、

revision surgery and outcomes of the management of periprosthetic fractures
修复手术和假体周围骨折管理的结局

associated with total knee arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Joint J
与全膝关节置换术相关。引用本文: 骨关节 J

2016;98-B:1489-96.
2016;98-B:1489-96。


©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
©2016 年英国骨与关节外科编辑学会。


DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.BJJ-2016-0029.R1
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.BJJ-2016-0029.R1

PMID: 27803224 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:27803224 [MEDLINE 索引]



31. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Oct 1;31(19):e746-e759. doi:
31. J Am Acad 骨科外科杂志 2023 年 10 月 1 日;31(19):e746-e759。doi:

10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00701. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00701.Epub 2023 年 6 月 26 日。


Periprosthetic Fractures After a Total Knee Arthroplasty.
全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折。


Bengoa F(1), Neufeld ME, Howard LC, Masri BA.
Bengoa F(1),Neufeld ME,Howard LC,Masri BA。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)From the Department of Orthopaedics, the University of British Columbia,
(1)来自不列颠哥伦比亚大学骨科系,

Vancouver, Canada.
加拿大温哥华。


As the number of total knee arthroplasties performed continues to increase,
随着全膝关节置换术数量的不断增加,

complications such as postoperative periprosthetic fractures are becoming
术后假体周围骨折等并发症正在成为

increasingly more common. Femoral periprosthetic fractures are the most common
越来越常见。股骨假体周围骨折是最常见的

type of fractures around a total knee arthroplasty, whereas tibial and patellar
全膝关节置换术周围的骨折类型,而胫骨和髌骨

periprosthetic fractures are infrequent. Treatment principles depend on the bone
假体周围骨折不常见。治疗原则取决于骨骼

the fracture is located, the status of the implant fixation, bone stock, and the
骨折定位、种植体固定状态、骨料和

type of implants available. The Vancouver classification allows for a
可用的植入物类型。Vancouver 分类允许

standardized system to describe and manage these injuries, incorporating these
描述和管理这些伤害的标准化系统,包括这些

factors. A systematic approach is vital in obtaining the best possible outcomes
因素。系统化的方法对于获得最佳结果至关重要

because complications and mortality rates mimic those of hip fractures.
因为并发症和死亡率与髋部骨折相似。


Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
美国©骨科医师学会版权所有 2023。


DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00701
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00701

PMID: 37364252 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:37364252 [MEDLINE 索引]



32. Knee. 2022 Aug;37:121-131. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
32. 膝盖。2022 年 8 月;37:121-131。doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.06.008.Epub 2022 年 6 月 27 日。


Distal femoral replacement or internal fixation for management of periprosthetic
股骨远端置换术或内固定术治疗假体周围

distal femur fractures: A systematic review.
股骨远端骨折: 系统评价。


Lex JR(1), Di Michele J(2), Sepehri A(3), Chuang TC(2), Backstein DJ(4), Kreder
Lex JR(1), Di Michele J(2), Sepehri A(3), Chuang TC(2), Backstein DJ(4), Kreder

HJ(5).
HJ(5) 的。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of
(1)大学外科系骨外科

Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: johnathanlex@gmail.com.
多伦多,多伦多,加拿大。电子地址:johnathanlex@gmail.com。

(2)Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of
(2)大学外科系骨外科

Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
多伦多,多伦多,加拿大。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver,
(3)温哥华英属哥伦比亚大学骨科外科

Canada.
加拿大。

(4)Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of
(4)大学外科系骨外科

Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Gluskin Granovsky Division of Orthopaedics, Mount
多伦多,多伦多,加拿大;Gluskin Granovsky 骨科,芒特

Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
加拿大多伦多大学西奈医院。

(5)Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of
(5)大学外科系骨外科

Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Division of
多伦多,多伦多,加拿大;Sunnybrook 健康科学中心,部门

Orthopaedic Surgery, Toronto, Canada.
骨科外科,加拿大多伦多。


BACKGROUND: The number of periprosthetic fractures above a total knee
背景:全膝关节以上假体周围骨折的数量

arthroplasty continues to increase. These fractures are associated with a high
关节置换术继续增加。这些骨折与高

risk of morbidity and mortality. Techniques for addressing these fractures
发病和死亡风险。解决这些骨折的技术

include open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and revision arthroplasty,
包括切开复位内固定术 (ORIF) 和翻修关节成形术,

including distal femoral replacement (DFR). The primary aim of this review is to
包括股骨远端置换术 (DFR)。本综述的主要目的是

compare mortality and reoperation rates between ORIF and DFR when used to treat
比较 ORIF 和 DFR 用于治疗

periprosthetic distal femur fractures.
假体周围股骨远端骨折。

METHODS: A systematic review including MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library
方法: 包括 MEDLINE 、 Embase 和 Cochrane Library 的系统评价

databases was completed from inception to April 10, 2021. Studies including a
databases 从建库到 2021 年 4 月 10 日完成。研究包括

comparator cohort were meta-analyzed.
对对照组进行 meta 分析。

RESULTS: Fourteen studies were identified for inclusion, of which, five had
结果: 确定了 14 项研究纳入,其中 5 项研究

sufficient homogeneity for inclusion in a meta-analysis. 30-day and 2-year
足够的同质性,可纳入 meta 分析。30 天和 2 年

mortality was 4.1% and 14.6% in the DFR group. There was no statistically
DFR 组的死亡率分别为 4.1% 和 14.6%。没有统计

significant difference between ORIF and DFR (log Odds-Ratio (OR) = -0.14,
ORIF 和 DFR 之间的显著差异(对数比值比 (OR) = -0.14,

95 %CI: -0.77 to 0.50). The reoperation rate in the DFR group was 9.3% versus
95 %CI:-0.77 至 0.50)。DFR 组的再手术率为 9.3% vs

14.8% for ORIF, with no difference between groups (log OR = 0.10, 95 %CI: -0.59
ORIF 为 14.8%,组间无差异 (log OR = 0.10,95 %CI: -0.59

to 0.79). There was no difference in rates of deep infection (log OR = 0.22,
到 0.79)。深部感染率无差异(对数 OR = 0.22,

95 %CI: -0.83 to 1.28). Direct comparison of functional outcomes was not
95 %CI:-0.83 至 1.28)。功能结局的直接比较不是

possible, though did not appear significant.
可能,但似乎并不重要。

CONCLUSION: DFR in the setting of periprosthetic distal femur fractures is
结论: 假体周围股骨远端骨折的 DFR 为

equivalent to ORIF with respect to mortality and reoperation rate and thus a
在死亡率和再手术率方面与 ORIF 相当,因此

safe and reliable treatment strategy. DFR may be more reliable in complex
安全可靠的治疗策略。DFR 在复杂

fracture patterns where the ability to obtain adequate fixation is difficult.
难以获得充分固定的骨折类型。


Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2022 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.06.008
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.06.008

PMID: 35772245 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:35772245 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors
利益冲突声明:利益争夺声明作者

declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal
声明他们没有已知的相互竞争的经济利益或个人利益

relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this
关系似乎可能影响了本文报道的工作

paper.
纸。



33. Chirurg. 2020 Oct;91(10):833-840. doi: 10.1007/s00104-020-01212-9.
33. 奇鲁格。2020 年 10 月;91(10):833-840.doi:10.1007/s00104-020-01212-9。


[Periprosthetic fractures around the knee].
[膝盖周围的假体周围骨折]。


[Article in German]
[德文文章]


Hawellek T(1), Lehmann W(2), von Lewinski G(2).
Hawellek T(1), Lehmann W(2), von Lewinski G(2).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie,
(1)创伤外科、骨科和整形外科诊所,

Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen,
哥廷根大学医学中心, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, 哥廷根,

Deutschland. Thelonius.Hawellek@med.uni-goettingen.de.
德国。Thelonius.Hawellek@med.uni-goettingen.de。

(2)Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie,
(2)创伤外科、骨科和整形外科诊所,

Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen,
哥廷根大学医学中心, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, 哥廷根,

Deutschland.
德国。


BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fractures of the knee joint are complex injuries and
背景: 膝关节假体周围骨折是复杂的损伤,并且

frequently represent a challenge for the surgeon.
通常代表外科医生面临的挑战。

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to present and discuss the current
目的: 本综述的目的是介绍和讨论当前的

classification and treatment options for periprosthetic knee fractures.
假体周围膝关节骨折的分类和治疗方案。

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A selective review of the existing literature on
材料和方法:对现有文献的选择性回顾

periprosthetic fractures around the knee was performed in PubMed. The various
膝关节周围的假体周围骨折在 PubMed 中进行。各种

classifications and treatment regimens are discussed with respect to the
分类和治疗方案将讨论

advantages and disadvantages and from this knowledge a new algorithm was
优点和缺点,根据这些知识,一种新的算法是

developed.
发达。

RESULTS: The classifications of periprosthetic fractures have changed in recent
结果: 近年来假体周围骨折的分类发生了变化

years and have been replaced by a uniform fracture classification; however, not
年,并已被统一的骨折分类所取代;然而,不是

only the radiological evaluation of the fractures is crucial to determine the
只有骨折的放射学评估对于确定

treatment regimen for periprosthetic fractures. A thorough evaluation of the
假体周围骨折的治疗方案。对

inserted endoprosthesis should be carried out in order to be able to decide
应进行插入的内假体,以便能够决定

between the treatment options of osteosynthesis and revision arthroplasty.
在接骨术和翻修关节置换术的治疗方案之间。

Treatment options are available for osteosynthesis and revision arthroplasty
治疗方案可用于接骨术和翻修关节置换术

that enable a safe treatment of these complex injuries.
能够安全地治疗这些复杂的损伤。

CONCLUSION: Periprosthetic fractures of the knee joint are complex injuries,
结论: 膝关节假体周围骨折是复杂的损伤,

requiring a thorough preoperative planning and an interdisciplinary treatment
需要全面的术前计划和跨学科治疗

with trauma and endoprosthetic expertise.
具有创伤和内修复专业知识。


DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01212-9
DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01212-9

PMID: 32533199 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:32533199 [MEDLINE 索引]



34. J Arthroplasty. 2022 May;37(5):1002-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.054. Epub
34. J 关节置换术。2022 年 5 月;37(5):1002-1008.doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.054。电子版

2022 Jan 31.
2022 年 1 月 31 日。


Clinical Outcomes Following Distal Femur Replacement for Periprosthetic Distal
远端股骨置换术远端假体后

Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
股骨骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。


Mechas CA(1), Isla AE(1), Abbenhaus EJ(1), Landy DC(1), Duncan ST(1), Selby
Mechas CA(1), Isla AE(1), Abbenhaus EJ(1), Landy DC(1), Duncan ST(1), Selby

JB(1), Aneja A(1).
JB(1),Aneja A(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
(1)肯塔基大学骨科外科,肯塔基州列克星敦。


BACKGROUND: Management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PDFFs) is often
背景: 假体周围股骨远端骨折 (PDFFs) 的处理通常是

complicated by poor bone quality and limited bone stock making fixation attempts
并发骨质量差和骨量有限固定尝试

challenging and prone to failure. Distal femoral replacement (DFR) is being used
具有挑战性且容易失败。正在使用股骨远端置换术 (DFR)

to treat such injuries although outcome data are mostly from small case series.
治疗此类损伤,尽管结局数据主要来自小型病例系列。

We sought to systematically review the literature on DFR for PDFF to summarize
我们试图系统地回顾 PDFF 的 DFR 文献以总结

their outcomes.
他们的结果。

METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE (EBSCO), and Cochrane Central Database were searched to
方法: 检索 PubMed 、 MEDLINE (EBSCO) 和 Cochrane 中心数据库

identify reports of PDFFs treated with DFR. Articles reporting on 5 or more
识别用 DFR 处理的 PDFF 的报告。报道 5 篇或更多篇的文章

knees were systematically reviewed for clinical function, complications, and
系统评价了膝关节的临床功能、并发症和

mortality. Random effects meta-analysis was used to create summary estimates and
死亡率。随机效应荟萃分析用于创建汇总估计值和

publication bias also assessed.
还评估了发表偏倚。

RESULTS: Of 287 identified and screened articles, 15 were included, 14
结果: 在确定和筛选的 287 篇文章中,纳入 15 篇,14 篇

retrospective, reporting on 352 knees. Following DFR, 87% (95% confidence
回顾性,报告了 352 个膝盖。遵循 DFR,87% (95% 置信度

interval [CI] 71-95) of patients were able to ambulate. The mean postoperative
间隔 [CI] 71-95) 的患者能够行走。术后平均

Knee Society Score was 80 (95% CI 77-84). The risk of periprosthetic joint
膝关节协会评分为 80 (95% CI 77-84)。假体周围关节的风险

infection was 4.3% (95% CI 2.2-8.2). One-year postoperative mortality rate was
感染率为 4.3% (95% CI 2.2-8.2)。术后 1 年死亡率

10% (95% CI 6-18). There was some evidence of publication bias with a trend
10% (95% CI 6-18)。有一些证据表明存在一种趋势的出版偏倚

toward smaller studies reporting lower infection risk and mortality.
针对报告感染风险和死亡率较低的小型研究。

CONCLUSION: DFR for PDFFs is associated with high functional outcomes and a
结论:PDFFs 的 DFR 与高功能结果相关,并且

relatively modest risk of infection. The periprosthetic joint infection and
感染风险相对较小。假体周围关节感染和

1-year mortality rates reported here should be considered lower bounds estimates
此处报告的 1 年死亡率应考虑下限估计值

due to publication bias and loss to follow-up. Further investigation of
由于发表偏倚和失访。进一步调查

long-term outcomes following DFR for PDFFs is warranted though short-term
PDFF 的 DFR 后的长期结果是有保证的,尽管是短期的

functional outcomes are promising.
功能结果令人鼓舞。


Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2022 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.054
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.054

PMID: 35093546 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:35093546 [MEDLINE 索引]



35. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):3335-3345. doi:
35. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 年 6 月;143(6):3335-3345.doi:

10.1007/s00402-022-04603-1. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
10.1007/s00402-022-04603-1。Epub 2022 年 9 月 11 日。


A comparison of distal femoral replacement versus fixation in treating
股骨远端置换术与固定术治疗

periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures: a systematic review and
假体周围髁上股骨骨折:系统评价和

meta-analysis.
荟萃分析。


Ponugoti N(1), Raghu A(2), Kosy JD(3), Magill H(4).
Ponugoti N(1)、Raghu A(2)、Kosy JD(3)、Magill H(4)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Hampshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
(1)汉普郡医院 NHS 基金会信托基金,英国汉普郡。

drnikhilponugoti@gmail.com.
drnikhilponugoti@gmail.com。

(2)East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, UK.
(2)英国斯蒂夫尼奇东赫特福德郡和北赫特福德郡 NHS 信托基金。

(3)Hampshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
(3)汉普郡医院 NHS 基金会信托基金,英国汉普郡。

(4)Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
(4)切尔西和威斯敏斯特医院,英国伦敦。


BACKGROUND: The treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures around a total knee
背景: 全膝关节周围股骨假体周围骨折的治疗

replacement remains a technical challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Management
更换仍然是骨科医生面临的技术挑战。管理

options include non-operative treatment, plate fixation, intramedullary nailing
选择包括非手术治疗、钢板固定、髓内钉

and distal femur replacement (DFR), with few studies comparing fixation with
和股骨远端置换术 (DFR),很少有研究将固定与

DFR. This is an up-to-date meta-analysis in the literature to directly compare
DFR.这是文献中最新的荟萃分析,用于直接比较

clinical outcomes between fixation and distal femoral replacement in the
固定与股骨远端置换术之间的临床结局

treatment of supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures.
治疗髁上假体股骨骨折。

METHODS: A stratified literature search of the Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane
方法: 对 Medline 、 EMBASE 和 Cochrane 进行分层文献检索

databases was performed. All studies in English language were searched from
databases 执行。检索所有英语研究均来自

inception to July 2022. The search was performed with the following MeSH terms:
成立至 2022 年 7 月。使用以下 MeSH 检索词进行检索:

Periprosthetic fracture AND ORIF OR Internal Fixation AND Distal Femur
假体周围骨折 AND ORIF OR 内固定和股骨远端

Replacement. The search was conducted using a predesigned search strategy where
更换。检索使用预先设计的检索策略进行,其中

all eligible literature was critically appraised for methodological quality
所有符合条件的文献都对方法学质量进行了严格评价

using the Cochrane collaboration tool. We included Level I, II and III studies
使用 Cochrane 协作工具。我们纳入了 I、II 和 III 级研究

comparing fixation with DFR in the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar
比较固定与 DFR 治疗假体上髁上

femur fractures. Data from eligible studies were extracted by two authors (NP
股骨骨折。符合条件的研究数据由两位作者 (NP

and AR) and a table created which included author, year, sample size, mean age,
和 AR)和一个创建的表格,其中包括作者、年份、样本量、平均年龄、

measured parameters, follow-up period, fracture classification, length of stay
测量参数、随访期、骨折分类、住院时间

(days), mortality rate, revision rate and complication rate.
(天)、死亡率、翻修率和并发症发生率。

RESULTS: The extracted data were pooled for meta-analysis using RevMan® v5.3.5
结果: 提取的数据合并使用 RevMan® v5.3.5 进行荟萃分析

software (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) and forest plots
软件(北欧 Cochrane 中心,丹麦哥本哈根)和森林图

constructed. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and
构建。< 0.05 的 p 值被认为具有统计学意义,并且

confidence intervals (CI) set to 95%. A total of six studies were included in
置信区间 (CI) 设置为 95%。共纳入 6 项研究

the meta-analysis (n = 406). 153 patients underwent distal femur replacement and
Meta 分析 (n = 406)。153 例患者接受了股骨远端置换术和

253 patients underwent fixation with a mean follow-up time of 71.4 months. The
253 例患者接受了固定,平均随访时间为 71.4 个月。这

results of this analysis suggest no statistically significant difference in
该分析的结果表明,在

measured outcomes.
测量结果。

CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis suggest no proven statistically
结论: 这项荟萃分析的结果表明没有统计学证明

significant difference between DFR and fixation in terms of length of hospital
DFR 和固定在住院时间方面的显著差异

stay, mortality rate, revision rate and complication rate for the treatment of
住院率、死亡率、翻修率和并发症发生率

periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures. Further prospective randomized
假体周围髁上股骨骨折。进一步的前瞻性随机化

research may help to define the specific indications for each treatment option
研究可能有助于确定每种治疗方案的具体适应证

which must include fracture configuration. Early functional outcome and
其中必须包括 Fracture 配置。早期功能结果和

cost-effectiveness have yet to be evaluated in the available literature.
成本效益尚未在现有文献中进行评估。


© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany,
© 2022 年。作者,经德国 Springer-Verlag GmbH 独家许可,

part of Springer Nature.
施普林格自然的一部分。


DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04603-1
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04603-1

PMID: 36088601 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:36088601 [MEDLINE 索引]



36. Injury. 2016 Feb;47(2):460-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.030. Epub 2015 Oct
36. 受伤。2016 年 2 月;47(2):460-4.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.030。Epub 2015 年 10 月

28.


Retrograde femoral nailing of periprosthetic fractures around total knee
全膝关节周围假体周围骨折的逆行股骨钉

replacements.
更换。


Jones MD(1), Carpenter C(2), Mitchell SR(2), Whitehouse M(3), Mehendale S(2).
琼斯 MD(1),卡彭特 C(2),米切尔 SR(2),怀特豪斯 M(3),梅亨代尔 S(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Tunbridge Wells Hospital, Maidstone
(1)梅德斯通滕布里奇韦尔斯医院创伤和骨科

and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Tonbridge Road, Pembury TN2 4QJ, UK. Electronic
和 Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Tonbridge Road, Pembury TN2 4QJ, UK。电子的

address: markdjones1984@gmail.com.
地址: markdjones1984@gmail.com.

(2)Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Bristol NHS
(2)布里斯托大学医院 NHS 创伤和骨科

Foundation Trust, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8HQ, UK.
Foundation Trust,英国布里斯托尔 BS2 8HQ 上莫德林街。

(3)Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Level 1 Learning and Research Building,
(3)肌肉骨骼研究部,1 楼学习和研究大楼,

Southmead Hospital, Westbury on Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
Southmead 医院,特里姆河畔韦斯特伯里,布里斯托尔 BS10 5NB,英国。


INTRODUCTION: The incidence of primary total knee replacement (TKR) is
引言:初次全膝关节置换术 (TKR) 的发生率为

increasing with a resultant rise in those patients sustaining distal femoral
在维持股骨远端的患者中,随着其升高而增加

periprosthetic fractures around TKRs. The management of these fractures pose a
TKR 周围的假体周围骨折。这些骨折的处理会带来

significant challenge. The compatibility of retrograde femoral intramedullary
重大挑战。逆行股骨髓内骨的相容性

(IM) nails with femoral TKR components needs to be considered preoperatively
术前需要考虑带有股骨 TKR 成分的 (IM) 钉

when this complex pathology is addressed. The aim of this study was to update
当这种复杂的病理得到解决时。本研究的目的是更新

the literature and assess the compatibility of the most commonly used primary
文献并评估最常用的原发性

TKR prostheses and retrograde femoral IM nails using a Sawbone anatomical model.
使用 Sawbone 解剖模型的 TKR 假体和逆行股骨 IM 钉。

METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight of the most commonly used primary TKR prostheses
方法和材料: 八种最常用的初级 TKR 修复体

and four of the most commonly used retrograde femoral IM nails were identified.
并确定了 4 种最常用的逆行股骨 IM 钉。

The femoral components of the TKRs were implanted onto left sided femoral
将 TKR 的股骨组件植入左侧股骨

Sawbones using the manufacturer's guides and cutting blocks and positioned
锯骨使用制造商的导轨和切割块并定位

appropriately. The retrograde IM nails were inserted using the conventional
适当地。逆行 IM 钉使用传统的

entry point and a nail was deemed compatible if this was possible through the
入口点,并且如果可以通过

femoral prosthesis. Details of whether a posterior entry point was required to
股骨假体。是否需要后路入口点的详细信息

allow insertion, whether the femoral nail was scratched by the femoral TKR
允许插入,股骨钉是否被股骨 TKR 划伤

prosthesis on insertion and whether excess force was required to insert the
插入时的假体以及是否需要用力插入

retrograde femoral IM nail were recorded.
记录逆行股骨 IM 钉。

RESULTS: The Biomet AGC Cruciate Retaining (CR) and Posterior Stabilised (PS)
结果:Biomet AGC 交叉固定 (CR) 和后部稳定 (PS)

TKR were the only prostheses that were compatible with all the nails used. The
TKR 是唯一与所有使用的指甲兼容的假肢。这

other TKR prostheses were not compatible because of the force required to gain
其他 TKR 假体不兼容,因为获得所需的力

entry, scratching of the retrograde femoral IM nail or because a posterior entry
进入、刮擦逆行股骨 IM 钉或由于后入

point was required to gain entry through the intercondylar notch.
需要 Point 才能通过髁间缺口进入。

CONCLUSION: The majority of standard sized retrograde femoral nails are
结论:大多数标准尺寸的逆行股骨钉是

technically feasible for insertion through most femoral TKR components but this
从技术上讲,通过大多数股骨 TKR 组件插入是可行的,但

study has found that they are not compatible due to excessive force required for
研究发现,由于需要过大的力

insertion, damage to the nail during insertion or the risk of anterior cortex
插入、插入时对指甲的损伤或前皮层的风险

perforation. Further studies are required to update the compatibility table and
穿孔。需要进一步的研究来更新兼容性表和

cadaveric studies would confirm the findings and allow further mechanical
尸体研究将证实这些发现并允许进一步的机械

testing.
测试。


Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.030
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.030

PMID: 26582217 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:26582217 [MEDLINE 索引]



37. Injury. 2025 Feb;56(2):112071. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.112071. Epub 2024 Nov
37. 受伤。2025 年 2 月;56(2):112071.doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.112071.Epub 2024 年 11 月

27.


Time to surgery and other risk factors for mortality and complication rates in
手术时间以及死亡率和并发症发生率的其他危险因素

patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures at the knee.
膝关节股骨假体周围骨折患者。


Wulbrand C(1), Müller F(2), Weber M(3), Füchtmeier B(4), Hanke A(5).
伍尔布兰德 C(1),穆勒 F(2),韦伯 M(3),福希特迈尔 B(4),汉克 A(5)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department for Trauma, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Hospital Barmherzige
(1)Barmherzige 医院创伤、骨科和运动医学科

Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic
Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, 雷根斯堡, 德国.电子的

address: christian.wulbrand@barmherzige-regensburg.de.
地址:christian.wulbrand@barmherzige-regensburg.de。

(2)Department for Trauma, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Hospital Barmherzige
(2)Barmherzige 医院创伤、骨科和运动医学科

Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic
Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, 雷根斯堡, 德国.电子的

address: franz.mueller@barmherzige-regensburg.de.
地址:franz.mueller@barmherzige-regensburg.de。

(3)Department for Trauma, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Hospital Barmherzige
(3)Barmherzige 医院创伤、骨科和运动医学科

Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic
Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, 雷根斯堡, 德国.电子的

address: markus.weber@barmherzige-regensburg.de.
地址: markus.weber@barmherzige-regensburg.de.

(4)Department for Trauma, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Hospital Barmherzige
(4)Barmherzige 医院创伤、骨科和运动医学科

Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic
Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, 雷根斯堡, 德国.电子的

address: bernd.fuechtmeier@barmherzige-regensburg.de.
地址: bernd.fuechtmeier@barmherzige-regensburg.de.

(5)Department for Trauma, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Hospital Barmherzige
(5)Barmherzige 医院创伤、骨科和运动医学科

Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic
Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, 雷根斯堡, 德国.电子的

address: alexander.hanke@barmherzige-regensburg.de.
地址: alexander.hanke@barmherzige-regensburg.de.


BACKGROUND: There is a high level of evidence that a short time to surgery (TTS)
背景: 有高水平的证据表明手术时间短 (TTS)

improves the outcome for patients with hip fractures. Accordingly,
改善髋部骨折患者的预后。因此

recommendations for timely treatment have been included in national guidelines.
及时治疗的建议已被纳入国家指南。

As patient characteristics appear to be similar, it seems reasonable that these
由于患者特征似乎相似,因此这些

guidelines are applicable to other fracture entities, such as knee
指南适用于其他骨折实体,例如 膝关节

periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPF). This monocentric retrospective study
股骨假体周围骨折 (PPF)。这项单中心回顾性研究

aimed to investigate outcome-related risk factors, particularly TTS, for knee
旨在调查膝关节的结局相关危险因素,尤其是 TTS

PPF.
PPF 的

METHODS: In total, 141 consecutive patients with knee PPF in a maximum-care
方法: 总共 141 例连续膝关节 PPF 患者接受最大护理

arthroplasty and trauma centre, treated between 2006 and 2020, were
2006 年至 2020 年间接受治疗的关节置换术和创伤中心

retrospectively evaluated. Primary outcome variables were operative and general
回顾性评估。主要结局变量是手术和一般

complications as well as mortalities within 1 year. Outcome-related risk factors
1 年内的并发症和死亡率。结局相关危险因素

were identified based on regression analysis using SPSS. For analysis of TTS,
根据 SPSS 的回归分析确定。对于 TTS 分析,

the cases were divided into two groups using a TTS of 24 h as the cutoff value.
将病例分为两组,以 24 h 的 TTS 为临界值。

RESULTS: The 1-year mortality was 8.3 %. Associated risk factors were age (HR
结果: 1 年死亡率为 8.3%。相关危险因素是年龄 (HR

1.2; p = 0.010) and Charlson score (HR 2.1; p = 0.001). Both, surgical and
1.2;p = 0.010) 和 Charlson 评分 (HR 2.1;p = 0.001)。手术和

general complications occurred in 20.6 % of the cases. Age (OR 1.07, p = 0.025)
20.6% 的病例发生一般并发症。年龄 (OR 1.07, p = 0.025)

and a TTS > 24 h (OR 3.06, p = 0.020) were identified as risk factors for
和 TTS > 24 小时(OR 3.06,p = 0.020)被确定为

general complications. The TTS ≤ 24 h (n = 75) and TTS > 24 h (n = 66) groups
一般并发症。TTS ≤ 24 小时 (n = 75) 和 TTS > 24 小时 (n = 66) 组

were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics. Revision arthroplasty was
在基线特征方面具有可比性。翻修关节置换术

performed more frequently in the TTS > 24 h group (p < 0.001).
在 TTS > 24 h 组中表现更频繁 (p < 0.001)。

CONCLUSION: 1-year mortality after knee PPF was 8.3 %. With a high complication
结论: 膝关节 PPF 后 1 年死亡率为 8.3%。复杂性高

rate in the treatment of knee PPF, TTS was identified as a risk factor for
率,TTS 被确定为危险因素

general complications. Early treatment appears to be beneficial for patients
一般并发症。早期治疗似乎对患者有益

with knee PPF.
带膝盖 PPF。


Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
版权所有 © 2024。由 Elsevier Ltd. 出版


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.112071
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.112071

PMID: 39642603 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:39642603 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of competing interest None.
利益冲突声明:利益争夺声明 无。



38. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024 Apr;28(8):3165-3175. doi:
38. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024 年 4 月;28(8):3165-3175.doi:

10.26355/eurrev_202404_36032.
10.26355/eurrev_202404_36032。


Finite element analysis of the stability of retrograde intramedullary nail and
逆行髓内钉稳定性的有限元分析

plate-screw combinations for periprosthetic femoral fractures following total
全假体周围股骨骨折的钢板-螺钉组合

knee replacement.
膝关节置换术。


Kurtuluş B(1), Bulut E.
救赎 B(1),云 E。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences,
(1)健康科学大学骨科和创伤学系,

Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

burhan.kurtulus@saglik.gov.tr.
burhan.kurtulus@saglik.gov.tr。


OBJECTIVE: Periprosthetic fractures following total knee replacement are rare
目的: 全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折罕见

but challenging. The goal of the treatment is to achieve the most stable
但具有挑战性。治疗的目标是达到最稳定的

fixation that allows early mobilization. Therefore, the aim of this study was to
允许早期动员的固定。因此,本研究的目的是

evaluate the biomechanical results of the use of different fixation systems in
评估使用不同固定系统的生物力学结果

the treatment of distal femur periprosthetic fractures with finite element
有限元治疗股骨远端假体周围骨折

analysis.
分析。

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total knee prosthesis was implanted in Sawbone femur
材料和方法: 将全膝关节假体植入锯骨股骨

models. A transverse fracture line was created in the supracondylar region and
模型。在髁上区域形成一条横向骨折线,并且

was fixed in four different groups. In group 1, fracture line fixation was fixed
被固定在四个不同的组中。第 1 组固定骨折线

using retrograde intramedullary nailing. In group 2, fixation was applied using
使用逆行髓内钉。在第 2 组中,使用

a lateral anatomic distal femoral. In group 3, in addition to the fixation made
股骨远端外侧解剖。在第 3 组中,除了固定外

in group 1, a lateral anatomic distal femoral plate was used. In group 4, in
在第 1 组中,使用外侧解剖远端股骨板。在第 4 组中,在

addition to the fixation made in group 2, a 3.5 mm Limited Contact Dynamic
除了在第 2 组中进行的固定外,还有一个 3.5 mm 的 Limited Contact Dynamic

Compression Plate (LC-DCP) was applied medially. Computed Tomography (CT) scans
加压钢板 (LC-DCP) 应用于内侧。计算机断层扫描 (CT) 扫描

were taken of the created models and were converted to three-dimensional models.
从创建的模型中获取并转换为 3D 模型。

Axial and rotational loading forces were applied to all the created models.
轴向和旋转载荷力被施加到所有创建的模型上。

RESULTS: The least deformation with axial loading was observed in the double
结果: 在双

plate group. Group 3 was determined to be more advantageous against rotational
板组。第 3 组被确定为对轮换更有利

forces. The greatest movement in the fracture line was found in group 2. The
力量。骨折线的最大运动出现在第 2 组。这

application of the medial plate was determined to reduce the tension on the
确定内侧板的应用以降低

lateral plate and increase stability in the fracture line.
侧钢板并增加骨折线的稳定性。

CONCLUSIONS: Combining a lateral anatomic plate with intramedullary nailing or a
结论:将侧位解剖板与髓内钉或

medial plate was seen to be biomechanically more advantageous than using a
内侧板被认为比使用

lateral plate or intramedullary nailing alone in the treatment of distal femoral
单独使用侧钢板或髓内钉治疗股骨远端

periprosthetic fractures.
假体周围骨折。


DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202404_36032
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202404_36032

PMID: 38708475 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:38708475 [MEDLINE 索引]



39. Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Feb 23;14(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0572-7.
39. Arch 骨质疏松症。2019 年 2 月 23 日;14(1):23.doi:10.1007/s11657-019-0572-7。


Changes in femoral bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty: a
全膝关节置换术后股骨骨密度的变化:一种

systematic review and meta-analysis.
系统评价和荟萃分析。


Prince JM(1), Bernatz JT(1), Binkley N(2), Abdel MP(3), Anderson PA(4).
Prince JM(1)、Bernatz JT(1)、Binkley N(2)、Abdel MP(3)、Anderson PA(4)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School
(1)威斯康星大学学院骨科与康复系

of Medicine and Public Health, UWMF Centennial Building, 1685 Highland Avenue,
医学和公共卫生,UWMF 百年纪念大楼,高地大道 1685 号,

6th Floor, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
6th Floor, 麦迪逊, WI, 53705, 美国。

(2)University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical Research Program, Madison, WI,
(2)威斯康星大学骨质疏松症临床研究项目,威斯康星州麦迪逊市

53705, USA.
53705,美国。

(3)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW,
(3)妙佑医疗国际骨科外科,200 First Street SW,

Rochester, MN, 65905-53705, USA.
美国明尼苏达州罗切斯特 65905-53705。

(4)Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School
(4)威斯康星大学学院骨科与康复系

of Medicine and Public Health, UWMF Centennial Building, 1685 Highland Avenue,
医学和公共卫生,UWMF 百年纪念大楼,高地大道 1685 号,

6th Floor, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. Anderson@ortho.wisc.edu.
6th Floor, 麦迪逊, WI, 53705, 美国。Anderson@ortho.wisc.edu。


BACKGROUND: Bone loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may lead to
背景: 全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 后骨质流失可能导致

periprosthetic fractures that are associated with significant costs (morbidity,
与高成本(发病率、

economic, etc.) and pose a challenge to operative fixation. This meta-analysis
经济等)并对手术固定构成挑战。本荟萃分析

quantifies the change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the distal femur after
量化后股骨远端骨密度 (BMD) 的变化

primary TKA.
原发性 TKA。

METHODS: A systematic review of six databases was performed by two independent
方法: 由两个独立的数据库对 6 个数据库进行系统评价

reviewers. Studies that reported bone density after knee arthroplasty were
评论家。报告膝关节置换术后骨密度的研究是

identified and inclusion/exclusion criteria was applied. Data were extracted and
确定并应用纳入/排除标准。提取数据并

analyzed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software.
使用综合荟萃分析软件进行分析。

RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the analysis. The average decrease in
结果: 分析纳入 14 项研究。平均下降

BMD was 0.09 [0.05, 0.13], 0.14 [0.08, 0.20], 0.16 [0.10, 0.23], and 0.16 [0.12,
BMD 分别为 0.09 [0.05, 0.13]、0.14 [0.08, 0.20]、0.16 [0.10, 0.23] 和 0.16 [0.12,

0.20] g/cm2 at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, corresponding to a 9.3%,
3、6、12 和 24 个月时分别为 0.20] g/cm2,相当于 9.3%,

13.2%, 15.8%, and 15.4% BMD loss. A high degree of heterogeneity existed between
BMD 损失 13.2%、15.8% 和 15.4%。两者之间存在高度的异质性

the studies (I2 > 90% at most time points).
研究 (I2 > 90% 在大多数时间点)。

CONCLUSION: In summary, there is a rapid and significant 15% decrease in BMD in
结论: 总之,BMD 在

the first 6 months after TKA that is sustained to 24 months. Better
TKA 后的前 6 个月持续到 24 个月。更好

understanding regarding how perioperative optimization of bone health may affect
了解围手术期骨骼健康优化如何影响

BMD loss and the incidence of periprosthetic fracture is essential.
BMD 丢失和假体周围骨折的发生率是必不可少的。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II.
证据级别: 治疗 II 级。


DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0572-7
DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0572-7

PMID: 30798359 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:30798359 [MEDLINE 索引]



40. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Feb 20;18(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03586-y.
40. J 骨科外科研究 2023 年 2 月 20 日;18(1):122.doi:10.1186/s13018-023-03586-y.


Optimal surgical treatment for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after
股骨假体周围远端骨折的最佳手术治疗

total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian-based network analysis.
全膝关节置换术:基于贝叶斯的网络分析。


Fu P(#)(1)(2), Liang W(#)(1), Gao Z(3), Chen G(2), Fan W(4).
付平(#)(1)(2), 梁 W(#)(1), 高 Z(3), 陈 G(2), 范 W(4).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical
(1)南京医学院第一附属医院骨科

University, Nanjing, China.
大学, 南京, 中国.

(2)Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing
(2)嘉兴市第二附属医院骨科

University, Jiaxing, China.
大学, 嘉兴, 中国.

(3)Department of Clinical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing
(3)嘉兴市第二附属医院临床肿瘤科

University, Jiaxing, China.
大学, 嘉兴, 中国.

(4)Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical
(4)南京医学院第一附属医院骨科

University, Nanjing, China. ludanbeko0907@163.com.
大学, 南京, 中国.ludanbeko0907@163.com。

(#)Contributed equally
(#)贡献均等


BACKGROUND: The surgical methods for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures
背景: 股骨假体周围远端骨折的手术方法

(PDFFs) after total knee arthroplasty included locking compression plate (LCP),
(PDFFs) 全膝关节置换术后包括锁定加压板 (LCP),

retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN), and distal femoral replacement (DFR).
逆行髓内钉 (RIMN) 和股骨远端置换术 (DFR)。

However, the optimal treatment remains controversial. We performed a network
然而,最佳治疗方法仍然存在争议。我们执行了一个网络

meta-analysis (NMA) to provide the optimal surgical method for PDFFs.
meta analysis (NMA) 为 PDFF 提供最佳手术方法。

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases, including Embase, Web of Science,
材料和方法:电子数据库,包括 Embase、Web of Science、

Cochrane Library, and PubMed, were searched for studies that compared LCP, RIMN,
检索了 Cochrane 图书馆和 PubMed 中比较 LCP、RIMN、

and DFR for PDFFs. The quality of the included studies was assessed according to
和 PDFF 的 DFR。纳入研究的质量根据

the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Pairwise meta-analysis was performed by Review
纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表。由 Review 进行成对荟萃分析

Manager version 5.4. The NMA was conducted in Aggregate Data Drug Information
Manager 版本 5.4。NMA 在 Aggregate Data Drug Information 中进行

System software version 1.16.5. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95%
系统软件版本 1.16.5。我们计算了比值比 (ORs) 和 95%

confidence intervals (CIs) for postoperative complications and reoperations.
术后并发症和再次手术的置信区间 (CIs)。

RESULTS: A total of 19 studies and 1198 patients were included, of whom 733 for
结果: 共纳入 19 项研究和 1198 例患者,其中 733 例

LCP, 282 for RIMN, and 183 for DFR. Pairwise meta-analysis comparing LCP to RIMN
LCP,RIMN 为 282,DFR 为 183。比较 LCP 与 RIMN 的成对 meta 分析

and LCP to DFR showed no significant difference in complications and
LCP 与 DFR 的并发症无显著差异,且

reoperations except that RIMN had a higher risk of malunion comparing to LCP (OR
除了 RIMN 与 LCP 相比,RIMN 的畸形愈合风险更高 (OR

3.05; 95% CI 1.46-6.34; P = 0.003). No statistically significant effects were
3.05;95% CI 1.46-6.34;P = 0.003)。无统计学意义效应

found in the NMA of overall complications, infection, and reoperation. However,
在 NMA 中发现总体并发症、感染和再次手术。然而

results of rank probabilities showed that DFR ranked best in overall
排名概率结果显示,DFR 总体排名最高

complications and reoperation, RIMN ranked best in infection but worst in
并发症和再次手术,RIMN 在感染中排名最高,但在

reoperation, and LCP ranked worst in infection and middle in reoperation.
再次手术,LCP 在感染中排名最差,在再次手术中排名中等。

DISCUSSION: We found similar complication rate and reoperation rate between LCP,
讨论: 我们发现 LCP 之间的并发症发生率和再手术率相似,

RIMN, and DFR. The results of rank probabilities favored DFR, and further
RIMN 和 DFR.排名概率的结果有利于 DFR,并且更进一步

studies with high-level evidence are expected to verify the optimal surgical
具有高水平证据的研究有望验证最佳手术

method for PDFFs.
方法。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II; network meta-analysis.
证据级别: II 级;网络荟萃分析。


© 2023. The Author(s).
© 2023 年。作者。


DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03586-y
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03586-y

PMCID: PMC9942323
PMCID:PMC9942323

PMID: 36803522 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:36803522 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of
利益冲突声明:作者声明没有潜在的利益冲突

interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this
与本研究、作者身份和/或出版有关的利益

article.
品。



41. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Sep;106(5):903-906. doi:
41. 骨科创伤外科研究 2020 年 9 月;106(5):903-906.doi:

10.1016/j.otsr.2020.02.017. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
10.1016/j.otsr.2020.02.017.Epub 2020 年 7 月 4 日。


One-session bilateral total knee replacement: Late complications and
一次双侧全膝关节置换术:晚期并发症和

survivorship.
生存。


Levy Y(1), Azar M(1), Raffaelli A(1), Tran L(1), Carles M(1), Boileau P(1),
利维 Y(1), 阿扎尔 M(1), 拉斐利 A(1), 陈 L(1), 卡莱斯 M(1), 博伊洛 P(1),

Trojani C(2).
特洛伊木马 C(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Institut Universitaire Locomoteur et du sport, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de
(1)大学运动与运动研究所、巴斯德 2 医院、大学医院

Nice, 30, voie Romaine, 06000 Nice, France.
尼斯,30 岁,voie Romaine,06000 尼斯,法国。

(2)Institut Universitaire Locomoteur et du sport, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de
(2)大学运动与运动研究所、巴斯德 2 医院、大学医院

Nice, 30, voie Romaine, 06000 Nice, France. Electronic address:
尼斯,30 岁,voie Romaine,06000 尼斯,法国。电子地址:

trojani.c@chu-nice.fr.
trojani.c@chu-nice.fr。


INTRODUCTION: The early morbidity and mortality of one-session bilateral total
引言: 单次双侧总计的早期发病率和死亡率

knee arthroplasty (1-session BTKA) has been reported in the medical literature.
膝关节置换术 (1 次 BTKA) 已在医学文献中报道。

However, there is less information about the long-term clinical impact of this
然而,关于这种疗法的长期临床影响的信息较少

strategy. The aim of this study was to report on the late complications (>90
策略。本研究的目的是报告晚期并发症 (>90

days), clinical outcomes (KOOS and new KSS) along with the survivorship of
天)、临床结果(KOOS 和新 KSS)以及

1-session BTKA. We hypothesised that 1-session BTKA will cause few late
1 会话 BTKA。我们假设 1 次 BTKA 会导致很少的延迟

complications and that the implant survival will meet the criteria of the
并发症,并且植入物存活率将满足

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).
国家健康与临床优化研究所 (NICE)。

METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study analysed a cohort of ASA-1 and
方法: 这项单中心回顾性研究分析了一组 ASA-1 和

ASA-2 patients who underwent 1-session BTKR over an 8-year period (2009 to
在 8 年期间接受 1 次 BTKR 治疗的 ASA-2 患者(2009 年至

2016). The cohort consisted of 116 patients (66% women, 34% men) with mean age
该队列由 116 名患者 (66% 女性,34% 男性) 组成,平均年龄

at inclusion of 69 years (32-85 years); 22% of patients were ASA-1 and 78% were
入组时 69 岁 (32-85 岁);22% 的患者为 ASA-1,78% 的患者为

ASA-2. The implant-related, infection-related or mechanical complications that
ASA-2 的植入物相关、感染相关或机械并发症

occurred more than 90 days after the operation, the clinical outcomes (KOOS and
发生在术后 90 天以上,临床结局 (KOOS 和

New KSS) and radiological outcomes, along with the survivorship were determined
确定了新的 KSS) 和放射学结果以及存活率

during the scheduled follow-up visits at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year
在 3 个月、6 个月和 1 年的预定随访期间

postoperative and during the long-term follow-up or during an intercurrent
术后和长期随访期间或间歇期间

event.
事件。

RESULTS: No patients were lost to follow-up. Fifteen complications occurred
结果: 无患者失访。发生 15 例并发症

(6.5%): four infections, four patellar problems (three cases of clunk syndrome
(6.5%):4 例感染,4 例髌骨问题(3 例 Clunk 综合征

and one of patellofemoral pain), four cases of stiffness, two of unexplained
和 1 例髌股关节疼痛),4 例僵硬,2 例不明原因

pain and one femoral periprosthetic fracture. Eight patients were readmitted to
疼痛和一例股骨假体周围骨折。8 例患者再次入院

the hospital (7%); seven were reoperated (3%) and two implants were revised
医院 (7%);7 例 (3%) 进行了再次手术,2 例植入物进行了翻修

(1%). The functional outcomes (KOOS and New KSS) were significantly improved and
(1%).功能结局(KOOS 和 New KSS)得到显著改善,并且

87% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with this procedure. At a mean
87% 的患者对该程序感到满意或非常满意。在平均值

follow-up of 5 years, the survivorship estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
随访 5 年,使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计的生存率

was 98.4% (95% CI: 0.933-0.996).
为 98.4% (95% CI: 0.933-0.996)。

CONCLUSION: Performing 1-session BTKA is a reliable strategy as it produces a
结论:执行 1 次 BTKA 是一种可靠的策略,因为它会产生

low rate of late complications, excellent medium-term functional outcomes and
晚期并发症发生率低,中期功能结局优秀,以及

survivorship that meets NICE criteria, thus confirming our hypothesis.
符合 NICE 标准的幸存者,从而证实了我们的假设。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.
证据级别:IV,回顾性病例系列。


Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
版权所有 © 2020。由 Elsevier Masson SAS 出版。


DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.02.017
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.02.017

PMID: 32631714 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:32631714 [MEDLINE 索引]



42. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):257-262. doi:
42. 骨科创伤外科研究 2017 年 4 月;103(2):257-262.doi:

10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.018. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.018.Epub 2017 年 1 月 13 日。


Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty :
全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折:

Plate versus nail fixation.
钢板固定与钉子固定。


Wallace SS(1), Bechtold D(2), Sassoon A(3).
华莱士 SS(1),贝克托尔德 D(2),沙逊 A(3)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)University of Washington medical center, department of orthopaedics and
(1)华盛顿大学医学中心骨科和

sports medicine, 98195 Seattle, Washington, USA.
运动医学,98195 西雅图,华盛顿州,美国。

(2)University of Washington, school of medicine, 1959, NE Pacific St., 98195
(2)华盛顿大学医学院,1959 年,NE Pacific St.,98195

Seattle, Washington, USA.
美国华盛顿州西雅图。

(3)University of Washington medical center, department of orthopaedics and
(3)华盛顿大学医学中心骨科和

sports medicine, 98195 Seattle, Washington, USA. Electronic address:
运动医学,98195 西雅图,华盛顿州,美国。电子地址:

sassoon@uw.edu.
sassoon@uw.edu。


The incidence of periprosthetic fractures about a TKA is increasing.
TKA 引起的假体周围骨折的发生率正在增加。

Traditionally, these fractures are classified by their location and prosthesis
传统上,这些骨折按其位置和假体进行分类

integrity. In the setting of a supracondyar fracture about a well-fixed
正直。在髁上骨折的情况下,大约固定良好

prosthesis, both plate and nail fixation of the fracture present themselves as
假体,骨折的钢板和钉子固定都表现为

options, each with unique benefits and pitfalls. Through review and discussion
选项,每个选项都有独特的好处和陷阱。通过审查和讨论

of the literature, we aim to describe some of the patient, fracture, and implant
在文献中,我们旨在描述一些患者、骨折和植入物

related factors that should be considered when planning fixation of
规划固定时应考虑的相关因素

periprosthetic fractures about a TKA. Additionally, we present several technical
关于 TKA 的假体周围骨折。此外,我们还介绍了几种技术

pearls that may be useful in the successful treatment of these difficult
珍珠可能有助于成功治疗这些困难

injuries.
损伤。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
证据级别: 4.


Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS。保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.018
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.018

PMID: 28089667 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:28089667 [MEDLINE 索引]



43. J Knee Surg. 2023 Sep;36(11):1111-1115. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749604. Epub 2022
43. J 膝外科 2023 年 9 月;36(11):1111-1115.doi:10.1055/s-0042-1749604。Epub 2022 年

Jul 12.
7 月 12 日。


Comparable Outcomes Between Native and Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal
远端自体骨折和假体周围骨折的可比结局

Femur.
股骨。


Kaufman MW(1), Rascoe AS(1), Hii JL(1), Thom ML(1), Levine AD(1)(2), Wilber
考夫曼 MW(1), 拉斯科 AS(1), 嗨 JL(1), 汤姆 ML(1), 莱文 AD(1)(2), 威尔伯

RG(1)(2), Hirschfeld AG(1)(2), Romeo NM(1)(2), Wera GD(1)(2).
RG(1)(2)、Hirschfeld AG(1)(2)、Romeo NM(1)(2)、Wera GD(1)(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of
(1)凯斯西储大学骨科

Medicine Cleveland, Ohio.
俄亥俄州克利夫兰梅迪恩。

(2)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland,
(2)克利夫兰 MetroHealth 医疗中心骨科外科

Ohio.
俄亥俄州。


Despite the rising prevalence of arthroplasty and aging population, limited data
尽管关节置换术的患病率不断上升,人口老龄化,但数据有限

exist regarding differences in periprosthetic fracture clinical outcomes
存在假体周围骨折临床结果的差异

compared with native counterparts. This study compares differences in hospital
与原生对应物相比。本研究比较了医院的差异

treatment, morbidity, and mortality associated with periprosthetic distal femur
与股骨远端假体周围的治疗、并发症发生率和死亡率

fractures at an urban level 1 trauma center. We retrospectively reviewed all
城市 1 级创伤中心的骨折。我们回顾性评价了所有

adult AO/OTA type 33 fractures (526) that presented to our institution between
成人 AO/OTA 33 型骨折 (526) 在我们机构之间出现

2009 and 2018. In total, 54 native and 54 periprosthetic fractures were matched
2009 年和 2018 年。总共匹配了 54 例自体骨折和 54 例假体周围骨折

by age and gender. We recorded demographics, operative measures, length of stay
按年龄和性别划分。我们记录了人口统计数据、手术措施、住院时间

(LOS), discharge disposition, and mortality. We used McNemar's and paired
(LOS)、出院处置和死亡率。我们使用了 McNemar 的并配对

t-tests for analysis where appropriate (p < 0.05) (IBM SPSS Statistics for
在适当的情况下进行分析 (p < 0.05) (IBM SPSS Statistics for

Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY; IBM Corp.). The average age at injury was 74
Windows 版本 26.0。纽约州阿蒙克;IBM Corp. 公司)。受伤的平均年龄为 74 岁

years ± 12 (native) compared with 73 years ± 12 (periprosthetic). After 1:1
12 ±岁(自然)与 73 岁± 12 岁(假体周围)。1:1 之后

matching, the groups had similar body mass index (31.01 vs. 32.98, p = 0.966 for
匹配,两组具有相似的体重指数 (31.01 vs. 32.98,p = 0.966

native and periprosthetic, respectively) and mechanisms of injury with 38 native
分别是自体和假体周围)和损伤机制,其中 38 例自体

and 44 periprosthetic (p = 0.198) fractures from low-energy falls. Both groups
和 44 例低能量跌倒引起的假体周围骨折 (p = 0.198)。两组

had 51/54 fractures managed with open reduction internal fixation with a locking
有 51/54 例骨折通过锁定术切开复位内固定治疗

plate. The remaining were managed via amputation or intramedullary nail
盘子。其余患者通过截肢或髓内钉进行治疗

fixation. Mean operative time (144 minutes (±64) vs. 132 minutes (±62),
固定。平均手术时间 (144 分钟 (±64) vs. 132 分钟 (±62),

p = 0.96) and estimated blood loss (319 mL (±362) vs. 289 mL (±231), p = 0.44)
p = 0.96) 和估计失血量 (319 mL (±362) vs. 289 mL (±231),p = 0.44)

were comparable between the native and periprosthetic groups, respectively. LOS:
分别在自体组和假体周围组之间具有可比性。洛杉矶:

9 days ± 7 (native) versus 7 days ± 5 (periprosthetic, p = 0.31); discharge
7 ± 9 天(天然)与 7 ± 5 天 (假体周围,p = 0.31);放电

disposition (to skilled nursing facility/rehab): n = 47 (native) versus n = 43
处置(专业护理机构/康复中心):n = 47(本地)与 n = 43

(periprosthetic, p = 0.61); and mortality: n = 6 (native) versus n = 8
(假体周围,p = 0.61);死亡率:n = 6(天然)与 n = 8

(periprosthetic, p = 0.55). No significant differences were observed. We found
(假体周围,p = 0.55)。未观察到显著差异。我们发现

no statistical differences in morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic distal
假体周围远端的发病率和死亡率无统计学差异

femur fractures treated over 10 years at a level 1 trauma center. Native and
在 1 级创伤中心治疗股骨骨折超过 10 年。Native 和

periprosthetic AO/OTA type 33 distal femur fractures are serious injuries with
假体周围 AO/OTA 33 型股骨远端骨折是严重损伤,

similar outcomes at a level 1 trauma center.
在 1 级创伤中心也有类似的结果。


Thieme. All rights reserved.
蒂姆。保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749604
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749604

PMID: 35820430 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:35820430 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: None declared.
利益冲突声明:未申报。



44. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Sep;25(9):2921-2928. doi:
44. 膝关节外科运动创伤器关节。2017 年 9 月;25(9):2921-2928.doi:

10.1007/s00167-016-4050-0. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
10.1007/s00167-016-4050-0。Epub 2016 年 2 月 20 日。


Similar outcomes of locking compression plating and retrograde intramedullary
锁定加压钢板和逆行髓内骨的结局相似

nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee
全膝关节术后假体周围髁上骨折的钉子

arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
关节置换术:荟萃分析。


Shin YS(1), Kim HJ(2), Lee DH(3).
申 YS(1)、金 HJ(2)、李 DH(3)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Veterans Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
(1)韩国首尔退伍军人医院骨科。

(2)Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine,
(2)高丽大学医学院预防医学系

Seoul, Korea.
韩国首尔。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan
(3)Sungkyunkwan 三星医疗中心骨外科

University School of Medicine, 81 Ilwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea.
大学医学院,首尔特别市江南区一元路 81 号,邮编 135-710,韩国。

eoak22@empal.com.
eoak22@empal.com。


PURPOSE: This meta-analysis was designed to compare clinical outcomes, including
目的: 本荟萃分析旨在比较临床结局,包括

knee scale score and nonunion rate, of patients with periprosthetic
假体周围患者膝关节量表评分和非骨连率

supracondylar fractures of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 后股骨远端髁上骨折

who were treated using locking compression plates and retrograde intramedullary
使用锁定加压钢板和逆行髓内管治疗的患者

nails.
指甲。

METHODS: Studies were included in this meta-analysis if they compared clinical
方法: 如果研究比较临床

outcomes, including operation time, Knee Society Score (KSS), time to union,
结果,包括手术时间、膝关节协会评分 (KSS)、愈合时间、

nonunion rate, and revision rate due to nonunion, in patients who underwent
骨不连率和骨不连引起的翻修率,在接受

locking compression plate or retrograde intramedullary nail for periprosthetic
用于假体周围的锁定加压钢板或逆行髓内钉

distal femur fractures following TKA.
TKA 后股骨远端骨折。

RESULTS: Eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. Mean operation time
结果: 本荟萃分析纳入 8 项研究。平均作时间

was 11 min shorter (95 % CI -9.56 to 31.33 min; n.s.) and KSS one point higher
短 11 min (95 % CI -9.56 至 31.33 min;n.s.),KSS 高 1 分

(95 % CI -8.88 to 11.10; n.s.) with retrograde intramedullary nail than with
(95 % CI -8.88 至 11.10;n.s.)与逆行髓内钉相比

locking compression plate, but these differences were not statistically
锁定加压钢板,但这些差异没有统计学意义

significant. The two groups were also similar in mean time to union (0.46 weeks
重要。两组在平均愈合时间(0.46 周

95 % CI -1.17 to 2.08 weeks; n.s.), the proportion of subjects with nonunion (OR
95 % CI -1.17 至 2.08 周;n.s.)、不愈合 (OR

0.83, 95 % CI 0.26-2.60; n.s.) and the proportion that underwent revision
0.83, 95 % CI 0.26-2.60;n.s.)以及接受修订的比例

surgery (OR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.32-2.40; n.s.).
手术 (OR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.32-2.40;

CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes, including nonunion and revision rates, were
结论: 临床结局,包括骨不连率和翻修率,均

similar in patients who underwent locking compression plate and retrograde
在接受锁定加压钢板和逆行治疗的患者中相似

intramedullary nail fixation for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fracture
假体周围髁上骨折的髓内钉固定术

following TKA. Orthopaedic surgeons must train to master both the retrograde
遵循 TKA。骨科医生必须接受培训以掌握逆行

intramedullary nail and locking compression plate techniques because both
髓内钉和锁定加压钢板技术,因为两者都

approaches can be considered for periprosthetic distal femur fracture after TKA
TKA 后股骨假体周围远端骨折可考虑方法

as they have similar clinicoradiologic outcomes.
因为它们具有相似的临床放射学结果。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
证据级别: II.


DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4050-0
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4050-0

PMID: 26897137 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:26897137 [MEDLINE 索引]



45. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Sep;25(9):624-633. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00680.
45. J Am Acad 骨科外科杂志 2017 年 9 月;25(9):624-633.doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00680.


Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Management of Periprosthetic Fractures.
翻修全膝关节置换术治疗假体周围骨折。


Kuzyk PRT(1), Watts E, Backstein D.
库兹克 PRT(1),瓦茨 E,巴克斯坦 D。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)From the Granovsky Gluskin Department of Orthopedics, Sinai Health System,
(1)来自西奈卫生系统 Granovsky Gluskin 骨科,

University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
多伦多大学,多伦多,安大略省,加拿大。


Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can present
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 后可出现假体周围骨折

reconstructive challenges. Not only is the procedure technically complex, but
重建挑战。不仅手术在技术上复杂,而且

patients with these fractures may have multiple comorbidities, making them prone
这些骨折患者可能有多种合并症,使他们易患

to postoperative complications. Early mobilization is particularly beneficial in
到术后并发症。早期活动特别有益

patients with multiple comorbidities. Certain patient factors and fracture types
患有多种合并症的患者。某些患者因素和骨折类型

may make revision TKA the ideal management option. Periprosthetic fractures
可能使修订 TKA 成为理想的管理选择。假体周围骨折

around the knee implant occur most frequently in the distal femur, followed by
膝关节周围植入物最常见于股骨远端,其次是

the tibia and the patella. Risk factors typically are grouped into patient
胫骨和髌骨。危险因素通常分为患者

factors (eg, osteoporosis, obesity) and surgical factors (eg, anterior notching,
因素(如骨质疏松症、肥胖)和手术因素(如前切迹、

implant malposition). Surgical options for periprosthetic fractures that involve
植入物错位)。涉及的假体周围骨折的手术选择

the distal femur or proximal tibia include reconstruction of the bone stock with
股骨远端或胫骨近端包括骨库重建,其中

augments or metal cones or replacement with an endoprosthesis.
增强或金属锥体或用内假体替代。


DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00680
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00680

PMID: 28837455 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:28837455 [MEDLINE 索引]



46. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 14;59(2):369. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020369.
46. 医学(考纳斯)。2023 年 2 月 14 日;59(2):369.doi:10.3390/medicine59020369。


Risk Factors and Preventive Strategies for Perioperative Distal Femoral Fracture
围手术期股骨远端骨折的危险因素和预防措施

in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.
在接受全膝关节置换术的患者中。


Kang KH(1), Kim MS(1), Kim JJ(1), In Y(1).
Kang KH(1), Kim MS(1), Kim JJ(1), In Y(1).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of
(1)首尔圣母医院骨外科

Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul
韩国天主教大学医学系,首尔特别市瑞草区盘浦大路 222 号

06591, Republic of Korea.
06591,大韩民国。


Background and Objectives Perioperative distal femoral fracture is rare in
背景和目的 围手术期股骨远端骨折罕见

patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In such rare cases,
接受全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 的患者。在这种罕见的情况下,

additional fixation might be required, and recovery can be delayed. Several
可能需要额外的固定,并且可能会延迟恢复。几个

studies have focused on perioperative distal femoral fractures in TKA, but there
研究集中在 TKA 的围手术期股骨远端骨折,但

remains a lack of information on risk factors. The purpose of this study was to
仍然缺乏有关风险因素的信息。本研究的目的是

investigate risk factors for perioperative distal femoral fractures in patients
调查患者围手术期股骨远端骨折的危险因素

undergoing TKA and suggest preventive strategies. Materials and Methods: This
接受 TKA 并提出预防策略。材质和方法:这里

retrospective study included a total of 5364 TKA cases in a single institution
回顾性研究包括单个机构中共有 5364 例 TKA 病例

from 2011 to 2022. Twenty-four distal femoral fractures occurred during TKA or
从 2011 年到 2022 年。24 例股骨远端骨折发生在 TKA 或

within one month postoperatively (0.45%). Patient demographics, intraoperative
术后 1 个月内 (0.45%)。患者人口统计学,术中

findings, and postoperative progress were obtained from patient medical records
从患者病历中获得结果和术后进展

and radiographs. Risk factors for fractures were analyzed using multivariate
和 X 光片。使用多变量分析骨折的危险因素

Firth logistic regression analysis. Results: Although all 24 distal femoral
Firth logistic 回归分析。结果:尽管所有 24 个股骨远端

fractures occurred in female patients (24 of 4819 patients, 0.50%), the
骨折发生在女性患者中 (4819 例患者中有 24 例,0.50%),

incidence rate of fracture between male and female patients was not
男性和女性患者骨折发生率不

significantly different (p = 0.165). The presence of osteoporosis and insertion
显著差异 (p = 0.165)。存在骨质疏松症和插入

of a polyethylene (PE) insert with knee dislocation were statistically
聚乙烯 (PE) 插入物伴膝关节脱位

significant risk factors (p = 0.009 and p = 0.046, respectively). However,
显著危险因素 (分别为 p = 0.009 和 p = 0.046)。然而

multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only osteoporosis with
多因素 logistic 回归分析显示,只有

bone mineral density (BMD) < -2.8 (odds ratio (2.30), 95% CI (1.03-5.54), p =
骨密度 (BMD) < -2.8 (比值比 (2.30),95% CI (1.03-5.54),p =

0.043) was an independent risk factor for perioperative distal femoral fracture
0.043) 是围手术期股骨远端骨折的独立危险因素

in TKA patients. Conclusions: Our results suggest that osteoporosis with BMD <
在 TKA 患者中。结论: 我们的结果表明,骨质疏松症伴 BMD<

-2.8 is a risk factor for distal femoral fractures in patients undergoing TKA.
-2.8 是接受 TKA 的患者股骨远端骨折的危险因素。

In these patients, careful bone cutting, adequate gap balancing, and especially
在这些患者中,小心地切骨,充分的间隙平衡,尤其是

the use of the sliding method for insertion of a PE insert are recommended as
建议使用滑动方法插入 PE 插件,因为

preventive strategies.
预防策略。


DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020369
DOI: 10.3390/medicine59020369

PMCID: PMC9965432
PMCID:PMC9965432

PMID: 36837570 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:36837570 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
利益冲突声明:作者声明没有利益冲突。



47. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Sep;109(5):103489. doi:
47. 骨科创伤外科研究 2023 年 9 月;109(5):103489.doi:

10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103489. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103489。Epub 2022 年 11 月 25 日。


Treatment of supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fractures with retrograde
逆行治疗髁上假体股骨骨折

intramedullary nailing versus distal femoral plating: A systematic review and
髓内钉与股骨远端钢板:系统评价和

meta-analysis of current evidence.
当前证据的荟萃分析。


Wall R(1), Syed F(2), Arastu M(2), Riemer B(2), Boutefnouchet T(3).
沃尔 R(1),赛义德 F(2),阿拉斯图 M(2),里默 B(2),布特夫努切特 T(3)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge
(1)考文垂大学医院和沃里克郡 NHS 信托基金,克利福德桥

Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK. Electronic address: rosemary.wall@nhs.net.
路,考文垂 CV2 2DX,英国。电子地址:rosemary.wall@nhs.net。

(2)University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge
(2)考文垂大学医院和沃里克郡 NHS 信托基金,克利福德桥

Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.
路,考文垂 CV2 2DX,英国。

(3)University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
(3)伯明翰大学医院 NHS 基金会信托基金,英国伯明翰。


BACKGROUND: Supracondylar periprosthetic fractures, when amenable to fixation,
背景:髁上假体周围骨折,当适合固定时,

can be treated by either retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) or plating.
可通过逆行髓内钉 (RIMN) 或钢板治疗。

There is paucity of evidence regarding the superiority of one fixation method
缺乏关于一种固定方法优越性的证据

over the other. This review aims to determine which fixation method leads to
而不是另一个。本综述旨在确定哪种固定方法会导致

better functional outcomes and perioperative complications.
更好的功能结局和围手术期并发症。

HYPOTHESIS: Superiority of intramedullary nailing in terms of fracture healing
假设:髓内钉在骨折愈合方面的优势

and surgical complications when compared to distal femoral plating.
和手术并发症。

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was
材料和方法: 使用 PRISMA 指南,系统检索是

performed. Studies which reported comparative outcome data following the two
执行。报告了两者之后的比较结局数据的研究

interventions were included. Qualitative data analysis and narrative synthesis
纳入干预措施。定性数据分析和叙述综合

were reported. Pooled comparisons were conducted when similar quantifiable
被报道。当相似的可量化时,进行汇总比较

outcomes were reported in a minimum of three studies.
至少有 3 项研究报告了结局。

RESULTS: A total of 151 records were generated by the search. Eight studies met
结果:搜索共生成 151 条记录。满足 8 项研究

the eligibility criteria so were included in the final analysis. The studies
资格标准 SO 被纳入最终分析。研究

comprised a total of 407 cases, with a follow up period ranging from 1 to 15
共 407 例,随访期由 1 至 15 次不等

years. 252 cases were treated with plate fixation and 155 with RIMN. All studies
年。252 例接受钢板固定治疗,155 例接受 RIMN 治疗。所有研究

were mitigated by heterogeneity and methodological limitations. The review
因异质性和方法学限制而得到缓解。评论

showed marked variation in descriptive fracture classifications. Narrative data
在描述性骨折分类中显示出显着差异。叙述性数据

synthesis was conducted. Although guarded by the methodological limitations of
进行综合。尽管受到

individual studies, outcomes showed that mean time to union was equivalent; 5.88
个别研究,结果表明平均结合时间是等效的;5.88

months for RIMN compared to 6.75 months in plating, standardised mean
RIMN 的月数与电镀的 6.75 个月相比,标准化平均值

difference=0.28 (95% CI -0.02-0.58). Similarly, no statistically significant
差异=0.28 (95% CI -0.02-0.58)。同样,没有统计学意义

differences were reported between RIMN and plating for deep infection (OR:1.41
据报道,RIMN 和电镀在深部感染方面存在差异 (OR:1.41

95%CI 0.40-5.00) and revision surgery (OR: 0.74, 95%CI 0.39-1.41).
95% CI 0.40-5.00) 和翻修手术 (OR: 0.74,95% CI 0.39-1.41)。

DISCUSSION: Clinical outcomes showed a tendency that favours intramedullary
讨论: 临床结果显示倾向于髓内

nailing; however, generalisation of results was not possible. Future priority
钉;然而,结果的推广是不可能的。未来优先

must be awarded to higher quality research in the form of a collaborative
必须以合作的形式授予更高质量的研究

multicentre observational studies to delineate appropriate major diagnostic
多中心观察性研究,以描述适当的主要诊断

categories, ultimately informing a large comparative trial using condition
类别,最终使用条件为大型比较试验提供信息

specific validated outcome measures.
特异性经过验证的结果测量。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, meta-analysis.
证据级别: III,荟萃分析。


Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS。保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103489
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103489

PMID: 36442809 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:36442809 [MEDLINE 索引]



48. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024 Apr 23;16:94574. doi: 10.52965/001c.94574. eCollection
48. Orthop Rev (帕维亚)。2024 年 4 月 23;16:94574。doi:10.52965/001c.94574。eCollection 系列

2024.


Distal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femoral
股骨远端置换术用于治疗股骨远端假体

fractures around a total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
全膝关节置换术周围的骨折:荟萃分析。


Wood MJ(1), Al-Jabri T(2), Stelzhammer T(3), Brivio A(4), Donaldson J(1),
伍德 MJ(1), 阿尔-贾布里 T(2), 斯特尔茨哈默 T(3), 布里维奥 A(4), 唐纳森 J(1),

Skinner JA(1), Barrett D(4).
斯金纳 JA(1),巴雷特 D(4)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Joint Reconstruction Unit Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital.
(1)联合重建单位皇家国家骨科医院。

(2)Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Imperial College London.
(2)创伤和骨科外科,伦敦帝国理工学院。

(3)Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Whittington Hospital.
(3)创伤和骨科外科惠廷顿医院。

(4)Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery King Edward VII Hospital.
(4)创伤和骨科外科爱德华七世国王医院。


BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fracture is a rare complication of arthroplasty but
背景: 假体周围骨折是关节置换术的一种罕见并发症,但

can have devastating consequences for the patient and presents a complex
可能会对患者造成毁灭性的后果,并呈现出复杂的

surgical challenge. Locking compression plate and retrograde intramedullary nail
手术激发。锁定加压钢板和逆行髓内钉

are both widely accepted surgical fixation techniques for distal femoral
都是广泛接受的股骨远端手术固定技术

periprosthetic fractures around a total knee arthroplasty. Although there is
全膝关节置换术周围的假体周围骨折。虽然有

still a need for further high-quality research into both techniques, there is
仍然需要对这两种技术进行进一步的高质量研究,有

even less literature concerning the use of distal femoral replacement to treat
关于使用股骨远端置换术治疗

distal femoral periprosthetic fractures. Interest has been piqued in distal
远端股骨假体周围骨折。远端的兴趣已被激起

femoral replacements for the treatment of distal femoral periprosthetic
用于治疗远端股骨周围假体的股骨置换物

fractures due to the theoretical advantages of immediate post-operative
由于术后即刻的理论优势而导致的骨折

weight-bearing and lack of dependence on fracture union, but there are still
负重和缺乏对骨折愈合的依赖性,但仍然存在

understandably reservations about performing such an extensive and invasive
可以理解的是,对执行如此广泛和侵入性的

procedure when an accepted alternative is available. This meta-analysis aims to
过程。本荟萃分析旨在

evaluate the current literature to compare the complication rates and return to
评估当前文献以比较并发症发生率并返回

pre-operative ambulatory status of distal femoral replacement and locking
股骨远端置换和锁定的术前动态状态

compression plate.
加压板。

METHOD: A literature search was performed to identify articles related to the
方法: 进行文献检索以确定与

management of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures around a total knee
全膝关节周围远端股骨假体周围骨折的处理

arthroplasty in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
关节置换术遵守系统的首选报告项目

Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Methodological quality was
评论和荟萃分析 (PRISMA) 清单。方法学质量

assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS)
使用非随机研究方法学指数 (MINORS) 进行评估

criteria. Articles were reviewed, and data extracted for analysis.
标准。审查文章并提取数据进行分析。

RESULTS: Five articles met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 345
结果: 5 篇文章符合纳入标准,共 345 篇

periprosthetic fractures. The overall rates of complications for distal femoral
假体周围骨折。股骨远端并发症的总体发生率

replacement and locking compression plate were: re-operation (6.1% vs 12.1%),
更换和锁定加压板是:再次手术(6.1% 对 12.1%),

infection (3.0% vs 5.3%), mortality (19.7% vs 19.3%), and return to
感染(3.0% 对 5.3%)、死亡率(19.7% 对 19.3%)和恢复到

pre-operative ambulatory status (60.9% vs 71.8%) (respectively).
术前动态状态 (分别为 60.9% 和 71.8%)。

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows no statistically significant difference in
结论: 这项荟萃分析显示

the rates of re-operation, infection, mortality or return to pre-operative
再次手术率、感染率、死亡率或恢复到术前的比率

ambulatory status when comparing distal femoral replacement to locking
比较股骨远端置换术与锁定时的动态

compression plate.
加压板。


DOI: 10.52965/001c.94574
DOI: 10.52965/001c.94574

PMCID: PMC11043028
PMCID:PMC11043028

PMID: 38666188
PMID:38666188



49. J Int Med Res. 2022 Oct;50(10):3000605221133012. doi: 10.1177/03000605221133012.
49. J Int Med Res. 2022 年 10 月;50(10):3000605221133012.doi: 10.1177/03000605221133012.


Comparison of locking compression plate and distal femoral replacement for
锁定加压钢板与股骨远端置换术的比较

periprosthetic distal femoral fractures: a retrospective study.
假体周围股骨远端骨折:一项回顾性研究。


Fu P(1)(2), Liang W(1), Gao Z(3), Zheng S(2), Fan W(1).
付平(1)(2), 梁 W(1), 高 Z(3), 郑 S(2), 范 W(1).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical
(1)南京医学院第一附属医院骨科

University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
大学, 中国江苏省南京市.

(2)Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing
(2)嘉兴市第二附属医院骨科

University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China.
大学, 中国浙江省嘉兴市.

(3)Department of Clinical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing
(3)嘉兴市第二附属医院临床肿瘤科

University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China.
大学, 中国浙江省嘉兴市.


OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of locking compression plate (LCP)
目的: 比较锁定加压钢板 (LCP) 的临床结局

and distal femoral replacement (DFR) for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures
和股骨远端置换术 (DFR) 用于股骨假体周围骨折

(PDFFs) after total knee arthroplasty.
(PDFFs) 全膝关节置换术后。

METHODS: This retrospective study identified patients with PDFFs in an
方法: 这项回顾性研究确定了 PDFFs 患者

institutional database between January 2012 and December 2021. Demographic data
2012 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间的机构数据库。人口统计数据

and clinical outcomes, including postoperative complications, reoperation,
和临床结果,包括术后并发症、再次手术、

1-year mortality, Knee Society Scores (KSS) and Knee Society Functional Score
1 年死亡率、膝关节协会评分 (KSS) 和膝关节协会功能评分

(KSFS) were analysed.
(KSFS) 进行分析。

RESULTS: In total, 12 patients treated with LCP and six patients treated with
结果: 总共 12 例接受 LCP 治疗的患者和 6 例接受 LCP 治疗的患者

DFR were included. There was no significant difference between the LCP and DFR
DFR 也包括在内。LCP 和 DFR 之间没有显著差异

groups in terms of postoperative complications (25.0% versus 33.3%,
术后并发症组(25.0% 对 33.3%,

respectively), reoperation (8.3% versus 0.0%), respectively, 1-year mortality
)、再次手术 (分别为 8.3% 和 0.0%),1 年死亡率

(8.3% versus 16.7%, respectively) or mean ± SD KSS (80.3 ± 8.3 versus
(分别为 8.3% 对 16.7%)或平均 ± SD KSS(80.3 ± 8.3 对

78.0 ± 2.5, respectively). However, the mean ± SD KSFS was significantly better
分别为 78.0 ± 2.5)。然而,SD KSFS ±平均值明显更好

for patients with LCP than for those with DFR (51.8 ± 12.5 versus 37.0 ± 6.7,
LCP 患者与 DFR 患者相比(51.8 ± 12.5 对 37.0 ± 6.7,

respectively).
分别)。

CONCLUSION: DFR provides similar clinical outcomes compared with LCP for PDFFs.
结论: 与 LCP 相比,DFR 为 PDFFs 提供了相似的临床结果。

Patients with advanced age may benefit from DFR to allow early weight bearing.
高龄患者可能受益于 DFR,以便尽早负重。


DOI: 10.1177/03000605221133012
DOI: 10.1177/03000605221133012

PMCID: PMC9608071
PMCID:PMC9608071

PMID: 36284456 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:36284456 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there are no conflicts
利益冲突声明:作者声明不存在冲突

of interest.
感兴趣。



50. J Arthroplasty. 2025 Apr;40(4):1048-1054.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.006.
50. J 关节成形术。2025 年 4 月;40(4):1048-1054.e1.doi:10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.006.

Epub 2024 Oct 19.
Epub 2024 年 10 月 19 日。


Fix or Replace? Comparable Outcomes With Internal Fixation and Distal Femoral
修复还是替换?与内固定和股骨远端的结局相当

Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures Above Total Knee Arthroplasty.
全膝关节置换术以上假体周围骨折的替代。


Lizcano JD(1), Giakas AM(1), Goh GS(1), Abbaszadeh A(1), Reddy YC(1), Courtney
Lizcano JD(1), Giakas AM(1), Goh GS(1), Abbaszadeh A(1), Reddy YC(1), Courtney

PM(1).
PM(1) 的 API 中。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas
(1)托马斯罗斯曼骨科研究所骨科外科

Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
宾夕法尼亚州费城杰斐逊大学医院。


BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for periprosthetic fracture (PPfx) around
背景: 假体周围骨折 (PPfx) 的最佳治疗方法

total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a topic of debate. Due to its low
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 仍然是一个争论的话题。由于它的低

incidence, comparative studies analyzing arthroplasty and fixation are lacking
发生率,缺乏分析关节置换术和固定术的比较研究

in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of
在文献中。本研究的目的是比较

distal femoral replacement (DFR) and open reduction and internal fixation open
股骨远端置换术 (DFR) 和切开复位和内固定开放

reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for distal femur PPfx.
股骨远端 PPfx 复位内固定 (ORIF)。

METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 99 patients who underwent DFR (n =
方法: 我们回顾了 99 例接受 DFR 的患者的连续系列 (n =

54) or ORIF (n = 45) for distal femur PPfx. The indications for DFR were
54) 或 ORIF (n = 45) 用于股骨远端 PPfx。DFR 的适应证是

reviewed. Fractures were classified based on their relation to the implant using
检讨。根据骨折与植入物的关系对骨折进行分类,使用

the Su classification. The primary outcome was rerevision, while secondary
Su 分类。主要结局是 rerevision,而次要结局

endpoints included inpatient complications, mortality within the first year, and
终点包括住院并发症、第一年内死亡率和

mechanical complications such as loosening and non-union.
机械并发症,如松动和不愈合。

RESULTS: Type 2 fractures were the most prevalent type in both groups (DFR 37
结果: 2 型骨折是两组中最常见的类型 (DFR 37

versus ORIF 48.9%), while Type 1 fractures were more commonly treated with ORIF
与 ORIF 相比 48.9%),而 1 型骨折更常用 ORIF 治疗

(35.6 versus 16.7%) and Type 3 with DFR (46.3 versus 15.6%) (P = 0.003). The
(35.6 对 16.7%)和 3 型有 DFR (46.3 对 15.6%) (P = 0.003)。这

preferred techniques in the ORIF group were plate osteosynthesis (66.7%) and
ORIF 组的首选技术是钢板接骨术 (66.7%) 和

retrograde nailing (31.1%). At a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range, one to
逆行钉 (31.1%)。平均随访 4.2 年(范围,1 至

14.1), DFR and ORIF did not demonstrate any difference in revision rates (13
14.1),DFR 和 ORIF 在翻修率方面没有表现出任何差异 (13

versus 24.4%, P = 0.140) or mortality (3.7 versus 4.4%, P = 0.887). However,
vs24.4%,P = 0.140)或死亡率 (3.7 vs4.4%,P = 0.887)。然而

more mechanical complications were noted in the ORIF group (22.2 versus 7.4%,
ORIF 组观察到更多的机械并发症(22.2 vs 7.4%,

P = 0.035).
P = 0.035)。

CONCLUSIONS: Both DFR and open reduction and internal fixation have comparable
结论: DFR 与切开复位和内固定具有可比性

revision rates, complications, and clinical outcomes when used in supracondylar
用于髁上时的翻修率、并发症和临床结局

periprosthetic distal femur fractures. Longer-term studies are needed to assess
假体周围股骨远端骨折。需要更长期的研究来评估

DFR survivorship as well as outcomes of newer trauma techniques such as
DFR 幸存率以及新型创伤技术的结果,例如

nail-plate combinations.
指甲板组合。


Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2024 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.006
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.006

PMID: 39428002 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:39428002 [MEDLINE 索引]



51. J Arthroplasty. 2022 May;37(5):966-973. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.078. Epub
51. J 关节成形术。2022 年 5 月;37(5):966-973.doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.078.电子版

2022 Feb 2.
2022 年 2 月 2 日。


New Classification for Periprosthetic Distal Femoral Fractures Based on
基于假体周围股骨远端骨折的新分类

Locked-Plate Fixation Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Study.
全膝关节置换术后锁板固定:一项多中心研究。


Kim JH(1), Kim KI(2), Park KC(3), Shon OJ(4), Sim JA(5), Kim GB(4).
Kim JH(1), Kim KI(2), Park KC(3), Shon OJ(4), Sim JA(5), Kim GB(4).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Joint Diseases, Kyung Hee
(1)Kyung Hee 关节疾病中心骨外科

University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea.
韩国首尔江东大学医院。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Joint Diseases, Kyung Hee
(2)Kyung Hee 关节疾病中心骨外科

University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea; Department of Orthopaedic
韩国首尔江东大学医院;骨科

Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
韩国首尔庆熙大学医学院外科。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital,
(3)汉阳大学九里医院骨外科

Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
韩国京畿道。

(4)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu,
(4)大邱岭南大学医学中心骨外科

Korea.
韩国。

(5)Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Gachon University College of Medicine,
(5)嘉泉大学医学院骨科外科

Incheon, Korea.
韩国仁川。


BACKGROUND: This study aimed to establish a new classification using
背景: 本研究旨在使用

locked-plate fixation for periprosthetic distal femoral fracture (PDFF)
股骨假体周围远端骨折的锁板固定 (PDFF)

following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to determine when dual locked-plate
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 后并确定何时使用双锁定板

fixation is necessary through defining this classification.
通过定义此分类,固定是必要的。

METHODS: One-hundred fifteen consecutive PDFFs that underwent operative
方法: 115 个连续的 PDFF 进行了手术

treatment were reviewed from 2011 to 2019 with minimum 1-year follow-up. Most
从 2011 年到 2019 年对治疗进行了回顾,并至少随访 1 年。最

PDFFs were fixed with single or dual locked-plate fixations using the minimally
PDFF 用单或双锁板固定,使用最小

invasive plate osteosynthesis technique. Based on preoperative radiographs,
侵入性板接骨技术。根据术前 X 线片,

PDFFs were classified according to the level of main fracture line relative to
PDFF 根据主断裂线相对于

the anterior flange of femoral component: type I and II, main fracture line
股骨成分前凸:I 型和 II 型,主要骨折线

located proximal and distal to the anterior flange; and type III, component
位于前凸的近端和远端;和 III 型,组件

instability regardless of fracture line requiring revisional TKA. Furthermore,
无论需要翻修 TKA 的骨折线如何,都不稳定。此外

type II fractures were subclassified based on the direction of fracture beak as
II 型骨折根据骨折喙的方向进行细分为

follows: type IIL, lateral-beak; type IIM, medial-beak. The incidence, treatment
遵循:IIL 型,侧喙;IIM 型,内喙。发生率、治疗

methods, and complications were analyzed according to the classification.
方法,并根据分类分析并发症。

RESULTS: Incidences of type I, IIL, IIM, and III were 64.4%, 8.7%, 24.3%, and
结果: I 型 、 IIL 、 IIM 和 III 型的发生率分别为 64.4 、 8.7 、 24.3% 和

2.6%, respectively. Meanwhile, most PDFFs in type I and II were treated with
分别为 2.6%。同时,大多数 I 型和 II 型 PDFFs 接受

lateral single locked-plate fixations, except for type IIM, which was treated
外侧单锁板固定,IIM 型除外,该固定板已接受治疗

with either single or dual locked-plate fixations. Overall complications were
使用单或双锁板固定。总体并发症

significantly higher in type II (28.9%) than in type I (10.8%, P = .019). In
II 型 (28.9%) 显著高于 I 型 (10.8%,P = .019)。在

type IIM, bone union-related complications were significantly higher in single
IIM 型、骨愈合相关并发症在单发患者中显著升高

locked-plate fixation (50.0%) than in dual locked-plate fixation (5.6%; P =
锁板固定 (50.0%) 比双锁板固定 (5.6%;P =

.013).

CONCLUSION: The new classification provides practical and obvious strategies for
结论: 新分类法为

the treatment of PDFF following TKA using locked-plate fixation. For type IIM
使用锁板固定治疗 TKA 后 PDFF。对于 IIM 型

fracture, dual plate fixation is necessary to prevent fixation failure or
骨折,需要双板固定以防止固定失败或

nonunion.
骨。


Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2022 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.078
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.078

PMID: 35121090 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:35121090 [MEDLINE 索引]



52. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Jun;141(6):997-1006. doi:
52. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 年 6 月;141(6):997-1006.doi:

10.1007/s00402-021-03866-4. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
10.1007/s00402-021-03866-4。Epub 2021 年 3 月 20 日。


Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction
切开复位术的早期并发症和再次手术率相似

internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for
内固定、髓内钉和股骨远端置换术

periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
假体周围股骨远端骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。


Quinzi DA(1), Ramirez G(1), Kaplan NB(1), Myers TG(1), Thirukumaran CP(1)(2)(3),
Quinzi DA(1), Ramirez G(1), Kaplan NB(1), Myers TG(1), Thirukumaran CP(1)(2)(3),

Ricciardi BF(4)(5)(6).
里卡迪 BF(4)(5)(6)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601
(1)罗切斯特大学医学中心骨科,601

Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA.
美国纽约州罗切斯特市埃尔姆伍德大道 (Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA)。

(2)Division of Health Policy and Outcomes Research, Department of Public Health
(2)公共卫生系卫生政策与成果研究部

Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester,
科学, 罗切斯特大学医学中心, 601 Elmwood Avenue, 罗切斯特,

NY, 14620, USA.
纽约州,14620,美国。

(3)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research,
(3)骨外科, 肌肉骨骼研究中心,

University of Rochester School of Medicine, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY,
罗切斯特大学医学院(University of Rochester School of Medicine),地址:601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY,

14620, USA.
14620, 美国。

(4)Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601
(4)罗切斯特大学医学中心骨科,601

Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA.
美国纽约州罗切斯特市埃尔姆伍德大道 (Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA)。

benjamin_ricciardi@urmc.rochester.edu.
benjamin_ricciardi@urmc.rochester.edu。

(5)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research,
(5)骨外科, 肌肉骨骼研究中心,

University of Rochester School of Medicine, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY,
罗切斯特大学医学院(University of Rochester School of Medicine),地址:601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY,

14620, USA. benjamin_ricciardi@urmc.rochester.edu.
14620, 美国。benjamin_ricciardi@urmc.rochester.edu。

(6)Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine, 1000 South
(6)罗切斯特大学医学院骨科外科,1000 South

Avenue, Suite 050, Rochester, NY, 14607, USA.
Avenue, Suite 050, 罗切斯特, NY, 14607, 美国。

benjamin_ricciardi@urmc.rochester.edu.
benjamin_ricciardi@urmc.rochester.edu。


BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to
背景: 我们的目的是进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以

evaluate complication and revision rates for periprosthetic distal femur
评估股骨远端假体周围修复术的并发症和翻修率

fractures (PPDFF) treated with: (1) ORIF using periarticular locking plates
骨折 (PPDFF) 治疗:(1) 使用关节周围锁定钢板的 ORIF

(ORIF), (2) retrograde intramedullary nail (IMN), and (3) distal femoral
(ORIF)、(2) 逆行髓内钉 (IMN) 和 (3) 股骨远端

replacement (DFR).
replacement (DFR) 的 Replacement。

METHODS: Systematic review of the literature was performed to identify eligible
方法: 对文献进行系统评价以确定符合条件的

studies (N = 52). Identified treatment groups were: ORIF (N = 1205 cases), IMN
研究 (N = 52)。确定的治疗组为:ORIF (N = 1205 例)、IMN

(N = 272 cases), and DFR (N = 353 cases). Median follow-up was 30 months (range
(N = 272 例)和 DFR(N = 353 例)。中位随访时间为 30 个月 (范围

6-96 months). Primary outcomes were: (1) major complication rates and (2)
6-96 个月)。主要结局是:(1) 主要并发症发生率和 (2)

reoperation rates over the follow-up period. Secondary outcomes were incidence
随访期间的再手术率。次要结局是 发生率

of deep infection, periprosthetic fracture, mortality over the follow-up period,
深部感染、假体周围骨折、随访期间死亡率、

1-year mortality, non-union, malunion, delayed union, and hardware failure. Data
1 年死亡率、不愈合、畸形愈合、延迟愈合和硬件故障。数据

for primary and secondary outcomes were pooled and unadjusted analysis was
对于主要和次要结局,合并未调整的分析

performed. Meta-analysis was performed on subset of individual studies comparing
执行。对比较

at least two of three treatment groups (N = 14 studies). Odds-ratios and their
三个治疗组中至少有两个(N = 14 项研究)。比值比及其

respective standard errors were determined for each treatment group combination.
确定每个治疗组组合的相应标准误差。

Maximum likelihood random effects meta-analysis was conducted for primary
对原发性

outcomes.
结果。

RESULTS: From the systematic review, major complication rates (p = 0.55) and
结果: 根据系统评价,主要并发症发生率 (p = 0.55) 和

reoperation rates (p = 0.20) were not significantly different between the three
三者之间的再手术率 (p = 0.20) 无显著差异

treatment groups. DFR group had a higher incidence of deep infection relative to
治疗组。DFR 组的深部感染发生率高于

IMN and ORIF groups (p = 0.03). Malunion rates were higher in IMN versus ORIF
IMN 和 ORIF 组 (p = 0.03)。IMN 的畸形愈合率高于 ORIF

(p = 0.02). For the meta-analysis, odds of major complications were not
(p = 0.02)。对于荟萃分析,主要并发症的几率没有

significantly different between IMN versus DFR (OR 1.39 [0.23-8.52]), IMN versus
IMN 与 DFR 之间存在显著差异 (OR 1.39 [0.23-8.52]),IMN 与

ORIF (OR 0.86 [0.48-1.53]), or the ORIF versus DFR (OR 0.91 [0.52-1.59]).
ORIF (OR 0.86 [0.48-1.53]),或 ORIF 与 DFR (OR 0.91 [0.52-1.59])。

Additionally, odds of a reoperation were not significantly different between IMN
此外,IMN 之间再次手术的几率没有显著差异

versus DFR (OR 0.59 [0.08-4.11]), IMN versus ORIF (OR 1.26 [0.66-2.40]), or ORIF
vs DFR (OR 0.59 [0.08-4.11])、IMN vs ORIF (OR 1.26 [0.66-2.40])或 ORIF

versus DFR (OR 0.91 [0.51-1.55]).
与 DFR 相比 (OR 0.91 [0.51-1.55])。

CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in major complications or reoperations
结论: 主要并发症或再次手术无差异

between the three treatment groups. Deep infection rates were higher in DFR
在三个治疗组之间。DFR 的深度感染率更高

relative to internal fixation, malunion rates were higher in IMN versus ORIF,
相对于内固定,IMN 的畸形愈合率高于 ORIF,

and periprosthetic fracture rates were higher in DFR and IMN versus ORIF.
DFR 和 IMN 的假体周围骨折率高于 ORIF。


DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03866-4
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03866-4

PMID: 33743062 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:33743062 [MEDLINE 索引]



53. J Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jan 1;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002141.
53. J 骨科创伤。2022 年 1 月 1 日;36(1):1-6.doi: 10.1097/BOT.000000000000002141.


Distal Femur Replacement Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for
股骨远端置换术与切开复位和内固定的比较

Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and
假体周围股骨远端骨折的治疗:系统评价和

Meta-Analysis.
荟萃分析。


Wadhwa H(1), Salazar BP(1), Goodnough LH(1), Van Rysselberghe NL(1), DeBaun
瓦德瓦 H(1), 萨拉查 BP(1), 古德诺 LH(1), 范里塞尔伯格 NL(1), 德鲍恩

MR(1), Wong HN(2), Gardner MJ(1), Bishop JA(1).
MR(1), Wong HN(2), Gardner MJ(1), Bishop JA(1).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center,
(1)斯坦福大学医学中心骨外科

Stanford, CA; and.
加利福尼亚州斯坦福;和。

(2)Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center, Stanford University,
(2)斯坦福大学兰恩医学图书馆和知识管理中心,

Stanford, CA.
加利福尼亚州斯坦福。


OBJECTIVE: To compare complications and functional outcomes of treatment with
目的: 比较

primary distal femoral replacement (DFR) versus open reduction and internal
一代股骨远端置换术 (DFR) 与切开复位和内部复位

fixation (ORIF).
固定 (ORIF)。

DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for English
数据来源: 检索 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库的英语

language studies up to May 19, 2020, identifying 913 studies.
截至 2020 年 5 月 19 日的语言研究,确定了 913 项研究。

STUDY SELECTION: Studies that assessed complications of periprosthetic distal
研究选择: 评估远端假体周围并发症的研究

femur fractures with primary DFR or ORIF were included. Studies with sample size
包括原发性 DFR 或 ORIF 的股骨骨折。样本量研究

≤5, mean age <55, nontraumatic indications for DFR, ORIF with nonlocking plates,
≤5 岁,平均年龄 <55 岁,DFR 的非创伤指征,ORIF 伴非锁定钢板,

native distal femoral fractures, or revision surgeries were excluded. Selection
自体股骨远端骨折或翻修手术被排除在外。选择

adhered to the PRISMA criteria.
遵守 PRISMA 标准。

DATA EXTRACTION: Study quality was assessed using previously reported criteria.
资料提取: 使用先前报告的标准评估研究质量。

There were 40 Level IV studies, 17 Level III studies, and 1 Level II study.
有 40 项 IV 级研究、17 项 III 级研究和 1 项 II 级研究。

DATA SYNTHESIS: Fifty-eight studies with 1484 patients were included in the
数据综合: 涉及 1484 名患者的 58 项研究被纳入

meta-analysis. Complications assessed {incidence rate ratio [IRR] [95%
荟萃分析。评估的并发症 {发生率比 [IRR] [95%

confidence interval (CI)]: 0.78 [0.59-1.03]} and reoperation or revision [IRR
置信区间 (CI)]:0.78 [0.59-1.03]} 和再次手术或翻修 [IRR

(95% CI): 0.71 (0.49-1.04)] were similar between the DFR and ORIF cohorts. The
(95% CI):0.71 (0.49-1.04)] 在 DFR 和 ORIF 队列之间相似。这

mean knee range of motion was greater in the ORIF cohort (DFR: 90.47 vs. ORIF:
ORIF 队列的平均膝关节活动度更大(DFR:90.47 vs. ORIF:

100.36, P < 0.05). The mean Knee Society Score (KSS) (DFR: 79.41 vs. ORIF:
100.36,P < 0.05)。平均膝关节协会评分 (KSS) (DFR: 79.41 vs. ORIF:

82.07, P = 0.35) and return to preoperative ambulatory status were similar [IRR
82.07,P = 0.35)和恢复到术前动态状态相似 [IRR

(95% CI): 0.82 (0.48-1.41)].
(95% CI):0.82 (0.48-1.41)]。

CONCLUSIONS: In comparing complications among patients treated for
结论: 在比较接受治疗的患者的并发症时

periprosthetic distal femur fracture with DFR or ORIF, there was no difference
假体周围股骨远端骨折伴 DFR 或 ORIF,无差异

between the groups. There were also no differences in functional outcomes,
组之间。功能结局也没有差异,

although knee range of motion was greater in the ORIF group. This systematic
尽管 ORIF 组的膝关节活动度更大。这个系统化的

review and meta-analysis highlights the need for future prospective trials
综述和荟萃分析强调了未来前瞻性试验的必要性

evaluating the outcomes of these divergent treatment strategies.
评估这些不同治疗策略的结果。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a
证据级别:治疗 III 级。有关以下内容,请参阅作者说明

complete description of levels of evidence.
证据级别的完整描述。


Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002141
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000000002141

PMID: 34001801 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:34001801 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: The authors report no conflict of interest.
利益冲突声明:作者报告没有利益冲突。



54. Malays Orthop J. 2022 Mar;16(1):46-50. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2203.007.
54. 马来骨科杂志 2022 年 3 月;16(1):46-50.doi:10.5704/MOJ.2203.007。


The Outcome of Fixing Distal Femur Periprosthetic Fracture around Total Knee
全膝关节周围股骨远端假体周围骨折固定的结果

Replacement using a Locking Plate Non-Contact Bridging (NCB).
使用锁定板非接触式桥接 (NCB) 进行更换。


Rahuma MA(1), Noureddine H(2).
Rahuma MA(1),Noureddine H(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Aintree University Hospitals NHS
(1)安特里大学医院 NHS 创伤和骨科

Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Foundation Trust,英国利物浦。

(2)Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Southampton NHS
(2)南安普敦大学医院 NHS 创伤和骨科

Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Foundation Trust,英国南安普敦。


INTRODUCTION: Surgical fixation of peri-prosthetic distal femur fractures around
引言:手术固定周围假体股骨远端骨折

knee replacements poses a challenge, especially in frail patients, with variable
膝关节置换术带来了挑战,尤其是对于虚弱的患者,存在可变

outcomes reported in the literature. This study looks at the outcomes of a
文献中报道的结局。本研究着眼于

consecutive series of patients presenting with such fractures and treated by
连续系列出现此类骨折并接受治疗的

using a locking plate fixation.
使用锁定板固定。

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 21 consecutive patients who were admitted to
材料和方法: 共 21 例连续入院患者

our trauma unit over 31 months and underwent fixation with the Non-Contact
我们的创伤科超过 31 个月,并接受了非接触式固定

Polyaxial Locking plate system were retrospectively identified and their acute
回顾性确定多轴锁定钢板系统及其急性

treatment with follow-up outcomes were analysed.
分析具有随访结局的治疗。

RESULTS: The mean age was 81 years and 71% were in ASA grades 3 and 4. Fracture
结果: 平均年龄为 81 岁,71% 为 ASA 3 年级和 4 年级。骨折

morphologies were classified as per the Su classification, yielding 8 (38%)
根据 Su 分类对形态进行分类,得到 8 个 (38%)

classified as Su one, 4 (19%) as Su two, and 9 (43%) as Su type three.
归类为 Su 1,4 (19%) 归类为 Su 2,9 (43%) 归类为 Su 类型 3。

Postoperatively, 2 patients (9.5%) died due to hospital-acquired pneumonia, and
术后 2 例患者 (9.5%) 死于医院获得性肺炎,且

another 2 patients (9.5%) developed wound infections necessitating further
另有 2 例患者 (9.5%) 出现伤口感染,需要进一步治疗

return to theatre. Additionally, 2 (9.5%) patients had distal femoral
重返剧院。此外,2 例 (9.5%) 患者股骨远端

replacements due to non-union. Mean discharge time was 28 days with 12 patients
由于非工会而更换。12 名患者的平均出院时间为 28 天

(55% of patients) starting protected weight-bearing six weeks after surgery.
(55% 的患者)在手术后 6 周开始保护性负重。

CONCLUSION: The incidence of morbidity, mortality was significant and
结论: 发病率、死亡率显著且

re-operation was required in patients treated as described, and these were
按照所述治疗的患者需要再次手术,这些

partly attributed to the patient's average age and the pre-existing
部分归因于患者的平均年龄和既往病史

comorbidities. Significant variations were noted in the time to discharge,
合并症。出院时间存在显著差异,

rehabilitation, and time to achieve fracture union. However, the majority of
康复,以及实现骨折愈合的时间。然而,大多数

fractures did eventually unite. Patients with comminuted fractures and
骨折最终还是联合起来了。粉碎性骨折患者

insufficient bone stock are more likely to progress to non-union and end up
骨量不足更容易发展为骨不连并最终

requiring revision knee arthroplasty.
需要翻修膝关节置换术。


© 2022 Malaysian Orthopaedic Association MOA. All Rights Reserved.
© 2022 年马来西亚骨科协会 MOA。保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.5704/MOJ.2203.007
DOI: 10.5704/MOJ.2203.007

PMCID: PMC9017929
PMCID:PMC9017929

PMID: 35519537
PMID:35519537



55. Trauma Case Rep. 2024 Jul 29;53:101084. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101084.
55. 创伤案例代表 2024 年 7 月 29;53:101084。doi:10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101084.

eCollection 2024 Oct.
eCollection 2024 年 10 月。


Femoral component retention in Rorabeck type III periprosthetic knee fracture
Rorabeck III 型假体周围膝关节骨折中的股骨成分滞留

with plating fixation and bone cement augmentation. A new surgical technique and
具有钢板固定和骨水泥增强。一种新的手术技术和

four cases reported.
报告了 4 例。


Queipo-de-Llano A(1), Lara JM(2), Gea AL(2), Delgado-Rufino B(2).
Queipo-de-Llano A(1), Lara JM(2), Gea AL(2), Delgado-Rufino B(2).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)C/ Sancha de Lara 13, 2° Derecha, 29015 Málaga, Spain.
(1)C/ Sancha de Lara 13, 2° Derecha, 29015 马拉加, 西班牙.

(2)Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, Hospital Universitario "Virgen de la
(2)Virgen de la 大学医院骨科和创伤科

Victoria", Campus Universitario Teatinos S/N, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
维多利亚“,Campus Universitario Teatinos S/N, 29010 Málaga, Spain.


Although dual implant constructs have recently been explored with promising
尽管最近已经探索了双种植体结构,但前景广阔

results in very distal periprosthetic femur fractures (PPKF), the gold standard
导致极远端假体股骨周围骨折 (PPKF),这是金标准

treatment of Rorabeck and Taylor type III PPKF remains a distal femur
Rorabeck 和 Taylor III 型 PPKF 的治疗仍然是股骨远端

replacement or a highly constrained rotating hinge implant. However, this
更换或高度受限的旋转铰链植入物。但是,此

surgery is very aggressive and expensive for functionally low-demanding elderly
对于功能要求低的老年人来说,手术非常激进且昂贵

patients. A new surgical technique using locking plates with polymethyl
病人。一种使用聚甲基锁定钢板的新型手术技术

methacrylate cement augmentation is described to retain the femoral component
甲基丙烯酸酯骨水泥增补可保留股骨成分

avoiding its replacement. Four patients were treated and followed up for more
避免其替代。4 名患者接受了治疗并接受了更多随访

than one year postoperative without any complications, their femoral component
术后一年以上无任何并发症,其股骨成分

was retained without any loosening and the mobility in the Barthel Index
保持不变,没有任何松动,并且在 Barthel 指数中的流动性

remained unchanged.
保持不变。


© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
© 2024 作者。由 Elsevier Ltd. 出版


DOI: 10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101084
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101084

PMCID: PMC11342893
PMCID:PMC11342893

PMID: 39183807
PMID:39183807


Conflict of interest statement: None.
利益冲突声明:无。



56. Acta Biomed. 2021 Jul 26;92(S3):e2021028. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS3.11770.
56. 生物医学学报。2021 年 7 月 26 日;92(S3):e2021028。doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS3.11770.


Distal femur periprosthetic knee fractures in elderly patients: clinical and
老年患者股骨远端假体周围膝关节骨折:临床和

radiographic outcome after internal fixation.
内固定后的影像学结果。


Canton G(1), Tomic M(2), Giunta M(3), Maritan G(4), Murena L(5).
坎顿 G(1),托米克 M(2),吉恩塔 M(3),马里坦 G(4),穆雷娜 L(5)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1). gcanton@units.it.
(1). gcanton@units.it.

(2)a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:22:"Università di Trieste";}. tomic.marko04@gmail.com.
(2)a:1:{s:5:“en_US”;s:22:“的里雅斯特大学”;tomic.marko04@gmail.com。

(3). michele.giunta93@gmail.com.
(3). michele.giunta93@gmail.com.

(4). gmaritan90@gmail.com.
(4). gmaritan90@gmail.com.

(5). luigi.murena@asugi.sanita.fvg.it.
(5). luigi.murena@asugi.sanita.fvg.it.


BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: The incidence of periprosthetic knee fractures
工作背景和目标: 假体周围膝关节骨折的发生率

is steadily increasing, especially in the geriatric population. Surgical
正在稳步增加,尤其是在老年人群中。外科

treatment in these patients must consider the poor bone quality and the risks of
这些患者的治疗必须考虑骨质差和

general complications related to age and comorbidities. The aim of the present
与年龄和合并症相关的一般并发症。现在的目标

study is to analyze the clinical and radiographic outcome of internal fixation
研究是分析内固定的临床和影像学结果

for periprosthetic knee fractures of the distal femur in elderly patients
用于老年患者股骨远端膝关节假体周围骨折

(>75aa).
(>75AA)。

METHODS: All patients treated at the Orthopedic and Traumatology Unit of
方法: 所有在骨科和创伤科接受治疗的患者

Cattinara Hospital-ASUGI (Trieste, Italy) between September 2014 and September
2014 年 9 月至 9 月期间,Cattinara 医院-ASUGI(意大利的里雅斯特)

2019 for distal femur periprosthetic fracture after total knee replacement were
2019 年全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折

included in the study. Mortality, complications, radiographic healing and
包括在研究中。死亡率、并发症、放射学愈合和

functional outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Data collection was
对功能结局进行回顾性评价。数据收集是

conducted by clinical database searching and telephone interview. Results were
通过临床数据库搜索和电话访谈进行。结果是

compared with the literature.
与文献相比。

RESULTS: The study population included 19 patients, F:M 16:3, mean age 84 years.
结果: 研究人群包括 19 例患者,F:M 16:3,平均年龄 84 岁。

Plate fixation was used in the majority of cases (90%). One-year mortality was
大多数病例 (90%) 使用钢板固定。一年死亡率

21.05%. Radiographic healing of the fracture occurred in 92% of cases.
21.05%.骨折的放射学愈合发生在 92% 的病例中。

Nonetheless, 61% of patients saw a worsening in their functional outcome.
尽管如此,61% 的患者发现他们的功能结果恶化。

CONCLUSION: Internal fixation is a valuable and safe option for distal femur
结论: 内固定是股骨远端的一种有价值且安全的选择

periprosthetic fracture treatment in the elderly. The significant impact of
老年人假体周围骨折治疗。的重大影响

periprosthetic knee fractures on the medium- to long-term survival and quality
膝关节假体周围骨折对中长期生存率和质量的影响

of life of the elderly patient is confirmed.
的老年患者的生活被确认。


DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92iS3.11770
DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92iS3.11770

PMCID: PMC8420835
PMCID:PMC8420835

PMID: 34313656 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:34313656 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Each author declares that he or she has no
利益冲突声明:每位作者声明他或她没有

commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest,
商业协会(例如咨询公司、股权、股权、

patent/licensing arrangement etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in
专利/许可安排等)这可能会在

connection with the submitted article
与提交的文章的联系



57. Bone Joint J. 2022 Aug;104-B(8):987-996. doi:
57. 骨关节杂志 2022 年 8 月;104-B(8):987-996。doi:

10.1302/0301-620X.104B8.BJJ-2021-1681.R1.


Epidemiology and characteristics of femoral periprosthetic fractures : data from
股骨假体周围骨折的流行病学和特征 : 数据来源

the characteristics, outcomes and management of periprosthetic fracture service
假体周围骨折服务的特点、结果和管理

evaluation (COMPOSE) cohort study.
评估 (COMPOSE) 队列研究。


COMPOSE Study Team.
COMPOSE 研究团队。


AIMS: The aim of this study was to describe the demographic details of patients
目的: 本研究的目的是描述患者的人口统计学细节

who sustain a femoral periprosthetic fracture (PPF), the epidemiology of PPFs,
股骨假体周围骨折 (PPF)、PPF 的流行病学、

PPF characteristics, and the predictors of PPF types in the UK population.
PPF 特征,以及英国人群中 PPF 类型的预测因子。

METHODS: This is a multicentre retrospective cohort study including adult
方法: 这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究,包括成人

patients presenting to hospital with a new PPF between 1 January 2018 and 31
2018 年 1 月 1 日至 31 日期间因新 PPF 就诊的患者

December 2018. Data collected included: patient characteristics, comorbidities,
2018 年 12 月。收集的数据包括:患者特征、合并症、

anticoagulant use, social circumstances, level of mobility, fracture
抗凝剂的使用、社会环境、活动水平、骨折

characteristics, Unified Classification System (UCS) type, and details of the
特征、统一分类系统 (UCS) 类型以及

original implant. Descriptive analysis by fracture location was performed, and
原始植入物。按骨折位置进行描述性分析,以及

predictors of PPF type were assessed using mixed-effects logistic regression
使用混合效应 logistic 回归评估 PPF 类型的预测因子

models.
模型。

RESULTS: In total, 720 femoral PPFs from 27 NHS sites were included. PPF
结果: 总共纳入了来自 27 个 NHS 站点的 720 例股骨 PPF。PPF

patients were typically elderly (mean 79.9 years (SD 10.6)), female (n = 455;
患者通常为老年人 (平均 79.9 岁 (SD 10.6))、女性 (n = 455;

63.2%), had at least one comorbidity (n = 670; 93.1%), and were reliant on
63.2%),至少有一种合并症 (n = 670;93.1%),并且依赖于

walking aids or bed-/chair-bound prior to admission (n = 419; 61.7%). The study
入院前助行器或卧床/坐在椅子上 (n = 419;61.7%)。研究

population included 539 (74.9%) hip PPFs, 151 (21.0%) knee PPFs, and 30 (4.2%)
人群包括 539 例 (74.9%) 髋关节 PPF、151 例 (21.0%) 膝关节 PPF 和 30 例 (4.2%)

dividing type PPFs. For hip (n = 407; 75.5%) and knee (n = 88; 58.3%)
分流型 PPF。髋关节 (n = 407; 75.5%) 和膝关节 (n = 88; 58.3%)

arthroplasty UCS B type fractures were most common. Overall, 556 (86.2%) were
关节置换术 UCS B 型骨折最常见。总体而言,556 例 (86.2%) 是

treated in the presenting hospital and 89 (13.8%) required transfer for
在就诊医院接受治疗,89 例 (13.8%) 需要转院

treatment. Female sex was the only significant predictor of fracture type
治疗。女性是骨折类型的唯一重要预测因素

(A/B1/C type versus B2/B3) for femoral hip PPFs (odds ratio 0.61 (95% confidence
股骨髋关节 PPF(A/B1/C 型与 B2/B3)(比值比 0.61(95% 可信度

interval 0.41 to 0.91); p = 0.014). Sex, residence type, primary versus revision
区间 0.41 至 0.91);p = 0.014)。性别、居住类型、初次与翻修

implant PPF, implant fixation, and time between arthroplasty and PPF were not
植入物 PPF、植入物固定以及关节置换术和 PPF 之间的时间没有

found to predict fracture type for hip PPFs.
发现可预测髋关节 PPF 的骨折类型。

CONCLUSION: This multicentre analysis describes patient and injury factors for
结论: 本多中心分析描述了

patients presenting with femoral PPFs to centres across the UK. These patients
股骨 PPF 患者到英国各地的中心就诊。这些患者

are generally elderly and frail, comparable to those sustaining a hip fracture.
通常年老体弱,与髋部骨折患者相当。

These data can be useful in planning future services and clinical trials. Cite
这些数据可用于规划未来的服务和临床试验。引用

this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):987-996 .
本文: 骨关节杂志 2022;104-B(8):987-996 .


DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B8.BJJ-2021-1681.R1
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B8.BJJ-2021-1681.R1

PMID: 35909377 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:35909377 [MEDLINE 索引]



58. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S351-S357. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.037. Epub
58. J 关节成形术。2021 年 7 月;36(7S):S351-S357。doi:10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.037.电子版

2020 Dec 26.
2020 年 12 月 26 日。


Contemporary Distal Femoral Replacements for Supracondylar Femoral Fractures
股骨髁上骨折的当代股骨远端置换术

Around Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties.
围绕初次和翻修全膝关节置换术。


Chalmers BP(1), Syku M(1), Gausden EB(1), Blevins JL(1), Mayman DJ(1), Sculco
查尔默斯 BP(1), Syku M(1), Gausden EB(1), Blevins JL(1), Mayman DJ(1), 斯库尔科

PK(1).
PK(1) 的。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement,
(1)骨外科、成人重建和关节置换、

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
特殊外科医院,纽约州纽约市。


BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the outcomes of distal femoral
背景: 缺乏关于股骨远端结局的数据

replacements (DFRs) in patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 患者的替代物 (DFR)

periprosthetic fractures. We sought to characterize these patients' survivorship
假体周围骨折。我们试图描述这些患者的生存情况

free from rerevision.
免于重新修订。

METHODS: We retrospectively identified 49 patients, including 34 after primary
方法: 我们回顾性地确定了 49 例患者,包括 34 例初次后

TKA (primary cohort), 9 after revision TKA, and 6 conversions for failed open
TKA(主要同期群),修订 TKA 后 9 次,打开失败 6 次转化

reduction and internal fixation (revision cohort) that underwent DFR for a
接受 DFR 的复位和内固定(翻修队列)

periprosthetic femur fracture. The mean age was 76 years, and 40 patients (82%)
股骨假体周围骨折。平均年龄为 76 岁,40 名患者 (82%)

were female. The mean follow-up was 4 years. Femoral fixation included 44
都是女性。平均随访时间为 4 年。包括股骨固定 44 例

cemented stems (90%) and 5 cementless stems (10%). Survivorship free from
胶结茎 (90%) 和 5 个无胶结茎 (10%)。无存活

rerevision was characterized by the Kaplan-Meier method; cox proportional
再修订以 Kaplan-Meier 方法为特征;COX 比例

regression was used to analyze the risk factors for rerevision.
采用回归分析再翻修的危险因素。

RESULTS: Survivorship free from any rerevision at 5 years in the primary and
结果:初次 5 年无任何翻修的存活率,并且

revision cohort was 93% and 18%, respectively. The revision cohort had a 5.3×
翻修队列分别为 93% 和 18%。修订组的评分为 5.3×

higher risk of re-revision (P = .008). Survivorship free from re-revision for
重新翻修的风险更高 (P = .008)。幸存者无需重新修订

aseptic loosening at 5 years in the primary and revision cohort was 93% and 53%,
初次和翻修队列中 5 年无菌性松动分别为 93% 和 53%,

respectively. Two of the 3 patients with cementless stems in the primary cohort
分别。主要队列中 3 例无骨水泥茎患者中有 2 例

underwent early rerevision for aseptic loosening, but patients with prior
因无菌松动而接受了早期再翻修,但

primary TKAs treated with cemented femoral fixation (n = 31) had a 97% 5-year
用骨水泥股骨固定治疗的原发性 TKA (n = 31) 的 5 年率为 97%

survivorship free from re-revision.
幸存者无需重新修订。

CONCLUSION: Patients with periprosthetic fractures around prior primary TKAs
结论: 既往原发性 TKA 周围假体周围骨折患者

treated with DFRs with cemented femoral fixation had a 97% 5-year survivorship
用骨水泥股骨固定的 DFR 治疗的 5 年生存率为 97%

free from any re-revision. DFRs for periprosthetic femur fractures around
无需任何重新修订。股骨假体周围骨折的 DFR

revision TKAs or conversions of failed open reduction and internal fixations
翻修 TKA 或失败的切开复位和内固定的翻修 TKA 转换

have a 5× increased risk of rerevision.
翻修风险增加 5×。


Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2020 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.037
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.037

PMID: 33487512 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:33487512 [MEDLINE 索引]



59. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024 Jan 6;16:91507. doi: 10.52965/001c.91507. eCollection
59. Orthop Rev (帕维亚)。2024 年 1 月 6;16:91507。doi:10.52965/001c.91507。eCollection 系列

2024.


Periprosthetic Distal Femoral Fractures Around a Total Knee Arthroplasty: a
全膝关节置换术周围的假体股骨远端骨折:a

Meta-analysis Comparing Locking compression Plating and Retrograde
Meta 分析:比较锁定加压钢板和逆行

Intramedullary Nailing.
髓内钉。


Al-Jabri T(1)(2), Wood MJ(3), Faddul F(4), Musbahi O(5), Bajracharya A(6), Magan
Al-Jabri T(1)(2), Wood MJ(3), Faddul F(4), Musbahi O(5), Bajracharya A(6), Magan

AA(7), Jayadev C(8), Giannoudis PV(9).
AA(7),Jayadev C(8),Giannoudis PV(9)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Orthopaedic Surgery Imperial College London.
(1)骨科外科,伦敦帝国理工学院。

(2)Joint Reconstruction Unit Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust.
(2)联合重建单位皇家国家骨科医院 NHS 信托基金。

(3)Joint Reconstruction Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital.
(3)皇家国家骨科医院联合重建股。

(4)St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
(4)圣乔治大学医院 NHS 基金会信托基金。

(5)Imperial College London.
(5)伦敦帝国理工学院。

(6)Princess Alexandra Hospital.
(6)亚历山德拉公主医院。

(7)University College Hospital.
(7)大学学院医院。

(8)Joint Reconstruction Unit Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital.
(8)联合重建单位皇家国家骨科医院。

(9)Academic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Leeds General
(9)利兹总医院创伤和骨科外科学术系

Infirmary.
医务室。


PURPOSE: The number of total knee replacements (TKRs) performed per year has
目的:每年进行的全膝关节置换术 (TKR) 数量

been increasing annually and it is estimated that by 2030 demand would reach
每年都在增长,预计到 2030 年需求将达到

3.48 million procedures per year in the United States Of America. The prevalence
美国每年 348 万例手术。患病率

of periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around TKRs has followed this trend with
的 TKR 周围的假体周围骨折 (PPF) 遵循这一趋势,其中

incidences ranging from 0.3% to 3.5%. Distal femoral PPFs are associated with
发病率从 0.3% 到 3.5% 不等。股骨远端 PPF 与

significant morbidity and mortality. When there is sufficient bone stock in the
显着的发病率和死亡率。当

distal femur and a fracture pattern conducive to fixation, locking compression
股骨远端和骨折模式有利于固定、锁定压迫

plating (LCP) and retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) are commonly used
常用钢板 (LCP) 和逆行髓内钉 (RIMN)

fixation strategies. Conversely, in situations with loosening and deficient bone
固定策略。相反,在骨骼松动和缺损的情况下

stock, a salvage procedure such as a distal femoral replacement is recognized as
Stock 的 Stock 中,股骨远端置换术等挽救性手术被认为是

an alternative. This meta-analysis investigates the rates of non-union,
一个替代方案。本荟萃分析调查了不愈合、

re-operation, infection, and mortality for LCPs and RIMNs when performed for
LCP 和 RIMN 的再次手术、感染和死亡率

distal femoral PPFs fractures around TKRs.
股骨远端 PPF TKR 周围骨折。

METHOD: A search was conducted to identify articles relevant to the management
方法: 进行检索以确定与管理相关的文章

of distal femoral PPFs around TKRs in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items
TKR 周围的股骨远端 PPF 符合首选报告项目

for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Articles meeting
用于系统评价和荟萃分析 (PRISMA) 清单。文章会议

the inclusion criteria were then assessed for methodological quality using the
然后使用

methodological items for non-randomised studies (MINORS) criteria. Articles were
非随机研究 (MINORS) 标准的方法学项目。文章是

reviewed, and data were compiled into tables for analysis.
审查,并将数据编译成表格进行分析。

RESULTS: 10 articles met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 528 PPFs. The
结果: 10 篇文章符合纳入标准,报告了 528 个 PPF。这

overall incidence of complications was: non-union 9.4%, re-operation 12.9%,
并发症的总发生率为:不愈合 9.4%,再次手术 12.9%,

infection 2.4%, and mortality 5.5%. This meta-analysis found no significant
感染率为 2.4%,死亡率为 5.5%。这项荟萃分析发现没有显著的

differences between RIMN and LCP in rates of non-union (9.2% vs 9.6%)
RIMN 和 LCP 在不愈合率方面的差异 (9.2% vs 9.6%)

re-operation (15.1% vs 11.3%), infection (2.1% vs 2.6%), and mortality (6.0% vs
再次手术 (15.1% vs 11.3%)、感染 (2.1% vs 2.6%) 和死亡率 (6.0% vs

5.2%), respectively.
5.2%)。

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in rates
结论: 这项荟萃分析显示发生率无显著差异

of non-union, re-operation, infection, and mortality between RIMN and LCP and
RIMN 和 LCP 之间的不愈合、再次手术、感染和死亡率,以及

both remain valid surgical treatment options.
两者都是有效的手术治疗选择。


DOI: 10.52965/001c.91507
DOI: 10.52965/001c.91507

PMCID: PMC10807720
PMCID:PMC10807720

PMID: 38765295
PMID:38765295



60. Bone Joint J. 2023 Jun 1;105-B(6):593-601. doi:
60. 骨关节杂志 2023 年 6 月 1 日;105-B(6):593-601。doi:

10.1302/0301-620X.105B6.BJJ-2022-1202.R1.


Surgical approaches to periprosthetic femoral fractures for plate fixation or
用于钢板固定的股骨假体周围骨折的手术方法或

revision arthroplasty.
翻修关节置换术。


Scott CEH(1)(2), Yapp LZ(1), Howard T(3), Patton JT(1), Moran M(1).
斯科特 CEH(1)(2),亚普 LZ(1),霍华德 T(3),巴顿 JT(1),莫兰 M(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
(1)爱丁堡骨科,英国爱丁堡皇家医院。

(2)Department of Orthopaedics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
(2)爱丁堡大学骨科系,英国爱丁堡。

(3)Royal Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, Fife, UK.
(3)皇家维多利亚医院,英国法夫郡柯科迪。


Periprosthetic femoral fractures are increasing in incidence, and typically
股骨假体周围骨折的发生率正在增加,通常

occur in frail elderly patients. They are similar to pathological fractures in
发生在虚弱的老年患者中。它们类似于

many ways. The aims of treatment are the same, including 'getting it right first
很多方法。治疗的目标是相同的,包括“先把事情做好

time' with a single operation, which allows immediate unrestricted
time“,允许立即不受限制

weightbearing, with a low risk of complications, and one that avoids the
负重,并发症风险低,并且避免

creation of stress risers locally that may predispose to further peri-implant
局部产生应力提升,可能诱发进一步的种植体周围

fracture. The surgical approach to these fractures, the associated soft-tissue
骨折。这些骨折的手术方法,相关的软组织

handling, and exposure of the fracture are key elements in minimizing the high
处理和裂缝暴露是最大限度地减少高

rate of complications. This annotation describes the approaches to the femur
并发症发生率。本注释描述了股骨的入路

that can be used to facilitate the surgical management of peri- and
可用于促进围手术期和

interprosthetic fractures of the femur at all levels using either modern methods
使用现代方法进行股骨各节段的人工间骨折

of fixation or revision arthroplasty.
固定或翻修关节成形术。


© 2023 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
© 2023 年英国骨与关节外科编辑学会。


DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B6.BJJ-2022-1202.R1
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B6.BJJ-2022-1202.R1

PMID: 37259633 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:37259633 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: None declared.
利益冲突声明:未申报。



61. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jul 20;24(1):594. doi:
61. BMC 肌肉骨骼病。2023 年 7 月 20 日;24(1):594.doi:

10.1186/s12891-023-06726-x.


Long locking plate combined with locking attachment plate in patients with
长锁定钢板联合锁定连接板治疗

periprosthetic femoral fracture around ipsilateral stem after total knee
全膝关节后同侧柄周围股骨假体骨折

arthroplasty.
置换 术。


Shon OJ(1)(2), Cho SJ(2), Kim GB(3)(4).
Shon OJ(1)(2), Cho SJ(2), Kim GB(3)(4).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine,
(1)岭南大学医学院骨外科

170 Hyeonchung-Ro Nam-Gu, Daegu, 42415, Republic of Korea.
170 Hyeonchung-Ro Nam-Gu, Daegu, 42415, 大韩民国。

(2)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, 170
(2)岭南大学医学院骨外科, 170

Hyeonchung-Ro Nam-Gu, Daegu, 42415, Republic of Korea.
Hyeonchung-ro Nam-Gu, Daegu, 42415, 大韩民国。

(3)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine,
(3)岭南大学医学院骨外科

170 Hyeonchung-Ro Nam-Gu, Daegu, 42415, Republic of Korea.
170 Hyeonchung-Ro Nam-Gu, Daegu, 42415, 大韩民国。

donggamgb@hanmail.net.
donggamgb@hanmail.net。

(4)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, 170
(4)岭南大学医学院骨外科, 170

Hyeonchung-Ro Nam-Gu, Daegu, 42415, Republic of Korea. donggamgb@hanmail.net.
Hyeonchung-ro Nam-Gu, Daegu, 42415, 大韩民国。donggamgb@hanmail.net。


BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce the surgical technique
背景: 本研究的目的是介绍手术技术

using long locking plate and locking attachment plate (LAP) in patient with
在患有

periprosthetic femoral fracture around ipsilateral stem after total knee
全膝关节后同侧柄周围股骨假体骨折

arthroplasty (TKA). Moreover, we sought to investigate the outcomes of this
关节置换术 (TKA)。此外,我们试图调查其结果

fixation technique and to propose a new subtype in the existing classification
固定技术,并在现有分类中提出新的亚型

of periprosthetic femoral fractures.
股骨假体周围骨折。

METHODS: From January 2013 to January 2022, thirty-four consecutive
方法: 从 2013 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月,连续 34 次

periprosthetic femoral fractures around ipsilateral stem following TKA with
TKA 后同侧柄周围的股骨假体周围骨折

minimum 1-year follow-up were enrolled in this study. Most cases were fixed with
本研究至少进行了 1 年的随访。大多数情况都是用

long-locking plate and LAP using the MIPO technique. For subgroup analysis, we
使用 MIPO 技术的长锁定板和 LAP。对于亚组分析,我们

classified patients with stemmed hip implant (group H) and stemmed knee implant
分类有柄髋关节植入物(H 组)和有柄膝关节植入物患者

(group K). Bone union, American Knee Society Score (AKSS) scale, Knee Injury and
(K 组)。骨愈合、美国膝关节协会评分 (AKSS) 量表、膝关节损伤和

Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, the Western Ontario and
关节置换术的骨关节炎结果评分,西安大略省和

McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for pain and function, and range of
麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎疼痛和功能指数,以及范围

motion were investigated.
动议进行了调查。

RESULTS: The number of group H and K were 24 patients (70.6%) and 10 patients
结果: H 组和 K 组分别为 24 例 (70.6%) 和 10 例

(29.4%), respectively. The mean age at operation was 71.5 years (range,
(29.4%)。手术时的平均年龄为 71.5 岁(范围,

65‒85 years), and the mean follow-up period was 27.5 months (range,
65\u201285 岁),平均随访期为 27.5 个月(范围,

12‒72 months). Bone union was confirmed radiographically in all patients, and
12-72 个月)。所有患者的骨愈合均经影像学证实,并且

the mean union time was 4.9 months (range, 3.5‒6 months). There were no
平均愈合时间为 4.9 个月 (范围,3.5\u20126 个月)。没有

significant differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes between the
两者之间影像学和临床结局的显著差异

groups.
组。

CONCLUSIONS: Long-locking plate combined with LAP showed favorable radiographic
结论: 长锁定钢板联合 LAP 显示良好的影像学

and clinical outcomes in patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture around
以及股骨假体周围骨折患者的临床结局

ipsilateral stem after TKA.
TKA 后的同侧柄。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Retrospective Case Series.
证据级别: IV 级,回顾性病例系列。


© 2023. The Author(s).
© 2023 年。作者。


DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06726-x
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06726-x

PMCID: PMC10357702
PMCID:PMC10357702

PMID: 37475013 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:37475013 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no competing interests.
利益冲突声明:作者声明没有竞争利益。



62. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Nov;110(7):103866. doi:
62. 骨科创伤外科研究 2024 年 11 月;110(7):103866.doi:

10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103866. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103866.Epub 2024 年 3 月 7 日。


Minimally invasive surgery of femoral periprosthetic fractures increases the
股骨假体周围骨折的微创手术增加了

rate of consolidation and decreases time to bone healing without a higher rate
巩固率并缩短骨愈合时间,而没有更高的比率

of complications.
的并发症。


Le Baron M(1), Battut T(2), Bégué T(3), Ehlinger M(4), Flecher X(5); SOFCOT(6).
Le Baron M(1), Battut T(2), Bégué T(3), Ehlinger M(4), Flecher X(5);索夫科特(6)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Service de chirurgie orthopédique, hôpital Nord, pôle locomoteur, Institut du
(1)北方医院骨科 肌肉骨骼中心研究所

mouvement et de l'appareil locomoteur, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de
运动和肌肉骨骼系统, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de

Marseille, Marseille, France; Institut du mouvement et de l'appareil locomoteur,
马赛,马赛,法国;运动和肌肉骨骼系统研究所,

Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France. Electronic
Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 马赛, 法国.电子的

address: marie.lebaron@ap-hm.fr.
地址:marie.lebaron@ap-hm.fr。

(2)Hôpital d'instruction des Armées Laveran, 34, boulevard Laveran, 13013
(2)Laveran 陆军训练医院,34, boulevard Laveran, 13013

Marseille, France.
法国马赛。

(3)Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital
(3)医院骨科创伤外科

Antoine-Béclère, université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, 157, rue de la
Antoine-Béclère, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, 157, rue de la

Porte-de-Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France.
Porte-de-Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, 法国。

(4)Service de chirurgie orthopédique et de traumatologie, hôpital de Hautepierre
(4)Hautepierre 医院骨外科和创伤科

2, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg
2, Strasbourg University Hospitals, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 斯特拉斯堡

cedex, France.
cedex,法国。

(5)Institut du mouvement et de l'appareil locomoteur, département d'orthopédie
(5)骨科运动与肌肉骨骼系统研究所

et de traumatologie ISM, CNRS, Aix-Marseille université, hôpital
和创伤学 ISM,CNRS,艾克斯-马赛大学,医院

Sainte-Marguerite, 270, boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, BP 29, 13274 Marseille,
Sainte-Marguerite, 270, boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, BP 29, 13274 马赛,

France; Institut du mouvement et de l'appareil locomoteur, CHU Marseille Nord,
法国;马赛北部大学医院运动和肌肉骨骼系统研究所,

chemin des Bourrely, 13015 Marseille, France.
chemin des Bourrely, 13015 马赛, 法国.

(6)56, rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.
(6)56, rue Boissonade, 75014 巴黎, 法国。


BACKGROUND: Knee periprosthetic femoral fractures (KPPFF) are becoming more
背景: 膝关节假体周围股骨骨折 (KPPFF) 越来越多

frequent due to the increasing number of arthroplasties and the aging
由于关节置换术数量的增加和衰老,频率很高

population, for whom maintaining autonomy and function remains a challenge. The
人群,对他们来说,保持自主性和功能仍然是一个挑战。这

use of locking plates has improved functional results and promoted the
使用锁定钢板改善了功能效果,并促进了

development of "minimally invasive" surgical (MIS) approaches. Despite the
开发“微创”手术 (MIS) 方法。尽管

availability of literature comparing between different types of osteosynthesis
比较不同类型接骨术的文献可用性

for KPPFF, there is a paucity of information available on the complications of
对于 KPPFF,缺乏关于

osteosynthesis using locking plates, depending on the approach. We therefore
使用锁定钢板的接骨术,具体取决于方法。因此,我们

carried out a retrospective multicenter study (nine centers: Dijon, Grenoble,
进行了一项回顾性多中心研究(九个中心:第戎、格勒诺布尔、

Lille, Marseille, Nice, Paris, Saint-Étienne, Strasbourg, Colmar) as part of a
里尔、马赛、尼斯、巴黎、圣艾蒂安、斯特拉斯堡、科尔马)作为

Symposium of the French Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SOFCOT).
法国骨科外科和创伤学会 (SOFCOT) 研讨会。

Following osteosynthesis of KPPFF by locking plates carried out by a standard
通过标准进行的锁定板对 KPPFF 进行接骨后

approach or by a minimally invasive approach (MIS), the objectives were: (1) to
方法或通过微创方法 (MIS),目标是:(1) 到

compare the complications, (2) to evaluate whether the radiological and clinical
比较并发症,(2) 以评估放射学和临床

results (rate and time of consolidation, resumption of weight bearing, lack of
结果(巩固率和时间、恢复负重、无

reduction, postoperative autonomy) were comparable in the two groups.
复位、术后自主性)在两组中具有可比性。

HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis was that performing an MIS approach in these
假设: 假设是在这些

indications does not confer more complications than a standard approach, and
适应症不会比标准方法带来更多的并发症,并且

rather, the MIS approach offers better functional and radiological results.
相反,MIS 方法提供了更好的功能和放射学结果。

MATERIAL AND METHOD: Five hundred and seventy-three patients presented with
材料和方法: 573 例患者

KPPFF over the periods studied (retrospective series from January 2012 to
研究期间的 KPPFF(从 2012 年 1 月到

December 2016, then prospective series from January to December 2019). After
2016 年 12 月,然后是 2019 年 1 月至 12 月的前瞻性系列)。后

applying the inclusion criteria (KPPFF by locking plate) and exclusion criteria
应用纳入标准(通过锁定钢板的 KPPFF)和排除标准

(tumor context, infectious, intraoperative fractures, fractures on loose
(肿瘤背景、感染性、术中骨折、松散骨折

prostheses, other osteosynthesis methods, treatment by prosthetic revision,
假体, 其他接骨方法, 假体翻修治疗,

patients under the age of 18, follow-up less than 1-year, incomplete files), a
18 岁以下的患者,随访时间少于 1 年,档案不完整),一个

global series of 306 patients was retained. Two groups were created according to
保留了 306 名患者的全球系列研究。根据

the approach performed: a standard approach group (S, n=228) and a minimally
执行的方法:标准方法组 (S,n=228) 和最小

invasive approach group (MIS, n=78). The demographic data of the population were
侵入性入路组 (MIS,n=78)。人口的人口统计数据为

recorded, as was the criteria for autonomy (Parker score, place of living).
记录下来,自主性标准(Parker 评分、居住地)也是如此。

Postoperative complications were sought (infection, mechanical complication,
寻找术后并发症(感染、机械并发症、

surgical revision). Finally, the radiological and clinical results were
手术翻修)。最后,放射学和临床结果是

evaluated (rate of, and time to consolidation, resumption of weight bearing,
评估(巩固率和时间、恢复负重、

lack of reduction, postoperative autonomy).
缺乏复位,术后自主性)。

RESULTS: The comparison of the two subgroups, S and MIS, found complication
结果: S 和 MIS 两个亚组的比较发现并发症

rates are comparable in the two groups in terms of infections [S group: n=18
两组的感染率相当 [S 组:n=18

(7.9%), MIS group: n=2 (2.6%)], mechanical complications [S: n=23 (10.1%), MIS:
(7.9%),MIS 组:n=2 (2.6%)],机械并发症 [S:n=23 (10.1%),MIS:

n=2 (2.6%)], and surgical revision [S: n=33 (14.5%), MIS: n=7 (8.9%)], and a
n=2 (2.6%)] 和手术翻修 [S: n=33 (14.5%),MIS: n=7 (8.9%)],以及

lack of difference in postoperative autonomy [Parker; S group: 4.7±2.4 (0-9) vs.
术后自主性缺乏差异 [Parker;S 组:4.7±2.4 (0-9) vs.

MIS group: 5±2, 7 (0-9)]. On the other hand, the time to return to weight
MIS 组:5±2, 7 (0-9)]。另一方面,恢复体重的时间

bearing was shorter in the MIS group [4.3±3.5weeks (0-12) versus 10.1±10.1weeks
MIS 组的轴承更短 [4.3±3.5 周 (0-12) 对 10.1±10.1 周

(0-110), p<0.001]. The rate of nonunion was lower in the MIS group [n=1 vs.
(0-110),第 <0.001] 页。MIS 组的骨不连率较低 [n=1 vs.

n=20, i.e. 1.7% vs. 11.1% (p=0.031)] and the time to consolidation was shorter
n=20,即 1.7% vs. 11.1% (p=0.031)],并且整合时间更短

[7.5±4.3weeks (6-30) versus 15.2±9.4weeks (5-78) (p<0.001)].
[7.5±4.3 周 (6-30) 对比 15.2±9.4 周 (5-78) (p<0.001)]。

CONCLUSION: Performing an MIS approach in the management of KPPFF by locking
结论:通过锁定在 KPPFF 的管理中执行 MIS 方法

plate osteosynthesis does not cause any more complications than a standard
钢板接骨术不会引起比标准

approach. In addition, higher consolidation rates can be obtained in shorter
方法。此外,可以在较短的时间内获得更高的整合率

periods of time. This study suggests that it proposing osteosynthesis using the
时间段。这项研究表明,它提出了使用

MIS approach as a primary surgery is a reasonable choice when treatment using
当使用

locking plates is chosen for a KPPFF, subject to technical expertise.
选择锁定板用于 KPPFF,具体取决于技术专业知识。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; observational study.
证据级别:III;观察性研究。


Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS。保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103866
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103866

PMID: 38460917 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:38460917 [MEDLINE 索引]



63. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2016 Nov;74(4):287-292.
63. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013 年)。2016 年 11 月;74(4):287-292.


Incidence of Distal Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures after Total Knee
全膝关节术后股骨远端假体周围骨折的发生率

Arthroplasty.
置换 术。


Welch T, Iorio R, Marcantonio AJ, Kain MS, Tilzey JF, Specht LM, Healy WL.
韦尔奇 T、伊奥里奥 R、马坎托尼奥 AJ、凯恩 MS、蒂尔泽 JF、斯佩赫特 LM、希利 WL。


BACKGROUND: The incidence of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures associated
背景: 股骨远端假体周围骨折的发生率

with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported as 0.3% to 2.5%. This study
据报道,全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 为 0.3% 至 2.5%。本研究

examined the incidence of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures at one
检查了 1 例股骨远端假体周围骨折的发生率

hospital over a 16-year period. We hypothesized that the incidence of these
医院超过 16 年。我们假设这些

fractures would be lowered after the introduction of lugged femoral implants and
引入凸耳股骨植入物后,骨折会降低,并且

insertion of a distal femoral intramedullary bone graft during TKA.
在 TKA 期间插入远端股骨髓内骨移植物。

METHODS: From 1994 to 2010, 4,943 primary TKAs were performed. Following these
方法: 从 1994 年到 2010 年,进行了 4,943 例初级 TKA。遵循这些

TKA operations, 21 distal femoral fractures occurred. The surgical technique and
TKA 手术,发生 21 例股骨远端骨折。手术技术和

implant design changed during this interval. Lugged femoral implants were
在此期间,植入物设计发生了变化。牵引股骨植入物是

introduced in 2000. Intramedullary bone grafting of the distal femoral
于 2000 年推出。股骨远端髓内骨移植术

intramedullary guide hole was introduced in 2002.
髓内导向孔于 2002 年推出。

RESULTS: The incidence of distal femoral periprosthetic fracture in this series
结果: 该系列研究中股骨远端假体周围骨折的发生率

of 4,943 TKA operations was 0.42% (21/4943). Six fractures occurred in 1,236
4,943 例 TKA 手术为 0.42% (21/4943)。1,236 年发生 6 例骨折

knees with femoral implants without femoral fixation lugs (0.49%). Fifteen
带有股骨植入物的膝盖,没有股骨固定凸耳 (0.49%)。十五

fractures occurred in 3,707 knees with femoral implants with femoral fixation
3,707 例膝关节骨折,股骨植入物固定

lugs (0.40%). Eight fractures occurred in 1,653 knees that did not have
表耳 (0.40%)。1,653 例膝关节发生了 8 例骨折,这些膝关节没有

intramedullary bone grafts (0.48%). Thirteen fractures occurred in 3,290 knees
髓内骨移植物 (0.48%)。3,290 个膝盖发生 13 例骨折

that had intramedullary bone grafts (0.40%). Two fractures occurred in 417 knees
有髓内骨移植物 (0.40%)。417 个膝关节发生 2 例骨折

with lugged femoral implants and no bone graft (0.48%).
有凸耳股骨植入物,无骨移植 (0.48%)。

CONCLUSIONS: In this series, there was no significant difference in the
结论: 在本系列研究中,

incidence of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures associated with adding
与添加相关的股骨远端假体周围骨折的发生率

fixation lugs to the femoral implant and filling the femoral intramedullary hole
将固定凸耳固定到股骨植入物上并填充股骨髓内孔

with bone graft.
用骨移植。


PMID: 27815952 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:27815952 [MEDLINE 索引]



64. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.050. Epub
64. J 关节成形术。2021 年 1 月;36(1):317-324.doi:10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.050.电子版

2020 Jul 25.
2020 年 7 月 25 日。


Nationwide Analysis of Lower Extremity Periprosthetic Fractures.
全国下肢假体周围骨折分析。


Pagani NR(1), Varady NH(2), Chen AF(2), Rajaee SS(3), Kavolus JJ(1).
帕加尼 NR(1)、瓦拉迪 NH(2)、陈 AF(2)、拉贾伊 SS(3)、卡沃卢斯 JJ(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
(1)马萨诸塞州波士顿塔夫茨医学中心骨科外科。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard
(2)哈佛大学布莱根妇女医院骨科

Medical School, Boston, MA.
医学院,波士顿,马萨诸塞州。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles,
(3)洛杉矶 Cedars-Sinai 医疗中心骨科外科

CA.
CA 的。


BACKGROUND: Although the annual incidence of primary total joint arthroplasty is
背景: 虽然初次全关节置换术的年发病率

increasing, trends in the annual incidence of periprosthetic fractures have not
增加,假体周围骨折年发病率的趋势没有

been established. This study aimed to define the annual incidence of
成立。本研究旨在确定

periprosthetic fractures in the United States.
美国的假体周围骨折。

METHODS: Inpatient admission data for 60,887 surgically treated lower extremity
方法: 60,887 例手术治疗的下肢住院数据

periprosthetic fractures between 2006 and 2015 were obtained from the National
2006 年至 2015 年间假体周围骨折是从国家

Inpatient Sample database. The annual incidence of periprosthetic fractures was
住院样本数据库。假体周围骨折的年发生率

defined as the number of new cases per year and presented as a
定义为每年的新病例数,以

population-adjusted rate per 100,000 US individuals. Univariable methods were
每 100,000 名美国人的人口调整率。单变量方法是

used for trend analysis and comparisons between groups.
用于趋势分析和组间比较。

RESULTS: The national annual incidence of periprosthetic fractures presented as
结果: 全国假体周围骨折的年发病率表现为

a population-adjusted rate of new cases per year peaked in 2008 (2.72; 95%
人口调整后的每年新病例率在 2008 年达到峰值 (2.72;95%)

confidence interval [95% CI], 2.39-3.05), remained stable from 2010 (1.65; 95%
置信区间 [95% CI],2.39-3.05),与 2010 年相比保持稳定 (1.65;95%)

CI, 1.45-1.86) through 2013 (1.67; 95% CI, 1.55-1.8) and increased in 2014
CI,1.45-1.86),并在 2014 年有所增加

(1.99; 95% CI, 1.85-2.13) and 2015 (2.47; 95% CI, 2.31-2.62). The proportion of
(1.99;95% CI,1.85-2.13)和 2015 年(2.47;95% CI,2.31-2.62)。的比例

femoral periprosthetic fractures managed with total knee arthroplasty revision
全膝关节置换术翻修治疗股骨假体周围骨折

remained stable (Ptrend = .97) with an increase in total hip arthroplasty (THA)
保持稳定 (Ptrend = .97),全髋关节置换术 (THA) 增加

revision (Ptrend < .001) and concurrent decrease in open reduction and internal
修订 (Ptrend < .001) 以及同时减少开放减少和内部

fixation (ORIF) (Ptrend < .001). Revision THA was significantly more costly than
固定 (ORIF) (Ptrend < .001)。修订版 THA 的成本明显高于

revision total knee arthroplasty (P = .004), and both were significantly more
翻修全膝关节置换术 (P = .004),两者均显著更高

costly than ORIF (P < .001 for both).
比 ORIF 昂贵(两者的 P < .001)。

CONCLUSION: The annual incidence of periprosthetic fractures remained relatively
结论: 假体周围骨折的年发生率保持相对

stable throughout our study period. The proportion of periprosthetic fractures
在整个学习期间保持稳定。假体周围骨折的比例

managed with revision THA increased, whereas ORIF decreased. Our findings are
管理翻修 THA 增加,而 ORIF 降低。我们的发现是

encouraging considering the significant burden an increase in periprosthetic
考虑到假体周围增加的巨大负担,令人鼓舞

fracture incidence would present to the health care system in terms of both
骨折发生率将呈现给医疗保健系统的两者

expense and patient morbidity.
费用和患者发病率。


Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2020 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.050
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.050

PMID: 32826143 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:32826143 [MEDLINE 索引]



65. J Biomech. 2021 Jan 22;115:110109. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110109. Epub
65. J 生物机械。2021 年 1 月 22;115:110109。doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110109.电子版

2020 Nov 18.
2020 年 11 月 18 日。


Biomechanical evaluation of the docking nail concept in periprosthetic fracture
假体周围骨折中对接钉概念的生物力学评价

fixation around a stemmed total knee arthroplasty.
固定在带茎全膝关节置换术周围。


Lenz M(1), Acklin YP(2), Kasper LA(3), Mischler D(4), Varga P(5), Zderic I(6),
伦茨 M(1), 阿克林 YP(2), 卡斯帕 LA(3), 米施勒 D(4), 瓦尔加 P(5), 兹德里克 I(6),

Gehweiler D(7), Klos K(8), Gueorguiev B(9), Stoffel K(10).
Gehweiler D(7), Klos K(8), Georgiev B(9), Stoffel K(10).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)AO Research Institute Davos, Switzerland; Department of Trauma, Hand and
(1)瑞士达沃斯 AO 研究所;创伤、手部和

Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Germany. Electronic address:
重建外科,德国耶拿大学医院。电子地址:

lenzmar@web.de.
lenzmar@web.de。

(2)University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address:
(2)瑞士巴塞尔大学医院。电子地址:

yvespascal.acklin@gmail.com.
yvespascal.acklin@gmail.com。

(3)AO Research Institute Davos, Switzerland; Department of Trauma, Hand and
(3)瑞士达沃斯 AO 研究所;创伤、手部和

Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Germany. Electronic address:
重建外科,德国耶拿大学医院。电子地址:

lena@kasper-schramberg.de.
lena@kasper-schramberg.de。

(4)AO Research Institute Davos, Switzerland. Electronic address:
(4)AO 研究所,瑞士达沃斯。电子地址:

dominic.mischler@aofoundation.org.
dominic.mischler@aofoundation.org。

(5)AO Research Institute Davos, Switzerland. Electronic address:
(5)AO 研究所,瑞士达沃斯。电子地址:

peter.varga@aofoundation.org.
peter.varga@aofoundation.org。

(6)AO Research Institute Davos, Switzerland. Electronic address:
(6)AO 研究所,瑞士达沃斯。电子地址:

ivan.zderic@aofoundation.org.
ivan.zderic@aofoundation.org。

(7)AO Research Institute Davos, Switzerland. Electronic address:
(7)AO 研究所,瑞士达沃斯。电子地址:

dominic.gehweiler@aofoundation.org.
dominic.gehweiler@aofoundation.org。

(8)Gelenkzentrum Rhein-Main, Hochheim (Main), Germany. Electronic address:
(8)德国 Hochheim (Main) 莱茵-美因联合中心。电子地址:

kajetan.klos@freenet.de.
kajetan.klos@freenet.de。

(9)AO Research Institute Davos, Switzerland. Electronic address:
(9)AO 研究所,瑞士达沃斯。电子地址:

boyko.gueorguiev@aofoundation.org.
boyko.gueorguiev@aofoundation.org。

(10)University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address:
(10)瑞士巴塞尔大学医院。电子地址:

nkstoffel@hotmail.com.
nkstoffel@hotmail.com。


Intramedullary femoral nails provide an ideal mechanical axis for periprosthetic
股骨髓内钉为假体周围修复提供了理想的机械轴

fracture fixation. Slotted nails allow a connection to a total knee arthroplasty
骨折固定。开槽钉允许连接到全膝关节置换术

(TKA) stem. This study aims to compare implant and construct stiffness,
(TKA) 字干。本研究旨在比较植入物和结构刚度,

interfragmentary movement and cycles to failure between an antegrade slotted
碎片间运动和逆行开槽之间的失效循环

femoral nail construct docked to a TKA stem and a distal femoral locking plate
对接到 TKA 柄和远端股骨锁定板的股骨钉结构

in a human periprosthetic femoral fracture model. In eight pairs of fresh-frozen
在人类假体股骨周围骨折模型中。在 8 对新鲜冷冻

human femora with stalked TKA, a 10 mm transverse osteotomy gap was set
人股骨有柄 TKA,设置 10 mm 横向截骨间隙

simulating a Rorabeck type II, Su type I fracture. The femora were pairwise
模拟 Rorabeck II 型、Su I 型断裂。股骨成对

instrumented with either an antegrade slotted nail coupled to the prosthesis
用与假体相连的顺行开槽钉进行器械作

stem, or a locking plate. Cyclic testing with a progressively increasing
茎或锁定板。周期性测试,逐渐增加

physiologic loading profile was performed at 2 Hz until catastrophic construct
在 2 Hz 下进行生理负荷曲线,直到灾难性构建

failure. Relative movement at the osteotomy site was monitored by means of
失败。截骨部位的相对运动通过以下方式监测

optical motion tracking. In addition, four-point bending implant stiffness,
光学运动跟踪。此外,四点弯曲种植体刚度,

torsional implant stiffness and frictional fit of the stem-nail connection were
植入物扭转刚度和茎钉连接的摩擦配合

investigated via separate non-destructive tests. Intramedullary nails exhibited
通过单独的无损检测进行调查。展出髓内钉

significantly higher four-point bending and significantly lower torsional
显著提高的四点弯曲和显著降低的扭转

implant stiffness than plates, P < 0.01. Increasing difference between nail and
种植体刚度比钢板高,P < 0.01。指甲和

stem diameters decreased frictional fit at the stem-nail junction. Nail
茎直径减少了茎-钉连接处的摩擦配合。指甲

constructs provided significantly higher initial axial bending stiffness and
结构提供了显著提高的初始轴向弯曲刚度和

cycles to failure (200 ± 83 N/mm; 16'871 ± 5'227) compared to plate constructs
失效周期(200 ± 83 N/mm;16'871 ± 5'227)与板结构相比

(93 ± 35 N/mm; 7'562 ± 1'064), P = 0.01. Relative axial translation at osteotomy
(93 ± 35 N/mm;7'562 ± 1'064),P = 0.01。截骨术中的相对轴向平移

level after 2'500 cycles was significantly smaller for nail fixation
2'500 次循环后的水平对于钉固定明显较小

(0.14 ± 0.11 mm) compared with plate fixation (0.99 ± 0.20 mm), P < 0.01. From a
(0.14 ± 0.11 mm) 与板固定 (0.99 ± 0.20 mm) 相比,P < 0.01。从

biomechanical perspective, the docking nail concept offers higher initial and
从生物力学的角度来看,对接钉概念提供更高的初始和

secondary stability under dynamic axial loading versus plating in TKA
动态轴向载荷下的次要稳定性与 TKA 中的电镀

periprosthetic fracture fixation.
假体周围骨折固定术。


Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
版权所有 © 2020。由 Elsevier Ltd. 出版


DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110109
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110109

PMID: 33257010 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:33257010 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors
利益冲突声明:利益争夺声明作者

declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal
声明他们没有已知的相互竞争的经济利益或个人利益

relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this
关系似乎可能影响了本文报道的工作

paper.
纸。



66. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 May;110(3):103814. doi:
66. 骨科创伤外科研究 2024 年 5 月;110(3):103814.doi:

10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103814. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103814.Epub 2024 年 1 月 13 日。


Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total knee
全膝关节术后股骨假体周围骨折的处理

arthroplasties using locking plates or intramedullary nailing. Comparative study
使用锁定板或髓内钉的关节置换术。比较研究

of 567 cases.
567 例。


Abboud J(1), Moussa MK(2), Sader Z(3), Favreau H(4), Bégué T(5), Flecher X(6),
阿布德 J(1), 穆萨 MK(2), 萨德尔 Z(3), 法夫罗 H(4), 贝格 T(5), 弗莱彻 X(6),

Ehlinger M(4); SOFCOT members(7).
埃林格 M(4);SOFCOT 成员 (7)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Service d'Orthopédie et Traumatologie, Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar, 39, avenue
(1)科尔马民事医院骨科和创伤科,大道 39 号

de la Liberté, 68024 Colmar cedex, France. Electronic address:
de la Liberté, 68024 Colmar cedex, 法国.电子地址:

abboud.johnny.md@gmail.com.
abboud.johnny.md@gmail.com。

(2)Service d'Orthopédie et Traumatologie, Grand Hôpital de l'Est
(2)Grand Hôpital de l'Est 骨科和创伤学系

Francilien - Site de Meaux, Meaux, France.
Francilien - Meaux site, Meaux, France.

(3)Service d'Orthopédie et Traumatologie, Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar, 39, avenue
(3)科尔马民事医院骨科和创伤科,大道 39 号

de la Liberté, 68024 Colmar cedex, France.
de la Liberté, 68024 Colmar cedex, 法国.

(4)Service d'Orthopédie et Traumatologie, Hôpital de Hautepierre - Hôpitaux
(4)Hautepierre 医院骨科和创伤科 - 医院

Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
斯特拉斯堡学者,斯特拉斯堡,法国。

(5)Service d'Orthopédie et Traumatologie, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère - Hôpitaux
(5)Antoine-Béclère 医院骨科和创伤科 - 医院

Universitaires Paris-Sud, Paris, France.
Universitaires Paris-Sud, 巴黎, 法国.

(6)Service d'Orthopédie et Traumatologie, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de
(6)骨伤科 公共援助医院

Marseille, Marseille, France.
马赛,马赛,法国。

(7)56, rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.
(7)56, rue Boissonade, 75014 巴黎, 法国.


INTRODUCTION: Proximal femur fractures in elderly patients pose a common problem
引言:老年患者的股骨近端骨折是一个常见的问题

that requires surgical management. The main objective of this study was to
这需要手术治疗。本研究的主要目的是

compare the results of treatment by locked plate (LP) and by anterograde (AIN)
比较锁定板 (LP) 和顺行性 (AIN) 的治疗结果

or retrograde (RIN) intramedullary nailing. The secondary objective was to
或逆行 (RIN) 髓内钉。次要目标是

analyze the complications related to each group. The hypothesis of this study
分析与每组相关的并发症。本研究的假设

was that the radiological and clinical results of each group were comparable.
是每组的放射学和临床结果具有可比性。

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 438 patients from 8 centers were studied
材料和方法: 研究了来自 8 个中心的 438 例患者的数据

retrospectively with 365 LP and 69 cases of intramedullary nailing (49 AIN and
回顾性使用 365 例 LP 和 69 例髓内钉 (49 AIN 和

20 RIN). The groups were comparable in terms of mean age (75±2years), mean
20 RIN)。各组在平均年龄 (75±2 岁)、平均年龄

preoperative Parker score (5.3±0.5) and mean KOOS score (74±2). Most patients
术前 Parker 评分 (5.3±0.5) 和平均 KOOS 评分 (74±2)。大多数患者

lived at home before their fracture [n=375 (86%)]. At follow-up, the joint range
骨折前住在家里 [n=375 (86%)]。随访时,关节范围

of motion, the KOOS and Parker scores, living premises, the time required to
的动作、KOOS 和 Parker 分数、居住场所、所需的时间

regain full weight-bearing, the time required for consolidation as well as the
恢复完全负重、整合所需的时间以及

reduction alignment: frontal, sagittal, horizontal.
复位对齐:额、矢状、水平。

RESULTS: The average follow-up was: 79±2weeks (65 to 82). The functional and
结果: 平均随访时间为: 79±2 周 (65 至 82)。功能性和

radiological results were comparable, although nailing allowed a faster return
放射学结果相当,尽管钉子可以更快地返回

to weight-bearing (1±2weeks for nailing versus 7±2weeks for LP, p=0.048) and a
负重(钉子 1±2 周,LP 为 7±2 周,p=0.048)和

better postoperative Parker score (5.5±0.5 for nailing versus 4.7±0.2 for LP,
更好的术后 Parker 评分(钉子为 5.5±0.5,而 LP 为 4.7±0.2,

p=0.045). Rotational malalignment in femoral nailing was often in the direction
p=0.045)。股骨钉中的旋转错位通常是在方向上

of internal rotation, compared to the LP (p=0.045). Complications were
与 LP 相比 (p=0.045)。并发症是

comparable with the exception of mortality, which was more frequent for LP
与死亡率相当,死亡率在 LP 中更常见

[22.5% in the LP group versus 13% in the nailing group (p=0.045)]. Complications
[LP 组为 22.5%,钉钉组为 13% (p=0.045)]。并发症

were categorized as: mechanical complications 6.8% of LP, 5.7% of nailing
被归类为: 机械并发症 6.8% 的 LP,5.7% 的钉子

(p>0.05), infections [11% of LP, 5.8% of nailing (p>0.05)], surgical revisions
(p>0.05)、感染 [11% 的 LP,5.8% 的钉子 (p>0.05)]、手术翻修

[2% of LP, 10% of nailing (p>0.05)].
[LP 的 2%,钉子的 10% (p>0.05)]。

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The hypothesis was refuted. These results show that
讨论和结论: 该假设被驳斥。这些结果表明

nailing conferred a faster recovery of weight-bearing, a better Parker score,
钉子赋予了更快的负重恢复,更好的帕克分数,

and is associated with a lower mortality rate. The morbidity rate is comparable
并且与较低的死亡率相关。发病率相当

between the two techniques. Indeed, when the indication for osteosynthesis by LP
在这两种技术之间。事实上,当 LP 进行接骨适应症

or by nailing is made, and both choices are technically justifiable, it would be
或者通过钉子做出,并且这两种选择在技术上都是合理的,那将是

prudent to favor the technique, which carries the least risk, which in this case
谨慎地选择风险最小的技术,在这种情况下

is nailing. This conclusion must, however, be taken in to consideration with
是钉钉子。然而,必须考虑这个结论

regard to the reduced number of nailing. A larger series of nailing,
关于钉子数量的减少。更大的钉子系列,

particularly retrograde, would be necessary to be able to confirm this last
特别是逆行,为了能够确认这最后

difference between the 2 groups.
两组之间的差异。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; comparative retrospective study.
证据级别:IV;比较回顾性研究。


Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS。保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103814
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103814

PMID: 38224866 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:38224866 [MEDLINE 索引]



67. Injury. 2022 Oct;53(10):3430-3437. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.002. Epub 2022
67. 受伤。2022 年 10 月;53(10):3430-3437.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.002.Epub 2022 年

Aug 3.
8 月 3 日。


Reliability of current classification systems for periprosthetic distal femur
当前假体周围股骨远端分类系统的可靠性

fractures.
骨折。


Makaram NS(1), Ross LA(2), Keenan OJ(2), Magill M(3), Moran M(2), Scott CEH(4).
马卡拉姆 NS(1),罗斯 LA(2),基南 OJ(2),马吉尔 M(3),莫兰 M(2),斯科特 CEH(4)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little
(1)爱丁堡皇家医院骨科和创伤科,利特尔

France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, United Kingdom; The University of
France Crescent, 爱丁堡 EH16 4SA, 英国;大学

Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, United Kingdom. Electronic address:
爱丁堡,小法兰西新月,英国。电子地址:

nmakaram@ed.ac.uk.
nmakaram@ed.ac.uk。

(2)Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little
(2)爱丁堡皇家医院骨科和创伤科,利特尔

France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, United Kingdom.
France Crescent, 爱丁堡 EH16 4SA, 英国。

(3)The University of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, United Kingdom.
(3)爱丁堡大学,英国小法兰西新月。

(4)Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little
(4)爱丁堡皇家医院骨科和创伤科,利特尔

France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, United Kingdom; The University of
France Crescent, 爱丁堡 EH16 4SA, 英国;大学

Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, United Kingdom.
爱丁堡,小法兰西新月,英国。


INTRODUCTION: This study aims to determine which Periprosthetic Distal Femur
引言: 本研究旨在确定哪种 Periprosthetic 远端股骨

Fracture (PDFF) classification system is the most reliable. The secondary aim
骨折 (PDFF) 分类系统是最可靠的。次要目标

was to determine which classification system correlated most accurately with the
是确定哪个分类系统与

surgical management recommended and delivered.
手术管理推荐并交付。

METHODS: Between 2011 and 2019, 83 patients with 83 PDFFs that extended to the
方法: 2011 和 2019 年间,83 例患者有 83 个 PDFFs,扩展到

femoral component of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were retrospectively
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 的股骨成分进行回顾性分析

identified from a trauma database. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Age, BMI, time
从创伤数据库中识别。最短随访时间为 1 年。年龄、BMI、时间

from TKA, operative management, and Nottingham Hip Fracture Scores were
来自 TKA、手术管理和诺丁汉髋部骨折评分

collected, and AP and lateral radiographs used to classify all fractures using
收集,并使用 AP 和侧位 X 线片对所有骨折进行分类

seven established classification systems by two observers blinded to management.
7 个由两名对管理不知情的观察员建立的分类系统。

In patients treated operatively (n = 69), preoperative radiographs were reviewed
在接受手术治疗的患者 (n = 69) 中,回顾术前 X 线片

by two surgeons with expertise in trauma and knee revision who recommended
由两位具有创伤和膝关节修复专业知识的外科医生推荐

fixation or distal femoral replacement (DFR) requirement.
固定或股骨远端置换术 (DFR) 要求。

RESULTS: Mean age was 80.7 years (SD9.4) and 50 (84.7%) were female. PDFFs
结果: 平均年龄为 80.7 岁 (SD9.4),女性 50 例 (84.7%)。PDFF 文件

occurred at a mean 9.5 years (SD5.2) after primary TKA. Mean follow-up was 3.8
发生在初次 TKA 后平均 9.5 年 (SD5.2)。平均随访率为 3.8

years (SD2.9). Management was fixation in 47, DFR in 22 and non-operative for
年 (SD2.9)。管理 47 例固定,22 例 DFR 和非手术

14. The Fakler classification demonstrated highest interobserver reliability
14. Fakler 分类显示出最高的观察者间可靠性

(ICC=0.948), followed by the Rorabeck (ICC=0.903), UCS (ICC=0.850) and Chen
(ICC=0.948),其次是罗拉贝克 (ICC=0.903)、UCS (ICC=0.850) 和 Chen

(ICC=0.906). The Neer classification demonstrated weakest agreement (ICC=0.633).
(ICC=0.906)。Neer 分类的一致性最弱 (ICC=0.633)。

Overall accuracy of predicting DFR requirement (as determined by two experts)
预测 DFR 要求的总体准确性(由两位专家确定)

was highest for the Fakler system (83.9%). Compared with actual management
Fakler 系统最高 (83.9%)。与实际管理相比

delivered the Rorabeck system was most accurate (94.1%). Multivariate regression
交付的 Rorabeck 系统最准确 (94.1%)。多元回归

demonstrated that the ultimate need for DFR (n = 22) was independently
证明 DFR 的最终需求 (n = 22) 是独立的

associated with medial comminution (HR 2.66 (1.12-6.35 95%CI), p = 0.027) and
与内碎相关 (HR 2.66 (1.12-6.35 95%CI),p = 0.027) 和

fractures distal to the anterior flange and posterior condyle of the femoral
股骨前凸和后髁远端骨折

component (HR 2.45 (1.13-5.31), p = 0.024).
成分 (HR 2.45 (1.13-5.31),p = 0.024)。

CONCLUSION: The Fakler classification showed highest interobserver agreement and
结论: Fakler 分类显示最高的观察者间一致性和

was most accurately predictive of the management recommended by two experts. No
最准确地预测了两位专家推荐的治疗。不

classification system accurately predicted the fractures that required DFR, and
分类系统准确预测了需要 DFR 的裂缝,并且

none included medial comminution which was independently associated with DFR
均未包含与 DFR 独立相关的内侧碎碎

requirement. There remains a need for a PDFF classification system that reliably
要求。仍然需要一个 PDFF 分类系统,该系统能够可靠地

guides operative management of PDFFs.
指导 PDFF 的手术管理。


Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2022 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.002
DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.002

PMID: 35948511 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:35948511 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors
利益冲突声明:利益争夺声明作者

declare that they have no conflicts of interest to declare.
声明他们没有需要申报的利益冲突。



68. Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85188. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85188. eCollection 2025
68. 库里乌斯。2025 年 6 月 1 日;17(6):e85188。doi: 10.7759/cureus.85188.eCollection 2025 系列

Jun.
六月。


Distal Femoral Replacement After Distal Femur Periprosthetic Fracture: A Case
股骨远端假体周围骨折后股骨远端置换术:一例

Report.
报告。


Jamal R(1), Shaqroon HA(2), Ali MA(3), Farsi SH(4).
贾马尔 (1), 舒克伦 H (2), 阿里马 (3), 波斯语 Sh(4).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Orthopedic Surgery, Prince Mohammed Bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of the
(1)穆罕默德·本·阿卜杜勒阿齐兹王子医院骨科外科

National Guard - Health Affairs, Madinah, SAU.
国民警卫队 - 卫生事务,麦地那,SAU。

(2)Orthopedic Surgery, King Fahad Hospital, Ministry of Health, Madinah, SAU.
(2)南澳大学麦地那卫生部法赫德国王医院骨科外科。

(3)General Practice, Saudi German Hospital, Madinah, SAU.
(3)SAU 麦地那沙特德国医院全科医师。

(4)Orthopedics, King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, SAU.
(4)骨科,萨勒曼国王武装部队医院,塔布克,SAU。


Distal femoral periprosthetic fractures present a complex challenge,
股骨远端假体周围骨折是一个复杂的挑战,

particularly in elderly patients with comorbidities and poor bone quality. We
特别是在有合并症和骨质差的老年患者中。我们

report a case of a 62-year-old Saudi female with morbid obesity and a history of
报告了一例 62 岁的沙特女性病态肥胖病例,病史

bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who sustained a distal femoral fracture
股骨远端骨折的双侧全膝关节置换术 (TKA)

after minor trauma. Due to limited bone stock and fracture proximity to the
轻微创伤后。由于骨量有限且骨折靠近

prosthesis, internal fixation was ruled out. The patient underwent successful
排除了假体、内固定。患者成功

revision TKA with distal femoral replacement (DFR). Postoperative recovery was
翻修 TKA 与股骨远端置换术 (DFR)。术后恢复

good, and she was discharged on day 4 with a knee range of motion of 0-90°. This
很好,她在第 4 天出院,膝关节活动度为 0-90°。这

case underscores the viability of DFR as a limb-salvaging option, offering
案例强调了 DFR 作为保肢选择的可行性,提供

immediate weight-bearing and early mobilization.
立即负重和早期活动。


Copyright © 2025, Jamal et al.
版权所有 © 2025,Jamal 等人。


DOI: 10.7759/cureus.85188
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.85188

PMCID: PMC12127015
PMCID:PMC12127015

PMID: 40458384
PMID:40458384


Conflict of interest statement: Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open
利益冲突声明:人类受试者:同意治疗和开放

access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
本研究的所有参与者均获得或放弃 Access Publication。

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all
利益冲突:根据 ICMJE 统一披露表,所有

authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared
作者声明以下内容: 付款/服务信息:所有作者都已声明

that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted
没有从任何组织收到对提交的

work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no
工作。财务关系:所有作者都声明他们没有

financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any
目前或过去三年内与任何

organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other
可能对提交的作品感兴趣的组织。其他

relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships
relationships:所有作者都声明没有其他关系

or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
或可能影响所提交作品的活动。



69. J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1402-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.033. Epub
69. J 关节成形术。2020 年 5 月;35(5):1402-1406.doi:10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.033.电子版

2019 Dec 20.
2019 年 12 月 20 日。


Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal
股骨远端假体周围骨折:切开复位和内部骨折

Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior?
固定还是股骨远端置换术 上位?


Darrith B(1), Bohl DD(1), Karadsheh MS(1), Sporer SM(1), Berger RA(1), Levine
Darrith B(1), Bohl DD(1), Karadsheh MS(1), Sporer SM(1), Berger RA(1), Levine

BR(1).
BR(1) 的。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
(1)伊利诺伊州芝加哥拉什大学医学中心骨科。


BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare open reduction and internal
背景: 本研究的目的是比较切开复位和内部

fixation (ORIF) to distal femoral replacement (DFR) for treatment of displaced
固定 (ORIF) 至股骨远端置换术 (DFR) 用于治疗移位

periprosthetic distal femur fractures.
假体周围股骨远端骨折。

METHODS: We identified 72 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up following a
方法: 我们确定了 72 例患者,在

displaced periprosthetic distal femur fracture: 50 were treated with ORIF and 22
移位性假体周围股骨远端骨折:50 例接受 ORIF 治疗,22 例

with DFR. Outcomes were assessed with multivariate regression analysis and
与 DFR 合作。通过多变量回归分析和

include Knee Society Scores (KSS), infection rates, revision incidence, and
包括膝关节协会评分 (KSS)、感染率、翻修发生率和

mortality.
死亡率。

RESULTS: Patients treated with DFR had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (5.2
结果: 接受 DFR 治疗的患者 Charlson 合并症指数较高 (5.2

vs 3.8; P = .006). The mean postoperative KSS were similar between groups, but
第 3.8 节;P = .006)。两组间平均术后 KSS 相似,但

the Knee Society Functional Scores were higher in the ORIF group (P = .01). Six
ORIF 组的膝关节协会功能评分较高 (P = .01)。六

ORIF patients (12%) and 3 DFR patients (14%) underwent a revision surgery (P =
ORIF 患者 (12%) 和 3 例 DFR 患者 (14%) 接受了翻修手术 (P =

.1). In the ORIF group, 3 revisions were associated with periprosthetic
.1).在 ORIF 组中,3 次翻修与假体周围相关

infection, and 3 revisions occurred for aseptic nonunion. In the DFR group, 1
感染,无菌性骨不连发生了 3 次翻修。在 DFR 组中,为 1

infection was treated with irrigation and debridement, and 2 cases of patellar
感染采用冲洗和清创治疗,2 例髌骨

maltracking resulted in 1 liner exchange with soft tissue release and 1 femoral
轨迹不良导致 1 次更换衬垫,软组织松解和 1 次股骨

revision for malrotation. More patients in the ORIF group required repeat
修复不良。ORIF 组中有更多患者需要重复治疗

revisions, with twice as many total revisions (P < .001). Six ORIF patients and
修订数,总修订数是 < 的两倍 (P .001)。6 名 ORIF 患者和

7 DFR patients died within 2 years (P = .26).
7 例 DFR 患者在 2 年内死亡 (P = .26)。

CONCLUSION: The Knee Society Functional Score favored ORIF, but the total
结论: 膝关节协会功能评分偏向 ORIF,但总分

incidence of revision was higher in the ORIF cohort. Given the high mortality
ORIF 队列的翻修发生率更高。鉴于高死亡率

and the substantial risk of reoperation in both groups, additional studies are
以及两组再次手术的巨大风险,其他研究是

needed regarding the prevention of and optimal treatment for patients with
需要预防和最佳治疗

periprosthetic distal femur fractures.
假体周围股骨远端骨折。


Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2019 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.033
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.033

PMID: 31924488 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:31924488 [MEDLINE 索引]



70. Injury. 2021 Jul;52(7):1875-1879. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.05.007. Epub 2021
70. 受伤。2021 年 7 月;52(7):1875-1879.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2021.05.007。Epub 2021 年

May 12.
5 月 12 日。


Outcomes of periprosthetic distal femur fractures following total knee
全膝关节术后股骨假体周围远端骨折的结局

arthroplasty: Intramedullary nailing versus plating.
关节成形术:髓内钉与钢板。


Gausden EB(1), Lim PK(2), Rabonivich A(3), Shaath MK(4), Mitchell PM(5),
Gausden EB(1), Lim PK(2), Rabonivich A(3), Shaath MK(4), Mitchell PM(5),

Hartline B(6), Achor TS(7), Warner SJ(8).
哈特林 B(6),阿乔尔 TS(7),华纳 SJ(8)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E.70th
(1)特殊外科医院骨外科,535 E.70th

Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. Electronic address: gausdene@hss.edu.
Street, New York, NY, 10021, 美国。电子地址:gausdene@hss.edu。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Orange,
(2)加州大学欧文分校骨科外科,奥兰治,

CA, 92868, USA. Electronic address: phillim@gmail.com.
CA, 92868, 美国.电子地址:phillim@gmail.com。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center
(3)德克萨斯大学健康科学中心骨外科

at Houston, Houston, TX, 77005, USA. Electronic address:
地址:Houston, Houston, TX, 77005, USA。电子地址:

Annat.Rabinovich@uth.tmc.edu.
Annat.Rabinovich@uth.tmc.edu。

(4)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, 32806, USA.
(4)奥兰多健康部骨科外科,美国佛罗里达州奥兰多 32806。

Electronic address: mkshaathmd@gmail.com.
电子地址:mkshaathmd@gmail.com。

(5)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center,
(5)范德堡大学医学中心骨科外科

Nashville, TN, 73232, USA. Electronic address: p.mitchell91@gmail.com.
美国田纳西州纳什维尔 73232。电子地址:p.mitchell91@gmail.com。

(6)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center
(6)德克萨斯大学健康科学中心骨外科

at Houston, Houston, TX, 77005, USA. Electronic address:
地址:Houston, Houston, TX, 77005, USA。电子地址:

Braden.E.Hartline@uth.tmc.edu.
Braden.E.Hartline@uth.tmc.edu。

(7)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center
(7)德克萨斯大学健康科学中心骨外科

at Houston, Houston, TX, 77005, USA. Electronic address:
地址:Houston, Houston, TX, 77005, USA。电子地址:

Timothy.S.Achor@uth.tmc.edu.
Timothy.S.Achor@uth.tmc.edu。

(8)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center
(8)德克萨斯大学健康科学中心骨外科

at Houston, Houston, TX, 77005, USA. Electronic address:
地址:Houston, Houston, TX, 77005, USA。电子地址:

Stephen.J.Warner@uth.tmc.edu.
Stephen.J.Warner@uth.tmc.edu。


BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PPDFFs) present a challenge
背景: 假体周围股骨远端骨折 (PPDFFs) 带来挑战

in terms of optimizing fixation in patients with poor bone quality and limited
在优化骨质量差和骨功能受限患者的固定方面

bone stock. The main treatment options include laterally based plating and
骨料。主要处理方案包括侧向电镀和

intramedullary nailing. We hypothesized that treatment of PPDFFs with
髓内钉。我们假设 PPDFF 的处理

intramedullary nails would result in improved union rate, fewer complications,
髓内钉会提高愈合率,减少并发症,

and an equivalent rate of malalignment compared to plating.
与钢板相比,错位率相当。

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases of PPDFFs were identified through a query of our
材料和方法: 通过查询我们的 PPDFF 病例

institutional trauma database between 2011-2018. Adult patients (>18 years) were
2011-2018 年间的机构创伤数据库。成年患者 (>18 岁)

included if they sustained a fracture of the distal femur around a total knee
如果他们在全膝关节周围遭受股骨远端骨折,则包括

arthroplasty (TKA) that was not initially treated at another institution. The
最初未在另一家机构治疗的关节置换术 (TKA)。这

anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA) and the anatomic posterior distal
解剖性股骨外侧远端角 (aLDFA) 和解剖性远端后侧

femoral angle (aPDFA) were measured on the follow-up radiographs.
在随访 X 光片上测量股骨角 (aPDFA)。

RESULTS: Ninety-seven PPDFFs in 97 patients, with a mean age of 76 years and 74%
结果: 97 例患者中有 97 例 PPDFF,平均年龄 76 岁,74%

female were identified. Plating was used in 74 patients (76%) and 23 patients
确定了女性。74 例患者 (76%) 和 23 例患者使用了钢板

(24%) were treated with intramedullary nailing. Extension deformity in the
(24%) 接受髓内钉治疗。Extension 畸形

sagittal plane was more common following intramedullary nailing compared to
髓内钉术后矢状面更常见

plating (10/23 nailing versus 10/74 plating) (p=0.002). There were 12
电镀(10/23 钉板与 10/74 电镀)(P=0.002)。有 12 个

reoperations (12/75, 16%), and the method of fixation was not associated with
再次手术 (12/75, 16%),且固定方法与

rate of reoperation (p=0.9).
再次手术率 (P=0.9)。

CONCLUSION: Intramedullary nailing was associated with an increased risk of
结论: 髓内钉与

malalignment, most commonly an extension deformity, in this series. However,
力线不良,最常见的是伸展畸形,在本系列中。然而

malalignment was not associated with worse outcomes.
对线不良与较差的结局无关。


Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
版权所有 © 2021。由 Elsevier Ltd. 出版


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.05.007
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.05.007

PMID: 34030866 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:34030866 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of Comprting Interest None.
利益冲突声明:利益声明 无。



71. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jul 6;16(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02586-0.
71. J 骨科外科研究 2021 年 7 月 6 日;16(1):433.doi:10.1186/s13018-021-02586-0.


Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with dual plating for periprosthetic
用于假体周围修复的双钢板微创钢板接骨术

distal femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty.
全膝关节置换术后股骨远端骨折。


Park YG(#)(1), Kang H(#)(1), Song JK(2), Lee J(1), Rho JY(1), Choi S(3).
Park YG(#)(1), Kang H(#)(1), Song JK(2), Lee J(1), Rho JY(1), Choi S(3).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jeju National University School of
(1)济州大学骨科

Medicine, Aran 13gil 15, Jeju-si, Jeju, Self-Governing Province, 63241, South
医学, Aran 13gil 15, 济州市, 济州, 自治道, 63241, 南

Korea.
韩国。

(2)Department of Preventive Medicine, Jeju National University School of
(2)济州大学预防医学系

Medicine, Jeju, South Korea.
医学,济州岛,韩国。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jeju National University School of
(3)济州大学骨科

Medicine, Aran 13gil 15, Jeju-si, Jeju, Self-Governing Province, 63241, South
医学, Aran 13gil 15, 济州市, 济州, 自治道, 63241, 南

Korea. swchoi1115@gmail.com.
韩国。swchoi1115@gmail.com。

(#)Contributed equally
(#)贡献均等


INTRODUCTION: Adequate treatment for periprosthetic distal femur fractures is
引言: 股骨假体周围远端骨折的适当治疗是

challenging because of various reasons, including severe osteoporosis and distal
由于各种原因(包括严重的骨质疏松症和远端骨质疏松症)而具有挑战性

fragments that are too small or too distal. We have introduced a new surgical
片段太小或太远。我们引入了一种新的手术

technique for dual plating of periprosthetic distal femur fractures following
以下假体周围股骨远端骨折的双重钢板固定技术

total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determined the clinical and radiological
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 并确定临床和放射学

outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with a dual locking
双重锁定的微创板接骨术 (MIPO) 的结果

compression plate (LCP).
加压钢板 (LCP)。

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and July 2019, 18 patients [mean
材料和方法: 2010 年 1 月至 2019年7月期间,18 例患者 [平均

age, 74.8 (68-89) years; average follow-up period, 14.8 (12-43) months]
年龄,74.8 (68-89) 岁;平均随访期,14.8 (12-43) 个月]

underwent MIPO with distal femoral LCP laterally and proximal humeral internal
接受 MIPO 伴股骨远端 LCP 外侧和肱骨内侧近端

locking system (PHILOS) medially for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures
用于股骨假体周围远端骨折的内侧锁定系统 (PHILOS)

following TKA. The minimum follow-up was 1 year. The clinical and radiological
遵循 TKA。最短随访时间为 1 年。临床和放射学

outcomes were assessed using the modified WOMAC scores, knee range of motion,
使用改良的 WOMAC 评分、膝关节活动度、

time to callus formation, time to union, and complications of malunion,
愈伤组织形成时间、愈合时间和畸形愈合并发症,

nonunion, and shortening.
不愈合和缩短。

RESULTS: The average time to union was 18.4 weeks (range, 10-51 weeks) and to
结果: 联合的平均时间为 18.4 周 (范围,10-51 周),并且

callus formation was 7.8 weeks (range, 2-14 weeks). At the 1-year follow-up, the
愈伤组织形成时间为 7.8 周 (范围,2-14 周)。在 1 年随访中,

average JLETS was 37.6 (range, 24-53), average knee ROM was 110.3° (range,
平均 JLETS 为 37.6(范围,24-53),平均膝关节 ROM 为 110.3°(范围,

80-135°), and average varus-valgus angles of the distal femur were 3.2° (range,
80-135°),股骨远端的平均内翻外翻角为 3.2°(范围

-2.9-10.5°). No nonunion, broken plates, or implant failure occurred. Malunion
-2.9-10.5°).未发生骨不连、钢板破损或种植体失败。Malunion

occurred in three patients.
发生在 3 例患者中。

CONCLUSION: MIPO with dual LCP is a reliable method for stabilizing
结论:具有双 LCP 的 MIPO 是一种可靠的稳定方法

periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following TKA, with satisfactory bone
TKA 后假体周围股骨远端骨折,骨骼满意

union rates and low complication rates.
联合率和低并发症率。


DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02586-0
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02586-0

PMCID: PMC8259434
PMCID:PMC8259434

PMID: 34229703 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:34229703 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no competing
利益冲突声明:作者声明他们没有竞争

interests.
利益。



72. Int Orthop. 2015 Sep;39(9):1737-42. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2764-0. Epub 2015
72. 国际骨科 2015 年 9 月;39(9):1737-42.doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2764-0。Epub 2015 年

Apr 16.
4 月 16 日。


Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following knee arthroplasty: a
膝关节置换术后假体髁上股骨骨折:a

biomechanical comparison of four methods of fixation.
四种固定方法的生物力学比较。


Mäkinen TJ(1), Dhotar HS, Fichman SG, Gunton MJ, Woodside M, Safir O, Backstein
Mäkinen TJ(1), Dhotar HS, Fichman SG, Gunton MJ, Woodside M, Safir O, Backstein

D, Willett TL, Kuzyk PR.
D, 威利特 TL, 库兹克 PR.


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Mount Sinai Hospital, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto,
(1)多伦多大学西奈山医院骨科外科

600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada, tatu.makinen@hus.fi.
600 University Avenue, 多伦多, 安大略省, M5G 1X5, 加拿大, tatu.makinen@hus.fi。


PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the biomechanical properties of
目的: 本研究的目的是确定

four fixation options for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures.
假体周围髁上股骨骨折的四种固定选择。

METHODS: Fourth-generation composite femurs were implanted with a
方法: 第四代复合股骨植入

posterior-stabilizing femoral component of total knee arthroplasty. All femurs
全膝关节置换术的后稳定股骨组件。所有股骨

were osteotomized to produce a AO/OTA 33-A3 fracture pattern and four different
截骨以产生 AO/OTA 33-A3 骨折模式和四种不同的

constructs were tested: (1) non-locking plate; (2) polyaxial locking plate; (3)
测试了构建体:(1) 非锁定板;(2) 多轴锁定板;(3)

intramedullary fibular strut allograft with polyaxial locking plate; (4)
髓内腓骨支柱同种异体移植物与多轴锁定板;(4)

retrograde intramedullary nail. The composite femurs underwent non-destructive
逆行髓内钉。复合股骨进行了非破坏性

tests to determine construct stiffness in axial and torsional cyclic loading.
用于确定轴向和扭转循环载荷下的结构刚度的测试。

The final testing consisted of quasi-static axial loading until failure.
最终测试包括准静态轴向载荷,直到失效。

RESULTS: Under cyclic torsional loading, the retrograde intramedullary nail was
结果: 在循环扭转载荷下,逆行髓内钉

less stiff than non-locking plate, polyaxial locking plate and intramedullary
比非锁定钢板、多轴锁定钢板和髓内钢板的刚度低

fibular strut allograft with polyaxial locking plate (p = 0.046). No differences
带多轴锁定板的腓骨支柱同种异体移植物 (p = 0.046)。无差异

were detected in cyclic axial loading between the different constructs. During
在不同结构之间的循环轴向载荷中检测到。在

quasi-static axial loading to failure, the intramedullary nail achieved the
准静态轴向载荷失效时,髓内钉达到

highest axial stiffness while the non-locking plate showed the lowest
轴向刚度最高,而非锁定板的轴刚度最低

(p = 0.036).
(p = 0.036)。

CONCLUSIONS: The intramedullary fibular strut allograft with polyaxial locking
结论: 多轴锁定髓内腓骨支柱同种异体移植物

plate did not prove to be significantly better to the polyaxial locking plate
钢板并没有被证明明显优于多轴锁定钢板

only in a periprosthetic distal femur fracture model.
仅在假体周围股骨远端骨折模型中。


DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2764-0
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2764-0

PMID: 25877161 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:25877161 [MEDLINE 索引]



73. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):4105-4111. doi:
73. Eur J 创伤新兴外科杂志 2022 年 10 月;48(5):4105-4111.doi:

10.1007/s00068-022-01940-z. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
10.1007/s00068-022-01940-z。Epub 2022 年 3 月 6 日。


Use of an intramedullary fibular strut allograft and dual locking plate in
使用髓内腓骨支柱同种异体移植物和双锁定板

periprosthetic fractures above total knee arthroplasty: new application of a
全膝关节置换术上方的假体周围骨折:A 的新应用

well-known treatment method in trauma.
众所周知的创伤治疗方法。


Suh D(1), Ji JH(1)(2), Heu JY(3), Kim JY(4), Chi H(1), Lee SW(5)(6).
徐 D(1), Ji JH(1)(2), Heu JY(3), Kim JY(4), Chi H(1), Lee SW(5)(6)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's
(1)大田圣玛丽医学院骨外科

Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
韩国天主教大学医院,大韩民国大田市。

(2)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic
(2)天主教医学院骨外科

University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
韩国首尔大学。

(3)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's
(3)汝矣岛圣玛丽医院医学院骨外科

Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 10, 63-Ro, Yeongdeungpo-Gu, Seoul,
医院, 韩国天主教大学, 10, 63-Ro, Yeongdeungpo-Gu, Seoul

07345, Republic of Korea.
07345,大韩民国。

(4)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym
(4)翰南圣心医院骨科外科

University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
大韩民国首尔大学医学院。

(5)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic
(5)天主教医学院骨外科

University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ssewon@naver.com.
韩国首尔大学。ssewon@naver.com。

(6)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's
(6)汝矣岛圣玛丽医院医学院骨外科

Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 10, 63-Ro, Yeongdeungpo-Gu, Seoul,
医院, 韩国天主教大学, 10, 63-Ro, Yeongdeungpo-Gu, Seoul

07345, Republic of Korea. ssewon@naver.com.
07345,大韩民国。ssewon@naver.com。


PURPOSE: Augmenting fracture fixation with intramedullary fibular graft has seen
目的: 髓内腓骨移植物增强骨折固定

several applications such as in comminuted proximal humerus fractures, and
多种应用,例如粉碎性肱骨近端骨折,以及

femoral neck and shaft nonunion. The purpose of this study was to report the
股骨颈和股骨干骨區不连。本研究的目的是报告

first case series demonstrating the novel application of an intramedullary
第一个案例系列展示了髓内的新应用

fibular allograft strut and dual locking plates on complicated periprosthetic
复杂假体周围假体上的腓骨同种异体移植支柱和双锁定板

fracture of distal femur.
股骨远端骨折。

METHODS: The patient demographics, weight-bearing status, and radiographic and
方法: 患者人口统计学、负重状况、影像学和

clinical outcomes of six patients, who were treated for periprosthetic distal
6 例接受远端假体周围修复治疗的患者的临床结局

femur fractures using an intramedullary fibular allograft strut and dual locking
使用髓内腓骨同种异体移植支柱和双重锁定的股骨骨折

plate, between January 2018 and April 2020 were analyzed.
分析了 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 4 月期间的板块。

RESULTS: Postoperative range of knee motion showed median 10' (range 10-20) of
结果: 术后膝关节活动范围显示中位 10' (范围 10-20)

flexion contracture and 90' (range 80-110) of further flexion. Postoperative
屈曲挛缩和 90 英尺(范围 80-110)的进一步屈曲。术后

joint function was assessed according to the Kolmert functional criteria, with
根据 Kolmert 功能标准评估关节功能,其中

"excellent to good" in angular deformity and "Good to fair" result in range of
角度畸形为“从优秀到良好”,而“从好到一般”的结果是范围

motion and pain. RUSH score was assessed, and median score was 24 (range 18-26).
运动和疼痛。评估 RUSH 评分,中位评分为 24 (范围 18-26)。

All patients were able to ambulate without assistance 6 months after surgery.
所有患者在手术后 6 个月均能够在没有帮助的情况下行走。

CONCLUSION: In summary, the application of fibular strut graft and dual locking
结论: 综上所述,腓骨支柱移植物和双重锁定的应用

plate might be an option in complicated distal femur fracture above total knee
钢板可能是全膝关节以上复杂性股骨远端骨折的一种选择

arthroplasty. Albeit with an available number, such application showed promise
置换 术。尽管有可用的数量,但此类应用程序显示出前景

as an intramedullary and cortical support for both reduction and maintenance of
作为髓内和皮质支持,用于复位和维持

correction alignment, length, and prevention of further angular deformity.
校正对齐、长度和防止进一步的角度畸形。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Surgical technique and Cases-series.
证据级别 IV:手术技术和病例系列。


© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
© 2022 年。作者,经德国 Springer-Verlag GmbH 独家许可。


DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-01940-z
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-01940-z

PMID: 35249116 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:35249116 [MEDLINE 索引]



74. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02222-x.
74. J 骨科外科研究 2021 年 1 月 22 日;16(1):78.doi:10.1186/s13018-021-02222-x.


Locked compression plating versus retrograde intramedullary nailing in the
锁定加压钢板与逆行髓内钉

treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar knee fractures: a systematic review
假体周围髁上膝关节骨折的治疗:系统评价

and meta-analysis.
和荟萃分析。


Magill H(1), Ponugoti N(2), Selim A(3), Platt J(4).
Magill H(1), Ponugoti N(2), Selim A(3), Platt J(4).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Orthopaedic Registrar, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
(1)英国伦敦切尔西和威斯敏斯特医院骨科注册官。

henry.magill@nhs.net.
henry.magill@nhs.net。

(2)Orthopaedic Registrar, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke,
(2)贝辛斯托克和北汉普郡医院骨科登记员,

UK.
英国。

(3)Orthopaedic Registrar, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK.
(3)英国特鲁罗皇家康沃尔医院骨科登记员。

(4)Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon, Hillingdon Hospital, London, UK.
(4)英国伦敦 Hillingdon 医院创伤与骨科外科医生顾问。


BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur above a total knee
背景:全膝关节以上股骨远端假体周围骨折

arthroplasty (TKA) have traditionally been managed by locking compression
关节置换术 (TKA) 传统上是通过锁定加压来管理的

plating (LCP). This technique is technically demanding and is associated with
电镀 (LCP)。这项技术在技术上要求很高,并且与

high rates of non-union and revision. More recently, retrograde intramedullary
不愈合率和翻修率高。最近,逆行髓内

nailing (RIMN) has been proposed as an acceptable alternative. This
钉钉 (RIMN) 已被提议作为一种可接受的替代方案。这

meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with periprosthetic
Meta 分析旨在评估假体周围患者的临床结局

supracondylar femoral fractures who were treated with LCP and RIMN.
接受 LCP 和 RIMN 治疗的股骨髁上骨折。

METHODS: An up-to-date literature search was carried out using the pre-defined
方法: 使用预定义的

search strategy. All studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for
搜索策略。所有符合纳入标准的研究都接受了

methodological quality with the Cochrane's collaboration tool. Operative time,
Cochrane 协作工具的方法学质量。手术时间 /

functional score, time-to-union, non-union rates and revision rates were all
功能评分、愈合时间、非愈合率和翻修率均为

considered.
考虑。

CONCLUSION: Ten studies with a total of 531 periprosthetic fractures were
结论: 10 项研究共 531 例假体周围骨折

included. This meta-analysis has suggested that there is no significant
包括。这项荟萃分析表明,没有显著的

difference in any of the outcome measures assessed. Further, more extensive
评估的任何结果测量的差异。此外,更广泛

literature is required on the subject to draw more robust conclusions.
需要关于该主题的文献来得出更有力的结论。


DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02222-x
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02222-x

PMCID: PMC7821478
PMCID:PMC7821478

PMID: 33482862 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:33482862 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: The authors whose names are listed immediately
利益冲突声明:姓名立即列出的作者

below certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any
以下证明他们与任何

organisation or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria;
具有任何经济利益的组织或实体(例如酬金;

educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment,
教育补助金;参与演讲团;会员资格、就业、

consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony
咨询、股权或其他股权;和专家证词

or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal
或专利许可安排)或非财务利益(例如个人

or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the
或专业关系、隶属关系、知识或信仰)

subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
本手稿中讨论的主题或材料。



75. Injury. 2024 Jun;55(6):111136. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111136. Epub 2023 Oct
75. 受伤。2024 年 6 月;55(6):111136.doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111136.Epub 2023 年 10 月

15.


Frequency and pathogenesis of periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures
假体周围非典型股骨骨折的频率和发病机制

associated with total knee arthroplasty: A multicenter prospective study with
与全膝关节置换术相关: 一项多中心前瞻性研究

complementary histopathological and biomechanical analysis.
互补的组织病理学和生物力学分析。


Hashimoto J(1), Oh Y(2), Yamamoto K(3), Yoshii T(1), Fukushima K(4), Kitagawa
桥本 J(1), 吴 Y(2), 山本 K(3), 吉井 T(1), 福岛 K(4), 北川

M(3), Okawa A(1).
M(3),大川 A(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic and Spinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and
(1)医学研究生院骨科脊柱外科

Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
东京医科齿科大学牙科科学,日本东京。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, Graduate School of Medical and
(2)医学研究生院骨科与创伤学系

Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic
东京医科齿科大学牙科科学,日本东京。电子的

address: oh.orth@tmd.ac.jp.
地址: oh.orth@tmd.ac.jp.

(3)Department of Comprehensive Pathology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental
(3)内科牙科研究生院综合病理学系

Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
科学,东京医科齿科大学,日本东京。

(4)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saku Central Hospital, Nagano, Japan.
(4)日本长野佐久中央医院骨科。


INTRODUCTION: Although the diagnostic criteria for atypical femoral fracture
引言:虽然非典型股骨骨折的诊断标准

(AFF) exclude periprosthetic fractures, reports of periprosthetic femoral
(AFF) 排除假体周围骨折、股骨假体周围报道

fractures with characteristics of AFF are rapidly increasing. In this study, we
具有 AFF 特征的骨折正在迅速增加。在这项研究中,我们

investigated the frequency and pathogenesis of periprosthetic AFF associated
研究了假体周围相关 AFF 的频率和发病机制

with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on a theory of AFF subtypes that
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 基于 AFF 亚型理论,其中

divides AFFs into two main types: fragility stress fractures of the bowed
将 AFF 分为两种主要类型:弯曲的脆性应力性骨折

femoral shaft in the mid-shaft and "typical" subtrochanteric AFFs due to
股骨干位于中轴和“典型”转子下 AFF,因为

suppression of bone turnover (e.g., by bisphosphonates).
抑制骨转换(例如,使用双膦酸盐)。

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter prospective study of AFFs was conducted
患者和方法: 进行了这项 AFFs 的多中心前瞻性研究

from 2015 through 2022. Clinical, pathological, and morphological
从 2015 年到 2022 年。临床、病理和形态学

characteristics were investigated in patients with periprosthetic AFFs
调查假体周围 AFF 患者的特征

associated only with non-stem TKA. Then, biomechanical investigation of the
仅与非干 TKA 相关。然后,对

periprosthetic AFF was performed by computer tomography-based finite element
假体周围 AFF 通过基于计算机断层扫描的有限元进行

analysis (CT/FEA) using two models with different load axes to examine how the
分析 (CT/FEA) 来检查具有不同载荷轴的模型

correction of lower limb alignment by TKA influences the tensile stress
TKA 对下肢对齐的矫正会影响拉应力

distribution of the femur and the location of the AFF.
股骨分布和 AFF 的位置。

RESULTS: Four of 61 AFFs (6.6%) were identified to be periprosthetic AFF (1
结果: 61 例 AFF 中有 4 例 (6.6%) 被确定为假体周围 AFF (1

mid-shaft; 3 subtrochanteric). Periprosthetic AFFs had characteristics including
中轴;3 转子下)。假体周围 AFF 的特征包括

mechanical stress due to bowing deformity and potentially suppressed bone
弓形畸形和可能受到抑制的骨骼引起的机械应力

turnover due to long-term exposure to specific drugs (e.g., bisphosphonates and
由于长期暴露于特定药物(例如双膦酸盐和

glucocorticoids). Although 2 periprosthetic AFFs appeared to involve a bowed
糖皮质激素)。尽管 2 个假体周围 AFF 似乎涉及弓形

femur, one with both of the aforementioned characteristics occurred in the
股骨,一个具有上述两个特征的

subtrochanteric region, which would be an unusual site for a bowed AFF, and it
转子下区域,这对于弓形 AFF 来说是一个不寻常的部位,并且它

was demonstrated histologically to have biological activity at the fracture
经组织学证实在骨折处具有生物活性

site, suggesting a stress fracture. Furthermore, CT/FEA revealed that tensile
部位,提示应力性骨折。此外,CT/FEA 显示拉伸

stress distribution changed proximally as load axis was shifted laterally
随着载荷轴的横向移动,应力分布向近端变化

according to correction of lower limb alignment by TKA.
根据 TKA 对下肢对齐的矫正。

CONCLUSION: Orthopedic surgeons should recognize the presence of TKA-associated
结论:骨科医生应识别 TKA 相关

periprosthetic AFF caused by various factors including specific drugs, bowing
由各种因素引起的假体周围 AFF,包括特定药物、弓形

deformity, and lower limb alignment. X-rays of the full-length femurs should be
畸形和下肢对齐。股骨全长 X 线片应

checked regularly after TKA, especially in patients with bowed femurs or
TKA 后定期检查,尤其是股骨弓形或

long-term exposure to specific drugs.
长期接触特定药物。


Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
版权所有 © 2023。由 Elsevier Ltd. 出版


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111136
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111136

PMID: 37867026 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:37867026 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of Competing Interest The department
利益冲突声明:利益争夺申报部门

to which the corresponding author (YO) belongs received funding for operating
通讯作者 (YO) 所属的 获得运营资金

costs from Saku Central Hospital of the Nagano Prefectural Federation of
长野县联合会佐久中央医院的费用

Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare, Suwa Central Hospital, Doujin
诹访中心医院、同人农业健康福利合作社

Hospital, Nerima General Hospital, Medtronic Sofamor Danek Co., Ltd., Stryker
医院, 练马综合医院, Medtronic Sofamor Danek Co., Ltd., Stryker

Japan K.K., HOYA Technosurgical Co., Ltd., and Magic Shields, Inc. The other
Japan K.K.、HOYA Technosurgical Co., Ltd. 和 Magic Shields, Inc.另一个

authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
作者声明他们没有利益冲突。



76. J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Dec;31(12):e425-e431. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000939.
76. J 骨科创伤。2017 年 12 月;31(12):e425-e431。doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000939.


Nail and Locking Plate for Periprosthetic Fractures.
用于假体周围骨折的钉子和锁定板。


Kanabur P(1), Sandilands SM, Whitmer KK, Owen TM, Coniglione FM, Shuler TE.
Kanabur P(1)、Sandilands SM、Whitmer KK、Owen TM、Coniglione FM、Shuler TE。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Medicine Department of Orthopaedics, Virginia Tech Carilion School, Roanoke,
(1)弗吉尼亚理工大学 Carilion 学校骨科医学系,罗阿诺克,

VA.
弗吉尼亚州。


The incidence of periprosthetic fractures have been increasing, and in patients
假体周围骨折的发生率一直在增加,在

with osteopenic bone, high body mass index, or a combination both, they are
骨质减少、体重指数高或两者兼而有之,它们是

difficult to treat and pose a high risk for malunion. Previous studies have
难以治疗且畸形愈合的风险很高。以前的研究有

compared the use of locking plates and intramedullary nails, and have found that
比较了锁定钢板和髓内钉的使用,发现

each has its own strengthens and drawbacks, but neither is superior in terms of
每个都有自己的优点和缺点,但在

treating periprosthetic fractures. Here, we present the technique and series of
治疗假体周围骨折。在这里,我们介绍了

patients treated with a combination of a retrograde intramedullary nail and
接受逆行髓内钉联合治疗的患者

flare-to-flare lateral locking plate without the use of allograft or autograft
Flare-to-Flare 侧向锁定板,无需使用同种异体移植物或自体移植物

supplementation.
补充。


DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000939
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000000939

PMID: 29189525 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:29189525 [MEDLINE 索引]



77. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Aug 25;32(8):686-691. doi:
77. 中国古上.2019 年 8 月 25 日;32(8):686-691.doi:

10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.08.002.


[Double plating through different approaches for periprosthetic femoral fracture
[通过不同方法进行股骨假体周围骨折的双钢板

following total knee arthroplasty].
全膝关节置换术后]。


[Article in Chinese]
[中文文章]


Zhang ZF, Xing ST(1), Yan SG, Wu LD, Wu HB, Shi LH.
张 ZF, 邢 ST(1), 闫 SG, 吴 LD, 吴 HB, 石 LH.


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics, the First People's Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou
(1)湖州市第一人民医院骨科

313000, Zhejiang, China; 1421919921@qq.com.
313000, 浙江, 中国;1421919921@qq.com。


OBJECTIVE: To study clinical effects of double plating through different
目的: 通过不同的

approaches for communicated and obvious osteoporosis periprosthetic femoral
有连通性和明显骨质疏松症的处理方法:股骨假体周围

fracture following total knee arthroplasty(TKA).
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 后的骨折。

METHODS: From July 2010 to June 2017, 21 patients with periprosthetic femoral
方法: 2010年7月至 2017年6月,21例股骨假体周围患者

fracture following TKA were divided into two groups according to operative
根据手术

approach. Fifteen patients in medial and lateral double approaches group,
方法。内侧和外侧双入路组 15 例患者,

including 5 males and 10 females aged from 63 to 79 years old with an average of
包括 5 名男性和 10 名女性,年龄在 63 至 79 岁之间,平均年龄

(67.2±5.9) years old; 11 patients were type 33-A2 and 4 patients were type 33-A3
(67.2±5.9) 岁;11 例患者为 33-A2 型,4 例患者为 33-A3 型

according to AO-OTA classification; 12 patients injured by falling down and 3
根据 AO-OTA 分类;12 名患者跌倒受伤,3 名

patients by traffic accident; treated with double plating. Six patients in
交通事故患者;用双镀处理。6 名患者

medial parapatellar approach group, including 3 males and 3 females, aged from
内侧髌旁入路组,包括 3 名男性和 3 名女性,年龄

61 to 74 years old with an average of (64.6±6.0) years old; 3 patients were type
61 至 74 岁,平均年龄为 (64.6±6.0) 岁;3 例患者为

33-A2 and 3 patients were type 33-A3 according to AO-OTA classification; 5
根据 AO-OTA 分类,33-A2 和 3 例患者为 33-A3 型;5

patients injured by falling down and 1 patient by traffic accident; treated with
跌倒受伤患者和 1 名交通事故患者;治疗

double plating. Operative time, blood loss, postoperative drainage, fracture
双层电镀。手术时间、出血量、术后引流、骨折

healing time were compared between two groups; HSS score and radiology at 3 and
比较两组之间的愈合时间;HSS 评分和放射学评分为 3 且

12 months were compared between two groups.
比较两组之间的 12 个月。

RESULTS: All patients were followed up, and the follow-up time of bilateral
结果: 对所有患者进行随访,随访时间

approaches group ranged from 12 to 18 months with an average of (14.2±2.6 )
方法组从 12 到 18 个月不等,平均为 (14.2±2.6)

months, while the follow-up time of single approach group ranged from 12 to 16
月,而单一方法组的随访时间从 12 到 16 不等

months with an average of (12.6±2.5) months, and there was no statistical
月的平均 (12.6±2.5) 个月,并且没有统计数据

difference between two groups. The operative time and postoperative drainage in
两组之间的差异。手术时间及术后引流

bilateral approaches group were (107.2±10.4) min and (213.9±30.4) ml, while in
双侧入路组分别为 (107.2±10.4) min 和 (213.9±30.4) mL,而

sigle approach group was (95.4±12.8) min and (256.8±34.2) ml, and the
Sigmale 方法组分别为 (95.4±12.8) min 和 (256.8±34.2) mL,且

differences were significant(P<0.05). There were no significant difference in
差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在

blood loss and fracture healing time(P>0.05). HHS score at 3 and 12 months after
失血量和骨折愈合时间 (P>0.05)。3 个月和 12 个月后 HHS 评分

operation in bilateral approach were 82.9±5.7 and 84.8±7.1, while in single
双侧入路的作分别为 82.9±5.7 和 84.8±7.1,而单

approach group were 83.6±6.1 and 86.3±6.8; there was no statistical difference
方法组分别为 83.6±6.1 和 86.3±6.8;没有统计学差异

in HSS score between two groups(P>0.05). According to HSS score at 12 months
两组间 HSS 评分 (P>0.05)。根据 12 个月时的 HSS 评分

after operation, 2 cases got excellent results and 13 good in bilateral
术后 2 例效果优秀,13 例双侧良好

approaches group; 1 case got excellent result and 4 good and 1 moderate in
方法组;1 例获得优秀结果,4 例良好,1 例中等

single approach group; but there was no statistical difference between two
单一方法组;但两者之间没有统计学差异

groups (χ²=2.625, P=0.105). There wase no significant differences in
各组 (χ²=2.625,P=0.105)。在

complications between bilateral approaches group(2 cases) and single approach
双侧入路组(2 例)与单一入路之间的并发症

group (1 case)(P>0.05).
组 (1 例) (P>0.05)。

CONCLUSIONS: Double plating technique for communicated and obvious osteoporosis
结论: 双板技术治疗沟通性和明显的骨质疏松症

periprosthetic femoral fracture following TKA could obtain good function of knee
TKA 后股骨假体周围骨折可获得良好的膝关节功能

joint. The medial parapatellar approach has shorter operative time, while the
关节。内侧髌旁入路的手术时间较短,而

bilateral approaches had less drainage.
双侧入路引流较少。


Copyright© 2019 by the China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Press.
版权所有© 2019 中国骨伤杂志社.


DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.08.002
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.08.002

PMID: 31533376 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:31533376 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: The authors of this article and the planning
利益冲突声明:本文作者及规划

committee members and staff have no relevant financial relationships with
委员会成员和工作人员与

commercial interests to disclose.
披露商业利益。



78. J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1571-1575. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.013. Epub
78. J 关节置换术。2017 年 5 月;32(5):1571-1575.doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.013.电子版

2016 Dec 23.
2016 年 12 月 23 日。


Predictors of Functional Recovery Following Periprosthetic Distal Femur
股骨远端假体术后功能恢复的预测因子

Fractures.
骨折。


Ruder JA(1), Hart GP(2), Kneisl JS(1), Springer BD(3), Karunakar MA(1).
罗德 JA(1),哈特 GP(2),克奈斯尔 JS(1),施普林格 BD(3),卡鲁纳卡尔 MA(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Carolinas Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charlotte, North
(1)卡罗来纳州医疗中心骨科外科,北夏洛特

Carolina.
卡罗莱纳州。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario,
(2)安大略省伦敦市西部大学骨科外科

Canada.
加拿大。

(3)OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.
(3)OrthoCarolina 髋关节和膝关节中心,北卡罗来纳州夏洛特。


BACKGROUND: Treatment options for periprosthetic distal femur fractures include
背景: 股骨假体周围远端骨折的治疗选择包括

open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and distal femoral replacement (DFR).
切开复位内固定术 (ORIF) 和股骨远端置换术 (DFR)。

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications, and functional
本研究的目的是评估并发症和功能

recovery (ambulatory status, living situation, mortality) in patients undergoing
接受

operative treatment (DFR and ORIF) of periprosthetic distal femur fractures.
股骨假体周围远端骨折的手术治疗 (DFR 和 ORIF)。

METHODS: A retrospective review of 58 patients with distal femoral
方法: 对 58 例股骨远端患者进行回顾性分析

periprosthetic fractures treated with either ORIF or DFR was conducted. Surgical
进行 ORIF 或 DFR 治疗的假体周围骨折。外科

complications, discharge disposition, ambulatory status, living situation at 1
并发症、出院处置、动态、居住状况 1

year, and mortality at 1 year were compared between patients treated with ORIF
年和 1 年死亡率比较接受 ORIF 治疗的患者

and DFR. Outcomes at 1 year were also compared between patients older and
和 DFR。还比较了年龄较大和

younger than 85 years of age.
年龄小于 85 岁。

RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with a mean age of 80 years (range, 61-95 years)
结果: 58 例患者,平均年龄为 80 岁 (范围,61-95 岁)

met inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 29.5 months (range, 5-81 months).
符合纳入标准。平均随访时间为 29.5 个月 (范围,5-81 个月)。

Patients undergoing DFR were significantly older than those who underwent ORIF
接受 DFR 的患者明显比接受 ORIF 的患者年龄大

(83 vs 78, P < .01). The 1-year mortality rate was 20.6%. There was no
(83 对 78,P < .01)。1 年死亡率为 20.6%。没有

difference between groups with respect to mortality, complications, discharge
组间死亡率、并发症、分泌物的差异

disposition, or ambulatory status and living situation at 1 year. Patients who
1 岁时的性格或门诊状况和生活状况。以下患者

lost the ability to ambulate at 1 year were significantly older than patients
1 岁时失去行走能力明显大于患者

who maintained the ability to ambulate (87.5 vs 76.4 years, P < .05). Patients
保持行走能力 (87.5 vs 76.4 岁,P < .05)。病人

older than 85 years were more likely to lose the ability to ambulate and to live
85 岁以上的人更有可能失去行走和生活的能力

in a skilled nursing facility at 1 year (P < .01).
1 年在专业护理机构 (P < .01)。

CONCLUSION: Distal femoral periprosthetic fractures have a high morbidity and
结论: 股骨远端假体周围骨折发病率高,且

mortality. Age at time of injury, not treatment rendered, is predictive of
死亡率。受伤时的年龄,而不是接受治疗,可以预测

ambulatory status and living independence after periprosthetic distal femur
股骨远端假体周围术后的动态状态和生活独立性

fractures.
骨折。


Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.013
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.013

PMID: 28131543 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:28131543 [MEDLINE 索引]



79. J Knee Surg. 2019 May;32(5):392-402. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683443. Epub 2019 Mar
79. J 膝关节外科杂志 2019 年 5 月;32(5):392-402.doi:10.1055/s-0039-1683443。Epub 2019 年 3 月

28.


Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Periprosthetic and Interprosthetic
用于假体周围和假体间的微创钢板接骨术

Fractures Associated with Knee Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique and Review of
膝关节置换术相关骨折:手术技术和综述

Current Literature.
当前文献。


Borade A(1), Sanchez D(1), Kempegowda H(1), Maniar H(1), Pesantez RF(2), Suk
Borade A(1), Sanchez D(1), Kempegowda H(1), Maniar H(1), Pesantez RF(2), 苏克

M(1), Horwitz DS(1).
M(1),Horwitz DS(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.
(1)宾夕法尼亚州丹维尔盖辛格医疗中心骨科。

(2)Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá,
(2)波哥大圣达菲基金会骨科和创伤学系,

Bogotá, Colombia.
哥伦比亚波哥大。


With the increasing number of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) being performed,
随着全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 数量的增加,

the incidence of periprosthetic fractures adjacent to a TKA is rising. Minimally
TKA 附近假体周围骨折的发生率正在上升。微

invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has proven to be successful for the
侵入性板接骨术 (MIPO) 已被证明对

biological fixation of many fractures. Advances in surgical instrumentation and
许多骨折的生物固定。手术器械和

techniques made MIPO possible for more complex fractures. Periprosthetic
技术使 MIPO 可用于更复杂的骨折。假体周围

fractures are always complicated by problems of soft tissue incisions, scarring,
骨折总是因软组织切口、疤痕、

and, of course, the arthroplasty components. MIPO techniques may be particularly
当然,还有关节置换术的组成部分。MIPO 技术可能特别

suited to these injuries and may make the surgical repair of these fractures
适合这些损伤,并可能对这些骨折进行手术修复

safer and more reliable. In this review, case examples are used to define the
更安全、更可靠。在这篇综述中,使用案例示例来定义

indications, preoperative planning, implant selection, complications,
适应症、术前计划、种植体选择、并发症、

limitations, and challenges of MIPO for the treatment of periprosthetic
MIPO 治疗假体周围的局限性和挑战

fractures about the knee. When considering MIPO for any fracture, we recommend
膝盖骨折。在考虑对任何骨折进行 MIPO 时,我们建议

prioritizing an acceptable reduction with biological fixation and resorting to
通过生物固定优先考虑可接受的减少,并求助于

mini-open or open approach when necessary to achieve it. Awareness of the
Mini-Open 或 Open 方法来实现它。对

learning curve of the surgical technique, advances in implant designs, the tips
手术技术的学习曲线、种植体设计的进步、提示

and tricks involved, and the limitations of the MIPO is of paramount importance
和涉及的技巧,而 MIPO 的局限性至关重要

from the orthopaedic surgeon's perspective.
从骨科医生的角度来看。


Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Thieme Medical Publishers 美国纽约州纽约市第七大道 333 号,邮编 10001。


DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683443
DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1683443

PMID: 30921821 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:30921821 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: None declared.
利益冲突声明:未申报。



80. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Sep;33 Suppl 6:S25-S28. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001565.
80. J 骨科创伤。2019 年 9 月;33 增刊 6:S25-S28。doi: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000001565.


Setting Yourself Up for Success: Locked Plating in Periprosthetic Fractures
为成功做好准备:假体周围骨折的锁定钢板

About Total Knee Arthroplasty.
关于全膝关节置换术。


Pires RE(1), Kfuri M(2).
皮雷斯 RE(1),克富里 M(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of the Locomotor Apparatus, Federal University of Minas Gerais,
(1)米纳斯吉拉斯联邦大学运动装置系,

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州贝洛奥里藏特。

(2)Missouri Orthopedic Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
(2)密苏里大学骨科研究所,密苏里大学,哥伦比亚,密苏里州。


As the incidence of total knee arthroplasty increases, a concurrent increase in
随着全膝关节置换术发病率的增加,同时

periprosthetic fractures will also occur. This article focuses on the most
也会发生假体周围骨折。本文最着重

common fracture types and current strategies adopted to overcome this
常见的骨折类型和当前为克服这一问题而采用的策略

challenging clinical problem. Our goal is to outline the role of locking plates
具有挑战性的临床问题。我们的目标是概述锁定钢板的作用

in the management of knee periprosthetic fractures.
在膝关节假体周围骨折的管理中。


DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001565
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000001565

PMID: 31404042 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:31404042 [MEDLINE 索引]



81. Sisli Etfal Hastan T&#305;p Bul. 2021 Dec 20;55(4):477-485. doi:
81. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tıp Bul. 2021 年 12 月 20 日;55(4):477-485.doi:

10.14744/SEMB.2021.34270. eCollection 2021.
10.14744/SEMB.2021.34270。电子收藏 2021。


Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femoral
两种修复体股骨髁上关节手术技术的比较

Fractures: Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Versus Retrograde Femoral Nails.
骨折:微创锁定钢板与逆行股骨钉。


Erinc S(1), Cam N(1), Kanar M(1), Mustafa Ozdemir H(1).
Erinc S(1), Cam N(1), Kanar M(1), Mustafa Ozdemir H(1).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences
(1)健康科学大学骨伤学系

Turkey, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
土耳其,土耳其伊斯坦布尔 Sisli Hamidiye Etfal 培训和研究医院。


OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare minimal invasive locking plate and
目的: 本研究旨在比较微创锁定钢板和

retrograde intramedullary nailing in the treatment of supracondylar femur
逆行髓内钉治疗股骨髁上

fracture following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in respect of fracture healing,
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 后骨折愈合情况,

complications, and functional results.
并发症和功能结果。

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made of 32 supracondylar femur fractures
方法: 对 32 例股骨髁上骨折进行回顾性分析

comprising 20 cases treated with minimal invasive locking plate fixation and 12
包括 20 例接受微创锁定钢板固定治疗的病例和 12 例

with retrograde femoral nailing. The two techniques were compared in respect of
伴逆行股骨钉。这两种技术在

range of motion (ROM), functional scores, intraoperative blood loss, surgery
关节活动度 (ROM)、功能评分、术中失血量、手术

time, and radiological examination findings.
时间和放射学检查结果。

RESULTS: The mean functional scores did not differ between the nailing and plate
结果: 钉子和钢板的平均功能评分没有差异

fixation groups. In the minimal invasive locking plate group, 2 (10%) patients
注视组。在微创锁定钢板组中,2 例 (10%) 患者

had delayed union, so revision surgery was applied. The mean post-operative ROM
延迟了愈合,因此应用了翻修手术。平均术后 ROM

was comparable between two groups (86.2° vs. 86°). Reduction quality in the
两组之间相当 (86.2° vs. 86°)。Reduction Quality in (减少质量)

sagittal plane and maintenance of the initial reduction were better in the
矢状面和初始复位的维持在

minimal invasive locking plate group. Greater shortening of the lower extremity
微创锁定钢板组。下肢缩短加剧

was seen in the retrograde femoral nailing group than in the minimal invasive
在逆行股骨钉组中可见于微创组

locking plate group (20.3 vs. 9.3 mm). Perioperative blood loss was greater (2
锁定板组(20.3 mm 对 9.3 mm)。围手术期失血量较大 (2

units vs. 1.2 units) and mean operating time was longer in the minimal invasive
单位 vs. 1.2 单位),微创组的平均手术时间更长

locking plate group (126.5 min vs. 102.2 min).
锁定钢板组(126.5 min vs. 102.2 min)。

CONCLUSION: In patients with good bone stock, supracondylar femur fracture
结论: 在骨量良好的患者中,股骨髁上骨折

following TKA can be treated successfully with retrograde nailing or minimal
TKA 后可以通过逆行钉或轻微钉成功治疗

invasive locking plate. Retrograde femoral nailing has the advantage of less
侵入性锁定板。逆行股骨钉的优点是

blood loss and a shorter operating time. Reduction quality may be improved with
失血和更短的手术时间。还原质量可以提高

the minimal invasive locking plate fixation technique. Both surgery techniques
微创锁定板固定技术。两种手术技术

can be successfully used by orthopedic surgeons taking a case-by-case approach.
可由采用具体方法的骨科医生成功使用。


Copyright © by The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital.
版权所有 © The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital。


DOI: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.34270
DOI:10.14744/SEMB.2021.34270

PMCID: PMC8907704
PMCID:PMC8907704

PMID: 35317368
PMID:35317368



82. Chirurg. 2020 Oct;91(10):794-803. doi: 10.1007/s00104-020-01219-2.
82. 奇鲁格。2020 年 10 月;91(10):794-803.doi:10.1007/s00104-020-01219-2。


[Periprosthetic fractures: basics, classification and treatment principles].
[假体周围骨折:基础知识、分类和治疗原则]。


[Article in German]
[德文文章]


Everding J(1), Schliemann B(2), Raschke MJ(2).
埃弗丁 J(1),施利曼 B(2),拉施克 MJ(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Klinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie,
(1)创伤、手部和重建外科诊所

Universitätsklinikum Münster, Waldeyer Straße 1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
明斯特大学医院,Waldeyer Straße 1,48149,明斯特,德国。

jens.everding@ukmuenster.de.
jens.everding@ukmuenster.de。

(2)Klinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie,
(2)创伤、手部和重建外科诊所

Universitätsklinikum Münster, Waldeyer Straße 1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
明斯特大学医院,Waldeyer Straße 1,48149,明斯特,德国。


Periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) are becoming an increasingly important topic in
假体周围骨折 (PPFx) 正成为

orthopedics and trauma surgery due to the rising number of endoprosthetic joint
骨科和创伤外科,由于内假体关节的数量增加

replacements. The recently published unified classification system (UCS) has
更换。最近发布的统一分类系统 (UCS) 具有

replaced numerous historical classification systems and can be applied to all
取代了许多历史分类系统,并可应用于所有

PPFx regardless of the bone or joint involved. The treatment of PPFx requires
PPFx 无关。PPFx 的治疗需要

individual therapeutic concepts taking patient-dependent and patient-independent
采用患者依赖和患者独立个体化的个性化治疗理念

factors into consideration. The conservative treatment of PPFx is only justified
因素。PPFx 的保守治疗是合理的

in exceptional situations. In contrast, the choice between operative treatment
在特殊情况下。相比之下,手术治疗之间的选择

and deciding between osteosynthesis or revision arthroplasty is particularly
在接骨术或翻修关节置换术之间做出决定尤其

based on the assessment of the implant stability. In order to achieve fracture
基于对植入物稳定性的评估。为了实现断裂

consolidation and also a good functional outcome, knowledge of the basic
整合以及良好的功能结果,基础知识

biomechanical principles of operative (osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis)
手术的生物力学原理(接骨术或内假体)

treatment of periprosthetic fractures is necessary.
假体周围骨折的治疗是必要的。


DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01219-2
DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01219-2

PMID: 32564108 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:32564108 [MEDLINE 索引]



83. Injury. 2018 Feb;49(2):392-397. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.040. Epub 2017 Dec
83. 受伤。2018 年 2 月;49(2):392-397.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.040。Epub 2017 年 12 月

1.


Equivalent mortality and complication rates following periprosthetic distal
远端假体周围术后的等效死亡率和并发症发生率

femur fractures managed with either lateral locked plating or a distal femoral
股骨骨折使用外侧锁定钢板或股骨远端处理

replacement.
更换。


Hoellwarth JS(1), Fourman MS(2), Crossett L(3), Goodman M(3), Siska P(2),
Hoellwarth JS(1), Fourman MS(2), Crossett L(3), Goodman M(3), Siska P(2),

Moloney GB(2), Tarkin IS(2).
莫洛尼 GB(2),塔金 IS(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Traumatology, University of
(1)大学创伤学部骨外科

Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA, USA. Electronic
匹兹堡,第五大道 3471 号,匹兹堡,宾夕法尼亚州,15213,美国,美国。电子的

address: drjsoon@gmail.com.
地址: drjsoon@gmail.com.

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Traumatology, University of
(2)大学创伤学部骨外科

Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA, USA.
匹兹堡,第五大道 3471 号,匹兹堡,宾夕法尼亚州,15213,美国,美国。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center,
(3)匹兹堡大学医学中心骨科外科

5230 Centre Avenue, Suite 415, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA, USA.
5230 Centre Avenue, Suite 415, 匹兹堡, 宾夕法尼亚州, 15232, 美国, 美国。


INTRODUCTION: Management of distal femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty
引言:全膝关节置换术以上股骨远端骨折的管理

(TKA) remains challenging. Two common surgical options are locked lateral
(TKA) 仍然具有挑战性。两种常见的手术选择是外侧锁定

plating (LLP) and distal femoral arthroplasty (DFR). Unfortunately,
钢板 (LLP) 和股骨远端关节置换术 (DFR)。不幸

approximately 30-50% of patients may die within one year of injury, require
大约 30-50% 的患者可能在受伤后一年内死亡,需要

further surgery, or not regain prior mobility performance. We compared 87 LLP to
进一步手术,或无法恢复以前的活动能力。我们将 87 LLP 与

53 DFR patients - to our knowledge the largest comparative study - focusing on
53 名 DFR 患者 - 据我们所知,最大的比较研究 - 侧重于

90- and 365-day mortality, mobility maintenance, and further surgery.
90 天和 365 天死亡率、活动能力和进一步手术。

METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients at least 55 years old
方法: 我们对至少 55 岁的患者进行了回顾性评价

who sustained femur fractures near a primary TKA (essentially OTA-33 or Su types
在原发性 TKA 附近发生股骨骨折(主要是 OTA-33 或 Su 型

1, 2, or 3) from 2000 to 2015 assigning cohort based on treatment: LLP or DFR.
1、2 或 3)从 2000 年到 2015 年根据治疗分配队列:LLP 或 DFR。

We excluded patients having prior care for the injury, whose surgery was not for
我们排除了既往接受过损伤护理的患者,这些患者的手术不是为了

fracture (e.g. loosening), or having other surgical intervention (e.g.
骨折(例如 松动),或进行其他手术干预(例如

intramedullary nail).
髓内钉)。

RESULTS: Results Cohorts were similar based on body mass index and age adjusted
结果: 结果:根据体重指数和年龄调整后的队列相似

Charlson Comorbidity Index (aaCCI). LLP was more common than DFR for fractures
查尔森合并症指数 (aaCCI)。LLP 比 DFR 更常见骨折

above and at the level of the implant, but similar for fractures within the
在植入物的上方和水平,但与

implant for patients with aaCCI ≥ 5. LLP and DFR had similar mortality at
aaCCI ≥ 5 患者的植入物。LLP 和 DFR 的死亡率相似

90 days (9% vs 4%) and 365 days (22% vs 10%), need for additional surgery (9% vs
90 天 (9% vs 4%) 和 365 天 (22% vs 10%),需要额外手术 (9% vs 10%)

3%), and survivors maintaining ambulation (77% vs 81%). Patients whose surgery
3%),以及保持行走的幸存者(77% 对 81%)。手术

occurred 3 or more days after presentation had similar mortality risk to those
发病后 3 天或以上的死亡风险与

whose surgery was before 3days. The mean age of one year survivors was 77
手术时间在 3 天之前。一年幸存者的平均年龄为 77 岁

whereas for patients who died it was 85. Neither surgical choice nor aaCCI was
而死亡的患者为 85 人。手术选择和 aaCCI 都没有

associated with increased risk in time to surgery.
与手术时间增加有关。

CONCLUSIONS: Fracture location, remaining bone stock, and patient's prior
结论: 骨折位置、剩余骨量和患者既往

mobility and current comorbidities must guide treatment. Our study suggests that
活动能力和当前合并症必须指导治疗。我们的研究表明

90- and 365-day mortality, final mobility, and re-operation rate are not
90 天和 365 天死亡率、最终活动度和再次手术率不高

statistically different with LLP vs DFR management.
LLP 与 DFR 管理的统计差异。


Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.040
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.040

PMID: 29208310 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:29208310 [MEDLINE 索引]



84. Injury. 2020 Apr;51(4):1062-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.043. Epub 2020
84. 受伤。2020 年 4 月;51(4):1062-1068.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.043。Epub 2020 年

Feb 16.
2 月 16 日。


Equivalent union rates between intramedullary nail and locked plate fixation for
髓内钉和锁定板固定之间的等效愈合率

distal femur periprosthetic fractures - a systematic review.
股骨远端假体周围骨折 - 系统评价。


Shah JK(1), Szukics P(2), Gianakos AL(1), Liporace FA(1), Yoon RS(3).
沙阿 JK(1),苏基克斯 P(2),贾纳科斯 AL(1),Liporace FA(1),Yoon RS(3)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jersey City
(1)泽西市骨外科骨科

Medical Center - RWJ Barnabas Health, Jersey City, NJ 07302, United States.
医疗中心 - RWJ Barnabas Health,泽西城,新泽西州 07302,美国。

(2)Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Rowan University School of Osteopathic
(2)罗文大学骨科医学院骨科外科

Medicine, Stratford, NJ 08084, United States.
医学,斯特拉特福德,新泽西州 08084,美国。

(3)Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jersey City
(3)泽西市骨外科骨科

Medical Center - RWJ Barnabas Health, Jersey City, NJ 07302, United States.
医疗中心 - RWJ Barnabas Health,泽西城,新泽西州 07302,美国。

Electronic address: yoonrich@gmail.com.
电子地址:yoonrich@gmail.com。


BACKGROUND: The incidence of periprosthetic fracture following total knee
背景:全膝关节术后假体周围骨折的发生率

arthroplasty continues to rise as the number of knee arthroplasty procedures
随着膝关节置换术手术的数量增加,关节置换术的数量不断增加

increases. Management of periprosthetic fractures can be complex, with locked
增加。假体周围骨折的处理可能很复杂,包括锁定

compression plating (LCP) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) being the most
加压钢板 (LCP) 和髓内钉 (IMN) 是最

commonly used treatment options. We performed a systematic review to report and
常用的治疗方案。我们进行了系统评价,以报告和

compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with
比较接受治疗的患者的临床和影像学结局

intramedullary nail fixation versus plate fixation for periprosthetic fractures
髓内钉固定与钢板固定治疗假体周围骨折

of the distal femur.
股骨远端。

METHODS: Several databases were screened. Studies evaluating intramedullary nail
方法: 筛选了几个数据库。评估髓内钉的研究

fixation or locked plate fixation for distal femur periprosthetic fractures were
股骨远端假体周围骨折的固定或锁定钢板固定

included. Primary and secondary variables as mentioned below, when included,
包括。主变量和辅助变量,如下所述,如果包含,

were analyzed and compared.
进行了分析和比较。

RESULTS: One prospective comparative study, 9 retrospective comparative studies,
结果: 1 项前瞻性比较研究,9 项回顾性比较研究,

and 28 retrospective case series with 1,188 patients were included in this
纳入 28 个回顾性病例系列,涉及 1,188 名患者

review. No statistically significant differences were found between IMN and LCP
回顾。IMN 和 LCP 之间未发现统计学上的显著差异

when analyzing union rate or time to union. Plating demonstrated a statistically
在分析并集率或并集时间时。电镀在统计上展示了一个

significant decrease in the overall complication rate and reoperation rate when

compared with IMN (p<0.003). IMN demonstrated a slightly higher percentage of
与 IMN 相比 (p<0.003)。IMN 显示

patients reaching full weight bearing status and a quicker time to full weight
患者达到完全负重状态并更快地达到完全负重

bearing (100% and 7.6 weeks) when compared to plating (94% and 15.8 weeks). A
与电镀(94% 和 15.8 周)相比,轴承(100% 和 7.6 周)。一个

higher percentage of patients treated with IMN returned to preinjury activity
接受 IMN 治疗的患者恢复到受伤前活动的百分比更高

when compared to those treated with plating (70.8% vs. 61.6%).
与电镀处理的患者相比 (70.8% vs. 61.6%)。

CONCLUSIONS: Both intramedullary nail and locked plate fixation offer unique
结论: 髓内钉和锁定板固定均具有独特的

benefits in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes for treatment of
治疗

periprosthetic distal femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty. While the
全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折。虽然

standard of care remains controversial, an increase in the recent literature has
护理标准仍然存在争议,最近文献的增加

allowed for better clarification of the significant clinicoradiologic advantages
可以更好地阐明显著的临床放射学优势

and disadvantages of both popular treatment options.
以及两种流行治疗方案的缺点。


Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2020 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.043
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.043

PMID: 32115204 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:32115204 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of Competing Interests Regarding the
利益冲突声明:关于

manuscript entitled, ``Equivalent Union Rates Between Intramedullary Nail and
题为“髓内钉和

Locked Plate Fixation for Distal Femur Periprosthetic Fractures – a Systematic
股骨远端假体周围骨折的锁定钢板固定 – 一种系统性的

Review.'' On behalf of myself and my co-authors, we would like to state that no
评论。我们谨代表我自己和我的合著者声明,没有

grants, funding, or any other additional benefits were received in the

preparation or execution of this study
本研究的准备或执行



85. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 May 20;19(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04796-8.
85. J 骨科外科研究 2024 年 5 月 20 日;19(1):303.doi:10.1186/s13018-024-04796-8。


Clinical differences between periprosthetic and native distal femur fractures: a
假体周围骨折和自体股骨远端骨折的临床差异:a

comparative observational study.
比较观察研究。


Kong S(1), Tse S(1), Saade A(1), Bautista B(1), Haffner M(1), Saiz AM Jr(2).
孔 S(1)、谢 S(1)、Saade A(1)、包蒂斯塔 B(1)、Haffner M(1)、Saiz AM Jr(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis, 4860 Y
(1)加州大学戴维斯分校骨科外科, 4860 Y

Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Street, Suite 3800, 萨克拉门托, CA, 95817, 美国。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis, 4860 Y
(2)加州大学戴维斯分校骨科外科, 4860 Y

Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. amsaiz@ucdavis.edu.
Street, Suite 3800, 萨克拉门托, CA, 95817, 美国。amsaiz@ucdavis.edu。


INTRODUCTION: The incidence of periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PDFF) is
引言: 人工体周围股骨远端骨折 (PDFF) 的发生率

increasing as the number of total knee replacements becomes more common. This
随着全膝关节置换术的数量越来越普遍,这种情况会增加。这

study compared the demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment, and
研究比较了人口统计学、骨折特征、治疗和

outcomes of periprosthetic versus native distal femur fractures (NDFF).
人工体周围与自体股骨远端骨折 (NDFF) 的结果。

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients ≥ 18
材料和方法: 这是一项针对 18 ≥患者的回顾性队列研究

who underwent surgical fixation of NDFF or PDFF from 2012 to 2020 at a level-1
2012 年至 2020 年在 1 级接受了 NDFF 或 PDFF 手术固定的患者

trauma center. The main variables collected included demographics, AO/OTA
创伤中心。收集的主要变量包括人口统计学、AO/OTA

fracture classification, fixation construct, concomitant fractures, polytrauma
骨折分类、固定结构、伴随骨折、多发性创伤

rates, bone density, and reduction quality. Primary outcomes were unexpected
比率、骨密度和复位质量。主要结局是意外的

return to the operating room (UROR), hospital length of stay, and quality of
返回手术室 (UROR)、住院时间和质量

reduction. T-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate analyses were used
减少。使用 T 检验、Fisher 精确检验和多变量分析

for statistical analysis.
进行统计分析。

RESULTS: 209 patients were identified, including 70 PDFF and 139 NDFF. PDFF
结果: 确定了 209 例患者,包括 70 例 PDFF 和 139 例 NDFF。PDF 格式

patients were elderly females (81%) with isolated (80%) and comminuted (85%)
患者为老年女性 (81%),患有孤立性 (80%) 和粉碎性 (85%)

33 A.3 (71%) fractures. NDFF patients included 53% females, were commonly
33 例 A.3 (71%) 骨折。NDFF 患者包括 53% 的女性,通常

middle-aged, and displayed comminuted (92%) 33 C.2 fractures. 48% of NDFF
中年,显示粉碎性 (92%) 33 C.2 骨折。NDFF 的 48%

patients had concomitant fractures. Intramedullary nailing was the primary
患者伴有骨折。髓内钉是主要的

fixation for both groups, followed by nail-plate combination (37%) for PDFF and
两组均固定,然后是 PDFF 的指甲板组合 (37%)和

lateral locking plates (21%) for NDFF. NDFF patients experienced significantly
用于 NDFF 的侧锁定板 (21%)。NDFF 患者经历显著

longer hospital stays, higher UROR rates, and worse quality of reduction
住院时间更长,UROR 率更高,复位质量更差

(p < 0.05). PDFF patients had a significantly greater prevalence of low bone
(p < 0.05)。PDFF 患者的低骨患病率明显更高

density (p < 0.05).
密度 (P < 0.05)。

CONCLUSION: PDFF occur as isolated injuries with significant metaphyseal
结论: PDFF 表现为伴有显著干骺端的孤立性损伤

comminution in elderly females with low bone quality. NDFF commonly occurs in
骨质量低的老年女性的粉碎。NDFF 通常发生于

younger patients with less metaphyseal comminution and concomitant fractures.
干骺端粉碎较少且伴有骨折的年轻患者。

Intramedullary nailing was the most common treatment for both groups, although
髓内钉是两组最常见的治疗方法,尽管

preference for nail-plate combination fixation is increasing. NDFF type 33 C
对甲板联合固定的偏好正在增加。NDFF 类型 33 C

fractures are at greater risk of UROR.
骨折发生 UROR 的风险更大。


© 2024. The Author(s).
© 2024 年。作者。


DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04796-8
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04796-8

PMCID: PMC11103867
PMCID:PMC11103867

PMID: 38769547 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:38769547 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare the following financial
利益冲突声明:作者声明以下财务

interests/personal relationships which may be considered potential competing
可能被视为潜在竞争的利益/个人关系

interests: AMS: OTA: committee member; AAOS: committee member; ORS: committee
兴趣: AMS: OTA: 委员会成员;AAOS:委员会成员;ORS:委员会

member; AO North America: committee member.
成员;AO North America:委员会成员。



86. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Sep;33 Suppl 6:S29-S32. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001567.
86. J 骨科创伤。2019 年 9 月;33 增刊 6:S29-S32。doi: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000001567.


Setting Yourself Up for Success: Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing in
为成功做好准备:逆行髓内钉入

Periprosthetic Fractures About Total Knee Arthroplasty.
关于全膝关节置换术的假体周围骨折。


Medda S(1), Snoap T, Carroll EA.
Medda S(1),Snoap T,Carroll EA。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center,
(1)维克森林浸信会医疗中心骨科外科,

Winston-Salem, NC.
北卡罗来纳州温斯顿-塞勒姆。


Treatment of periprosthetic fractures above total knee arthroplasty remains
全膝关节置换术以上假体周围骨折的治疗

challenging because of assessment of implant stability and the short segment of
具有挑战性,因为需要评估植入物的稳定性和

often osteoporotic bone available for distal fixation. Fractures with
通常骨质疏松性骨可用于远端固定。骨折

significant medial comminution should undergo retrograde intramedullary nailing
严重的内碎应进行逆行髓内钉

or dual-implant fixation, as isolated lateral locked plating is not indicated.
或双重种植体固定,因为不需要孤立的侧向锁定钢板。

There are a multitude of objective and subjective factors incorporated into the
有许多客观和主观因素包含在

decision to proceed with retrograde nailing including assessment of the
决定进行逆行钉子,包括评估

patient's functional status, fracture morphology, implant stability, and
患者的功能状态、骨折形态、植入物稳定性以及

compatibility of the prosthesis with retrograde nailing. Here, we review the
假体与逆行钉的兼容性。在这里,我们回顾一下

steps to success in using retrograde intramedullary nailing in the treatment of
使用逆行髓内钉治疗

specific periprosthetic fractures about total knee arthroplasty.
关于全膝关节置换术的特定假体周围骨折。


DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001567
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000001567

PMID: 31404043 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:31404043 [MEDLINE 索引]



87. Scand J Surg. 2015 Sep;104(3):200-7. doi: 10.1177/1457496914552343. Epub 2014
87. Scand J 外科杂志 2015 年 9 月;104(3):200-7.doi: 10.1177/1457496914552343.Epub 2014 年

Oct 20.
10 月 20 日。


Operative Results of Periprosthetic Fractures of The Distal Femur In A Single
单根股骨远端假体周围骨折的手术结果

Academic Unit.
学术单位。


Leino OK(1), Lempainen L(2), Virolainen P(3), Sarimo J(2), Pölönen T(4), Mäkelä
Leino OK(1), Lempainen L(2), Virolainen P(3), Sarimo J(2), Pölönen T(4), Mäkelä

KT(3).
KT(3).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Turku University
(1)图尔库大学骨外科和创伤学系

Hospital, Turku, Finland oskari.leino@utu.fi.
芬兰 oskari.leino@utu.fi 图尔库医院。

(2)Hospital Neo, Turku, Finland.
(2)芬兰图尔库 Neo 医院。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Turku University
(3)图尔库大学骨外科和创伤学系

Hospital, Turku, Finland.
芬兰图尔库医院。

(4)Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
(4)芬兰图尔库图尔库大学生物统计学系。


BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Periprosthetic supracondylar fractures after total knee
背景和目的: 全膝关节后假体髁上骨折

arthroplasty are often associated with poor bone stock, fracture comminution,
关节置换术通常与骨量不良、骨折粉碎、

and loose components. Current operative methods include plating, intramedullary
和松散的组件。目前的手术方法包括钢板、髓内

nailing, and re-arthroplasty, depending on the fracture type. The aim of the
钉子和再关节置换术,具体取决于骨折类型。目标

study was to assess the outcome of operatively treated periprosthetic
研究旨在评估手术治疗的假体周围修复体的结局

supracondylar fractures at our institute with special interest on the use of
我们研究所的髁上骨折,特别关注

strut grafts in association with plating.
支柱移植物与电镀相关。

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 68 patients were included in the study. They had
材料和方法: 研究共纳入 68 例患者。他们有

been treated operatively due to a periprosthetic supracondylar fracture at our
由于假体周围髁上骨折在我们的

center between 2000 and 2010. The data of these patients were retrospectively
在 2000 年至 2010 年之间。这些患者的资料是回顾性的

collected from the electronic patient archives. Fractures with a fixed
从电子患者档案中收集。固定的骨折

prosthesis component were treated using internal fixation provided that there
假体组件使用内固定处理,前提是

was enough bone for osteosynthesis in the distal fracture fragment (39
骨骼足以在远端骨折碎片中进行接骨合成 (39

patients). Fractures with a loose prosthesis component were treated using
患者)。假体组件松动的骨折使用

re-arthroplasty (29 patients). The demographics of the two treatment groups did
再关节置换术(29 名患者)。两个治疗组的人口统计数据确实如此

not differ statistically significantly. Death or any re-operation was chosen as
在统计学上没有显著差异。死亡或任何再次手术被选为

the endpoint of follow-up. Cumulative survival percentages were estimated for
随访终点。估计

each treatment group.
每个治疗组。

RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment
结果: 治疗间无统计学意义差异

groups regarding clinical outcome. Clinical outcome was not assessable in nine
关于临床结果的组。9 项临床结局不可评估

patients. A positive clinical outcome was reported in 52 cases (88.1%). The
病人。52 例 (88.1%) 报告了积极的临床结局。这

survival of both laminofixation and re-arthroplasty was 75% at 3 years, but the
椎板固定术和再关节置换术在 3 年时的存活率均为 75%,但

survival of laminofixated fractures with strut graft was 80% compared to that of

51% without strut grafts. In all, 16 patients (24%) had a post-operative
51% 无支柱移植物。总共有 16 例患者 (24%) 术后

surgical site complication: seven infections (10%), six non-unions (15%), and
手术部位并发症:7 例感染 (10%),6 例不愈合 (15%),以及

three patellar dislocations (11%).
3 个髌骨脱位 (11%)。

CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative surgical site complications were relatively common
结论: 术后手术部位并发症相对常见

in these mainly elderly female patients. The survival percentages of the
在这些主要是老年女性患者中。的

re-arthroplasty and laminofixation groups were similar. The use of strut grafts
再关节置换术组和椎板固定组相似。支柱移植物的使用

in association with plating may decrease re-operation rate.
与电镀结合可能会降低再次手术率。


© The Finnish Surgical Society 2014.
© 芬兰外科学会 2014 年。


DOI: 10.1177/1457496914552343
DOI: 10.1177/1457496914552343

PMID: 25332221 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:25332221 [MEDLINE 索引]



88. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):189-192. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.056. Epub
88. J 关节置换术。2017 年 1 月;32(1):189-192.doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.056.电子版

2016 Aug 3.
2016 年 8 月 3 日。


Outcomes of Surgical Management of Supracondylar Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.
髁上假体股骨骨折手术治疗的结果。


Matlovich NF(1), Lanting BA(1), Vasarhelyi EM(1), Naudie DD(1), McCalden RW(1),
马特洛维奇 NF(1), 兰廷 BA(1), 瓦萨尔赫伊 EM(1), 诺迪 DD(1), 麦卡登 RW(1),

Howard JL(1).
霍华德 JL(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre Ontario, 339
(1)安大略省伦敦健康科学中心骨科外科,339

Windermere Road, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada.
Windermere Road, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada.


BACKGROUND: Fracture location is an important consideration in managing
背景:骨折位置是管理

supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures. The outcomes of locked plating and
髁上假体股骨周围骨折。锁定电镀和

intramedullary (IM) nail fixation were therefore compared based on fracture
因此,根据骨折比较髓内 (IM) 钉固定术

location, being above or at/below the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) flange.
位置,位于全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 法兰上方或下方。

METHODS: Fifty-seven patients were identified from surgical records as being
方法: 从手术记录中确定 57 例患者为

treated for supracondylar periprosthetic femur fracture with either a locking
治疗髁上假体股骨骨折,伴有锁定

plate (n = 38) or IM nail (n = 19). Based on fracture location, either above or
板 (n = 38) 或 IM 钉 (n = 19)。根据断裂位置,上述或

at/below the TKA flange, both groups were assessed for time to full weight
在 TKA 法兰/以下,两组都评估了达到全重的时间

bearing, time to radiographic union, number of postoperative complications,
方位、影像学愈合时间、术后并发症数量、

subsequent surgery, transfusion requirements, as well as range of motion, pain,
后续手术、输血需求以及关节活动度、疼痛、

and instability at most recent follow-up. Radiographs were reviewed to assess
以及最近一次随访的不稳定性。回顾 X 线片以评估

fracture alignment with comparisons made immediately postoperative to most
骨折对线与术后即刻与 MOST 进行比较

recent.
最近。

RESULTS: Mean follow-up for IM nail and locking plate fixation was 13.9 and 15.6
结果: IM 钉和锁定钢板固定的平均随访率分别为 13.9 和 15.6

months, respectively. There was no statistical difference between groups in the
月,分别。组间无统计学差异

mean time to fully weight bear, the incidence of postoperative pain, range of
完全负重的平均时间、术后疼痛的发生率、范围

motion, use of gait aids, time to full radiographic union, or the overall
运动、步态辅助设备的使用、放射学完全愈合的时间或整体

radiographic alignment of a healed fracture (P > .05). Comparison based on
愈合骨折的放射学对线 (P > .05)。比较依据

fracture location yielded similar outcomes. Nonunion was only demonstrated in
骨折位置产生相似的结果。骨不连仅在

the IM nail cohort, particularly for fractures below the TKA flange (n = 2).
IM 钉队列,特别是 TKA 法兰以下的骨折 (n = 2)。

CONCLUSION: The use of either IM nail or locking plate fixation for
结论:使用 IM 钉或锁定钢板固定

supracondylar periprosthetic fractures provides comparable clinical outcomes.
髁上假体周围骨折提供可比的临床结局。

Caution is recommended in using IM nails for fractures below the flange where
建议谨慎使用 IM 钉处理法兰以下的骨折,其中

limited fixation may increase the risk of nonunion.
有限的固定可能会增加骨不连的风险。


Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.
版权所有 © 2016。由 Elsevier Inc. 出版


DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.056
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.056

PMID: 27639307 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:27639307 [MEDLINE 索引]



89. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Nov 25;18(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1855-z.
89. BMC 肌肉骨骼 Disord。2017 年 11 月 25 日;18(1):490.doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1855-z。


A new classification of TKA periprosthetic femur fractures considering the
考虑到 TKA 股骨假体周围骨折的新分类

implant type.
植入物类型。


Fakler JKM(1), Pönick C(2), Edel M(2)(3), Möbius R(2)(3), Brand AG(2), Roth
Fakler JKM(1), Pönick C(2), Edel M(2)(3), Möbius R(2)(3), Brand AG(2), Roth

A(2), Josten C(2)(3), Zajonz D(2)(3).
A(2),Josten C(2)(3),Zajonz D(2)(3)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery,
(1)骨外科、创伤学和整形外科

University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.
莱比锡大学医院,Liebigstrasse 20,D-04103,莱比锡,德国。

Johannes.Fakler@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Johannes.Fakler@medizin.uni-leipzig.de。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery,
(2)骨外科、创伤学和整形外科

University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.
莱比锡大学医院,Liebigstrasse 20,D-04103,莱比锡,德国。

(3)ZESBO - Center for Research on Musculoskeletal Systems, University of
(3)ZESBO - 肌肉骨骼系统研究中心

Leipzig, Semmelweisstrasse 14, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.
莱比锡,Semmelweisstrasse 14,D-04103,莱比锡,德国。


BACKGROUND: The treatment aims of periprosthetic fractures (PPF) of the distal
背景: 远端假体周围骨折 (PPF) 的治疗目标

femur are a gentle stabilization, an early load-bearing capacity and a rapid
股骨是温和的稳定、早期的承载能力和快速的

postoperative mobilization of the affected patients. For the therapy planning of
受影响患者的术后活动。对于

PPF a standardized classification is necessary which leads to a clear and safe
PPF 标准化的分类是必要的,这样才能实现清晰和安全的

therapy recommendation. Despite different established classifications, there is
治疗建议。尽管已建立的分类不同,但存在

none that includes the types of prosthesis used in the assessment. For this
none 包括评估中使用的修复体类型。对于这个

purpose, the objective of this work is to create a new more extensive fracture
目的,这项工作的目标是创造一个新的更广泛的裂缝

and implant-related classification of periprosthetic fractures of the distal
以及远端假体周围骨折的种植体相关分类

femur based on available classifications which allows distinct therapeutic
股骨基于可用分类,允许不同的治疗

recommendations.
建议。

METHODS: In a retrospective analysis all patients who were treated in the
方法: 在回顾性分析中,所有接受

University Hospital Leipzig from 2010 to 2016 due to a distal femur fracture
2010 年至 2016 年因股骨远端骨折而在莱比锡大学医院

with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were established. To create an
建立全膝关节置换术 (TKA)。要创建

implant-associated classification the cases were discussed in a panel of
植入物相关分类病例在

experienced orthopaedists and well-practiced traumatologists with a great
经验丰富的骨科医生和训练有素的创伤学家,拥有出色的

knowledge in the field of endoprosthetics and fracture care. In this context,
内假体和骨折护理领域的知识。在此上下文中,

two experienced surgeons classified 55 consecutive fractures according to Su et
两位经验丰富的外科医生根据 Su et 对 55 例连续骨折进行了分类

al., Lewis and Rorabeck and by the new created classification. In this regard,
al., Lewis 和 Rorabeck 以及由新创建的分类。在这方面,

the interobserver reliability was determined for two independent raters in terms
观察者间可靠性是针对两个独立的评分者确定的

of Cohen Kappa.
科恩·卡帕 (Cohen Kappa)。

RESULTS: On the basis of the most widely recognized classifications of Su et al.
结果: 根据 Su 等人最广泛认可的分类。

as well as Lewis and Rorabeck, we established an implant-dependent
以及 Lewis 和 Rorabeck,我们建立了一个依赖于植入物的

classification for PPF of the distal femur. In accordance with the two stated
股骨远端 PPF 的分类。按照两个声明

classifications four fracture types were created and defined. Moreover, the four
分类 创建并定义了四种断裂类型。此外,这四个

most frequent prosthesis types were integrated. Finally, a new classification
整合了最常见的假体类型。最后,新的分类

with 16 subtypes was generated based on four types of fracture and four types of
具有 16 个亚型,基于四种类型的骨折和 4 种类型的

prosthesis. Considering all cases the presented implant-associated
義肢。考虑到所有情况,所提出的植入物相关

classification (κ = 0.74) showed a considerably higher interobserver reliability
分类 (κ = 0.74) 显示观察者间可靠性要高得多

compared to the other classifications of Su et al. (κ = 0.39) as well as Lewis
与 Su 等人 (κ = 0.39) 以及 Lewis 的其他分类相比

and Rorabeck (κ = 0.31). Excluding the cases which were only assessable by the
和 Rorabeck (κ = 0.31)。不包括只能由

new classification, it still shows a higher interobserver reliability (κ = 0.70)
新分类,它仍然显示出更高的观察者间可靠性 (κ = 0.70)

than the other ones (κ = 0.63 or κ = 0.45).
比其他值(κ = 0.63 或 κ = 0.45)。

CONCLUSIONS: The new classification system for PPF of the distal femur following
结论: 股骨远端 PPF 的新分类系统如下

TKA considers fracture location and implant type. It is easy to use, shows agood
TKA 考虑骨折位置和植入物类型。它易于使用,显示良好

interobserver reliability and allows conclusions to be drawn on treatment
观察者间可靠性,并允许得出治疗结论

recommendations. Moreover, further studies on the evaluation of the
建议。此外,对

classification are necessary and planned.
分类是必要的和有计划的。


DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1855-z
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1855-z

PMCID: PMC5702181
PMCID:PMC5702181

PMID: 29178860 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:29178860 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE: The
利益冲突声明:道德批准和同意参与:这

ethics committee of the University Hospital Leipzig, Germany, granted ethical
德国莱比锡大学医院伦理委员会被授予伦理认证

approval (ref. no. 044/14032016). The committee is listed in the Institutional
批准 (参考编号 044/14032016)。该委员会被列入机构

Review Board (IRB) of the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP)
人类研究保护办公室 (OHRP) 审查委员会 (IRB)

IORG0001320, IRB00001750. All patients of our study gave their written consent
IORG0001320,IRB00001750。我们研究的所有患者都给出了他们的书面同意

for participation and publication of their anonymized data. CONSENT FOR
参与和发布他们的匿名数据。同意

PUBLICATION: Not applicable. COMPETING INTERESTS: JKMF is a member of the
出版物:不适用。利益争夺:JKMF 是

Editorial Board of BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. The other authors declare no
BMC 肌肉骨骼疾病编辑委员会。其他作者声明否

competing interests. PUBLISHER’S NOTE: Springer Nature remains neutral with
利益争夺。出版商注:施普林格·自然 (Springer Nature) 对

regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
关于已发布的地图和机构中的管辖权要求

affiliations.
背景。



90. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jan;143(1):115-124. doi:
90. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 年 1 月;143(1):115-124.doi:

10.1007/s00402-021-04000-0. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
10.1007/s00402-021-04000-0。Epub 2021 年 6 月 29 日。


Short-term outcomes of periprosthetic compared to native distal femur fractures,
假体周围骨折与自体股骨远端骨折相比的短期结局,

a national database study.
一项国家数据库研究。


Upfill-Brown A(1), Arshi A(1), Sekimura T(1), Lee C(1), Stavrakis A(1), Sassoon
Upfill-Brown A(1), Arshi A(1), Sekimura T(1), Lee C(1), Stavrakis A(1), 沙宣

A(2).
A(2).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine At UCLA,
(1)加州大学洛杉矶分校大卫格芬医学院骨科外科

1255 15th St, Suite 2100, Santa Monica, Los Angeles, CA, 90404, USA.
1255 15th St, Suite 2100, 圣莫尼卡, 洛杉矶, CA, 90404, 美国。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine At UCLA,
(2)加州大学洛杉矶分校大卫格芬医学院骨科外科

1255 15th St, Suite 2100, Santa Monica, Los Angeles, CA, 90404, USA.
1255 15th St, Suite 2100, 圣莫尼卡, 洛杉矶, CA, 90404, 美国。

asassoon@mednet.ucla.edu.
asassoon@mednet.ucla.edu。


BACKGROUND: Distal femur fractures (DFFx) are highly morbid injuries with a
背景: 股骨远端骨折 (DFFx) 是高度病态的损伤,伴有

complication rate comparable to hip fractures. Rising rates of total knee
并发症发生率与髋部骨折相当。全膝关节的发生率升高

arthroplasty (TKA) have led to increasing rates of periprosthetic DFFx (pDFFx).
关节成形术 (TKA) 导致假体周围 DFFx (pDFFx) 的发生率增加。

We sought to determine how pDFFx complication rates differed from native DFFx
我们试图确定 pDFFx 并发症发生率与天然 DFFx 有何不同

(nDFFx).
(nDFFx) 的

METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement
方法: 美国外科医师学会全国手术质量改进

Program (ACS NSQIP) was used to identify patients who sustained pDFFx or nDFFx
程序 (ACS NSQIP) 用于识别持续 pDFFx 或 nDFFx 的患者

between 2012 and 2018. Patients were further stratified by operative treatment:
在 2012 年至 2018 年之间。患者通过手术治疗进一步分层:

open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or distal femur replacement (DFR).
切开复位内固定术 (ORIF) 或股骨远端置换术 (DFR)。

Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare 30-day complication rates
多因素 logistic 回归 用于比较 30 天并发症发生率

between pDFFx versus nDFFx and, among pDFFx patients, ORIF versus DFR or
pDFFx 与 nDFFx 之间,以及在 pDFFx 患者中,ORIF 与 DFR 或

revision TKA (rTKA).
修订版 TKA (rTKA)。

RESULTS: 563 patients with pDFFx and 2259 patients with nDFFx were identified
结果: 确定了 563 例 pDFFx 患者和 2259 例 nDFFx 患者

between 2012 and 2018. pDFFx patients had significantly lower rates of ORIF than
在 2012 年至 2018 年之间。pDFFx 患者的 ORIF 发生率显著低于

nDFFx patients (36.4 vs 95.4%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, pDFFx were
nDFFx 患者 (36.4 vs 95.4%,p < 0.001)。在多变量分析中,pDFFx

associated with a higher rate of surgical site complications (OR 2.48,
与较高的手术部位并发症发生率相关 (OR 2.48,

p = 0.009) compared to nDFFx. There were no differences in mortality,
p = 0.009)与 nDFFx 相比。死亡率没有差异,

reoperations, major complications, rate of blood transfusion, venous
再次手术、主要并发症、输血速率、静脉

thromboembolism and disposition. In patients with pDFFx, patients undergoing
血栓栓塞和处置。在 pDFFx 患者中,接受

DFR/rTKA were more likely to be discharged home versus a rehab facility,
与康复机构相比,DFR/rTKA 更有可能出院回家,

compared to those undergoing ORIF (OR 2.62, p < 0.001).
与接受 ORIF 的患者相比 (OR 2.62,p < 0.001)。

CONCLUSIONS: In this first large registry study comparing pDFFx and nDFFx, we
结论: 在第一项比较 pDFFx 和 nDFFx 的大型注册研究中,我们

find similar outcomes between these groups in the first 30 days after surgery.
在手术后的前 30 天内发现这些组之间的相似结局。

Patients with pDFFx did have higher rates of surgical site complications,
pDFFx 患者的手术部位并发症发生率确实较高,

including infection and dehiscence. In pDFFx patients, those undergoing DFR were
包括感染和裂开。在 pDFFx 患者中,接受 DFR 的患者

more likely to return home post-operatively.
术后更有可能回家。


© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany,
© 2021 年。作者,经德国 Springer-Verlag GmbH 独家许可,

part of Springer Nature.
施普林格自然的一部分。


DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04000-0
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04000-0

PMID: 34185154 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:34185154 [MEDLINE 索引]



91. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Jan;29(1):189-196. doi:
91. Eur J 骨科外科创伤。2019 年 1 月;29(1):189-196.doi:

10.1007/s00590-018-2266-z. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
10.1007/s00590-018-2266-z。Epub 2018 年 6 月 22 日。


Clinical outcome and quality of life of patients with periprosthetic distal
远端假体周围患者的临床结局和生活质量

femur fractures and retained total knee arthroplasty treated with polyaxial
股骨骨折和多轴治疗固位全膝关节置换术

locking plates: a single-center experience.
锁定钢板:单中心体验。


Lotzien S(1), Hoberg C(2), Hoffmann MF(2), Schildhauer TA(2).
Lotzien S(1),Hoberg C(2),Hoffmann MF(2),Schildhauer TA(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil,
(1)BG 大学医院 Bergmannsheil,

Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany. sebastianlotzien@hotmail.com.
Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, 波鸿, 德国.sebastianlotzien@hotmail.com。

(2)Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil,
(2)BG 大学医院 Bergmannsheil,

Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, 波鸿, 德国.


PURPOSE: The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) increased rapidly. In
目的: 全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 的数量迅速增加。在

conjunction with higher implantation rates, periprosthetic femur fractures
结合较高的植入率,股骨假体周围骨折

following TKA are also gradually increasing. Purpose of this study was to
随后的 TKA 也在逐渐增加。本研究的目的是

evaluate polyaxial locking plate treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures
评估股骨假体周围骨折的多轴锁定钢板治疗

with retained total knee replacement using polyaxial locking plates in regard to
使用多轴锁定板进行固位全膝关节置换术

quality of life, functional outcome and complications.
生活质量、功能结果和并发症。

METHODS: The Study design is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis.
方法: 研究设计是单中心回顾性队列分析。

Included were patients with periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures with
包括假体周围髁上股骨骨折患者

a well-fixed knee prosthesis initially treated with NCB plate (Non-contact
固定良好的膝关节假体最初使用 NCB 板治疗(非接触式

bridging plate, Zimmer Inc., Warsaw, IN). Primary outcome was measured including
桥接板,Zimmer Inc.,印第安纳州华沙)。测量的主要结局包括

quality of life and functional status using the SMFA-D score (German short
使用 SMFA-D 评分(德语简称

musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire), the mortality rate and union
肌肉骨骼功能评估问卷)、死亡率和 UNION

rate. Formerly published SMFA-data presenting representative randomly chosen
率。以前发布的 SMFA 数据呈现代表是随机选择的

cross-sectional data from general population of the USA and Dutch population was
来自美国和荷兰人口的一般人群的横断面数据为

used as historic control group.
用作历史对照组。

RESULTS: In total, 45 patients with a mean age of 74 years were included (10
结果: 共纳入 45 例平均年龄为 74 岁的患者 (10

males; 35 females). Body mass index averaged 27.4 kg/m2. Follow-up averaged
男性;35 名女性)。体重指数平均为 27.4 kg/m2。平均随访率

52 months. Comparison of the SMFA-D scores showed higher scores according to
52 个月。SMFA-D 分数的比较显示更高的分数

bother index (41.5 vs. 15.7/13.8) and function index (42.5 vs. 14.5/12.7).
烦恼指数(41.5 对 15.7/13.8)和功能指数(42.5 对 14.5/12.7)。

Mortality rate was 26.7%. The CCI was directly related to the mortality rate
死亡率为 26.7%。CCI 与死亡率直接相关

(p = 0.033). Union was achieved in 35 of 45 fractures (78%) six months after the
(p = 0.033)。45 例骨折中有 35 例 (78%) 在

index procedure. The ultimate union rate including following procedures at last
索引过程。最终的工会费率包括最后的以下程序

follow-up was 95.6%.
随访率为 95.6%。

CONCLUSION: Besides already highlighted limitations in range of motion, we
结论:除了已经强调的运动范围限制外,我们还

quantified patient-related limitations in daily living. A large number of
量化了日常生活中与患者相关的限制。大量

patients after surgery are not self-reliant mobile or on orthopedic aids. A high
手术后的患者不能自力更生地移动或依赖骨科辅助设备。一个 高

CCI was directly related to the mortality rate and can be used as a predictive
CCI 与死亡率直接相关,可用作预测

factor for postoperative mortality.
术后死亡率的因素。


DOI: 10.1007/s00590-018-2266-z
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-018-2266-z

PMID: 29931530 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:29931530 [MEDLINE 索引]



92. J Arthroplasty. 2025 Jun;40(6):1622-1628. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.010. Epub
92. J 关节置换术。2025 年 6 月;40(6):1622-1628.doi:10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.010.电子版

2024 Nov 15.
2024 年 11 月 15 日。


Reoperations After Operatively and Non-Operatively Treated Periprosthetic Knee
手术和非手术治疗膝关节假体周围手术后的再次手术

Fractures: A Nationwide Study on 1,931 Fractures After Primary Total Knee
骨折:对初次全膝关节术后 1,931 例骨折的全国性研究

Arthroplasty.
置换 术。


Risager SK(1), Arndt KB(2), Abrahamsen CS(2), Viberg B(1), Odgaard A(3),
里萨格尔 SK(1), 阿恩特 KB(2), 亚伯拉罕森 CS(2), 维伯格 B(1), 奥德加德 A(3),

Lindberg-Larsen M(1).
林德伯格-拉森 M(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic and traumatology, Odense University Hospital,
(1)欧登塞大学医院骨科和创伤科,

Odense, Denmark.
丹麦欧登塞。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Lillebaelt,
(2)利勒巴伊尔特医院骨科外科和创伤科,

University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.
南丹麦大学医院,丹麦科灵。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Rigshospitalet,
(3)Rigshospitalet 骨外科和创伤科,

Copenhagen, Denmark.
丹麦哥本哈根。


BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic knee fracture (PPKF) following total knee
背景:全膝关节术后假体周围膝关节骨折 (PPKF)

arthroplasty (TKA) can be difficult to treat. A PPKF can be treated both
关节置换术 (TKA) 可能难以治疗。PPKF 可以同时处理

operatively and nonoperatively, and the treatment varies between fracture sites.
手术和非手术,并且治疗因骨折部位而异。

This study aimed to assess the risk of reoperation according to the fracture
本研究旨在根据骨折评估再次手术的风险

site and treatment of the PPKF.
PPKF 的部位和治疗。

METHOD: This study is a nationwide cohort study using register data from 1997 to
方法: 本研究是一项全国性的队列研究,使用 1997 年至 1997 年的注册数据

2022. Cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized primary TKA were identified
2022. 确定了交叉骨保留或后稳定原发性 TKA

from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Subsequent PPKFs, fracture
来自丹麦膝关节置换术登记册。后续 PPKF、骨折

treatments, and later reoperations were identified through the International
治疗,后来的再次手术是通过国际

Classification of Diseases, tenth edition (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes
疾病分类,第十版 (ICD-10) 诊断和程序代码

in the Danish National Patient Register. In addition, indications for revision
在丹麦国家患者登记册中。此外,翻修指征

total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register were
丹麦膝关节置换术登记册中的全膝关节置换术 (rTKA) 为

used to identify PPKFs and the reason for reoperation.
用于识别 PPKF 和再次手术的原因。

RESULTS: We included 1,931 PPKFs (1,494 femoral, 207 patellae, and 230 tibial)
结果: 我们纳入了 1,931 例 PPKF (1,494 例股骨、207 例髌骨和 230 例胫骨)

with an overall two-year reoperation risk of 20% (95% confidence interval (CI):
总体两年再手术风险为 20% (95% 置信区间 (CI):

18 to 23). Femoral PPKFs had a two-year reoperation risk of 16% (CI: 12 to 22)
18 到 23)。股骨 PPKF 的两年再手术风险为 16% (CI: 12 至 22)

after nonoperative treatment and 21% (CI: 18 to 24) after operative treatment.
非手术治疗后和 21% (CI: 18 至 24) 术后。

Patellar PPKFs had a two-year reoperation risk in five to 17 after nonoperative
髌骨 PPKF 在非手术后 5 至 17 年有 2 年再次手术风险

treatment and 46% (CI: 30 to 69) after operative treatment. Tibial PPKFs had a
治疗和 46% (CI: 30 至 69) 术后。胫骨 PPKF 的

two-year reoperation risk of 17% (CI: 11 to 27) after nonoperative treatment and
非手术治疗后两年再手术风险为 17%(CI:11 至 27),并且

36% (25 to 53) after operative treatment.
手术治疗后 36% (25 至 53)。

CONCLUSIONS: The overall two-year reoperation risk was 20% (CI: 18 to 23).
结论: 总体两年再手术风险为 20% (CI: 18 至 23)。

Operative-treated PPKFs had a higher risk of reoperation across all fracture
手术治疗的 PPKFs 在所有骨折中再次手术的风险更高

locations. The highest reoperation risk was found after operatively treated
地点。手术治疗后再次手术风险最高

patella and tibial PPKFs (46 and 36%, respectively), and the lowest reoperation
髌骨和胫骨 PPKF(分别为 46% 和 36%),并且再次手术率最低

risk was found after nonoperative-treated patella PPKFs.
在非手术治疗的髌骨 PPKF 后发现风险。


Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2024 作者。由 Elsevier Inc. 出版保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.010
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.010

PMID: 39549884 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:39549884 [MEDLINE 索引]



93. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Mar;136(3):331-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2374-8.
93. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 年 3 月;136(3):331-8.doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2374-8。

Epub 2015 Dec 8.
Epub 2015 年 12 月 8 日。


Comparison of retrograde nailing and minimally invasive plating for treatment of
逆行钉和微创钢板治疗

periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures (OTA 33-A) above total knee
全膝关节以上假体髁上骨折 (OTA 33-A)

arthroplasty.
置换 术。


Park J(1)(2), Lee JH(3).
Park J(1)(2),Lee JH(3)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Catholic Kwandong
(1)天主教观东医学院骨外科

University, International St. Mary's Hospital, 25, Simgok-ro 100 beon-gil,
大学, 国际圣玛丽医院, 25, Simgok-ro 100 beon-gil,

Seo-gu, Incheon, 404-834, Republic of Korea. parkjinos@gmail.com.
仁川西区,404-834,大韩民国。parkjinos@gmail.com。

(2)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical School and Research Institute of
(2)医学院骨外科系

Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
韩国全州全北国立大学临床医学。

parkjinos@gmail.com.
parkjinos@gmail.com。

(3)Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical School and Research Institute of
(3)医学院骨外科系

Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
韩国全州全北国立大学临床医学。

jhlee55@jbnu.ac.kr.
jhlee55@jbnu.ac.kr。


INTRODUCTION: Retrograde intramedullary (IM) nailing and minimally invasive
引言:逆行髓内 (IM) 钉和微创

plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using locking plate are typically considered the
使用锁定钢板的钢板接骨术 (MIPO) 通常被认为是

gold standards of treatment for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures
假体周围髁上股骨骨折的治疗金标准

above total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 以上。

METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients treated with either retrograde nailing
方法: 41 例连续接受逆行钉治疗的患者

(nail group, n = 20) or minimally invasive plating (plate group, n = 21) for
(钉子组,n = 20)或微创电镀(板组,n = 21)

periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures between March 2003 and January
2003 年 3 月至 1 月期间假体髁上股骨骨折

2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical functions [arc range of motion and
对 2014 年进行了回顾性分析。临床功能 [弧关节活动度和

the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
西安大略大学和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数 (WOMAC)

score] and bony outcomes (bony union and malunion) were evaluated.
评分] 和骨结局 (骨联合和畸形愈合)。

RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the nail and plate groups
结果: 钉组和板组之间没有统计学差异

in age (p = 0.665), one-year postoperative arc range of motion (p = 0.642),
年龄 (p = 0.665)、术后 1 年弧形运动范围 (p = 0.642)、

preoperative WOMAC score (p = 0.076), postoperative one-year WOMAC score (p =
术前 WOMAC 评分 (p = 0.076),术后一年 WOMAC 评分 (p =

0.135), and union time (p = 0.081). The mean union time of the nail group and
0.135) 和联合时间 (p = 0.081)。钉子组的平均联合时间 和

the plate group was 4.3 months (range 3-12 months) and 3.6 months (range 3-5
板组为 4.3 个月 (范围 3-12 个月) 和 3.6 个月 (范围 3-5

months), respectively. There were three cases of malalignment in the nail group,
月),分别。甲组有 3 例错位,

whereas there was one case of malalignment in the plate group (p = 0.343). One
而板组有 1 例错位 (p = 0.343)。一

case of nailing using a short nail demonstrated nail breakage.
使用短钉钉的案例表明指甲断裂。

CONCLUSIONS: Although retrograde nailing was found to have a slightly higher
结论: 虽然发现逆行钉子的

rate of malunion compared to minimally invasive plating, there was no
畸形愈合率与微创钢板相比,没有

statistically significant difference between both treatment options in terms of
两种治疗方案在以下方面具有统计学意义差异

clinical outcomes. Regardless of which implant is used, the proper application
临床结果。无论使用哪种植入物,正确的应用

is essential in management of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures
在治疗假体周围髁上股骨骨折中是必不可少的

above TKA.
TKA 以上。


DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2374-8
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2374-8

PMID: 26646847 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:26646847 [MEDLINE 索引]



94. Knee. 2023 Mar;41:204-213. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.12.002. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
94. 膝盖。2023 年 3 月;41:204-213。doi:10.1016/j.knee.2022.12.002.Epub 2023 年 1 月 30 日。


Biomechanical analysis of different fixation methods for Rorabeck II
Rorabeck II 不同固定方法的生物力学分析

supracondylar femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty.
全膝关节置换术后股骨髁上骨折。


Yuan D(1), Wu Z(2), Xu S(2), Wu X(2), Teng J(2), Ye C(3).
袁 D(1)、吴 Z(2)、徐 S(2)、吴 X(2)、滕 J(2)、叶 C(3)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical
(1)贵州医科附属医院骨科

University, Guiyang, China; Center for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells,
大学,贵阳,中国;组织工程和干细胞中心

Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China; Sports Medicine, The Affiliated
贵州医科大学,中国贵阳;运动医学,附属机构

Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
贵州医科大学附属医院,贵阳,中国。

(2)Department of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical
(2)贵州医科附属医院骨科

University, Guiyang, China; Center for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells,
大学,贵阳,中国;组织工程和干细胞中心

Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
贵州医科大学,中国贵阳。

(3)Department of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical
(3)贵州医科附属医院骨科

University, Guiyang, China; Center for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells,
大学,贵阳,中国;组织工程和干细胞中心

Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China. Electronic address:
贵州医科大学,中国贵阳。电子地址:

yechuanchina@hotmail.com.
yechuanchina@hotmail.com。


BACKGROUND: Locking plate (LP) and retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) are
背景: 锁定钢板 (LP) 和逆行髓内钉 (RIMN) 是

widely used to fix Rorabeck II supracondylar femoral fractures after total knee
广泛用于修复全膝关节后 Rorabeck II 股骨髁上骨折

arthroplasty (TKA). The biomechanical properties of the implant used for
关节置换术 (TKA)。用于

treatment influence its longevity. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the
治疗会影响其寿命。因此,我们旨在评估

biomechanical stability of different fixations using finite element analysis.
使用有限元分析的不同固定的生物力学稳定性。

METHODS: Seven finite element models (FEMs) were established, including LP
方法: 建立了 7 个有限元模型 (FEM),包括 LP

groups (short LP, long LP, and double LP), RIMN groups (short RIMN and long
组(短 LP、长 LP 和双 LP)、RIMN 组(短 RIMN 和长 RIMN

RIMN), and mixed groups (long LP with short RIMN and long LP with long RIMN).
RIMN) 和混合组(长 LP 带短 RIMN 和长 LP 带长 RIMN)。

The stress of the implants around the fracture area was calculated to evaluate
计算骨折区域周围植入物的应力以评估

the biomechanical stability under loads.
负载下的生物力学稳定性。

RESULTS: Stress was mainly distributed around the fracture area in all models.
结果: 应力主要分布在骨折区周围。

The stress-shielding phenomenon was most evident in the short LP. The trend in
应力屏蔽现象在短 LP 中最为明显。趋势

maximum equivalent stress values of implants around the fracture area for the
骨折区域周围植入物的最大等效应力值

seven internal fixations was: short LP (324.63 MPa) > short RIMN
7 次内固定分别为:短 LP (324.63 MPa) >短 RIMN

(306.37 MPa) > long LP (275.06 MPa) > long RIMN (262.74 MPa) > double LP
(306.37 MPa) >长 LP (275.06 MPa) >长 RIMN (262.74 MPa) >双 LP

(203.19 MPa) > long LP with short RIMN (124.42 MPa) > long LP with long RIMN
(203.19 MPa) > 长 LP 带短 RIMN (124.42 MPa) >长 LP 带长 RIMN

(112.41 MPa). We found that the double LP can better disperse the stress than a
(112.41 MPa) 的我们发现,双 LP 比

single LP, and a long LP with long RIMN can prevent stress concentration and
单个 LP 和具有长 RIMN 的长 LP 可以防止应力集中和

make the stress distribution more uniform.
使应力分布更加均匀。

CONCLUSION: From the perspective of biomechanics, long LP with long RIMN can
结论: 从生物力学的角度来看,长 LP 和长 RIMN 可以

stabilize fractures and avoid stress concentration in Rorabeck II supracondylar
稳定骨折并避免应力集中于 Rorabeck II 髁上

femoral fractures after TKA.
TKA 后股骨骨折。


Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2022 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.12.002
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.12.002

PMID: 36724579 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:36724579 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors
利益冲突声明:利益争夺声明作者

declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal
声明他们没有已知的相互竞争的经济利益或个人利益

relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this
关系似乎可能影响了本文报道的工作

paper.
纸。



95. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Sep;33 Suppl 6:S18-S20. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001571.
95. J 骨科创伤。2019 年 9 月;33 增刊 6:S18-S20。doi: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000001571.


Nail and Plate Combination Fixation for Periprosthetic and Interprosthetic
用于假体周围和假体间的钉板联合固定

Fractures.
骨折。


Yoon RS(1), Patel JN, Liporace FA.
Yoon RS(1),Patel JN,Liporace FA。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Division of Orthopaedic Trauma and Complex Adult Reconstruction, Department
(1)骨科创伤与成人复杂重建科

of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jersey City Medical Center, Jersey City, NJ.
新泽西州泽西市泽西市医疗中心骨科外科。


Nail plate combination technique can be applied in the setting of periprosthetic
指甲板组合技术可应用于假体周围

and interprosthetic fractures to promote reliable healing with a biomechanically
和假体间骨折,以促进生物力学的可靠愈合

favorable construct. Here, technical aspects and discussion of the technique are
有利的结构。在这里,技术方面和对该技术的讨论是

reviewed through a case of an 87-year-old woman who suffered from an
通过一位 87 岁女性的案例进行了审查,该女性患有

interprosthetic "floating" total knee arthroplasty (TKA); a supracondylar distal
假体间“浮动”全膝关节置换术 (TKA);远端髁上

femur fracture in between a total hip arthroplasty and a TKA, with a proximal
股骨骨折介于全髋关节置换术和 TKA 之间,近端

tibial metaphyseal fracture below the TKA tibial base plate.
TKA 胫骨底板下方的胫骨干骺端骨折。


DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001571
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000001571

PMID: 31404040 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:31404040 [MEDLINE 索引]



96. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2022 Jun 30;24(3):193-199. doi:
96. Ortop 创伤康复。2022 年 6 月 30 日;24(3):193-199.doi:

10.5604/01.3001.0015.9058.


An Assessment of Factors That Influence Outcome Following Fixation of
对固定后影响结果的因素的评估

Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures Associated with Total Knee Arthroplasty.
与全膝关节置换术相关的假体股骨远端骨折。


Fakoya K(1), Sedarous R(1), Seifo M(1), Okoro T(1).
法科亚 K(1),塞达鲁斯 R(1),塞福 M(1),奥科罗 T(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury
(1)皇家什鲁斯伯里医院创伤与骨科部门,什鲁斯伯里

and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust, Mytton Oak Road, Shrewsbury.
和 Telford Hospitals NHS Trust,Shrewsbury 的 Mytton Oak Road。


BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic distal femur fractures following total knee
背景:全膝关节后股骨假体周围远端骨折

arthroplasty (PDFFTKA) are increasingly common [1], mainly in elderly patients
关节置换术 (PDFFTKA) 越来越常见 [1],主要见于老年患者

with significant co-morbidities [2]. Surgical management usually requires
伴有严重的合并症 [2]。手术治疗通常需要

balancing prompt fixation for early mobilization with the need to consider the
平衡早期活动的及时固定与考虑

least physiologically demanding option [3].The aim of this study was to assess
对生理要求最低的选择 [3]。本研究的目的是评估

predictors of clinical and radiological outcome in patients with PDFFTKA treated
PDFFTKA 治疗患者临床和放射学结局的预测因子

with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).
切开复位内固定术 (ORIF)。

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients managed for
材料和方法: 一项接受治疗的患者的回顾性队列研究

PDFFTKA over the last 21 years in the Trauma &amp; Orthopaedics Department of
PDFFTKA 在过去的 21 年里在创伤和骨科部门

the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital (RSH) was carried out. Radiological images, pre-
皇家什鲁斯伯里医院 (RSH) 进行了。放射学图像,前

and post-operatively, were assessed for fracture related parameters. Last known
和术后,评估骨折相关参数。最后已知

functional status was evaluated using the most recent outpatient review letters.
使用最近的门诊评论信评估功能状态。

After assessment of normality of data, evaluation of predictors of clinical and
在评估数据的正常性后,评估临床和

radiological outcome was made using correlation analyses.
使用相关性分析得出放射学结局。

RESULTS: There was no statistically significant correlation between age, primary
结果: 年龄、原发性

TKA to fracture interval, and length of intact medial cortex vs clinical outcome
TKA 与骨折间隔和完整内侧皮层长度 vs 临床结局

for the parametric variables evaluated. For non-parametric variables assessed,
对于计算的参数变量。对于评估的非参数变量,

there was a statistically significant correlation between clinical outcome and
临床结果与

evidence of callus formation (Spearman rho value -0.476; p=0.022). In
愈伤组织形成的证据 (Spearman rho 值 -0.476;p = 0.022)。在

stratifying the patients with poor and good outcome, there was no difference
对预后较差和预后良好的患者进行分层,无差异

noted in primary TKA to fracture interval, or length of intact medial cortex
在原发性 TKA 到骨折间期或完整内侧皮层的长度中注意到

(mm) between both groups. In terms of the number of comminuted fragments and
(mm) 在两组之间。就粉碎碎片的数量和

anterior flange to fracture distance (mm), there was also no difference noted
前法兰到骨折距离 (mm),也没有注意到差异

between the poor and good functional groups.
在较差和良好的官能团之间。

CONCLUSIONS: 1. There was no observed correlation in pre-operative patient and
结论: 1. 在术前患者中未观察到相关性,并且

fracture related variables with outcome in this population of patients with
骨折相关变量与该

PDFFTKA. 2. Post-operative evidence of callus formation appears to be directly
PDFFTKA 的。2. 愈伤组织形成的术后证据似乎是直接的

related to better clinical outcomes.
与更好的临床结果相关。


DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.9058
DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.9058

PMID: 36888643 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:36888643 [MEDLINE 索引]



97. Int Orthop. 2015 Oct;39(10):1951-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2970-9. Epub 2015
97. 国际骨科 2015 年 10 月;39(10):1951-7.doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2970-9。Epub 2015 年

Aug 25.
8 月 25 日。


Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur following total knee arthroplasty:
全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折:

even very distal fractures can be successfully treated using internal fixation.
即使是非常远端的骨折也可以使用内固定成功治疗。


Kim W(1), Song JH(1), Kim JJ(2).
Kim W(1), Song JH(1), Kim JJ(2).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan
(1)蔚山大学峨山医疗中心骨外科

College of Medicine, 86, Asanbyeongwongil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea.
医学院,86, Asanbyeongwongil, Songpa-gu, 首尔, 138-736, 韩国。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan
(2)蔚山大学峨山医疗中心骨外科

College of Medicine, 86, Asanbyeongwongil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea.
医学院,86, Asanbyeongwongil, Songpa-gu, 首尔, 138-736, 韩国。

jjkim2@amc.seoul.kr.
jjkim2@amc.seoul.kr。


PURPOSE: We treat periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur above total knee
目的: 我们治疗全膝关节以上股骨远端假体周围骨折

arthroplasty using single or double plating and the minimally invasive plate
使用单板或双板和微创板的关节置换术

osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique. Here, we report the results of using this
接骨术 (MIPO) 技术。在这里,我们报告使用它的结果

operative treatment and our analysis of whether very distally extended fractures
手术治疗和我们对 Very far extended 骨折是否向远端延伸的分析

can also be successfully treated using internal fixation.
也可以使用内固定成功治疗。

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 32 periprosthetic distal femoral fractures.
方法: 我们回顾性回顾了 32 例假体周围股骨远端骨折。

Mean patient age was 73 years and mean follow-up period 25 months. There were 11
患者平均年龄为 73 岁,平均随访期为 25 个月。有 11 个

(34.4 %) Su type I/II and 21 (65.6 %) type III fractures. All Su type I/II
(34.4 %)Su I/II 型和 21 例 (65.6%) III 型骨折。所有 Su 类型 I/II

fractures were treated by single plating, whereas 14 of 21 (66.7 %) type III
骨折采用单钢板治疗,而 21 例中有 14 例 (66.7%) 采用 III 型

fractures were treated using double plating and the MIPO technique. We defined
骨折采用双钢板和 MIPO 技术治疗。我们定义了

bony union as the primary endpoint of this study based on callus formation
骨结合作为本研究基于愈伤组织的研究的主要终点

across the fracture site at two or more cortices (1 medial and 1 other) on 3D
在 3D 上的两个或多个皮质(1 个内侧皮质和 1 个其他皮质)的骨折部位

computed tomography (CT).
计算机断层扫描 (CT)。

RESULTS: Bony union was confirmed in 30 cases (93.8 %) after a mean time to
结果: 30 例 (93.8%) 在平均时间

union of 3.7 (range, 3-7) months. Two patients showed nonunion (6.2 %), and one
3.7 个月(范围,3-7)个月的联合。2 例患者出现骨不连 (6.2%),1 例

demonstrated delayed union (3.1 %), none of whom complied with our
表现出延迟愈合 (3.1 %),没有人遵守我们的

rehabilitation protocol. There was one instance of nonunion among both Su types
康复协议。两种 Su 类型中都有一个不愈合的实例

I/II and III fractures; however, this difference was not significant
I/II 和 III 骨折;然而,这种差异并不显著

(p = 0.577).
(p = 0.577)。

CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur can be successfully
结论: 股骨远端假体周围骨折可成功

healed using internal fixation, either the single- or double-plate MIPO
使用内固定愈合,单板或双板 MIPO

technique, even for very distally extended fractures.
技术,即使对于非常远端延伸的骨折也是如此。


DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2970-9
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2970-9

PMID: 26300375 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:26300375 [MEDLINE 索引]



98. World J Orthop. 2017 Oct 18;8(10):809-813. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i10.809.
98. 世界骨科杂志。2017 年 10 月 18 日;8(10):809-813.doi:10.5312/wjo.v8.i10.809。

eCollection 2017 Oct 18.
eCollection 2017 年 10 月 18 日。


Managing extremely distal periprosthetic femoral supracondylar fractures of
处理极远端假体周围股骨髁上骨折

total knee replacements - a new PHILOS-ophy.
全膝关节置换术 - 一个新的 PHILOS-ophy。


Donnelly KJ(1), Tucker A(2), Ruiz A(2), Thompson NW(2).
唐纳利 KJ(1),塔克 A(2),鲁伊斯 A(2),汤普森 NW(2)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Altnagelvin Hospital,
(1)Altnagelvin 医院创伤和骨科外科,

Londonderry BT47 6SB, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Londonderry BT47 6SB,北爱尔兰,英国。

kevin.donnelly@belfasttrust.hscni.net.
kevin.donnelly@belfasttrust.hscni.net。

(2)Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Altnagelvin Hospital,
(2)Altnagelvin 医院创伤和骨科外科,

Londonderry BT47 6SB, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Londonderry BT47 6SB,北爱尔兰,英国。


We report two cases where a proximal humeral locking plate was used for the
我们报告了两例病例,其中肱骨近端锁定钢板用于

fixation of an extremely distal, type III peri-prosthetic femoral fractures in
极远端 III 型股骨假体周围骨折的固定

relation to a total knee replacement (TKR). In each case there was concern
与全膝关节置换术 (TKR) 的关系。在每种情况下,都有担忧

regarding the fixation that could be achieved using the available anatomic
关于使用可用的解剖学可以实现的固定

distal femoral plates due to the size and bone quality of distal fragment. The
远端股骨板,这是由于远端碎片的大小和骨质量所致。这

design of the Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS) allows nine
近端肱骨内锁系统 (PHILOS) 的设计允许 9 个

3.5-mm locking screws to be placed over a small area in multiple directions.
3.5 mm 锁定螺钉,可沿多个方向放置在小区域上。

This allowed a greater number of fixation points to be achieved in the distal
这允许在远端实现更多的固定点

fragment. Clinical and radiological short-term follow-up (6-12 mo) has been
片段。临床和放射学短期随访 (6-12 个月)

satisfactory in both cases with no complications. We suggest the use of this
两种情况均令人满意,无并发症。我们建议使用 this

implant for extremely distal femoral fractures arising in relation to the
植入物,用于与

femoral component of a TKR.
TKR 的股骨组件。


DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i10.809
DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i10.809

PMCID: PMC5656497
PMCID:PMC5656497

PMID: 29094012
PMID:29094012


Conflict of interest statement: Conflict-of-interest statement: None of the
利益冲突声明:利益冲突声明:无

authors have any conflict of interests to declare.
作者有任何利益冲突需要声明。



99. Injury. 2020 Aug;51(8):1858-1862. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.009. Epub 2020
99. 受伤。2020 年 8 月;51(8):1858-1862.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.009。Epub 2020 年

May 22.
5 月 22 日。


Complication Rates after Lateral Plate Fixation of Periprosthetic Distal Femur
股骨远端假体外侧钢板固定后的并发症发生率

Fractures: A Multicenter Study.
骨折:一项多中心研究。


Campbell ST(1), Lim PK(2), Kantor AH(2), Gausden EB(3), Goodnough LH(4), Park
坎贝尔 ST(1), 林 PK(2), 坎托尔 AH(2), 高斯登 EB(3), 古德诺 LH(4), 帕克

AY(3), Bishop JA(4), Achor TS(3), Scolaro JA(2), Gardner MJ(4).
AY(3), Bishop JA(4), Achor TS(3), Scolaro JA(2), Gardner MJ(4).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
(1)斯坦福大学骨科外科,斯坦福,加利福尼亚州。

Electronic address: Campbellst87@gmail.com.
电子地址:Campbellst87@gmail.com。

(2)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA.
(2)加州大学欧文分校医学中心骨科外科,加利福尼亚州奥兰治。

(3)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Texas at Houston, Houston,
(3)德克萨斯大学休斯顿分校骨科外科, 休斯顿,

TX.
德克萨斯州。

(4)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
(4)斯坦福大学骨科外科,斯坦福,加利福尼亚州。


OBJECTIVE: Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur can be challenging
目的: 股骨远端假体周围骨折可能具有挑战性

injuries to treat; nonunion rates of up to 22% have been reported. The purpose
需要治疗的伤害;据报道,骨不连率高达 22%。目的

of this study was to determine the rate of complications and nonunion in a
的这项研究旨在确定 a

multicenter series, and to identify patient or surgical factors that were
多中心系列,并确定

associated with nonunion.
与骨不连相关。

DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study SETTING: Three Level 1 trauma centers
设计: 回顾性比较研究 地点: 三个 1 级创伤中心

PATIENTS: Fifty-five patients with a periprosthetic distal femur fracture
患者:55 例股骨假体周围远端骨折患者

proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. Minimum follow up for inclusion was six
全膝关节置换术近端。纳入的最短随访时间为 6 次

months or until union or failure.
月或直到联合或失败。

INTERVENTION: Surgical fixation using a precontoured lateral locking plate MAIN
干预: 使用预先塑造的侧向锁定板 MAIN 进行手术固定

OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Fracture union was the primary outcome. Patient demographic
结果测量: 骨折愈合是主要结果。患者人口统计

and injury variables (age, comorbidities, fracture classification and
和损伤变量(年龄、合并症、骨折分类和

characteristics) and surgical technique factors (mode of plate fixation, plate
特征)和手术技术因素(钢板固定方式、钢板

material, working length, screw density, and proximal screw type) were
材料、工作长度、螺钉密度和近端螺钉类型)分别为

identified and compared between patients who developed a nonunion and those who
确定并比较发生骨不连的患者和

did not. Regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors
冇。进行回归分析以确定独立的危险因素

for nonunion.
对于非骨區。

RESULTS: The overall rate of nonunion was 18% and the total complication rate
结果: 骨不连总发生率为 18%,总并发症发生率

was 24%. After additional surgery, 49 of 55 patients went on to heal (89%).
为 24%。额外手术后,49 名患者中有 55 名 (89%) 继续愈合。

There were no statistical differences in patient demographic or injury variables
患者人口统计学或损伤变量没有统计学差异

between the union and nonunion groups, and none of the variables studied were
在联合组和非愈合组之间,研究的变量均无

independent risk factors for nonunion in the regression analysis.
回归分析中骨不连的独立危险因素。

CONCLUSIONS: In this series of 55 patients with periprosthetic distal femur
结论: 在本系列研究的 55 例股骨假体周围患者

fractures treated with precontoured lateral locking plates, 18% developed
使用预先定型的外侧锁定钢板治疗的骨折,18% 发生

nonunion and the overall complication rate was 24%. No patient or surgical
骨不连,总体并发症发生率为 24%。无患者或手术

variables were identified as risk factors. Future research should seek to
变量被确定为风险因素。未来的研究应寻求

identify patients at high risk for complication and nonunion who could benefit
确定可能获益的并发症和非骨连高风险患者

from alternative fixation strategies or distal femoral replacement.
来自替代固定策略或股骨远端置换术。


Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2020 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.009
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.009

PMID: 32482424 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:32482424 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of Competing Interest None.
利益冲突声明:竞争利益声明 无。



100. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(3):205-211.
100. Acta Chir 骨科创伤 Cech.2019;86(3):205-211.


[Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femoral Fractures].
[假体周围股骨远端骨折的治疗]。


[Article in Czech]
[捷克文文章]


Malotí T(1), Jansová M, Matějka T, Matějka J.


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Klinika ortopedie a traumatologie pohybového ústrojí, Lékařská fakulta UK v
(1)布拉格查理大学医学院肌肉骨骼系统骨科和创伤学系

Plzni.
比尔森。


PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFF) constitute
研究目的 假体周围股骨远端骨折 (PDFF) 构成

an unpleasant complication in patients with a total knee replacement (TKR). The
全膝关节置换术 (TKR) 患者的令人不快的并发症。这

incidence reported in literature is 0.3-2.5 %. The number of periprosthetic knee
文献中报道的发病率为 0.3-2.5%。假体周围膝关节的数量

fractures has been increasing due to the ageing of population, a growing number
由于人口老龄化,骨折数量不断增加

of implants, a longer life expectancy of patients, a more intensive physical
的植入物,更长的患者预期寿命,更密集的身体

activity of patients, and osteoporosis. Most of these fractures are treated
患者的活动和骨质疏松症。这些骨折大多得到治疗

surgically, non-surgical treatment is reserved solely for patients unable to
在手术上,非手术治疗仅适用于无法

undergo a surgery for general health conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our
因一般健康状况而接受手术。材料和方法 我们的

retrospective study evaluated the group of patients with PDFF who were treated
回顾性研究评估了接受治疗的 PDFF 患者组

at out department in the period 2007- 2016 and 2,975 primary TKR were performed.
在 2007-2016 年期间在 OUT 部门进行了 2,975 例初级 TKR。

The total number of patients with PDFF was 56. The mean age of patients with
PDFF 患者总数为 56 例。患者的平均年龄

PDFF was 77 years (56-94 years) and at the time of fracture the mean age was 71
PDFF 为 77 岁 (56-94 岁),骨折时平均年龄为 71 岁

years in men and 78 years in women. The average time from the TKR to
男性年,女性 78 年。从 TKR 到

periprosthetic fracture was 8.2 years (0-20 years). The fractures were assessed
假体周围骨折为 8.2 年 (0-20 年)。评估骨折

using the Su classification modified by Krbec. RESULTS A primary TKR was
使用 Krbec 修改的 Su 分类。结果 原发性 TKR

performed in 46 cases for gonarthrosis, in 6 cases for rheumatoid arthritis and
46 例为子宫腺炎,6 例为类风湿性关节炎和

in 4 cases for secondary, post-traumatic gonarthrosis. The average incidence of
4 例为继发性创伤后性性腺关节病。平均发病率

periprosthetic distal femoral fractures was 5-6 cases per year. Women
假体周围股骨远端骨折为每年 5-6 例。女人

represented 86 %, men 14 %. Su Type I fracture was diagnosed in 25 % of cases,
占 86%,男性占 14%。25% 的病例诊断为 Su I 型骨折,

Su Type II fractures in 71 %, and Su Type III fractures 4 %. 52 patients with
Su II 型骨折占 71%,Su III 型骨折占 4%。52 名患者

PDFF were treated surgically, in 4 cases conservative treatment was opted for.
PDFF 接受手术治疗,4 例选择保守治疗。

The average treatment time of PDFF to healing by callus formation was 6.6 months
PDFF 通过愈伤组织形成愈合的平均治疗时间为 6.6 个月

(3-12 months). Mortality during the first 3 months after osteosynthesis of PDFF
(3-12 个月)。PDFF 接骨术后前 3 个月的死亡率

was 9 %. A failure of osteosynthesis of PDFF was reported in 4 cases. DISCUSSION
为 9%。据报道,4 例 PDFF 接骨失败。讨论

Multiple classification systems were developed to assess these fractures. The
开发了多种分类系统来评估这些骨折。这

most appropriate we consider the classification of Su et al. classifying the
最合适 我们考虑 Su 等人的分类,将

PDFF into 3 groups, namely based on the height of the fracture line relative to
PDFF 分为 3 组,即根据断裂线相对于

the femoral component. Osteosynthesis by retrograde femoral nail is indicated
股骨组件。需经逆行股骨甲进行接骨术

for periprosthetic fractures, with sufficient bone mass in distal femur, which
对于假体周围骨折,股骨远端有足够的骨量,其中

allows stable distal fixation. The new generation of anatomically shaped angular
允许稳定的远端固定。新一代解剖形状的角形

stable implants gives us yet another option for osteosynthesis of PDFF. Many
稳定的植入物为我们提供了另一种 PDFF 接骨的选择。多

studies point at the advantages of these implants in osteoporotic bone as
研究指出,这些植入物在骨质疏松性骨中的优势 AS

against the conventional plates. CONCLUSIONS The number of PDFF has been
与传统板相比。结论 PDFF 的数量已经

increasing. The main methods of internal osteosynthesis continue to be the
增加。内部接骨术的主要方法仍然是

angular stable plates and the retrograde femoral nail. Preoperative planning is
棱角稳定的板和逆行的股骨钉。术前计划是

important to determine the type and dimensions of the existing femoral component
确定现有股骨组件的类型和尺寸很重要

and to distinguish whether or not it has come loose. The choice of the implant
并区分它是否松动。植入物的选择

may depend on the bone mass available for distal fixation. The retrograde
可能取决于远端固定的骨量。逆行

femoral nail is usually the most suitable method of treatment for proximal PDFF
股骨甲通常是最适合治疗近端 PDFF 的方法

(Su Type I). The angular stable plates can be used for PDFF originating at the
(Su I 型)。角度稳定板可用于源自

femoral component (Su Type II and Type III). Very distal fractures classified as
股骨成分(Su II 型和 III 型)。极远端骨折分类为

Su Type III with a loose femoral component require a revision surgery with a TKR
股骨成分松动的 Su III 型需要使用 TKR 进行翻修手术

with stems. The surgeon should be prepared for a revision surgery if the
带茎。如果出现以下情况,外科医生应为翻修手术做好准备

intraoperative finding is more complicated than anticipated based on the
术中发现比预期的要复杂,基于

preoperative radiograph. Key words:total knee arthroplasty, periprosthetic
术前 X 光片。关键词 :全膝关节置换术, 假体周围

fracture, osteosynthesis.
骨折、接骨术。


PMID: 31333185 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:31333185 [MEDLINE 索引]



101. J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Aug;32 Suppl 1:S30-S31. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001199.
101. J 骨科创伤。2018 年 8 月;32 增刊 1:S30-S31。doi: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000001199.


Lateral Distal Femur Plate for Periprosthetic Fracture.
用于假体周围骨折的股骨外侧远端钢板。


Yarboro SR(1).
亚伯罗 SR(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
(1)弗吉尼亚大学骨科外科,弗吉尼亚州夏洛茨维尔。


In this case, a lateral locking plate is used for fixation of a periprosthetic
在这种情况下,使用侧向锁定板固定假体周围

distal femur fracture in a 68-year-old woman. Modern implants with locking screw
一名 68 岁女性股骨远端骨折。带锁定螺钉的现代种植体

options and soft-tissue-sparing surgical techniques have improved the care of
选择和保留软组织的手术技术改善了

periprosthetic distal femur fractures. Although much debate about the working
假体周围股骨远端骨折。虽然关于工作有很多争论

length and technical variables of plating exists, it is generally accepted that
电镀的长度和技术变量存在,但普遍认为

longer (>10 hole) plates with adequate working length and careful soft-tissue
较长(>10 孔)板,具有足够的工作长度和仔细的软组织

handling are preferred. This case outlines a stepwise approach to distal femur
处理是首选。本病例概述了股骨远端的阶梯式方法

fractures to achieve appropriate plate position and restoration of alignment
骨折以达到适当的钢板位置并恢复对齐

while avoiding excessive surgical exposure or soft-tissue dissection. In this
同时避免过度手术暴露或软组织清扫。在这个

case, retrograde intramedullary nail was not considered because of the distal
案例中,由于远端

nature of the fracture, but this option may be favorable for cruciate-retaining
骨折的性质,但这种选择可能有利于交叉骨保持

total knee arthroplasty or open box designs that will accommodate nail
可容纳指甲的全膝关节置换术或开箱设计

insertion. Although weight bearing was protected for 6 weeks, plate fixation
插入。尽管负重受到保护 6 周,但钢板固定

allows early rehabilitation and knee range of motion. This patient went on to
允许早期康复和膝关节活动度。这位患者继续

successful union and excellent clinical outcome with return to baseline
成功愈合和出色的临床结果,恢复到基线水平

function.
功能。


DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001199
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000001199

PMID: 29985903 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:29985903 [MEDLINE 索引]



102. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3262-3271. doi:
102. 膝外科运动创伤关节。2016 年 10 月;24(10):3262-3271.doi:

10.1007/s00167-016-4107-0. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
10.1007/s00167-016-4107-0。Epub 2016 年 4 月 7 日。


Modified fixations for distal femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty:
全膝关节置换术后股骨远端骨折的改良固定:

a biomechanical and clinical relevance study.
一项生物力学和临床相关性研究。


Chen SH(1), Tai CL(2)(3), Yu TC(1), Wang CW(1), Lin CW(1), Chen CY(4), Liu

KC(1).
KC(1) 的 S Package。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopedics, Buddhist Tzu-Chi General Hospital at Taichung,
(1)台中佛教慈济综合医院骨科

Tzu-Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
慈济大学,台湾花莲。

(2)Graduate Institute of Medical Mechatronics, Chang Gung University, 259,
(2)长庚大学医学机电一体化研究生院, 259,

Wen-Hua 1st RD., Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan. taicl@mail.cgu.edu.tw.
温华 1st RD., 桂山, 桃园, 台湾.taicl@mail.cgu.edu.tw。

(3)Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan,
(3)桃园市长庚纪念医院骨与关节研究中心,

Taiwan. taicl@mail.cgu.edu.tw.
台湾。taicl@mail.cgu.edu.tw。

(4)Department of Orthopedics, Postal Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
(4)台湾台北邮政医院骨科。


PURPOSE: Distal femur fractures adjacent to total knee arthroplasty are a rare
目的: 全膝关节置换术附近的股骨远端骨折罕见

yet complex problem. Recently, extramedullary locking plate and retrograde
然而复杂的问题。最近,髓外锁定钢板和逆行

intramedullary nail fixations have become popular options, but the complication
髓内指甲固定已成为流行的选择,但并发症

rates associated with these procedures are 15-20 %. Modified fixations were
与这些程序相关的比率为 15-20%。改良的固定点是

assessed in an effort to reduce complications from unstable periprosthetic
评估以减少不稳定假体周围并发症

fractures.
骨折。

METHODS: Using experimental and finite element methods, this study compared the
方法: 本研究使用实验和有限元方法,比较了

construct behaviours of a locking plate, a retrograde intramedullary nail, and
构建锁定板、逆行髓内钉的行为,以及

their modifications (a spiral-blade supplemented in an intramedullary nail or a
它们的修饰(螺旋叶片补充髓内钉或

locking plate/allograft hybrid) when subjected to various fracture types,
锁定钢板/同种异体移植物杂交)当遭受各种骨折类型时,

locations, loading conditions, and bony strength. The implanted models were used
位置、负载条件和骨骼强度。使用植入的模型

to assess construct stiffness, fracture micromotion, and implant stress under
评估结构刚度、骨折微动和植入物应力

different osteoporotic conditions. Finally, we collected 40 cases for
不同的骨质疏松症。最后,我们收集了 40 个案例

radiological analysis to indicate the appropriate procedure for treating
放射学分析,以指示适当的治疗程序

periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty.
全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折。

RESULTS: Regardless of the fracture type, femoral constructs fixed with a
结果: 无论骨折类型如何,用

conventional or spiral-blade supplemented intramedullary nail exhibited higher
传统或补充螺旋刀片的髓内钉表现得更高

axial but lower torsional stiffness than those fixed with a locking plate.
轴向但扭转刚度低于用锁定板固定的那些。

Torsional deformation occurred if the lower-positioned fracture had no medial
如果较低位置的骨折没有内侧骨折,则会发生扭转变形

support. The locking plate/allograft construct exhibited the highest stiffness
支持。锁定板/同种异体移植物结构表现出最高的刚度

and the least micromotion. A review of 40 clinical cases confirmed the above
和最少的微动。对 40 个临床病例的回顾证实了上述情况

findings regarding the locking plate/allograft construct.
关于锁定板/同种异体移植物结构的发现。

CONCLUSION: The spiral-blade supplement of retrograde intramedullary nail and
结论: 逆行髓内钉和

locking plate/allograft modified constructs significantly stabilizes the
锁定板/同种异体移植物修饰的构建体可显著稳定

unstable fractured gaps. The locking plate/allograft is recommended for the
不稳定的断裂间隙。建议将锁定钢板/同种异体移植物用于

periprosthetic fractures with deficient bone stock and severe osteoporosis to
假体周围骨折伴有骨量不足和严重骨质疏松症

improve alignment and healing potentials.
提高对齐和愈合潜力。


DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4107-0
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4107-0

PMID: 27056688 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:27056688 [MEDLINE 索引]



103. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Mar;52(2):92-96. doi:
103. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc.2018 年 3 月;52(2):92-96.doi:

10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.010. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.010.Epub 2018 年 1 月 3 日。


An alternative treatment for osteoporotic Su Type III periprosthetic
骨质疏松性 Su III 型假体的替代疗法

supracondylar femur fractures: Double locking plate fixation.
股骨髁上骨折:双锁定板固定。


Çiçek H(1), Tuhanioğlu Ü(2), Oğur HU(2), Seyfettinoğlu F(2), Bozkurt M(3).
Çiçek H(1), Tuhanioğlu Ü(2), Oğur 胡(2), Seyfettinoğlu F(2), Bozkurt M(3).


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, Orthopedics and Traumatology
(1)Adana Numune 培训和研究医院,骨科和创伤科

Department, Adana, Turkey. Electronic address: drcicekh@hotmail.com.
部门,阿达纳,土耳其。电子地址:drcicekh@hotmail.com。

(2)Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, Orthopedics and Traumatology
(2)Adana Numune 培训和研究医院,骨科和创伤科

Department, Adana, Turkey.
部门,阿达纳,土耳其。

(3)Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,
(3)Yıldırım Beyazıt 大学,骨科和创伤学系,

Turkey.
土耳其。


INTRODUCTION: Patients with Su Type III fractures based on total knee
引言: 基于全膝关节的 Su III 型骨折患者

arthroplasty (TKA) constitute a patient group with problematic treatment and
关节置换术 (TKA) 构成了一个治疗有问题的患者群体,并且

management. Although it has difficulties, open reduction and internal fixation
管理。虽然有困难,但切开复位和内固定

is one of the treatment options.
是治疗选择之一。

METHOD: A retrospective evaluation was made of 22 patients surgically treated in
方法: 对 22 例手术治疗的患者进行回顾性评价

our clinic with double locking, low contact titanium plate and screw for a Su
我们的诊所采用双锁、低接触钛板和螺钉,用于 Su

Type III periprosthetic fracture based on TKA. The patients were evaluated with
基于 TKA 的 III 型假体周围骨折。患者接受

bone mineral densitometry, postoperative Knee Society Score (KSS), WOMAC and
骨矿物质密度测定、术后膝关节协会评分 (KSS)、WOMAC 和

radiological evaluations.
放射学评估。

RESULTS: The mean follow-up period of the patients was 68.6 ± 15.5 months, with
结果: 患者的平均随访期分别为 68.6 ± 15.5 个月,其中

pain-free weight-bearing determined at 4.9 ± 1.1 months and mean radiological
在 4.9 ± 1.1 个月时确定无痛负重和平均放射学

union at 18.5 ± 4.3 weeks. Revision was required because of non-union in 2
18.5 ± 4.3 周的联合。由于 2 中的未愈合,需要修订

(9.09%) cases. The postoperative KSS value was 81.8 ± 7.8, the WOMAC value was
(9.09%) 案例。术后 KSS 值为 81.8 ± 7.8,WOMAC 值为

78.1 ± 5.3 and the T-score was -3.3 ± 0.3. At the final follow-up examination, a
78.1 ± 5.3,T 评分为 -3.3 ± 0.3。在最终随访检查中,

correction loss (4.9° ± 1.5°) was determined in the mean knee valgus angle
校正损失 (4.9° ± 1.5°) 在平均膝外翻角中确定

according to the mechanical axis, which was statistically significant but
根据机械轴,该轴具有统计学意义,但

remained within the physiological limits (p = 0.21).
保持在生理范围内 (p = 0.21)。

CONCLUSION: In addition to providing the advantages of rigid fixation together
结论:除了提供刚性固定在一起的优点外

with early and effective rehabilitation, satisfactory clinical and radiological
早期有效的康复,令人满意的临床和放射学

results were obtained with the application of double locking plate and screw in
通过应用双锁定板和旋入获得结果

the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures based on TKA, with
基于 TKA 的股骨假体周围骨折的治疗,其中

osteoporosis.
骨质疏松。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic study.
证据级别:IV 级,治疗研究。


Copyright © 2017 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.
版权所有 © 2017 土耳其骨科和创伤学协会。

Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
由 Elsevier B.V. 制作和主持保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.010

PMCID: PMC6136332
PMCID:PMC6136332

PMID: 29306499 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:29306499 [MEDLINE 索引]



104. Injury. 2019 Oct;50(10):1745-1749. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.04.019. Epub 2019
104. 受伤。2019 年 10 月;50(10):1745-1749.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2019.04.019.Epub 2019 年

Apr 22.
4 月 22 日。


Locking plates versus retrograde intramedullary nails in the treatment of
锁定钢板与逆行髓内钉治疗

periprosthetic supracondylar knee fractures. A retrospective multicenter
假体周围髁上膝关节骨折。回顾性多中心

comparative study.
比较研究。


Kyriakidis T(1), Kenanidis E(2), Akula MR(3), Zorman D(4), Tsiridis E(5).
基里亚基迪斯 T(1),凯纳尼迪斯 E(2),阿库拉 MR(3),佐尔曼 D(4),齐里迪斯 E(5)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Erasme University Hospital,
(1)伊拉斯梅大学医院骨科和创伤科,

Brussels, Belgium.
比利时布鲁塞尔。

(2)Academic Orthopaedic Department, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle
(2)亚里士多德 Papageorgiou 综合医院学术骨科

University Medical School, Ring Road, Thessaloniki, 56403, Greece; Center of
大学医学院,环城路,塞萨洛尼基,56403,希腊;中心

Orthopaedics and Regenerative Medicine (C.O.RE.) - Center of Interdisciplinary
骨科与再生医学 (C.O.RE.) - 跨学科中心

Research and Innovation (C.I.R.I.) - Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Balkan
研究与创新 (C.I.R.I.) - 亚里士多德大学 塞萨洛尼基,巴尔干半岛

Center, Buildings A & B, Thessaloniki, 10th km Thessaloniki-Thermi Rd, P.O. Box
中心,A 和 B 楼,塞萨洛尼基,10 公里塞萨洛尼基-Thermi Rd,邮政信箱

8318, GR 57001, Greece. Electronic address: stathiskenanidis@gmail.com.
8318, GR 57001, 希腊。电子地址:stathiskenanidis@gmail.com。

(3)University of Leeds, School of Medicine, Academic Department of Trauma and
(3)利兹大学医学院创伤学术系

Orthopaedics, Clarendon Wing A, Leeds General Infirmary Teaching Hospitals NHS
骨科,Clarendon Wing A,利兹综合医院教学医院 NHS

Trust, Great George Street, Leeds, UK.
Trust,英国利兹大乔治街。

(4)Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, C.H.U. Tivoli, La Louvière,
(4)骨科和创伤学系,CHU Tivoli,La Louvière,

Belgium.
比利时。

(5)Academic Orthopaedic Department, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle
(5)亚里士多德 Papageorgiou 综合医院学术骨科

University Medical School, Ring Road, Thessaloniki, 56403, Greece; Center of
大学医学院,环城路,塞萨洛尼基,56403,希腊;中心

Orthopaedics and Regenerative Medicine (C.O.RE.) - Center of Interdisciplinary
骨科与再生医学 (C.O.RE.) - 跨学科中心

Research and Innovation (C.I.R.I.) - Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Balkan
研究与创新 (C.I.R.I.) - 亚里士多德大学 塞萨洛尼基,巴尔干半岛

Center, Buildings A & B, Thessaloniki, 10th km Thessaloniki-Thermi Rd, P.O. Box
中心,A 和 B 楼,塞萨洛尼基,10 公里塞萨洛尼基-Thermi Rd,邮政信箱

8318, GR 57001, Greece; University of Leeds, School of Medicine, Academic
8318, GR 57001, 希腊;利兹大学医学院,学术

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Clarendon Wing A, Leeds General Infirmary
创伤和骨科,Clarendon Wing A,利兹综合医院

Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds, UK.
英国利兹大乔治街教学医院 NHS 信托基金。


INTRODUCTION: Biomechanical studies demonstrated the superiority of retrograde
引言:生物力学研究证明了逆行的优越性

supracondylar intramedullary nails (RIN) against locking plates (LP) for the
髁上髓内钉 (RIN) 与锁定板 (LP) 的

treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures (PSFs); however,
修复体周围髁上股骨骨折 (PSF) 的治疗;然而

clinical results are still conflicting. This study aimed to compare LP and RIN,
临床结果仍然存在冲突。本研究旨在比较 LP 和 RIN,

as well as, cemented and uncemented nails in the treatment of PSFs regarding
以及胶合和非胶合钉治疗 PSF 方面

fracture healing, complications and functional results.
骨折愈合、并发症和功能结果。

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter analysis of 60 PSFs
材料和方法: 60 例 PSF 的回顾性多中心分析

classified as Rorabeck type I or II was performed. Thirty-one cases were treated
进行了分类为 Rorabeck I 型或 II 型的检查。治疗了 31 例

with LP while in 29 cases RIN were used. Out of the latter, 14 had nailed
与 LP 一起使用,而在 29 例中使用 RIN。在后者中,有 14 人成功了

cementoplasty, while 15 an uncemented nail.
骨水泥成形术,而 15 个未粘接的钉子。

RESULTS: The two groups were comparable concerning gender, ASA score, operated
结果: 两组在性别、 ASA 评分、手术方面具有可比性

side, follow-up time, fracture type and mechanism of injury. The LP was
侧面、随访时间、骨折类型和损伤机制。LP 是

significantly younger than the RIN group. Forty-six cases had fracture union at
明显比 RIN 组年轻。46 例骨折愈合

an average of six months, 11 were healed between seven and twelve months
平均 6 个月,11 人在 7 到 12 个月之间痊愈

(delayed unions), and three developed non-unions. There was no significant
(延迟工会),3 个发展了非工会。没有显著的

difference in the median union time between RIN and LP groups (six vs five
RIN 组和 LP 组之间中位联合时间的差异 (6 组 vs 5 组

months, p = 0.707) or cemented and uncemented nailing groups (5.5 vs six months,
月,p = 0.707)或骨水泥和非骨水泥钉组(5.5 vs 6 个月,

p = 0.354). The RIN group had fewer delayed unions or non-unions than LP group;
p = 0.354)。RIN 组的延迟愈合或非愈合比 LP 组少;

however, not reaching significance (4 vs 10, p = 0.190). Complications were
然而,没有达到显著性 (4 vs 10, p = 0.190)。并发症是

fewer but non-significantly different between cemented and uncemented nails (one
胶合钉和非胶合钉之间较少但无显著差异(1

vs five, p = 0.481). The mean postoperative flexion was comparable between RIN
vs 5,p = 0.481)。RIN 之间的平均术后屈曲率相当

and LP groups (99.1° vs 94.9°, p = 0.547) or cemented and uncemented nails (102°
和 LP 组 (99.1° vs 94.9°,p = 0.547) 或胶合和非胶合钉 (102°

vs 96.3°, p = 0.4). The mean Oxford Knee Score did not differ between LP and RIN
vs 96.3°,p = 0.4)。LP 和 RIN 的平均牛津膝评分没有差异

groups (30.8 vs 31.3, p = 0.93) as well as between cemented and uncemented nails
各组 (30.8 vs 31.3,p = 0.93) 以及胶合钉和非胶合钉之间

(31.5 vs 30.6, p = 0.801).
(31.5 对 30.6,p = 0.801)。

DISCUSSION: PSFs with good bone stock can be treated equally with LP or RIN.
讨论:骨量好的 PSF 可以用 LP 或 RIN 同等治疗。

Nails demonstrated advantages concerning the fracture healing potential.
钉子在骨折愈合潜力方面表现出优势。

Orthopaedic surgeons need to be trained in both treatment options to manage
骨科医生需要接受两种治疗方案的培训,以管理

PSFs. Cemented nails may increase stability and healing capacity in elderly
胶合指甲可以提高老年人的稳定性和愈合能力

osteoporotic patients; however, further studies are needed.
骨质疏松症患者;然而,还需要进一步的研究。


Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.04.019
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.04.019

PMID: 31036367 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:31036367 [MEDLINE 索引]



105. J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Feb 1;38(2):57-64. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002730.
105. J 骨科创伤。2024 年 2 月 1 日;38(2):57-64.doi: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000002730.


Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating for Extreme Distal
逆行髓内钉与锁定钢板治疗极远端

Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.
股骨假体周围骨折:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。


Van Rysselberghe NL(1)(2), Seltzer R(1), Lawson TA(1), Kuether J(3), White P(3),
Van Rysselberghe NL(1)(2), Seltzer R(1), Lawson TA(1), Kuether J(3), White P(3),

Grisdela P Jr(4), Daniell H(4), Amirhekmat A(5), Merchan N(6), Seaver T(7),
Grisdela P Jr(4), Daniell H(4), Amirhekmat A(5), Merchan N(6), Seaver T(7),

Samineni A(7), Saiz A(8), Ngo D(8), Dorman C(8), Epner E(8), Svetgoff R(8),
萨米尼尼 A(7), 赛兹 A(8), 吴 D(8), 多曼 C(8), 埃普纳 E(8), 斯维特戈夫 R(8),

Terle M(9), Lee M(9), Campbell S(9), Dikos G(3), Warner S(8), Achor T(8), Weaver
特尔 M(9), 李 M(9), 坎贝尔 S(9), 迪科斯 G(3), 华纳 S(8), 阿乔尔 T(8), 韦弗

MJ(4), Tornetta P 3rd(7), Scolaro J(5), Wixted JJ(6), Weber T(3), Bellino MJ(1),
MJ(4), 托内塔 P 3rd(7), 斯科拉罗 J(5), 维克斯特德 JJ(6), 韦伯 T(3), 贝利诺 MJ(1),

Goodnough LH(1), Gardner MJ(1), Bishop JA(1).
古德诺 LH(1),加德纳 MJ(1),主教 JA(1)。


Author information:
作者信息:

(1)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine,
(1)斯坦福大学医学院骨科外科

Stanford, CA.
加利福尼亚州斯坦福。

(2)Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Harborview Medical Center,
(2)Harborview 医疗中心骨科和运动医学科,

Seattle, WA.
华盛顿州西雅图。

(3)OrthoIndy Trauma, St. Vincent Trauma Center, Indianapolis, IN.
(3)OrthoIndy Trauma,圣文森特创伤中心,印第安纳波利斯,印第安纳州。

(4)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard
(4)哈佛大学布莱根妇女医院骨科

Medical School, Boston, MA.
医学院,波士顿,马萨诸塞州。

(5)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine School of
(5)加州大学尔湾分校骨科

Medicine, Orange, CA.
医学,加利福尼亚州奥兰治。

(6)Carl J. Shapiro Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Center for Advanced
(6)Carl J. Shapiro: 骨科外科和高级中心

Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical
哈佛医学院 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 骨科研究

School, Boston, MA.
学校,马萨诸塞州波士顿。

(7)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston,
(7)波士顿大学医学中心骨科外科, 波士顿,

MA.
但。

(8)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of
(8)大学麦戈文医学院骨外科系

Texas Health, Houston, TX; and.
德克萨斯州休斯顿的德克萨斯健康;和。

(9)Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis School of
(9)加州大学戴维斯分校骨科外科

Medicine, Sacramento, CA.
医学,加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托。


OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes after retrograde
目的: 比较逆行后的临床和影像学结局

intramedullary nailing (rIMN) versus locked plating (LP) of "extreme distal"
髓内钉 (rIMN) 与“极远端”的锁定钢板 (LP)

periprosthetic femur fractures, defined as those that contact or extend distal
股骨假体周围骨折,定义为接触或延伸远端的骨折

to the anterior flange.
到前法兰。

DESIGN: Retrospective review.
设计: 回顾性评价。

SETTING: Eight academic level I trauma centers.
地点: 八个学术 I 级创伤中心。

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adult patients with periprosthetic distal femur
患者选择标准: 股骨远端假体周围成年患者

fractures at or distal to the anterior flange (OTA/AO 33B-C[VB1]) treated with
前凸处或远端骨折 (OTA/AO 33B-C[VB1]) 治疗

rIMN or LP.
rIMN 或 LP。

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The primary outcome was reoperation to promote
结局指标和比较: 主要结局是再次手术以促进

healing or to treat infection (reoperation for elective removal of symptomatic
愈合或治疗感染(选择性去除症状的再次手术

hardware was excluded from this analysis). Secondary outcomes included nonunion,
硬件被排除在此分析之外)。次要结局包括骨不连、

delayed union, fixation failure, infection, overall reoperation rate, distal
延迟愈合、固定失败、感染、总再手术率、远端

femoral alignment, and ambulatory status at final follow-up. Outcomes were
股骨力线和最终随访时的动态状态。结局是

compared between patients treated with rIMN or LP.
在接受 rIMN 或 LP 治疗的患者之间进行比较。

RESULTS: Seventy-one patients treated with rIMN and 224 patients treated with LP
结果: 71 例接受 rIMN 治疗的患者和 224 例接受 LP 治疗的患者

were included. The rIMN group had fewer points of fixation in the distal segment
都包括在内。rIMN 组在远端节段的固定点较少

(rIMN: 3.5 ± 1.1 vs. LP: 6.0 ± 1.1, P < 0.001) and more patients who were
(rIMN:3.5 ± 1.1 vs. LP:6.0 ± 1.1,P < 0.001)和更多

allowed to weight-bear as tolerated immediately postoperatively (rIMN: 45%; LP:
允许在术后立即耐受的情况下负重 (rIMN: 45%;LP:

9%, P < 0.01). Reoperation to promote union and/or treat infection was 8% in the
9%,P < 0.01)。促进愈合和/或治疗感染的再次手术率为 8%

rIMN group and 16% in the LP group ( P = 0.122). There were no significant
rIMN 组和 LP 组为 16% (P = 0.122)。没有显著的

differences in nonunion ( P > 0.999), delayed union ( P = 0.079), fixation
骨不连 (P > 0.999)、延迟愈合 (P = 0.079)、固定的差异

failure ( P > 0.999), infection ( P = 0.084), or overall reoperation rate ( P >
失败 ( P > 0.999)、感染 ( P = 0.084) 或总体再手术率 ( P >

0.999). Significantly more patients in the rIMN group were ambulatory without
0.999)。rIMN 组中没有

assistive devices at final follow-up (rIMN: 35%, LP: 18%, P = 0.008).
最终随访时的辅助设备 (rIMN: 35%,LP: 18%,P = 0.008)。

CONCLUSIONS: rIMN of extreme distal periprosthetic femur fractures has similar
结论: 股骨极远端假体周围骨折的 rIMN 具有相似之处

complication rates compared with LP, with a possible advantage of earlier return
并发症发生率与 LP 相比,可能具有更早返回的优势

to weight-bearing. Surgeons can consider this treatment strategy in all
负重。外科医生可以考虑这种治疗策略

fractures with stable implants and amenable prosthesis geometry, even extreme
具有稳定植入物和适合的修复体几何形状的骨折,甚至极端

distal fractures.
远端骨折。

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a
证据级别:治疗 III 级。有关以下内容,请参阅作者说明

complete description of levels of evidence.
证据级别的完整描述。


Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
版权所有 © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.保留所有权利。


DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002730
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.00000000000002730

PMID: 38031262 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID:38031262 [MEDLINE 索引]


Conflict of interest statement: The authors report no conflict of interest.
利益冲突声明:作者报告没有利益冲突。